TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

RIAA Failed To Disclose Expert’s Lobbying History to “Six-Strikes” Partners

A month before the controversial “six strikes” anti-piracy plan goes live in the U.S., the responsible Center of Copyright Information (CCI) is dealing with a small crisis. As it turns out the RIAA failed to mention to its partners that the “impartial and independent” technology expert they retained previously lobbied for the music industry group. In a response to the controversy, CCI is now considering whether it should hire another expert to evaluate the anti-piracy monitoring technology.

riaaStarting next month the MPAA, RIAA and five major Internet providers in the United States will start punishing persistent BitTorrent pirates,

The scheme is being coordinated by the Center for Copyright Information (CCI) who agreed to hire an impartial and independent expert to review the evidence that will be used to accuse suspected subscribers.

However, earlier this week the news broke that the touted independent technology expert, Stroz Friedberg, is not so neutral. In fact, the company is a former RIAA lobbying firm.

The lobbying job earned the company more than half a million dollars ($637,000), which makes it hard to view the company as “independent and impartial” as the agreement between the copyright holders and ISPs requires.

In our initial report we already noted that it was rather surprising that, of all the available companies, this one was picked. Stroz Friedberg may operate without any bias, but given the public’s skepticism CCI should have anticipated the backlash.

That is, if they knew about Stroz Friedberg’s history with the RIAA.

A source at the CCI tells TorrentFreak that the RIAA had not informed the participating Internet providers or CCI’s Executive Director Jill Lesser about this unfortunate relationship. Our report on Monday came as a complete surprise to them, and it has been the topic of a heated internal discussion during the days that followed.

While Jill Lesser appears to be unaffected by the controversy in her comments to the press, she and the board members are facing a small crisis which they plan to “do something” about shortly.

TorrentFreak was informed that behind the scenes a few options have been discussed this week.

The first option that’s being considered is to make Stroz Friedberg’s review of the BitTorrent tracking technology public. This would allow the world to see whether it was done properly, as opposed to taking CCI’s word that everything is in order.

A second option that has been discussed is to hire another independent expert, possibly an academic, to confirm that Stroz Friedberg did a proper review.

Initially some forces at the CCI pushed to deliver a quick response to alleviate the concerns about the impartiality of the review, but things appear to be moving slowly. TorrentFreak is informed that it might take a week or two before the group makes an announcement.

Ironically enough, the CCI owes most of the bad press it received over the past months to itself. The group has been very reluctant to give out information to the public, thereby allowing rumors to continue and conspiracy theories to bubble up.

This might be a good time for them to start realizing that sharing information is not always a bad thing.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • http://profiles.google.com/pianogamer Knut Harald

    They should do both options.

    • http://twitter.com/TomNicky2 TomNicky

      April responded I am dazzled that anyone can get paid $5941 in 4 weeks on the network. did you look at this(Click on menu Home)

    • http://twitter.com/TomNicky2 TomNicky

      ……goo.gl/3KyOa

  • Anyone

    “This might be a good time for them to start realizing that sharing information is not always a bad thing.”

    sharing information is never a bad thing

    • Anon

      “sharing information is never a bad thing”

      Live in a naive world, much? lol How old are you, 14?

      • Guest

        You sure do talk about 14 year olds alot.

        You’re an angry 14 year old, aren’t you?

        • Anon

          Yeah, share everybody’s medical information, share where your child goes to school, share state secrets, retirement information, share everything the CIA has learned, share your friends credit data and c-card numbers, share your salary and stock options, share where you hide your cash and your stash at home. Share your daughter’s phone number.

          You people are idiots. Finally evidenced beyond any doubt. Thank you.

        • Step13

          As an “Anon” I would think that sharing is part of your 12-Step “thing”.
          Maybe you are on stpe-zero … DENIAL!

        • Guest

          You’re just mad that once again, your heroes/masters were caught sidestepping due process and protocol again. Need daddy Pelouzey to soothe that butthurt, Anon?

        • TheOiulkj

          @Anon You’re an even bigger fool than these idiots if you think any of that information is private.

          Keep on living in your wonderful fairy land where everyone is 14.

        • http://twitter.com/Alanman6 Alan man

          @anon I’m petty sure he ment sharing information, with in reason, is never a bad thing.

        • Gongle

          “Yeah, share everybody’s medical information, share where your child goes to school”

          What, RIAA has medical information and children? Who says he’s talking about private individuals? The topic here is organizations. Hmm, a reading comprehension failure?

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          @Anon

          None of your personal examples are secrets for anyone who wants to know. Since only bad people would want to know, only bad people will know these “secrets” of yours. And can obtain them at will already.

