Now you really are sounding like a industry advocate,
Shallow to boot…….poor poor boy.

hehehahahaa

Funny how your accuse me of "trembling with geek rage" when your throwing around schoolground insults.

hahahahaha (can't you tell how i'm hearing it)

Roze is right, i n d u s t r y a d v o c a t e , who else would get so upset if they were accused?? NubCakes the industry advocate.

Could imagine you trembling with geek rage as typed all that, loved it, every single word.

Where did you learn the word incredulous?? Oh wait….thats right you're unwilling to believe or learn from commenters here, & you say you have a mind of your own.

hhahaahahah (here's a clue its none of your suggestions)

Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing!
Roze

See:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/05/07/pirate_ba…

Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing!
Roze

Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing!
Roze

Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing!
Roze

Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing!
Roze

Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing!
Roze

Like the fact the people are unlikely to vote on a comment equating to "LOLWUT" so it will always have +1 and the fact that they write long strings of laughter.

so, just so were clear roze, YOU get to use the "it's expensive" defense but the musicians and filmmaker's don't?

i want to get a clear picture of your hypocrisy…

"I'm on your side" means you are taking the same side as the other person .

"Nope, never said that" is a lie as you said you took the side of the other person in the post before the one when you said "Nope, never said that" on the same page in the same blog you simple donkey .

So you are doing this for a non – existent wage, this proves you are simple and do not tell your bosses , they already know .

Copy and pasting is simple like you so no need for congrats and no its not excellent news .

To avoid looking simple stop posting here .

You have proven your a simple plant, saying you're on the same side as simple reasoned mind and then saying you never said that proves this .

There you go, nice and simple , even left a extra space between the words for you so it will be easier to read out loud .
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

I said "Robbery? Mate, I'm on your side but that is ridiculous."

"I'm on your side" is referring to Life Hackers post above, on the same thread. Most people realise this as it is nested – ie not replying to Reasoned Mind and contains the word "robbery" in reference to Life Hacker's comment. You didn't follow what was right in front of you.

Then, in your thread nested inside that, you said: ""So you're on retarded minds side are you, gee thanks for letting all the torrent freak readers in on what the rest of us have know for long time."

Then in that nested thread I replied to you with: ""Nope, never said that" – directly afterwards – meaning no I never said I am on Reasoned Minds side which again is perfectly obvious as it's nested again with your post and underneath a direct quote of yours which – call me pernickety – usually indicates that the text is in relation to the quote and not a post that is 5 or whatever comments above it..

Your making the mistake of thinking I am saying I am on Reasoned Minds side – despite it being directly underneath the actual comment I am replying to, nested seperately from Reasoned Mind and containing the word "robbery" to put it in context. You'd think that the fact that Life Hacker said "robbery" and Reasoned Mind did not would register.

You failed to realise I was replying to your own comment depite it being nested with your, containing a direct quote that you said and being directly underneath your comment. But no – in your stupidity fit you had to link that to a comment posted 5 or whatever posts above.

Your also so intelligent that you assume that I would lie about a statement made just 2 or whatever posts above.

So you understand the basics of how this works: if a comment is nested it's replying to the post it's nested under and nothing else. It is not replying to anything else. And if a comment has a quote in it the following text is referring to that quote and not another post.

Your basically just laid out that your dumb shit who has trouble following a conversation without making regferences to completely unrelated posts you realise. I note you didn't use the actual commenters pseudonyms because if you had replaced the phrase "other person" with names you would looked more stupid.

Could you tell us how you hear the laughter in your comments – is it in an evil, mocking or incredulous tone.

Do you think we're blind or as simple as you?"

Well please enlighten us as to what you believe it means – be specific and use short and simple words – you know, seeing as I'm so simple-minded and all.

OK then! The non-existent wage I'm supposedly paid is a complete waste, I'll let my bosses know. Congrats on copying and pasting, that's excellent news. Could you please explain how I might avoid the problem of every post with no vote having a +1 rating… oh wait, that's right, i can come back and change them on my multiple numbers of other accounts.

Either way I can't prove I'm not a plant and you cannot prove I am but you are, of course, welcome to have your opinion.

OMG I GOT MORE POINTS THEN U! NO U VOTED 4 URSELF NOOB! NO I DIDNT YOU DID! OMG!

Fucking hit you with a god damn sledge hammer in the face..

Do you think we're blind or as simple as you?

Quote "Nope, never said that. In case you didn't notice I even explicitly stated I wasn't." Unquote

Again, do you think we're blind or as simple as you?

Quote "Assuming that's true isn't it a complete waste of money then? If it was true and "everybody" knew about it wouldn't I be better off getting a new identity: seeing as I'm not exactly popular with some people here. Or is that anothet tactic by me, the cunning plant." Unquote

Yes it is a complete waste of money because no matter how many identities you create we'll still know you're a plant.

Me get pissed off cause you don't toe the "party line" aaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhahaahhahahahaha

Nice try noob boy but your post & plus is just another admission to being a plant, lies + more lies = plant

See i can use the copy & paste buttons as well…..

regarding the finance:
http://rixstep.com/1/20060715,00.shtml

an interesting insight into tpb's finance

The Pirate Bay stands against those who would attack democracy in an attempt to win the piracy war! For this I support and salute you!

