I really like your posts….

http://www.cafepress.com/oppluvvpigg

http://www.musicbits.net/

Not many people on it though

also, why mediadefender? i’ve been searching around the net for about an hour now reading the chatter regarding waffles and haven’t found anything remotely close to your suspicion.

i guess i’m just curious to know, is that all it is as of right now? suspicion? or do you have some sort of evidence proving this?

i ask this in complete seriousness — i have also wondered about the legitimacy of waffles and definitely would like to know for sure.[/quote]
Only suspicion, no evidence. But the advise given by OiNK sysops was to avoid anything until an announcement was made here (see previous news). I don’t think an announcement would be made in BB, so I am waiting. If you check out mediadefender and the rest of that crowd setting up false site, false torrents is just what they are into. Be cautious and for the present put your torrents on reliable pre existing sites such as STMusic. If you check out the STMusic OiNK discussion in their forum you will find some details of where waffles.fm is being hosted. This
“Ip address for the site comes back as being right outsite St. Catherines Canada, right across the river from Niagra. hmm seems a little fishy to me as well”

I might have been lucky, but I never had that in 2-3years of actively using OiNK :/

also, why mediadefender? i’ve been searching around the net for about an hour now reading the chatter regarding waffles and haven’t found anything remotely close to your suspicion.

i guess i’m just curious to know, is that all it is as of right now? suspicion? or do you have some sort of evidence proving this?

i ask this in complete seriousness — i have also wondered about the legitimacy of waffles and definitely would like to know for sure.

i am not bad mouthing oink, it was one of the best trackers i have been on. but seriously anyone who thinks it was all quality is just fooling themselves and wanting to have a perfect memory to be nostalgic about. I wish oink had been more strict. It was often you would find torrents without even track numbers in their filenames.

Now yes, compared to the crap on public trackers oink was miles ahead. In my mind its just sad that so many people haven’t experienced better and think that it was the end all be all. Take me back to the days of FXP and now we are talking nothing but quality.

a lot of stuff on oink was shit. bad tags, messed up file names, no .nfo, no .m3u or .pls

ok so most of the time anything that wasn’t >192kbps got nuked but I would have liked it to be much more strict.

Get yourself on a real scene distro source if you want good releases.[/quote]
Obviously another stazi who never used OiNK. You ignorance of what OiNK was and will remain is so high you can only be another stooge of the mediadefender morons. Anonymous by name and Anonymous by nature. No matter what you do we have won. The industry fat cats better look for new jobs, sell the Porsche and get the bus.

Ever occur to you that many people don’t want the garbage that is put out today, that we may in fact want to download music that came out 5,10,20 years ago? Scene releases are great and all, but I liked oink because I could download things my parents listend to on 8 tracks

a lot of stuff on oink was shit. bad tags, messed up file names, no .nfo, no .m3u or .pls

ok so most of the time anything that wasn’t >192kbps got nuked but I would have liked it to be much more strict.

Get yourself on a real scene distro source if you want good releases.

oh an orignal is original