Comments on: Supreme Court Rules File-Sharer’s Identity Handed To Movie Companies

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:33:55 +0000

I don’t see why the lower court rulings “had” to be kept private. Does anyone understand why there were kept private?

By: Chinese Lacquer Chest » Blog Archive » Why you should get a Fireproof file Cabinet

Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:09:08 +0000

[...] Supreme Court Rules File-Sharer's Identity Handed To Movie … [...]

By: Traditional Painted Furniture » Blog Archive » What is a Credit Bureau

Traditional Painted Furniture » Blog Archive » What is a Credit Bureau — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 03:27:47 +0000

[...] Supreme Court Rules File-Sharer's Identity Handed To Movie … [...]

By: homie

homie — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:31:24 +0000

If you want to feel 100% secure while using VPN I suggest using these providers: anonine, strong vpn, ibvpn, hideipvpn and tuvpn.

Here, you will find a list of all the VPN providers: http://en.start-vpn.com/vpn-info/vpn-providers/

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:24:23 +0000

“as in Sweden. There the Pirate Bay ruling and the introduction of IPRED Act (ie the Swedish implementation of EU Directive on Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement) meant that music sales in 2009 increased by approximately 10%.”

Some people are still stupid enough to still believe what the corporation of parasites and liars are telling them.

Pathetic.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:21:27 +0000

I love Norway and I am sad to see that the industry has managed to corrupt the Norwegian government too.

Hopefully it will be temporary until the Norwegian people do something about this.

By: JLG

JLG — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:54:30 +0000

I am not happy about this decision. I happen to be Norwegian(and French) :P I saw the movie, and i think it was kinda average anyway. What i am not happy is i found out Espen Töndel lives in my friggin neighbourhood! I have seen him several times around..

By: Larwyn’s Linx: Obama’s New America — Running on Silly Fantasies | MorallyRight.org

Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:43:44 +0000

[...] Supreme Court Rules File-Sharer's Identity Handed To Movie … [...]

By: Una opinión más: Supreme Court Rules FileSharers Identity Handed Over

Una opinión más: Supreme Court Rules FileSharers Identity Handed Over — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 13:40:14 +0000

[...] has been made available and for both file-sharers and privacy advocates alike, the result isSource:http://torrentfreak.com/supreme-court-rules-file-sharers-identity-handed-to-movie-companies-100704/ Posted by Paola Fuentes at 06:40 Labels: file sharers, final decision, [...]

By: Sanity_Vocal

Sanity_Vocal — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 09:17:38 +0000

Well, this is one movie I know I will NOT be dling, nor will I be buying from the stores, nor watching it online or at theatres.

In fact, I’m going to ban myself from watching any movies or stuff whose owners take such drastic action.

Heck, I may just ban myself from getting anything from Norway.

Who knows what will happen next?

By: Filesharing 4ever!

Filesharing 4ever! — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 09:01:48 +0000

Sharing the movie “Max Manus” as we speak. With thousands and thousands of others.

By: Supreme Court's File Sharing Ruling

Supreme Court's File Sharing Ruling — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 08:53:44 +0000

[...] Via torrentfreak. com [...]

By: the rediqlous

the rediqlous — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 07:32:25 +0000

i m glad im not living in a first world country.
here in our country even though our download speed is only 60kbps, we dont have to worry about film makers chasing us.

By: Supreme Court Rules File-Sharer’s Identity Handed Over

Supreme Court Rules File-Sharer’s Identity Handed Over — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 03:45:55 +0000

[...] After two appeals, a file-sharing case in Norway with important privacy implications has gone all the way to the Supreme Court. The whole process has been shrouded in secrecy, with the results of each stage kept from the public. Now the final decision has been made available and for both file-sharers and privacy advocates alike, the result is unwelcome. Read ahead [...]

By: john

john — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 21:37:01 +0000

as in Sweden. There the Pirate Bay ruling and the introduction of IPRED Act (ie the Swedish implementation of EU Directive on Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement) meant that music sales in 2009 increased by approximately 10%.”

Remaining Story You Can Get Here:

http://www.mobigang.net/category/nokia-games/s-60v-5-games/

By: Ninja

Ninja — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 21:14:01 +0000

@10 Jul 04, 2010 at 19:52 by truth:
You are right. In fact, the 10% increase seems to follow the latest trends in revenue growth. MAFIAA and merry friends will not admit it, obviously.

