Comments on: Study Reveals Reckless Anti-Piracy Antics

By: daemonmatrix

daemonmatrix — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:13:23 +0000

I want to see a p2p client that auto detects RIAA etc then blocks them while also sending spoofed packets back telling them to connect to other detected anti-p2p companies and watch the chaos.

After all if their constantly changing their ip addresses to keep out of block lists how are they gonna keep track of each other ^_^

By: justin

justin — Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:55:17 +0000

sorry the CORRECT address is www.fileswire.com

By: Justin

Justin — Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:04:44 +0000

Already companies are devising ways round this. I found FilesWire the other day, there system is web-based so could be used from any internet connected computer. By spreading p2p usage between a few computers the powers that be will have to step up there efforts 3 fold to quantify indivisual p2p bandwith usage. You can find Web Based P2P Here

By: antip2pdude

antip2pdude — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:41:07 +0000

Well this is sad for the antip2p companies that does this, maybe they should look into another industry and try something new maybe something that doesn’t have todo with technology as much!

regards the nice antip2p dude :P

By: h33t

h33t — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 13:25:28 +0000

to Ben Jones the voice of the MAFIAA on torrentfreak:

if the title of the article was “how my printer received a DMCA notice” then you had a good and humorous article

however, the story wilted under your campaign against bluetack and ipfiltering

scientific method means everything to filesharers even if not to you. where are the study results and where are the test controls? where are the assumptions and limits? i say this report will make no change to anything

http://www.h33t.com

By: Anonymoose

Anonymoose — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:25:52 +0000

Someone needs to deal with BayTSP.
Mr Mark Ishikawa Thinks a little to highly of himself. perhaps some Anonymous lulz are in order for this man.

By: Tim

Tim — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:09:06 +0000

Does this mean those who didn’t settle out of court (if there are any) can get their money back or some form of compensatation? Their verdict was decided on false or unreliable evidence as a whole. I can’t see much other evidence they could provide on top off you were using this I.P on this Torrent at this time. I would expect my money back and more if it were me. Artists wouldn’t loose out if they had to pay back money as they never saw it anyway.

By: Norm

Norm — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:04:23 +0000

So wait, does this mean one can spoof the ip of some innocent person and get them in trouble for file sharing, even if they didn’t participate?

Lets spoof the IP of legislators until they get sued for filesharing. Maybe that will motivate them to change the law.

By: Rekrul

Rekrul — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:21:20 +0000

I’ll bet the printer was a Lexmark. There always was something shady about those things. ;)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:04:46 +0000

Good luck I don’t have a printer! Oh wait…