Now you really are sounding like a industry advocate,
Shallow to boot…….poor poor boy.

hehehahahaa

Funny how your accuse me of "trembling with geek rage" when your throwing around schoolground insults.

hahahahaha (can't you tell how i'm hearing it)

Roze is right, i n d u s t r y a d v o c a t e , who else would get so upset if they were accused?? NubCakes the industry advocate.

Could imagine you trembling with geek rage as typed all that, loved it, every single word.

Where did you learn the word incredulous?? Oh wait….thats right you're unwilling to believe or learn from commenters here, & you say you have a mind of your own.

hhahaahahah (here's a clue its none of your suggestions)

Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing!
Roze

See:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/05/07/pirate_ba...

Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing!
Roze

Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing!
Roze

Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing!
Roze

Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing!
Roze

Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing!
Roze

Like the fact the people are unlikely to vote on a comment equating to "LOLWUT" so it will always have +1 and the fact that they write long strings of laughter.

so, just so were clear roze, YOU get to use the "it's expensive" defense but the musicians and filmmaker's don't?

i want to get a clear picture of your hypocrisy…

"I'm on your side" means you are taking the same side as the other person .

"Nope, never said that" is a lie as you said you took the side of the other person in the post before the one when you said "Nope, never said that" on the same page in the same blog you simple donkey .

So you are doing this for a non – existent wage, this proves you are simple and do not tell your bosses , they already know .

Copy and pasting is simple like you so no need for congrats and no its not excellent news .

To avoid looking simple stop posting here .

You have proven your a simple plant, saying you're on the same side as simple reasoned mind and then saying you never said that proves this .

There you go, nice and simple , even left a extra space between the words for you so it will be easier to read out loud .
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

I said "Robbery? Mate, I'm on your side but that is ridiculous."

"I'm on your side" is referring to Life Hackers post above, on the same thread. Most people realise this as it is nested – ie not replying to Reasoned Mind and contains the word "robbery" in reference to Life Hacker's comment. You didn't follow what was right in front of you.

Then, in your thread nested inside that, you said: ""So you're on retarded minds side are you, gee thanks for letting all the torrent freak readers in on what the rest of us have know for long time."

Then in that nested thread I replied to you with: ""Nope, never said that" – directly afterwards – meaning no I never said I am on Reasoned Minds side which again is perfectly obvious as it's nested again with your post and underneath a direct quote of yours which – call me pernickety – usually indicates that the text is in relation to the quote and not a post that is 5 or whatever comments above it..

Your making the mistake of thinking I am saying I am on Reasoned Minds side – despite it being directly underneath the actual comment I am replying to, nested seperately from Reasoned Mind and containing the word "robbery" to put it in context. You'd think that the fact that Life Hacker said "robbery" and Reasoned Mind did not would register.

You failed to realise I was replying to your own comment depite it being nested with your, containing a direct quote that you said and being directly underneath your comment. But no – in your stupidity fit you had to link that to a comment posted 5 or whatever posts above.

Your also so intelligent that you assume that I would lie about a statement made just 2 or whatever posts above.

So you understand the basics of how this works: if a comment is nested it's replying to the post it's nested under and nothing else. It is not replying to anything else. And if a comment has a quote in it the following text is referring to that quote and not another post.

Your basically just laid out that your dumb shit who has trouble following a conversation without making regferences to completely unrelated posts you realise. I note you didn't use the actual commenters pseudonyms because if you had replaced the phrase "other person" with names you would looked more stupid.

Could you tell us how you hear the laughter in your comments – is it in an evil, mocking or incredulous tone.

Do you think we're blind or as simple as you?"

Well please enlighten us as to what you believe it means – be specific and use short and simple words – you know, seeing as I'm so simple-minded and all.

OK then! The non-existent wage I'm supposedly paid is a complete waste, I'll let my bosses know. Congrats on copying and pasting, that's excellent news. Could you please explain how I might avoid the problem of every post with no vote having a +1 rating… oh wait, that's right, i can come back and change them on my multiple numbers of other accounts.

Either way I can't prove I'm not a plant and you cannot prove I am but you are, of course, welcome to have your opinion.