          As for sharing state secrets…Yes, OK, I understand. You believe it was BAD that Abu Ghraib became publicly known. You think it is justifiable for a state to hide mass murder.

          Or were you in fact thinking rather more selectively?

          As for “salary” and “stock options” – neither of these are “information”. They represent investments in what is at the end physical property.

          Do yourself a favor – don’t call other people “idiots” when you have just proven the same about yourself in the earlier sentence.

      • ScrewEwe2

        An?n-?-Tr?ll, if you are in a 12 step program, have you come to believe that a Power greater than yourself can restore you to sanity and serenity? In your case, a bug turd may suffice as a higher power.

        Have you made a decision to turn your will and your life over to the care of God, as you understood God? Again, a bug turd may suffice as a God as you understood God, if you can’t rap your head around the concept of some imaginary old white dude with a long white ZZ Top beard that lives in the clouds or dresses to be a burning bush on Halloween.

        If you find some serenity, you may not need to obsess about 14 years olds so much either. Don’t let chronoss chiron find out you are preoccupied with 14 year olds, you’ll never hear the end of it.

        P.S. Is dat ewe Nate Glass, or maybe a p?rno c?pyright Tr?ll?

      • Stfu

        Give a few examples?

      • Stfu

        No state should hold secrets.
        End of fucking story

        • Freedom of Speech

          How exactly do we get North Korea to stop holding secrets?!?

      • ANo

        You’re right about…. “naive that” “sharing information is NEVER a bad thing”
        It can of course be a bad thing in certain circumstances.

        Anon ….. context matters.
        In the context of this comment section, of this article.
        This* “sharing information” exposes the corruption in American law.
        When hundreds of millions of people, are having laws made AGAINST them, the transparency regarding how those laws are created and implemented is relevant.

        A few people creating restrictions, laws and punishment, on 300 Million people.
        In this* case …… “sharing information is NEVER a bad thing”

         
         
         
         
         
        No wonder America has the highest incarceration rate in the world.
        Anyone with some money can buy laws to criminalize people

    • anon

      never say never, sharing false or wrong information is bad.

      in general sharing is caring, so share the good information

    • Guest

      Sharing is caring

    • feeblemind

      There is plenty of information and things what we can share without problem, but there is also some secrets what must stay secrets, and the god who I dont believe are not willing to give me knowledge “what to do with them”…

      Sharing is caring but some caring is not good for us, like when you care your son and bring him food when he suffers extremely bad obesity.

      But sharing is caring when I give donations for TV-shack exAdmin…

      If we share all secrets then there is allways some idiots who use them against us… so some sharing is caring, and some is not. (sry spellin errors etc.)

      • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

        No, there aren’t ‘some secrets that must remain secrets’ in the slightest. Anyone who says that is worried about their own misdealings coming to light, i.e. the government and the Manning incident where he PROPERLY released to a reputable organization who redacts just like the federal government does.

        They are just quicker at it.

        • Kaliumgirl

          See, this is why governments and big business (some branches of which MAFIAA represents) are trying so hard to limit the reach of Internet and to slow it down. Their power essentially depends on secrets they can keep from the populace, be they military, economical or cultural. The Internet is something revolutionary because it has made keeping secrets harder than ever. Many things currently hidden in this world won’t stay so for long.

  • Pelham123

    I’ll be watching their response with interest … but ultimately it doesn’t matter.

    I feel the same way about “six strikes” that I’m guessing most other consumers do. One false positive and it’s straight to to a VPN. One accurate positive for something I think is fair use, VPN. One flag for something that I know the artist is OK with sharing, VPN. One strike for something someone else does without my knowledge? VPN.

    I will not be paying $35 to appeal any strikes. There is no need because I will only receive a maximum one strike in my lifetime.

    I don’t care if Chris Dodd vets the system. Either it works perfectly in practice or I cloak.

    • ScrewEwe2

      Pelham, you should allready be cloaking yourself. I started using a paid VPN about 6 months ago, but have been playing around with public proxy servers for a few years now. I’ve also had luck routing torrent traffic through other peoples computers as long as I have their IP address and port number. I’ve been lucky, 13 years of P2P and no infringement letters for me. I haven’t been overly greedy though, and I think that helps. Be proactive about stealth and not reactive. Proxy chaining in today’s environment is a must. If you’re only using your VPN’s proxy that’s better than your real IP being monitored, but those VPN logs could come back to bite you if the MAFIAA is trying to shakedown your VPN provider to get to you.

