Comments on: Study Reveals Reckless Anti-Piracy Antics

By: daemonmatrix

daemonmatrix — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:13:23 +0000

I want to see a p2p client that auto detects RIAA etc then blocks them while also sending spoofed packets back telling them to connect to other detected anti-p2p companies and watch the chaos.

After all if their constantly changing their ip addresses to keep out of block lists how are they gonna keep track of each other ^_^

By: justin

justin — Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:55:17 +0000

sorry the CORRECT address is www.fileswire.com

By: Justin

Justin — Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:04:44 +0000

Already companies are devising ways round this. I found FilesWire the other day, there system is web-based so could be used from any internet connected computer. By spreading p2p usage between a few computers the powers that be will have to step up there efforts 3 fold to quantify indivisual p2p bandwith usage. You can find Web Based P2P Here

By: antip2pdude

antip2pdude — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:41:07 +0000

Well this is sad for the antip2p companies that does this, maybe they should look into another industry and try something new maybe something that doesn’t have todo with technology as much!

regards the nice antip2p dude :P

By: h33t

h33t — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 13:25:28 +0000

to Ben Jones the voice of the MAFIAA on torrentfreak:

if the title of the article was “how my printer received a DMCA notice” then you had a good and humorous article

however, the story wilted under your campaign against bluetack and ipfiltering

scientific method means everything to filesharers even if not to you. where are the study results and where are the test controls? where are the assumptions and limits? i say this report will make no change to anything

http://www.h33t.com

By: Anonymoose

Anonymoose — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:25:52 +0000

Someone needs to deal with BayTSP.
Mr Mark Ishikawa Thinks a little to highly of himself. perhaps some Anonymous lulz are in order for this man.

By: Tim

Tim — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:09:06 +0000

Does this mean those who didn’t settle out of court (if there are any) can get their money back or some form of compensatation? Their verdict was decided on false or unreliable evidence as a whole. I can’t see much other evidence they could provide on top off you were using this I.P on this Torrent at this time. I would expect my money back and more if it were me. Artists wouldn’t loose out if they had to pay back money as they never saw it anyway.

By: Norm

Norm — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:04:23 +0000

So wait, does this mean one can spoof the ip of some innocent person and get them in trouble for file sharing, even if they didn’t participate?

Lets spoof the IP of legislators until they get sued for filesharing. Maybe that will motivate them to change the law.

By: Rekrul

Rekrul — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:21:20 +0000

I’ll bet the printer was a Lexmark. There always was something shady about those things. ;)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:04:46 +0000

Good luck I don’t have a printer! Oh wait…

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:35:24 +0000

mafiAA warning > /dev/null
continue downloading…

By: Reacto

Reacto — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:31:11 +0000

That printer has himself in a jam! ooooohhhh yes i went there. lol

By: lolllll

lolllll — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:01:09 +0000

@5 . lol.

anyway, hopefully the anti-p2p comitees will do their usual job of being useless and not actually create a better way to track people uploading/downloading with less flaws. Or most peoples defence goes out the widnow ^_^

By: AnarchyNow

AnarchyNow — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:00:25 +0000

DMCA = obvious ass-wiping of the 1st amendment, fuck the law

By: ^o^

^o^ — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 06:13:16 +0000

Although it’s well known that IP blocklists do not provide 100% protection, there are secondary benefits to using them.

It is because of the widespread use of blocklists that anti-P2P firms are forced to spend a lot more money, because effectively defeating blocklists requires the anti-P2P to set up a dynamic series of colocation servers all over the world.

The financial burden of this substantial expense may have contributed greatly to bankrupting MediaDefender.

For that alone, blocklists are a P2P’s best friend.

By: Ezzy Elliott

Ezzy Elliott — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:44:51 +0000

lol, point taken. Have a look at the code (100% open source) at http://code.google.com/p/kerjodando/ .

Post specific points to blog http://kerjodando.blogspot.com/ .

BTW I don’t think anonymous p2p is the total answer to sham DCMA notices. It is a work round for now.

The solution is to change the law so that like the UK BBC licence fee is used to compensate TV companies in UK, a similar fee is collected to compensate IP owners on the internet.

Governments to promote development should be promoting the free flow of information not aiding ludites to keep the status quo.

By: lol

lol — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:20:14 +0000

ezzy, i keep thinking about trying dargens, but your website looks like a 4 year old designed it with some crayons. It doesn’t inspire confidence.

By: Monster_mack

Monster_mack — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 02:49:45 +0000

This study clearly shows, that anti-piracy groups are trying to manipulate people’s minds by using truly deceitful ways of collecting data on copyright infringers.
I am really glad, that there are people who can see through this bullshit and are not silent.

By: Ezzy Elliott

Ezzy Elliott — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 02:29:42 +0000

What does it mean to be law abiding?

Is it that you don’t break any law?

Can you break silly laws which harm no one?

Most people only come into contact with the law through traffic offences. There at least it is easy to see the point.

But sending legal notices to kids and young people to introduce them to the legal system is undernining the law.

Dargens
http://www.Dargens.com
Web UI Ad-Hoc Network

By: Hulk

Hulk — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:40:15 +0000

Well,

again I might add that the Opentracker software (run on TPB’s trackers) has a build in feature against these “indirect-evidence” (a.k.a. bullshit) collecting, inserting random IP’s in the tracker answer. Obviously BayTSP et al. are either to stupid to reckon the effect of this feature on their “evidence” collection, or they are ignorand about it, which might open the way for ligitation against them. Just in case a interested laywer needs more info to kick some MAFIAA-enforcers rectum:

http://opentracker.blog.h3q.com/?p=22