Comments on: Slacker Uprising BitTorrent Takedown Sent to DNS Provider

By: movie downloads

movie downloads — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:35:34 +0000

The truth is when this kind of shit hits digg the number of people downloading it will shoot up, out of morbid curiosity. If this is as shit as you all seem to be saying maybe that's his point.
I like Michael Moore but only in very small doses.

By: UnitardLTD » Blog Archive » BitTorrent as distro platform is de facto worldwide day-and-date

Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:57:06 +0000

[...] the whole (and very informative) article. Filed under: Distro Strategies, Web Distribution – SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: “BitTorrent as [...]

By: Some one who isnt american

Some one who isnt american — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:31:28 +0000

SUCKS ON DONKEY COCK

By: Some one who isnt american

Some one who isnt american — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:31:06 +0000

USA LICKS BALLS

By: Some one who isnt american

Some one who isnt american — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:27:24 +0000

I laugh at all these stupid people having a go at Micheal Moore he is a legit film maker, I see alot of you have been mislead by the U.S. Government and believing them, so all I can say is

GO ON LOVING BUSH AND DESTROY THE WORLD

By: On Message with Ben Gross » Blog Archive » New and noteworthy for 10/06/08

Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:19:12 +0000

[...] Slacker Uprising BitTorrent Takedown Sent to DNS Provider: TorrentFreak covers the simultaneous release Michael Moore’s new film “Slacker Uprising” to DVD, web streaming, and the Bit Torrent peer-to-peer network. The distributors attempted to limit the release to the US and Canada, which demonstrated a clear a lack of understanding of the technical implications of the online release. The limitations quickly became ineffective, which was a surprise to apparently no one other than the movie’s distributors. To add insult to injury, the film’s lawyers attempted to issue a takedown request to the DNS provider of the Bit Torrent tracker hosting the movie torrent file, even though they were in Canada and could have had effectively no influence on the spread of the movie as they were not the hosting provider. [...]

By: Someone

Someone — Sun, 05 Oct 2008 07:35:18 +0000

What the point in having this movie now,bush is in office and look at the state of it.

By: Larry

Larry — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 21:27:14 +0000

The documentary sucks big time. It even has an appearance by Roseanne Barr in it. :(

By: OpenID-Nikos

OpenID-Nikos — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 03:44:13 +0000

Wouldn’t it be simpler if they released it under a creative commons license. It at least all share the ability to copy a movie freely!

By: kevin

kevin — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:55:37 +0000

I recon all of the negative responses in this blog are from lazy younger US people who did not bother to vote and have a feeling of guilt as well they should. Well you got Bush back, another Vietnam and his millionaire & billionaire banking buddies totally screwing your economy up and the tax payers inevitably footing the bill. He retires a rich man. Unfortunately, other countries economies suffer because Bush allowed this to happen. The election is around the corner. Get off you lazy apathetic backsides and vote. Otherwise shut up. No vote no voice!