      Peerblock = better than nothing
      Peerblock + VPN = good, easy and for most probably adequate
      Peerblock + VPN + TOR = very good (choose the fasted TOR nodes you can find)
      Peerblock + VPN + TOR + routing µTorrent traffic through an extra proxy or a peers computer = best

      • Anyone

        don’t run torrents over TOR
        it ruins the network

      • NO FFS!

        How many times do people have to say this!? :facepalm:

        DO NOT USE BITTORRENT OVER TOR FFS!!!!!

        ScrewEwe2 please start using i2p instead https://www.i2p2.de/bittorrent.html

      • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

        How do you ‘choose’ your TOR nodes? I use TOR and I have always wondered how you do that.

        Is there a way to tell TOR to only connect to nodes with a minimum speed?

  • Spartacus666

    So the ‘Presumption of Innocence” so ‘loved’ by the U.S.A. is just a mirage it seems ?

    Even though an I.P. is NOT a person or ‘an identifier’

    • ForestSilverwood

      It’s loved by the People of the U.S.A.

      It’s loathed by the U.S.A. Government.

    • ScrewEwe2

      Seems like demanding “Presumption of Innocence” is often regarded by “The Man” as being presumptuous at best. “You’re innocent when we say you’re innocent”. ?¿?

  • http://twitter.com/MAFIAAFire MAFIAAFire

    The whole scheme is flawed from the start.
    Scrap it and come up with something that is not so one sided in the greedy corporations favor.

    Oh, while we are in fantasy land, tar and feather the scumbags at the RIAA.

    • MadAsASnake

      Any “strikes” scheme based solely on IP and not requiring the beneficiaries to pay (just everybody else) is completely flawed. Any scheme that is sufficiently robust is too invasive and too costly to be worthwhile.

      • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

        Any system can be easily defeated by encryption as well. Use a 30 character symbol/letter/number password on your files and it’s impossible to tell what is being shared.

        In fact, some torrent websites are going to that and having a special ‘trusted poster’ functionality like TPB to get around the “It’s a fake! It’s a virus!” problems that open torrent websites have.

  • Qjo

    Isn’t it great seeing these assholes do the backstep? Now if we could just get them to do it off a fucking cliff.

  • CCI

    Ernesto is to the CCI as Assange is to the USA.

    CCI = Can’t Contain Information

    • Ridd

      I smell a Pulitzer for Ernesto

  • Andrew Lee

    CCI has to be about the luckiest company in the world. I mean they’re being paid out the ass to provide a service that’s going to make zero difference.

    I wanna be paid for nothing as well :(

  • Wonsann

    lol, is anyone actually surprised at all? They shouldnt be.
    http://www.Stay-Anon.tk

  • Lulz

    CCI has no clue, they’re just a bunch of puppets anyways. Why bother? And I will never pay $35 for my legal right of innocence until proven guilty.

    • MadAsASnake

      Paying a quasi judicial body that is likely biased to assert your innocence is a feature of the DEA in the UK as well. Beleive me, they would get one strongly worded email from me (why waste a stamp) and no money. If they aren’t happy with that, they can see me in a real court…

      • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

        It’s also an illegal thing to do that (take away your right to sue and to use the court system) and I am surprised that it hasn’t been challenged in the U.K. yet.

  • Guest

    So they made money before working for the RIAA, now they’ll leech their paychecks from … who exactly, the taxpayer?

  • nostrafarious

    The Empire Strikes Back

    • Strike me down, and…

      followed by episode VI:

      Return of the Mega

      • Gen. Eric Guy

        Naturally, these fools still think the prequels rock harder than the classic trilogy.

        Must be fans of “Har Har Finks” (‘Le Trollface Meme guy’, as their kids would call him).

        Saying “Le” just made my hands suddenly cramp up for some odd reason. I gotta stay away from that term in that context like the Devil would with Holy Water.

  • Andrew me

    LOL and it is all irrelevant really other than being good press fodder for the masses. All there needs to be is one case where the accused can prove they did not download any material they are accused of o for this to go to the real court and not some kangaroo court that wants to determine how much you have to pay them. Lol talk about a waste of time and money. Sadly a lot of people will be conned into paying for the right to have your opinion heard. If anything this could be the nail in the coffin for anti torrent monopolists when the full might of the law comes crashing down on them..

