<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIAA vs. IP:127.0.0.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/</link>
	<description>Torrent News, Torrent Sites and the latest Scoops</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-523908</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-523908</guid>
		<description>Is that true? Even with the latest wireless security technologies, no wifi network is impenetrable. Do they actually prosecute people for that? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that true? Even with the latest wireless security technologies, no wifi network is impenetrable. Do they actually prosecute people for that? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LordAzuzu</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-370757</link>
		<dc:creator>LordAzuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 13:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-370757</guid>
		<description>When ppl say to &quot;reset your router&quot;, they mean to bring it back to factory defaults, so the wifi connections is NOT encrypted, and you can say that &quot;anyone passing by&quot; could have used your connection.
In Italy you could be anyway sued for another law infrigment: you HAVE to keep your wireless network protected, because of terroristic activity in the previous years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When ppl say to &#8220;reset your router&#8221;, they mean to bring it back to factory defaults, so the wifi connections is NOT encrypted, and you can say that &#8220;anyone passing by&#8221; could have used your connection.<br />
In Italy you could be anyway sued for another law infrigment: you HAVE to keep your wireless network protected, because of terroristic activity in the previous years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phex</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-297974</link>
		<dc:creator>phex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-297974</guid>
		<description>from what i&#039;ve read re: stunnel, doesn&#039;t the &quot;thing i&#039;m connecting to&quot; akways have to &quot;be in the same place&quot;? As you may well tell, i&#039;m not well up in the actual mechanisms which underpin the internet etc...

if not that, surely you cant use it to encrypt all torrent traffic due to it&#039;s nature?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from what i&#8217;ve read re: stunnel, doesn&#8217;t the &#8220;thing i&#8217;m connecting to&#8221; akways have to &#8220;be in the same place&#8221;? As you may well tell, i&#8217;m not well up in the actual mechanisms which underpin the internet etc&#8230;</p>
<p>if not that, surely you cant use it to encrypt all torrent traffic due to it&#8217;s nature?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techrat</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-295973</link>
		<dc:creator>Techrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-295973</guid>
		<description>People saying &quot;reset your router!&quot; are idiots. Point blank. ISPs keep logs of who has what IP assigned to which router (MAC address and/or serial number) from the times the router is actually up and assigned an IP address. Past logs are what these letters are based on. Getting a letter and resetting your router later is the same thing as closing the door after you&#039;ve left it open long enough for the killer to sneak in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People saying &#8220;reset your router!&#8221; are idiots. Point blank. ISPs keep logs of who has what IP assigned to which router (MAC address and/or serial number) from the times the router is actually up and assigned an IP address. Past logs are what these letters are based on. Getting a letter and resetting your router later is the same thing as closing the door after you&#8217;ve left it open long enough for the killer to sneak in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackscompletelackofsurprise</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-295571</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackscompletelackofsurprise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-295571</guid>
		<description>Most ISPs keep radius logs of provisioning that takes place with the public IPs that are assigned... if they subpoena the radius logs, the RIAA can determine at least down to the person who is being billed for the connection at the time of sharing. 

In response to something someone mentioned, there&#039;s no way they are using Mac addresses to prove their case.  The ISP isn&#039;t storing that kind of info.

As stated in the article, a knowledgeable forensic expert witness could absolutely OWN the RIAA....a defendent just needs to man up and spend the money.

The defense I would use, &quot; I must have had an incorrectly configured wifi router.&quot;   Zero out the HD 50 times and prove it was ever on my drive.  Problem solved!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most ISPs keep radius logs of provisioning that takes place with the public IPs that are assigned&#8230; if they subpoena the radius logs, the RIAA can determine at least down to the person who is being billed for the connection at the time of sharing. </p>
<p>In response to something someone mentioned, there&#8217;s no way they are using Mac addresses to prove their case.  The ISP isn&#8217;t storing that kind of info.</p>
<p>As stated in the article, a knowledgeable forensic expert witness could absolutely OWN the RIAA&#8230;.a defendent just needs to man up and spend the money.</p>
<p>The defense I would use, &#8221; I must have had an incorrectly configured wifi router.&#8221;   Zero out the HD 50 times and prove it was ever on my drive.  Problem solved!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-295538</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-295538</guid>
		<description>Even if you had received a new IP address most ISP&#039;s keep track of when a IP lease has been given and when it expired and to who. Most of the time its historical so the RIAA asks who uses this IP at this time on this day and its over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if you had received a new IP address most ISP&#8217;s keep track of when a IP lease has been given and when it expired and to who. Most of the time its historical so the RIAA asks who uses this IP at this time on this day and its over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yo</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-295521</link>
		<dc:creator>yo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-295521</guid>
		<description>Anyone use Stunnel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone use Stunnel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robmatic</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-273952</link>
		<dc:creator>robmatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 06:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-273952</guid>
		<description>Resetting your router may give you a new IP address, but how does that protect you? It is certain that your ISP has data that tells them that &quot;from Jan 26 at 11:36AM through Jan 29 at 3:14PM the IP address 1.2.3.4 was leased to &quot;. And I bet they have this sort of data going back well into the past. So getting a new IP address doesn&#039;t erase everything that happened in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Resetting your router may give you a new IP address, but how does that protect you? It is certain that your ISP has data that tells them that &#8220;from Jan 26 at 11:36AM through Jan 29 at 3:14PM the IP address 1.2.3.4 was leased to &#8220;. And I bet they have this sort of data going back well into the past. So getting a new IP address doesn&#8217;t erase everything that happened in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ESkO</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-44037</link>
		<dc:creator>ESkO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 03:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-44037</guid>
		<description>what about using the software hide ip platinum?? nayone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about using the software hide ip platinum?? nayone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dutch court forces isp to hand over name at Torrentfreak</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-10554</link>
		<dc:creator>Dutch court forces isp to hand over name at Torrentfreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-10554</guid>
		<description>[...] It is unsure why the judge decided that these two conditions were met in this particular case, but it&#8217;s likely that his/her private ISP email address (muzan@chello.nl) identified him/her. This makes the case a little stronger, since it is more that just an ip-address. But still, no hard evidence. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It is unsure why the judge decided that these two conditions were met in this particular case, but it&#8217;s likely that his/her private ISP email address (muzan@chello.nl) identified him/her. This makes the case a little stronger, since it is more that just an ip-address. But still, no hard evidence. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kdsde</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-9300</link>
		<dc:creator>kdsde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 12:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-9300</guid>
		<description>Resetting you wifi thingy serves that:
a) the combination of assigned LAN IPs -&gt; network card identifiers (MACadress) will be reset. So no chance to say which machine in the neighborhood got a free rideticket to infringe copyrights via the billpayers WAN IP 
b) most wifi equippment is shipped per default without any WEP/WPA settings. So anybody can use it in range (THAT&#039;S the defence against MAFIAA because IP != one specific sueable copyright infringing person)

