Comments on: Studios: Movie Piracy Halved After Sending Zero Infringement Notices

By: Gully Foyle

Gully Foyle — Sun, 21 Oct 2012 02:55:00 +0000

I’m surprised that the “rights holders/studios/whatever” think $25 per notice is too much. Having discovered the arcane bookkeeping practices of the Film Industry, if they paid “pennies” per notice they would still claim it cost them $500 or more.

There are cases of films costing $300M, and the studios still, ahem, ‘claim’ it lost money. Could it have been those $8,000 charging for “processing a cheque for payment.” And, as one book puts it: “”[the studio] was legally within its rights to be an unimaginably lousy money manager,” There’s more, just as enlightening and boring.

The Film Industry has always been long on arrogance.

Dorothy Parker was right: “The only ‘isms’ Hollywood believes in is plagiarism.”

By: putian590

putian590 — Mon, 06 Aug 2012 02:27:00 +0000

tinyurl.com/cyk9xz2

By: Studios: Movie Piracy Halved After Sending Zero Infringement Notices | Zombie Torrents - Ultimate Torrents Downloads

Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:46:18 +0000

[...] Source: Studios: Movie Piracy Halved After Sending Zero Infringement Notices [...]

By: Bnetx1

Bnetx1 — Sun, 29 Jul 2012 03:37:00 +0000

Cause the movie people know its wrong cause legaly all they have is an I.P. address of a computer and it will cost them if the people take them up in court to fight it which would take even longer to prove a point and make them look like idiots to the movie industry which does not loose money for people pirating on the box office sales

By: James

James — Sat, 28 Jul 2012 03:29:00 +0000

my
friend’s sister-in-law earned $12717 the previous month. she is making
income on the laptop and moved in a $518800 condo. All she did was get
blessed and put into use the clues uncovered on this web site

http://www.LazyCash49.com

By: Miami Sunset

Miami Sunset — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:48:00 +0000

They claim piracy costs them millions but they aren’t willing to spend the money to stop it? This could play heavily into the proposed US system.

And has it really cut piracy 50% or has it just made it 50% harder to detect?

By: Ellen

Ellen — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:04:00 +0000

This info is a lie, misinformation, to backup they bad work… but trully its not working.

If it halved the piracy, how much it increased the movie sales? LMAO at this info

By: FortuneJr

FortuneJr — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 02:54:00 +0000

Ehh itll have to be Europe itd take an atom bomb to get my country (the US) to wake up weve been slowly conditioned to give up our rights so people could feel “safe” and gotta say i kinda feel bad since it seems the whole coprate taking over democracy thing kinda started here

By: Loopyjuice

Loopyjuice — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:49:00 +0000

So if the mere threat of sending out an infringement warning halved movie
piracy in less than a month and they haven’t sent out a single warning, stands to reason that if they don’t send out twice as many warnings we’ll all disappear. I should work for these people they are idiots.

By: ItsNotParanoia

ItsNotParanoia — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:37:00 +0000

Q. Why do pirates download films?

A. Because pirates fucking love films.

The cinema is an integral part of the experience, if you’re lucky enough to have a cinema nearby that gives a shit about the experience, you’d be a idiot not to go there and support them.

For every “I’d rather watch it in my basement”, there are ten “Let’s go out, then talk about it and get twatterized in the bar afterwards”

This is why cinema revenues are the highest they’ve been in decades.

Piracy is a service issue – I can torrent lossless music in minutes. Mainstream legit on iTunes/Amazon/etc – 320kbps is your lot.

Q. Why do pirates download music?