  • Who

    there probably trying to cover up there fuck up’s LOL. this 6 strikes regime isn’t a law like everybody thinks it is. its a system designed just like the last one to get people to do what they say. I used to get cease and desist letters from my isp all the time and each time I was accused of downloading from a location were I did not download from. so all I did was tell them that if I got one more that I would file a report against them to the BBB and the FCC and also told them that because of all the other crap they were putting me threw ide file a class action lawsuit against them and the shit stopped. but any way them cease and desist letters are actually considered harassment. and when enough subscribers are lost because the users are to scared to defend them selves, the isp’s will say enough just like the last time.
    “making a copy of any movie music or game is not piracy, nether is sharing it over the web” ya wana know y they want this to stop? cause they can’t profit off of it. if every one the shares stops they WILL find something else to bitch about. and ya wana know y? cause EVEN IF it stops…..they still will NOT be able to make any money off of nothing LOL.

  • Nasty

    On a side note …

    vpnbook is getting “nasty” on ScanEye.
    Just a few weeks ago nothing.
    Now … DIRTY DIRTY DIRTY (a good thing)

    The FREE service is growing in popularity. COOL.
    Romania ROCKS!

    Sometimes hard to login.
    Also, after no activity, bandwidth drops.
    Just reconnect (still very fast once you get on).

    I use VPNReactor AND VPNBook. FREE IS GOOD!
    CCI MY ASS! F#CK MARKMONITOR!
    50 Mbps BOOST FTW!

    • ScrewEwe2

      Are there any restrictions to the Free VPNReactor Accounts?

      Yes, there is a 30 MINUTE TIME LIMIT per vpn connection, and outbound email (SMTP) is blocked. Once you have been connected for 30 minutes, the VPN server will automatically disconnect the VPN tunnel. You will need to WAIT 30 minutes & manually reestablish your VPN connection if you wish to continue to use the Free VPN service.

      I tested out VPNBook, and it wasn’t too bad. Also tried out the Ad supported Hotspot Shield VPN from Anchorfree and it was OK, but ran into some problems with some sites including here on TF/DISQUS while using an Ad Blocker in IE9. I still find it best to pay for a ProVPN service over a free one in addition to TOR.

      • BAT182

        FREE system scheduler app
        Desktop BAT (text) files (for easy weekly editing)
        Multiple FREE accounts (UN/PW)

        example BAT file …

        cd/
        rasdial /disconnect
        rasdial VPNReactor 1234567890 abcdefghijk

        I’m old skool. Grew up on MSDOS.

        • ScrewEwe2

          The only DOS commands I ever learned how to use, were for formatting and partitioning HD’s. Didn’t get my first PC ’till ’98. I was thinking about Windows ’95 earlier today in comparison to Windows 8, LOL. Little by little over the years I have edumedicated (medicated education) myself pretty well on PC’s from W95 to W7, and thanks to P2P, have learned how to set up some pretty sweet PC’s for myself and others. I’m going to have to grab a copy of Windows 8 soon, so I can get up to speed on it, so I can set up machines for people that will sooner or later be using or wanting that OS. Sometimes lack of money is a good thing in some way’s. Since I couldn’t afford tech support, I had to learn how to find the hardware and software answers I needed on the net. I’ve learned a lot from fellow TorrentFreakers over the years. The internet is a cheap University, or maybe UniverCity.

  • Trelew

    I don’t think anyone they get will be impartial for the simple reason is that Big Business doesn’t want that. They want everything there way and they don’t give a rat’s ass if it fare or not. Anybody involved with this will be bought off to do it the corporate way. There are going to be a lot of strikeouts with this policy of thiers

  • Guest

    Got this comment from techdirt –

    “In the source article that TorrentFreak cited (Daily Dot), they mention that Jill Lesser, the executive director of the program is planning to go ahead despite the controversy:

    Lesser, who has twice before granted interviews to the Daily Dot to clarify how the CAS works, denied a request to speak about Stroz Friedberg’s involvement. Instead, she issued a statement defending the decision to hire that firm:

    “We are confident in the Stroz team’s skill, competency and ability to honestly and fairly review the content community’s methodologies [...] The prior, and completely separate, relationship between Stroz Friedberg and RIAA is irrelevant to our choice and our work.”

    She added that the CAS would continue to retain Stroz for consulting.

    In other words, it’s sticking with Stroz regardless of past history.

    Source: http://www.dailydot.com/news/piracy-six-strikes-copyright-alerts-RIAA-lobbyists/

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      This woman needs fired if she is really going to stick with this guy after his conflict of interest has been made obvious to her and anyone who doesn’t have their eyes sewn shut.