Cannons, definitely cannons (real or painted ones) for the Pirate Bay Bus!

I'll be expecting a "you keep saying i'm a plant cause thats the standard answer from people like you who don't want to hear the other sides argument" comment, but then you won't post that now would you cause thar would be the standard answer from a plant.

Come up with something good noob boy so you can put another plus next to your name & keep sucking satans c__k

hhahahahahahahahaahhahahahahahahahahhahahahaha

I'm an observer with an interest in taking care of digital creators, the artists, that's all.
Okay then, you can do that. Take them in to your homes, let them live with you, or something, cause they are obviously starving.

Also, what is this "higher right" you speak of?

I've forgotten more about this issue than you'll ever know.
Yeah, that explains everything.

fix'd

Hahahah.

Look, kid. It's painfully obvious you created multiple IntenseDebate accounts(which is extremely simple to do) just so you could give yourself points, because you think having a high number next to your name makes you seem credible. In reality, you're just another industry advocate. Your whole "I P2P TOO!!!" thing is a thin, shitty veneer.

Here's a tip. If you want to make it somewhat less clear that you're gaming the IntenseDebate system, stop giving +1 to every single one of your comments. When you post shit on par with "LOLWUT!!" and then somehow have +1 for it, it's a little bit obvious.

LOL.

Yes. Considering The Pirate Bay is entirely 100% legal under Swedish law, I WONDER WHICH WAY THIS CASE WILL GO!!

Reasoned Mind: He's a lover! He's a fighter! He's a hired MAFIAA troll :D

Me either.

"I'm an observer"

Me also although everyone is here.

"with an interest in taking care of digital creators, the artists, that's all."

Thats where I differ – I would rather enjoy artists work without paying and obtaining it almost instantly with a huge amount of choice.

"You take what they are trying to sell, thus you are doing wrong."

In your opinion and according to the law in many places however I'm far more interested in my own stake in this and what's more there is an extremely low chance I will be caught. The chance of Usenet and Filehosting users being caught is so close to nil as to be non-existent. The chance of torrent users being caught is higher but I'd say the odds are probably better than winning the first division lottery that you will not be caught.

"You have no "higher right" to their goods and services unless you pay what they ask."

Agreed that people have no "higher rights" but I think that's more because I don't recognise the "rights" framework that your alluding to of either side of the argument. I am more interested in obtaining content for free and being able to use an unlimited amount of content. My right to do this exists because I can.

"This will not change; the laws and enforcement and punishment will change one court case at a time to make certain this does not change."

Well, I hate to break it (actually no I dont) to you but in reality this isn't happening – yes there are legal cases but the number of cases alone, not even counting successful prosecutions is absolutely miniscule. Look at how many people have been punished by the court system… LOL.

"And I've forgotten more about this issue than you'll ever know."

OK, that statement makes you sound like a conceited twat.

Me either.

"I'm an observer"

Me also although everyone is here.

"with an interest in taking care of digital creators, the artists, that's all."

Thats where I differ – I would rather enjoy artists work without paying and obtaining it almost instantly with a huge amount of choice.

"You take what they are trying to sell, thus you are doing wrong."

In your opinion and according to the law in many places however I'm far more interested in my own stake in this and what's more there is an extremely low chance I will be caught. The chance of Usenet and Filehosting users being caught is so close to nil as to be non-existent. The chance of torrent users being caught is higher but I'd say the odds are probably better than winning the first division lottery that you will not be caught.

"You have no "higher right" to their goods and services unless you pay what they ask."

Agreed that people have no "higher rights" but I think that's more because I don't recognise the "rights" framework that your alluding to of either side of the argument. I am more interested in obtaining content for free and being able to use an unlimited amount of content.

"This will not change; the laws and enforcement and punishment will change one court case at a time to make certain this does not change."

Well, I hate to break it (actually no I dont) to you but in reality this isn't happening – yes there are legal cases but the number of cases alone, not even counting successful prosecutions is absolutely miniscule. Look at how many people have been punished by the court system… LOL.

"And I've forgotten more about this issue than you'll ever know."

OK, that statement makes you sound like a conceited twat.

i think you're confused. roze is on your side. i love how he ups every single post he makes. it's funny.

(and sad)

but mostly funny.

Well that's not melodramatic at all is it? What a self-righteous individual you sound.

Just 'cos Lundstrom is on trial with the other three doesn't mean he's deeply involved with TPB. Just cos someone is under investigation doesn't make them guilty either.

A truly reasoned mind works on the basis of innocent until PROVEN guilty.

on youtube, they don't restrict you watching the video on they site . they don't ask you to pay any money to watch the video .

on megavideo , they restrict you with max bandwidth limit and if you want to continue watch you must pay for they service. this kind of service is actually illegal.

now you can see the direct and indirect method ?

making money from ads in laws is totally legal .

Also TPB and the Bureau of Piracy paid for the bus, not TPB alone.

Direct from the linked article. Read it again. He's on trial every bit as much as the others, and he should be.

Roze, I don't work in the industry, I'm an observer with an interest in taking care of digital creators, the artists, that's all. You take what they are trying to sell, thus you are doing wrong. You have no "higher right" to their goods and services unless you pay what they ask. This will not change; the laws and enforcement and punishment will change one court case at a time to make certain this does not change. And I've forgotten more about this issue than you'll ever know.