Comments on: Paysafecard Begins Banning VPN Providers

By: Guest101

Guest101 — Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:07:00 +0000

I still don't get why people use credit card to pay for their VPN. if you want TRUE anonymity with your VPN then use bit coin! I paid for EzyVPN with bit coin, they are offshore and don't have logs which gives me piece of mind. They don't care about torrents either.

By: anthonybrown0917

anthonybrown0917 — Sun, 15 Sep 2013 22:06:00 +0000

my Aunty Alexandra got a nice six month old Mercedes-Benz E-Class Diesel only from working part time off a macbook. find out here now ►►►►►► ＰＯＲＴ６０．ＣＯＭ

By: Ashadin

Ashadin — Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:48:00 +0000

Ignore copyright troll Anon.

The time will come pretty soon when we will be executing these scums right in their homes. Real soon. And corrupted antilaw enforcement agencies wont save you. You will be killed.And they will be killed in great numbers. We will skin you alive and feed your screaming body to dogs

By: Public Information Bureau

Public Information Bureau — Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:26:00 +0000

I recommend you do NOT use paysafecard with VPN or otherwise.
I bought a paysafecard in europe to pay a european site over a russian VPN connection and my money was frozen. What do you guess the stinger was to collect my money? What do you think would render paysafecard worse than useless? Could you imagine anything worse than having to give them copies of your passport and your bank details?
Paysafecard are NOT there to provide a truly worldwide system of money transfer. They know there is a high rate of abandonment of claims against them due to privacy concerns, so they use a thin excuse of fraud protection just get to keep all your money.
The irony is they will lose so much more trade than the money on that paysafecard was worth to them, through this warning to you.

By: Buttercup

Buttercup — Sun, 01 Sep 2013 23:15:00 +0000

Stealing a Snicker’s bar deprives the store of the bar. That is theft in court. Copyright infringement cannot be called theft in the USA.

By: Agotando toda capacidad de sorpresa | Lejos del tiempo

Agotando toda capacidad de sorpresa | Lejos del tiempo — Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:59:07 +0000

[...] ¿Qué hacer? Mientras puedas, instalarte una VPN y cifrar todo tu tráfico… pero no te hagas ilusiones, eso también se va a acabar: del mismo modo que la NSA ha tomado posesión de toda la red y lo que sobre ella circula, también es capaz de obligar a cualquier empresa a cooperar con sus fines, o a evitar que puedas utilizar determinados servicios porque, sencillamente, no puedes utilizar ningún medio de pago razonablemente cómodo para ello. [...]

By: icec0ld

icec0ld — Wed, 28 Aug 2013 03:48:00 +0000

And no one can actually decide what the hell happened that night. There is unbelievable amount of hearsay on who fired on who first and regardless the US wanted a war in Vietnam and used the confusion of that incident to stage themselves as victims despite there being zero casualties on the US side.

As a parallel, the Gulf of Tonkin was not a terrorist attack. It was an attack carried out by North Vietnamese Soldiers.

By: NewWorldStoner

NewWorldStoner — Wed, 28 Aug 2013 01:28:00 +0000

Gulf of Tonkin terrorist attack was staged by the US govt as a pretenseto go to war in Vietnam.

By: Traveller

Traveller — Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:43:00 +0000

Good points yours and that’s what I try; to look at the bigger picture. At this heights of my life, I don’t believe everything I’m told.

By: icec0ld

icec0ld — Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:42:00 +0000

I have no doubt about that and I totally agree.

However, being responsible for an event of such terror and such blatant disregard for human rights does not by any extension make them responsible for the attack that killed thousands of people on 9/11