      • Fantastic

        Well the other “Partners” (You know the other bits of the Big Media cesspool) didn’t see a problem with the conflict and likely the ISPs won’t be told about it since a “past history” that shows they’ll be nothing close to impartial. Its going to be the ISPs that take it between the cheeks from these dictating loons when people start to get ticked at more spectacular “enforcement” and “education”. People should blast emails off to their ISPs showing that they are in for a real mess if they stick with this insane Corporate Justice Plan. I mean what the heck is going on when the Government is allowing Corporations of be a law unto themselves..oh yea Lobbyist..ugh. Need to take a wrecking ball to the whole system.

  • Anonymous

    ‘CCI is now considering whether it should hire another expert to evaluate the anti-piracy monitoring technology’

    what is there to consider? the ISPs have been lied to, yet again, by the entertainment industries. how can anyone expect fair, open and honest appraisal of a supposed copyright infringement if the company is already bias towards those that want people convicted for anything copyright related, even if it is just an accusation? the ISPs should immediately pull out of this arrangement and think very seriously about entering into anything else at all, ever, with the entertainment industries. they need to start thinking about their customers and their own business instead of continuously shooting themselves, all be it willingly up til now, in both feet!

    if CCI were not informed about the former ‘occupation’ of Stroz Friedberg, the entertainment industries should expect nothing less than serious backlash from CCI and the public. CCI itself, however, should expect nothing less than serious backlash from the public for not doing what it should, ie, taking what the entertainment industries say with a pinch of salt and CHECKED THE FUCKING INFO FOR THEMSELVES!!

    • Anonymous

      Its “albeit” not “all be it”

  • Anonymous

    ‘some forces at the CCI pushed to deliver a quick response to alleviate the concerns about the impartiality of the review’

    i dont suppose those ‘forces’ could have been ‘encouraged’ at all to ‘deliver a quick response’ could they? so far, this whole exercise smacks of being the same sort of fiasco as the Mega case. the DoJ isn’t involved somewhere along the line, is it?

  • Roswell1701

    This is no big surprise. The world of politics is incestuous by nature. Everyone knows everyone, everyone hangs out with everyone and everyone FUCKS everyone…

  • jrau18

    They should replace the guy, make the reports public, and have a second person verify that everything is actually legit.

    • Anyone

      that would mean they could scrape the whole system
      there is no way that an actual independent expert will sign this shit off

  • Pingback: In the News.. | TorGuard.net Blog - Anonymous VPN Services

  • Ophelia Millais

    I would be quite surprised if the CCI goes with the first option, revealing their investigative methods for everyone to poke holes in. The CCI is not going to do anything that puts its operation at risk. More likely, they’ll have someone else more independent (yet paid by them) vet the forensic method, but they’ll put that person under an NDA so they have to keep it secret, too.

  • Predator

    Conflict of interest no conflict of interest It does not matter we are going to kill all of these business of gangsters.

    1 strike, 3 strikes, 6 strikes whatever. It is not going to make me go back to buy their crap. So folks you know what you have to do.

    -Get ride of your cable/Satellite subscription,
    -don’t buy or rent any music or video,
    -don’t buy any iShit or kindle crap full of DRM scam that ripe you blind.

    Actually you will make them a favor if you manage to kill their business because otherwise we will have to kill them.

    Now you know.

  • Joe

    I find that these mafIAA organizations are little more than pseudo-criminal organizations more interested in increasing their personal salaries than getting money for the artists and organizations they claim to represent. They certainly appear to lie, deceive, buy influence, threaten and manipulate like the real Mafia. What’s the difference?

    • Fantastic

      Least the Mafia in some forms started out to protect the people (it was a long time ago so goes the stories) MAFIAA in all that makes up that group have always been criminals abusing artist and performers while promoting themselves as “the only game in town” and just about forcing the people to align with them or suffer. They are like Vegas mobsters cept those guys have the decency to keep it in Vegas and associated casinos and not try to take over the whole world to keep their dying empire alive.

  • Pingback: La RIAA place une taupe au sein de la Hadopi américaine et se fait chopper | {niKo[piK]}

  • Pingback: RIAA Failed To Disclose Expert’s Lobbying History to “Six-Strikes” Partners | My Daily Feeds

  • Pingback: The Feed for Monday, October 29th, 2012 | NABSPOT

  • Pingback: |^| the Upload » The Feed for Monday, October 29th, 2012

  • POKE

    Most interesting is that neither of the proposed solutions actually include LIVING UP TO THEIR AGREEMENTS by hiring an independent and unbiased group.

  • Pingback: NUTesla | The Informant » Big Content stuffs up six strikes law

  • Zar

    Could you guys not use a dark font on a dark background? It’s more irritating than this 6 strikes rule.

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.