Lawyers For ‘Imposter’ P2P Software Threaten Open-Source Team

Written by enigmax on February 25, 2008 

A company trying to pass itself off as vendors of the open-source file-sharing software Shareaza, has set the legal dogs on the real Shareaza forum. Discordia Ltd, who earlier turned Bearshare and iMesh into pay services, demanded action after a member of the real Shareaza forum suggested a DOS attack on the site.

When the news started to break in December last year, it looked bleak for the real Shareaza project. A company had somehow gained control of Shareaza.com, the domain name used previously for the real, open-source Shareaza P2P client, and was now passing its own pay service client off as the real thing. Something was seriously wrong, with many putting the pieces together into what could only be described as a conspiracy.

Now, lawyers for the “fake” or “imposter” Shareaza are threatening the real Shareaza team for a comment made by a user on their forum - things are getting out of hand. So how did this begin?

Last year a company associated with the French RIAA somehow obtained the Shareaza.com domain name from its owner, Mr Jonathan Nilson, who was given the domain in the belief he would keep it safe. Nilson would neither confirm nor deny that he had sold the domain, but speculation suggests that he may have sold it to avoid legal action. Others suggest the domain expired. Either way, the original owners of the domain (the Shareaza creators) don’t have it anymore.

Now the owners of the ‘fake’ Shareaza had control of the domain name previously associated with the real product (shareaza.com), it became easy to pretend to be them. There are two screenshots below - one is the ‘fake’ domain and one is the real thing. Can you spot the imposter?

FakeShareaza

RealShareaza

The real, open source client is represented by the bottom graphic. The ‘fake‘ is at the top and according to Neglacio ;

ShareazaV4, is totally fake. It violates the open-source license, GPL (Version 2) in many ways. Also, it isn’t free nor open source. It requires a subscription and installs a suspicious toolbar. You can read what happened from this reference list: http://tinyurl.com/2cx7ff

Please, update your Shareaza version to Shareaza 2.3.1.0, and change the site from Shareaza.com to the new official site at Sourceforge: http://shareaza.sourceforge.net .

Understandably, the real Shareaza team and users are really upset that this outfit has effectively stolen their brand name from under their noses in a hostile takeover, and is actively ruining their reputation. It’s no surprise that emotions run high when people are ripped off so when a new signup to the real Shareaza forums suggested a small way to get back at the people doing this to them, it wasn’t anything so special. A user called Red Squirrel posted (quote courtesy of Google.com) :

Make it so the real shareaza program queries their site [shareaza.com] every couple of seconds. As an individual user this won’t take much personal bandwidth. But all shareaza users worldwide put together should be enough to kill their server and they won’t really be able to do much since it will be coming from so many different IPs.

Even though a moderator outlined that this behavior might be considered illegal, that wasn’t enough for Meister Seelig & Fein, lawyers representing the company that took over Shareaza.com. Despite now passing themselves off as the real Shareaza, the ‘imposter’ outfit clearly thinks they have the law on their side too. In correspondence sent to the ‘real’ Shareaza team:

This law firm represents Discordia, Ltd., the operator of the website Shareaza.com and owner of the rights in the Shareaza branded software distributed from that domain. Please be advised, that your forum contains a string of posts under the title: “suggestion to kill Shareaza.com.” Under the string, the poster, RedSquirrel offers directions for users of Shareaza software to implement a DoS that would have the effect of destroying or seriously impairing our client’s application and network. The poster OldDeath also offers a manner to illegally attack our client’s business.

Despite whatever complaints your forum’s users may have with our client’s proper and legal business activities, the type of activity promoted on your forum is illegal. Therefore, we request that you immediately remove this string of posts and any future strings of this nature. My client respects your users’ rights to express their points of view. However, the line is crossed when users begin to promote the destruction of a legitimate business (evidently based on out some misguided belief that artists and others who create music should not be fairly compensated for their efforts) via illegal or other predatory means.

If the above cited illegal activity on your site does not immediately cease and desist, our client will take all necessary action to vigorously and relentlessly protect its rights. To be clear, if this action is not immediately taken and, as result, our client’s business is harmed, we will not only pursue, locate and hold fully responsible each and every one of those who have implemented this, or any similar DoS, but also those responsible for maintaining your site and the forums.

Please confirm that the requested action is being taken immediately.

Jeffrey A. Kimmel

Meister Seelig & Fein, LLP
140 E. 45th St., 19th Fl.
New York, NY 10017
(212) 655-3578

Meister Seelig & Fein is the same law firm that struck the distribution deal between iMesh and SonyBMG, so their involvement in this issue is no surprise.

Shareaza.com is offering a pay client that no file sharer wants, for many reasons, including keeping all hashes, downloaded files and chat logs in a database. We certainly don’t recommend it.

Those who prefer the real, free, open-source Shareaza experience should get along to Sourceforge or to this thread where all the genuine domains point.

On the one hand, The Pirate Bay lose a domain they bought legitimately because the IFPI doesn’t like it, but when a music industry outfit attempts the destruction of a completely legal piece of open source software by passing itself off as the real thing, no-one blinks. Sign of the times?

Update: It appears that Shareaza.com has been marked as a web forgery, illustrated in the screenshot below.

ShareazaPhish?

