Rogers Continues to Throttle BitTorrent Traffic, Despite Contentious Pricing Scheme
Written by Ernesto on April 09, 2008The Canadian ISP Rogers recently introduced contentious hosting plans, which means that users have to pay for every extra gigabyte they consume. The problem is, however, that Rogers continues to throttle BitTorrent traffic, so most BitTorrent users will never reach their quota anyway.
Rogers‘ new pricing scheme (see image below) gets rid of the all-you-can-eat plans most ISPs offer, and charges customers for every additional gigabyte once they have reached their monthly quota. For example, customers with an “extreme plus” plan pay $99.95 a month for the first 95GB, and $1.25 for every additional gigabyte they consume.
Here’s what Rogers wrote in a letter to their customers: “With households doing more online every day - from downloading music and streaming videos to joining online communities - it’s important to have an Internet provider that evolves to meet your online needs. At Rogers, we remain committed to always providing you with the best Internet experience possible.”
Don’t get me wrong, a contentious pricing scheme makes sense. The more people consume, the more they pay, fair enough. What bothers most Rogers users is that, even with this new pricing scheme, their BitTorrent traffic is still being throttled.
Rogers was one of the early adopters of BitTorrent traffic shaping. The first reports date back to 2005, and last year Rogers even decided to block all encrypted traffic, just to make sure that BitTorrent protocol encryption didn’t work.
Nevertheless, Rogers plays nice to its customers, and says it is “committed to providing the best Internet experience as possible”, but how can this be true if their customers can hardly use BitTorrent?
In the letter they sent to their customers they mention that, with a monthly bandwidth limit of 95GB, users can download a whopping 24,320 songs a month. However, if Rogers continues to throttle BitTorrent traffic, it can take up to 67.6 months before their customers actually reach their quota.
In a response to the new pricing scheme, a Rogers subscriber told TorrentFreak: “Pretty funny actually, as with the throttling they are doing, I could downgrade my service considerably.”
Not to worry though, there are several tip and tricks to get around the traffic shaping devices rogers uses. For some, BitTorrent encryption is sufficient to circumvent Rogers’ throttling, others need to adjust a few extra settings to enjoy their torrents in full-speed.
Happy torrenting…
Rogers’ new pricing scheme
Previously: IFPI Erases Evidence Of Fascist Roots For 75th Anniversary
Next: Vote for the Movie Screening Security Guards
77 Responses
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] Show All
I would have quit Rogers LONG ago, but in Canada its basically an oligopoly/monopoly. Rogers has the best speed and charges big $$ for it, and is pathetic compared to other countries. Rogers owns the cable lines all around the city (Toronto). They can shaft their customers in every orifice and they would have little choice. Bell owns all the phone lines, and offers DSL with slightly slower speeds, with that whole painful dial up process (i think).
I am really hoping an American company like at&t, verison, or whoever, comes up here and lays some fiber lines and starts offering decent internet.
dropped bell today, they have shaped traffic for close to a year, broke my contract without telling me, throttled so called “unlimited” account and now they have introduced this new b.s. 60gb cap per month with traffic shaping. i am urging all canadians to drop the monopolistic companies and go with the small providers. bell and rogers are are anti-competitive, anti-consumer and anti-net neutrality conglomerates that need to be kicked in the teeth with our pocket books.
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] Show All
Responses are closed
All remaining responses will continue to be archived. Use the TorrentFreak forums if you want to discuss something.