Note that using an IP blocker with publicly known lists is not a protection but an identification tool for MAFIAA these days!
Read this explaination why:
http://neuron2neuron.blogspot.com/2006/05/blocklist-balderdash.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Resetting you wifi thingy serves that:<br />
a) the combination of assigned LAN IPs -&gt; network card identifiers (MACadress) will be reset. So no chance to say which machine in the neighborhood got a free rideticket to infringe copyrights via the billpayers WAN IP<br />
b) most wifi equippment is shipped per default without any WEP/WPA settings. So anybody can use it in range (THAT&#8217;S the defence against MAFIAA because IP != one specific sueable copyright infringing person)</p>
<p>Note that using an IP blocker with publicly known lists is not a protection but an identification tool for MAFIAA these days!<br />
Read this explaination why:<br />
<a href="http://neuron2neuron.blogspot.com/2006/05/blocklist-balderdash.html" rel="nofollow">http://neuron2neuron.blogspot.com/2006/05/blocklist-balderdash.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peca</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-9028</link>
		<dc:creator>Peca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-9028</guid>
		<description>Well, suppose RIAA have log on their computer that (for example) ip 1.2.3.4 has  shared something illegal. OK, so wheres the proof ? Isnt log file just a text file where any server administrator can put/edit anything ? Its just like if i said &quot;hey, that man over there shoot somebody&quot;...  I cant understand, how any one can be so dumb to consider this as main proof ! Its clear, that those, who do this doesnt know anything about networking/computers/how things work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, suppose RIAA have log on their computer that (for example) ip 1.2.3.4 has  shared something illegal. OK, so wheres the proof ? Isnt log file just a text file where any server administrator can put/edit anything ? Its just like if i said &#8220;hey, that man over there shoot somebody&#8221;&#8230;  I cant understand, how any one can be so dumb to consider this as main proof ! Its clear, that those, who do this doesnt know anything about networking/computers/how things work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-8894</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-8894</guid>
		<description>These are Civil court cases, they only need to proponderance of evidence, not absolute proof; if it&#039;s 51% likely, they win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are Civil court cases, they only need to proponderance of evidence, not absolute proof; if it&#8217;s 51% likely, they win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pariah</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-8834</link>
		<dc:creator>Pariah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 22:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-8834</guid>
		<description>Still the same. Who says a neighbor&#039;s friend with wifi didn&#039;t get on, share, then get off. It&#039;s a forest of &quot;what-ifs&quot; that no-one can answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still the same. Who says a neighbor&#8217;s friend with wifi didn&#8217;t get on, share, then get off. It&#8217;s a forest of &#8220;what-ifs&#8221; that no-one can answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tramline</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-8829</link>
		<dc:creator>tramline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 22:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-8829</guid>
		<description>What if your IP sets you with a static IP and no neighbors have wifi computers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if your IP sets you with a static IP and no neighbors have wifi computers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: falafelboy</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-8815</link>
		<dc:creator>falafelboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-8815</guid>
		<description>Resetting your router will assign a new IP, but not always.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Resetting your router will assign a new IP, but not always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernesto</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-8803</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 12:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-8803</guid>
		<description>Opening up your WiFi means that it could have been your neighbours who downloaded pirated stuff using your connection...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opening up your WiFi means that it could have been your neighbours who downloaded pirated stuff using your connection&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kaspar</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-8795</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kaspar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-8795</guid>
		<description>What would be the point of resetting the router?

Reset the setup? Erase any traffic logs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would be the point of resetting the router?</p>
<p>Reset the setup? Erase any traffic logs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernesto</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-8751</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-8751</guid>
		<description>resetting your router would mean that you can point the finger at your freeriding neighbours.

Peerguardian is fine, but I personally know at least 3 people who used it and still got a letter from their ISP that some movie company complained...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>resetting your router would mean that you can point the finger at your freeriding neighbours.</p>
<p>Peerguardian is fine, but I personally know at least 3 people who used it and still got a letter from their ISP that some movie company complained&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yatti420</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-8749</link>
		<dc:creator>Yatti420</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 19:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-vs-ip127001/#comment-8749</guid>
		<description>Id think if you live in the United States resseting ur router if u get a letter  from the MPAA etc wont do a damn thing! Even if your address changes.. A good defence would be PEER GUARDIAN 2!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Id think if you live in the United States resseting ur router if u get a letter  from the MPAA etc wont do a damn thing! Even if your address changes.. A good defence would be PEER GUARDIAN 2!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