Previously: Oscar Winners 2008 Popular on BitTorrent

Next: FCC Hearing: Comcast Uses Hacker Techniques

149 Responses

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] Show All

126 Mar 10, 2008 at 00:57 by Denial Mc Service

Update… the –no-cache avoids your ISP memorizing the file and sending it to you without downloading it from shareaza.com.

x=0; while true; do x=$(($x + 1)); echo Start $x; wget http://download.shareazaweb.com/ShareazaV4.exe –no-cache –limit-rate 30k -O - 2>&1 >/dev/null | grep HTTP; echo Done; sleep 30; done

127 Mar 14, 2008 at 19:33 by AngelaShields

cdcdcvd
vdcdcdcdcdc

128 Mar 15, 2008 at 20:55 by megatrendsZ

Hello All
Im New…

129 Mar 21, 2008 at 16:33 by Webwhiteman

hi
hi

130 Mar 23, 2008 at 00:14 by ISeduction

hi
hi

131 Mar 23, 2008 at 04:36 by runs while farting

Why not not download their fakeza program 10 times or more per day?

Bandwith costs money doesn’t it? :)

132 Mar 28, 2008 at 03:41 by ARN

Well. For years I have kept a constant ping on yahoo.com, so I can monitor general net latency and see when my net burps or IP resets.

Just changed it to shareaza.com :)

133 Mar 30, 2008 at 16:45 by BlackDahlia

[quote comment="297829"][quote comment="297817"]I’d bloody DOS them if I had the time and resources. The stuff these guys are doing is pretty much as illegal as filesharing.[/quote]

No, it is more illegal. They are making money of pirated files. This is the kind of thing that costs society money.
Why can’t the RIAA/MPAA go after these bastards?[/quote]
fuck you loser

134 Apr 13, 2008 at 12:09 by Melissa Taylor

I think that it is very important not mention DDOS… BIG BROTHER is watching and waiting to strike…

Here is a good contribution and update post I discovered on the CMS Made simple forum:
http://forum.cmsmadesimple.org/index.php?topic=20984.msg102145

135 May 13, 2008 at 11:17 by lol

I recently heard about all of this mess. I personally never used Shareaza as far as I know, but the name certainly sounds familiar. I’ll take a look at it (from the real site of course.. ) since I’m tired of the Frostwire and Limewire bull I use..

136 May 14, 2008 at 15:33 by fred massoni

Attacks are only childish behavior. People know which the real Open Source software is, and is not. People who try to pose are posers. Always have been, always will be. Let the people decide. Best thing you can do is remain calm, and help get the word out. Impostors don’t last long under any kind of scrutiny. Caveat Emptor, let the buyer beware! Or in this case the open source sharer!

137 May 16, 2008 at 07:10 by akjopser

hello , ban me please ,
im a weird boy, i like to write strange things , thank you and sorry

138 May 28, 2008 at 12:48 by zipbuggy

People on the forum are understandably upset that a brand name is being stolen for no other purpose than to ruin, destroy or taunt the original creators business. Why else do you take someones logo, name and trademark?

That said, the upset members jokingly suggest DoS.. But what kind of Ahole then decides to attack even that? A lawyer. There are some of them that think the law is a game where you can just use it to attack, and then accused the attacked of being the attacker etc.

But Notice the childish assumption that words where they let out the the true reasoning behind being hypocrites.

“evidently based on out some misguided belief that artists and others who create music should not be fairly compensated for their efforts”

The forum members didn’t want to attack them because they believe artists should not be compensated. They attacked because no one likes an impostor or someone who is clearly designing an attack that also pretends they are the attacked.

They deserve to be put in their place. However, the problem is this. They are somehow connected with the RIAA? If I understood it… That said, what kind of people are the RIAA that like to fine people $220,000 for $20 worth of songs in court? Oh yeah, they are lawyers. Never mind trying to use your lawyer skills to be fair. They just show how bad they are by being worse than the ones they accuse.

139 May 28, 2008 at 12:49 by zipbuggy

Oh, and I’ll add, notice what really scares the fake one. If they were willing to launch a letter about DoS, then LOL, bingo. That suggestion probably would have worked. Either that, or they just like fighting and being that they are pushy lawyers, maybe that’s what they are doing.

140 May 28, 2008 at 13:07 by zipbuggy

Another thought came to mind. If the site is 100% legal etc, does that mean they give all the sign up money to the artists? LOL.. of course I know the answer is no. So the next thing I think of is that maybe they set up the site so they can use some of their friends to form lawsuits against the people downloaded. Ok, that really sounds paranoid, but it came to mind. I deleted that piece of junk as fast as I could, hehe.

141 Jun 01, 2008 at 04:29 by wingscancer

peer to peer file sharing like that is \crap. bit torrents are the way to go

142 Jul 03, 2008 at 14:12 by trastuso

Hi

G’night

143 Jul 06, 2008 at 17:32 by irencott

Hello!Help me please.Recently I have bought the car. A week later it has ceased to go. In service to me have told, that it I am guilty. The acquaintance has given the site address
http://nissan.net46.net. I there have found nothing. Other friend has told to look torrentfreak.com. What to me to do?

144 Aug 02, 2008 at 20:08 by ska3ka19996

dddas afsd fsdsdfa dfsdfsdfsdfa
asdffasddfsa asasdf

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] Show All

Responses are closed

All remaining responses will continue to be archived. Use the TorrentFreak forums if you want to discuss something.