Also to include if it wasn’t already when it comes to politics they have party whips which they go up to say you if you were in congress and say hey if you don’t vote yes for this next bill then we wont let you get on the farm committee like you want to be and make your life hell.

Also they vote to keep there position in congress and be reelected and make those who give them money to be happy so they will still give them money.

What we need is somebody who will stand up against all of that because anything to change copyright has to go through the congress

Hillary Clinton up in arms over plastered Ted Kennedy’s support of Barack Hussein Obama! Hillary thinks Teddy should be supporting a white candidate. Clinton undoubtedly also expected Ted Boy to have a little respect for a woman. Throwing her arms up…

I dislike both parties and both have greatly expanded the Federal Government but I might point out that the largest single expansion took place under Franklin Roosevelt (New Deal, etc), who was a democrat. Then comes George Bush(homeland security, etc) the younger, who is a republican.
But the New Deal was bigger than anything else by a factor of 5-10 at least. But every president thus far has, without exception, expanded the government to some degree.

if you think you’re wasting your vote on ron paul because he’s unelectable, you’re just another person that feeds the election gameshow. you throw away your vote by giving it to a candidate that doesnt fully represent your values. thats a weak compromise.

That’s absolute crap. The reason net neutrality is because of the government regulations that GRANT them that near-monopoly. It is competition that would keep the net neutral, as people demanding that as a service would cause a company to come into existence to serve them.

You are correct that a monopoly is a profitable position – which is why they constantly lobby the government to provide it. This country had THOUSANDS of “phone companies” until the government nationalized the phone system for awhile. Then after that they just made it a monopoly state-by-state and gave it to AT&T.

if Government is the problem, then MORE government is not the answer. Net Neutrality legislation is NOT the answer. As soon as you go that route you’ve said “It’s ok if you regulate the internet”. Pandora’s box has been opened and things will get a lot worse. You’re influencing them right now, but once that door is opened I want you to consider – who has more money and contacts to influence our government? You, or the providers?

You open that door and you’re screwed. The free market and competition is the ONLY answer to this problem. We need LESS regulation, not more.

In other words you cannot legislate net neutrality. Government cannot make a law/s telling people they can/can’t censor speech (websites) on the internet.

The US already has the 1st amendment — rather it used to.

The 4th amendment also protects your privacy on the net.

Your activities cannot be monitored nor tracked unless there is a warrant supported by Oath or affirmation.

Democrats do not understand this however and think the best option is MORE government.

You have already fed the Beast too much! It has become enormous, arrogant, and vicious. It’s now biting the hand…

Wolf in sheep’s clothing, beware.

Looks like the US Pirate Party is just a sham. They probably are just part of the Man trying to gain trust and have the naive follow. Or worse they may just be ingnorant and naive themselves!

Private property rights, small government, and liberty, good.

No property rights, big government, and tyranny, bad.

Easy, look at his voting record! He is the only one who doesn’t say he’s for/against something and then votes a different way when it comes time to be counted! He has always done exactly what he says he will do![/quote]
Yeah, he says he’s against net neutrality, he voted against net neutrality. So, get ready to pay a lot more for even posting a comment here, except he’s not really against net neutrality, but he doesn’t really understand it all, so he voted anyway, and didn’t bother researching the topic. Great idea.

[quote]Also, he is also the ONLY candidate that doesn’t take any money from big corporations or their lobbyists![/quote]

Sorry, Obama hasn’t either. The difference is, Obama has receieved donations (acceptance of them is automatic) yet has refunded them. Why not go and check the facts yourself, it’s listed on the FEC, as all candidates are required to do. Sounds like Ron Paul’s campaign just fed you a lie. If they’er feeding you stupid, easily disproved lies now, how many if he were ever to get into office?

[quote]Ron Paul is not running as a republican, but as an independent (because there are no real republicans left). These days most people would say he falls much more under a category like ‘Conservative Libertarian’.

Ron Paul is the first independent to actually stand a chance in a 100 years or more (Ralph Nader was pretty funny and helped start internet gorilla campaigning, but never really stood a chance)! We all know neither party is worth a shit anymore, so vote independent and tell all the bitch-ass demirepublicrats to all take a walk![/quote]
Another lie, alas. Lets see, 1968, Wallace got 46 electoral votes, 48, strom thurmond got 39, 1912, teddy got 88.

More recently, perot got 19% of the popoular vote in 92, half that of incumbent Bush.

This is hwere the Paul campaign has fallen down, it makes too many claims that rely on the ignorance of the general populace. The most ignorant, instead of going, as I just did with your claims, “that doesn’t sound right, let me check that” go “cool” and pas it on as fact. Also, notice that I, for one, have given verifyable facts, you have given claims, mine are easy to check, yours doesn’t even stand brief scrutiny. Thats why the only major candidate Paul beat in Iowa, was the one that didn’t bother with Iowa.

Obama said that he will fight for the MPAA’s claims, even worldwide.

That is the exact same attitude like the ppl sending TPB threatening letters.

Whoever in the pirate party endorsed Obama is possibly a MPAA/RIAA troll. Shame on you!

Concerning Ron Paul/net neutrality: Who would you rather have your internet controlled by? Your ISP with the possibility that there will be free ISPs through the free market or the government that is bought by antipirate-lobbyists?

If you chose the government regulation you can be 100% sure they will be using your tax dollars to watch you and destroy your life if you share.

Easy, look at his voting record! He is the only one who doesn’t say he’s for/against something and then votes a different way when it comes time to be counted! He has always done exactly what he says he will do!

