[quote comment="256157"]What a fucking loser. This guy makes bums look bad![/quote]

Who is this douchebag anyway? Try finding a picture of him, hes a professional background actor. Whoop.

Taking someones elses property whether they are rich or poor is stealing. Huge companies pay assloads more taxes than average Joes to pay for welfare suckling douches who sit at home downloading other peoples property.[/quote]

HAHAHA! Trying to sway opinion on TorrentFreak. Pathetic lowlife. BAHAHAHAHA!!!

As if they are going to haul you off to jail if your screener copy is legitimately stolen.

It’s not unreasonable to ask them to sign something saying they won’t let anyone else have them and pointing out the penalties for violating that promise, like that old guy a couple years ago who was caught routinely sending his screeners to someone in the Chicago area who in turn duped them for friends.

There is no requirement for going to outlandish lengths to protect the screeners.[/quote]

What is this dick doing here? This be no pirate. This be corporate rat boy.

Who is this douchebag anyway? Try finding a picture of him, hes a professional background actor. Whoop.

Taking someones elses property whether they are rich or poor is stealing. Huge companies pay assloads more taxes than average Joes to pay for welfare suckling douches who sit at home downloading other peoples property.

you alright?

I thought it was quite funny, he is just pointing out in a comical way that he shouldnt have to feel like a criminal when he pays for membership and helps the movie industry out.

But really…

Why do the companies a favour if they’re already suspecting you of stealing their merchandise AND threatening in your own home?

They’re even loosing their screener people now.. it’s glorious :D

As if they are going to haul you off to jail if your screener copy is legitimately stolen.

It’s not unreasonable to ask them to sign something saying they won’t let anyone else have them and pointing out the penalties for violating that promise, like that old guy a couple years ago who was caught routinely sending his screeners to someone in the Chicago area who in turn duped them for friends.

There is no requirement for going to outlandish lengths to protect the screeners.[/quote]

Weirder shit has happened.

He may not like pirating, but he makes the case of how far anti-piracy measure will got and how they’ll harm unintended people.

The academy forces a member out to prevent leeching of movies, he blogs about it and you leech his blog.

Learn to hyperlink, plagiarist.

Like AMPAS gives a rats arse that a 69 year old unknown third string bit part actor has declined to accept screeners. BFD.

It doesn’t matter if the guy is/was talented, is/was conscientious with his AA evaluation/review duties, he is a relative nobody. His dramatic resignation is no big deal to anyone, anywhere, except himself.

Yawn.

As if they are going to haul you off to jail if your screener copy is legitimately stolen.

It’s not unreasonable to ask them to sign something saying they won’t let anyone else have them and pointing out the penalties for violating that promise, like that old guy a couple years ago who was caught routinely sending his screeners to someone in the Chicago area who in turn duped them for friends.

There is no requirement for going to outlandish lengths to protect the screeners.

This story has been submitted to Stirrdup. Your support can help it become hot….

I woulda quit too

Successful actor and Academy member Britt Leach says he was “so very proud to be a member of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences” when he was accepted over 17 years ago. How things have changed….

I guess I should be glad I got to live before these maroons were the majority of the population – to bad my kids’ kids won’t have the same luxury.

The internet should require a license to use – yes that would have an arguably ugly side, but boy would it be ever easier on the brain if there were reading comprehension, writing, and IQ tests required…

[…]
Your response is awaiting moderation.

I am not saying anything wrong, heck some people say really vile stuff, maybe the admin here hates me.
”
There are certain key word that will trigger it
a censorship that will hold your post then later deleted completely.

[…]
Your response is awaiting moderation.

I am not saying anything wrong, heck some people say really vile stuff, maybe the admin here hates me.

what if someone manage to duplicate the dvd before reaching him . when problem come out and FBI trace back to him , how can he denied , what evidence can he use to defend him self .

people that comment him overreacting , if it’s you, will you take the chance ?

if me , I will do the same . quit

Really, perish the thought that he should destroy the screener when he was done reviewing it…

HOWDY!