Comments on: Sexpert Uncovers Shades of Dahl in Piracy Witch-Hunt

By: Davenport Lyons Will Be My Bitch!

Davenport Lyons Will Be My Bitch! — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 06:13:24 +0000

@14

Truer words were never spoken.

It’s called justice. And I won’t shed any tears when it happens either.

By: jerusalem spider

jerusalem spider — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:55:45 +0000

I call Godwin’s law.

By: sakonkak

sakonkak — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:27:03 +0000

money money money……

By: Roger

Roger — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:27:48 +0000

Good Article but needs to link to Violet Blue blog/article.

Citations pls!

By: Aiue

Aiue — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:56:35 +0000

@29: Wait, what?

By: Frank E White

Frank E White — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:24:09 +0000

This is hilarious.

Yes, it’s true: it’s almost impossible to write something that others can understand, which is one reason why Steve King makes so much money.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 07:12:56 +0000

I demand more dispute over this not-yet-fully-interpreted reply, from the otherwise insignificant article!

By: @24

@24 — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:40:10 +0000

@24 thats what I said numbnuts. The post was sarcastic.
*shvroooom.* Over your head.

By: -_-

-_- — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:54:40 +0000

blind man is in the novel idiots

By: LOL

LOL — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:17:23 +0000

Insert Peter Griffin laugh here. Ehehehehehehe

By: omg

omg — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:22:31 +0000

you people are serious idiots, i know the blind person is in a STORY. I was commenting on a the comment of the story.

Guy was saying it doesnt matter if the “blind” guy was blind or not, they still have evidence so they should prosecute anyway.

thats complete bs. Perhaps im interpreting this all wrong, and the guy commenting is being sarcastic..

By: Rekrul

Rekrul — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:14:57 +0000

Don’t bother trying to explain the “blind man” part. 90% of the people reading this article are too dim-witted to understand the concept of an analogy.

By: please learn to read

please learn to read — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:37:18 +0000

im amazed at how many people here cannot read the article correctly…

the BLIND person was in the novel by Dahl, and the “letter” was someone modifying it as if the blind, deceased husband was being sued by DL

By: iiZNZNZNZ!!

iiZNZNZNZ!! — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:52:15 +0000

@1: You must be blind …. pls to read the article again.

By the way #1 …. only joking about the blind comment … couldn’t resist the playful remark :)

By: Jacob

Jacob — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:49:37 +0000

Lol fail. What a fail law firm. They sued a DEAD, BLIND MAN!, on dodgey, circumstantial and easily forgeable evidence from a dodgey company.

By: lol

lol — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:48:40 +0000

@ #18 Hacked lines?!? Seems more like you can’t even find your own caps-lock key. :p

By: ruinyourlife

ruinyourlife — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:04:38 +0000

Jesus, can’t you people read a simple article. There is no blind man being accused of anything. Take you head out of you ass, and re-read the article.

By: the.dwarfer

the.dwarfer — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:52:35 +0000

those pensioners should file a counter-suit for deformation, mental anguish loss of earnings and what ever else they can think of. take DL to court. whos gonna win, loveable doddery pensioners or evil gay-porn peddling copyright nazis?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:24:26 +0000

@13 lol

By: aquariumfish

aquariumfish — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:44:46 +0000

Davenport Lyons, are getting a really bad rep for themselves of late.

http://www.aquariumfish.me

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:35:44 +0000

Ahh, the sweet stench of crooks in hot water.

Live it up while you can, DigiProtect & Davinport Lyons. Your expiration date is nearing.

By: gregf

gregf — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:13:58 +0000

He’s guilty as charged. Apparently he had whacked it to too many gay porno’s and has gone blind. Now he’s trying to use the “oh i’m blind” excuse. We’ll sir your not going to fool me!

By: oupi

oupi — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:22:27 +0000

Hehe, does the name of the bookstore guy refer to Bukkake?

By: someone

someone — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:04:03 +0000

@ torrentfreak

check this out

In RiP: A remix manifesto, Web activist and filmmaker Brett Gaylor explores issues of copyright in the information age, mashing up the media landscape of the 20th century and shattering the wall between users and producers.

http://www3.nfb.ca/webextension/rip-a-remix-manifesto/

By: ALIS

ALIS — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:00:39 +0000

Someone should try to fake or hijack some important persons(like brittish prime minister or the queen or something) IP address then download alot of material that is on digiprotects list. Then we’ll see what happens when Davenmorons send a letter to them, might be interesting to see how fast they sue davenport and digiprotect :D

By: Bojangles

Bojangles — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:59:47 +0000

First there was the ‘wireless defence’ now there is the “I’m blind” defence. Off to get my soldering iron.

By: @6

@6 — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:23:52 +0000

The fact that he is blind was the point of his post. He was making a joke about the way DL practice. It was not his own opinion that the analogical blind man should pay up.

By: www.eZee.se

www.eZee.se — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:10:57 +0000

Brits are not as “sweet” as Americans, esp the younger ones, go to any soccer game where there’s a UK team playing and see for yourself.

I hung around with some really nice people from Britain, till they got drunk and just wanted a good ol’ punch-up :D
This happened in Stockholm, Prague, Rome and even in London… different sets of people too.

I predict something nasty is going to happen very soon to people working at DL once they accuse the wrong person, no matter if they did download something or not… and I for one am not going to shed a tear over it when people from DL are found with their faces smashed in.

Cheers!
http://www.eZee.se

By: I know

I know — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:59:55 +0000

I know that #4, im talking about the guys response to the story. He just starts rambling on about lawyer BS, completely ignoring the fact the guy is BLIND.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:59:32 +0000

the story was just a way of showing how the bookstore (Big company) Blackmails (weak and defenceless eldarly)

However those without blind husbands (Eldarly couples) are less likely to be believed if they go to the press and therefore made to pay much like the widows in the story

By: @1

@1 — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:03:32 +0000

@1 Re-read the article. You will see that they haven’t accused a blind person of sharing anything. [as far as we know]

By: ATuin

ATuin — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:59:40 +0000

Everyone that receives one of these should tell them all where to go and to continue and communications through their lawers.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:58:15 +0000

By: heh

heh — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:57:59 +0000

Well my Response to him is.. I hope someone kills you soon.

Hes blind you stupid f*ck, HE IS BLIND. HE CANNOT SEE THE PORN YOU F*CKING TWAT.

Whomever that was, needs to have every legal privilege he has taken away.

It is people like him that will ruin everything, he will destroy all humanity.

That is not blind justice, that is blind corruption.