Also, he is also the ONLY candidate that doesn’t take any money from big corporations or their lobbyists!

Ron Paul is not running as a republican, but as an independent (because there are no real republicans left). These days most people would say he falls much more under a category like ‘Conservative Libertarian’.

If you file-share or like to smoke a blunt once in a while, you should be voting for Ron Paul. Not that we will get any real change right away, but it would be a very good start. How can we “Promote freedom around the world” while we are slowly losing ours?!?!?

Ron Paul is the first independent to actually stand a chance in a 100 years or more (Ralph Nader was pretty funny and helped start internet gorilla campaigning, but never really stood a chance)! We all know neither party is worth a shit anymore, so vote independent and tell all the bitch-ass demirepublicrats to all take a walk!

Stop by Gamemp3s.net for all your music needs :) Warez, music and tons O stuff

irc.xelium.net #gamemp3s

Get educated. The USA Constitution requires a Bill of War to be presented to both houses of congress, and upon passage a signature by the president. No Bill of War was ever presented to congress, the actions taken by this white house are in clear violation of the Constituion. The “war” is illegal and unlawful as it is not a true war but an executive action of force.

gotta agree here… I can’t understand how people get so psyched about *any* politicians… The simple fact that he got that far means that Obama’s got to be as corrupt as everyone else, or else they’d have gotten rid of him long ago, with a bullet in the head if necessary…

But the guy can talk, he’d be definitely better than the monkey pausing in the office right now…

So I guess I’d agree to vote for Obama, plus it’ll be fun to look at the faces of racists who have a black president :P

lol I also love the fact that no republicans have been mentioned at all. Yay!

Just now did i reliaze that ron paul (rp) stands for roleplay and BO (barack obama) stands for body odor…. i think i prefer roleplay

Or will he be gunned down by a Clansman, before the RIAA/MPAA can get to him?

Just a question.

I see where your getting at, and agree to some extent, but I can’t help laugh at the term “illegal war”.

I do understand the the U.S. is supposed to fall in line with the United Abominations rules, but really, why should a country back down just because a bunch of cowards didn’t want to join in? To say a war is illegal, or even legal, is just silly at best.

I even find it funny that we try to set rules for war. What a joke. War is Hell, and in Hell, there are no rules.

Don’t think I pro war by saying this either, I’m just saying.

You’re just stupid, right?[/quote]

It’s comments like that that lead to idiots becoming president or any government office… Believe it or not the only thing that happens is you make yourself seem like a retarded 12 year old when you leave that kind of comment. Next time try saying what’s wrong with the way I saw something.

Fuck the narrowminded fundamentalistic Christians… I mean republicans. How about keeping religion and government separated. USA is falling more towards medieval times, unless it realizes this.

If I were an USA citizen, I’d vote for Clinton or Obama just for the sake of not having a white male as president for the first time. All the rest are lies anyway. But it won’t happen. USA dug its own grave.[/quote]
Its a good thing people like you who live in the USA are too lazy to vote.

lol medieval times…. retard.

and let me tell you this, Bush is a lair, Clinton too, and thats why I attacked the Twin Towers, because America is evil and wants to police the world.

Why can’t America stop harassing people, fu** them. Thats why muslims hate him because he thinks he has the global right to harass the world.

I hope he dies of his own Mercury filled Vaccines and Ron Paul becomes president, if that happens maybe Al-Quada will stop attcking America if Ron Paul is elected.

In fact I am a Fan of Ron Paul, even though I hate Americans. He is against big governments, I am tired of hiring suicide bombers, I want America to stop sending troops to Iraq.

Bye Bye Bushy Infidels[/quote]
How do you know Ron Paul is not a liar? Just because he says one thing now, what keeps him from doing another later. Do not give me the whole “actions speak louder then words bullshit”. Politicians are all liars. Heck I bet Osama bin laden has lied his fair share of lies. When will you learn humans are complex. Perfection is an illusion. Instead of killing people who may think different then you, ask why. We all have skeletons in our closets. It’s just human nature.

Stop harassing the world UN, stop enforcing copyright laws allm over the fu*ken world.

and let me tell you this, Bush is a lair, Clinton too, and thats why I attacked the Twin Towers, because America is evil and wants to police the world.

Why can’t America stop harassing people, fu** them. Thats why muslims hate him because he thinks he has the global right to harass the world.

I hope he dies of his own Mercury filled Vaccines and Ron Paul becomes president, if that happens maybe Al-Quada will stop attcking America if Ron Paul is elected.

In fact I am a Fan of Ron Paul, even though I hate Americans. He is against big governments, I am tired of hiring suicide bombers, I want America to stop sending troops to Iraq.

Bye Bye Bushy Infidels

Fuck the narrowminded fundamentalistic Christians… I mean republicans. How about keeping religion and government separated. USA is falling more towards medieval times, unless it realizes this.

If I were an USA citizen, I’d vote for Clinton or Obama just for the sake of not having a white male as president for the first time. All the rest are lies anyway. But it won’t happen. USA dug its own grave.

He was against the Iraq war from the beginning.

On the climate change issue, he just has the right attitude

The Pirate Party supports him, that shows how pirates are smart.

:p[/quote]

climate change
what a retard. drink Algores koolade if you want. Militant environmentalists are just where the commies went when they were no longer relevant.[/quote]
Just because you care about your surroundings doesnt make communist, it makes you human. Besides I dont think showing slides to be people is very ‘militant’.

Read Noam chomsky or other thinkers who question society of today. You can always make a difference, and the first important step is to realize that we do NOT live in the free world, we have to do things differently and politicians and corporations are not going to help us.