I do pity the user of that specific IP. He is probably just a scapegoat since the real source must have used super-seeding making him/herself safe from the usual brainless assumptions MAFIAA makes (the first seeder is the source, one download equals one lost sale etc).

Despicable as always. And seems Norway judicial system needs reforming…

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 21:13:44 +0000

@10 Jul 04, 2010 at 19:52 by truth:
You are right. In fact, the 10% increase seems to follow the latest trends in revenue growth. MAFIAA and merry friends will not admit it, obviously.

Despicable as always. And seems Norway judicial system needs reforming…

By: Norwegian

Norwegian — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 20:29:19 +0000

1/4 of Norways population bought a ticket to see it, and all they got was 2 hours of movie and a lifetime of surveillance from greedy lawyers.

By: J

Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:28:38 +0000

Obviously this movie company is acting irrational and dangerous. Adapt to the new environment industry don´t try to create fear.

If you want to feel 100% secure while using VPN I suggest using this freeware:
vpncheck.jothodesign.com

By: Paralegal In Mississauga | Personal Injury Lawyers Brisbane

Paralegal In Mississauga | Personal Injury Lawyers Brisbane — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:12:04 +0000

[...] Supreme Court Rules File-Sharer's Identity Handed To Movie … [...]

By: 3h

3h — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:09:11 +0000

@8 Why’s it you fucker always post a link to anon-surfing.at.tc? it’s not like it protects beetr than ipredator or swissvpn etc.. but you specifically picked one that’s listed under scam by WOT (Firefox pulg-in)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:07:01 +0000

What is amazing is that these corporate parasites are going right into the wall and they don’t seem to understand this.

Hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe.

Obviously USA is not the only country that have to dismiss his current government and replace it.

By: truth

truth — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 17:52:05 +0000

10% growth could be due to population growth or music lacking DRM (Digitally Restricted Media) being made available online. Saying that it is due to Orwellian oversight of the internet, by privately held corporations does not make it true.

By: some dude

some dude — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 17:08:38 +0000

not long till we will see some norwegian pirate party grow up to be huge…

By: Jimy Dean

Jimy Dean — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 15:42:56 +0000

Wow, thats downright scary dude.

anon-surfing.at.tc

By: Joe Biden

Joe Biden — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 15:06:17 +0000

Who’d have thunk it?

By: File-Sharer’s Identity Handed To Movie Companies After Supreme Court Decision | Systema

Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:34:02 +0000

[...] “A sort of perversely inverted Kinder Egg…”. [...]

By: RoestVrijStaal

RoestVrijStaal — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:32:20 +0000

In developing countries, there is freedom.

In developed countries, there is dictatorship.

By: Tweets that mention Supreme Court Rules File-Sharer’s Identity Handed To Movie Companies | TorrentFreak -- Topsy.com

Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:19:01 +0000

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TorrentFreak and others. TorrentFreak said: Supreme Court Rules File-Sharer’s Identity Handed To Movie Companies http://bit.ly/8XztBG [...]

By: Freedom.Fighter

Freedom.Fighter — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:14:33 +0000

CEO Marte Thorsby. “Hopefully the fact that we now have the opportunity to pursue civil illegal file sharing cases in Norway will provide the same results here as in Sweden. There the Pirate Bay ruling and the introduction of IPRED Act (ie the Swedish implementation of EU Directive on Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement) meant that music sales in 2009 increased by approximately 10%.”

What kind of an argument is that? IPRED has lead to 1 case since it’s inception, and the Pirate Bay ruling only lead to huge increases in traffic. Neither of these events had what the Pro-Copyright groups would consider positive results. The Pirate Bay is still sailing, and if the Pirate Party gets a seat it’s going to stay floating for a long time. Piracy is at record highs, so the 10% increase cannot possibly be labeled as a corollary from any scientific or mathematic stand-point. This is going to be an issue for free speech and privacy. Companies should not have the right to affect the law.

By: J

Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:04:24 +0000

Shouldn’t be long now… REVOLUTIOOOON!

By: *D

*D — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:01:38 +0000

Laws. Who needs them?
It only works in favor of mafiaa and money anyway.

Fuck’em and share/download the sh1t out of everything, dudes and dudettes.

Try to stop millions stupid assclowns.

By: anonymous

anonymous — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:51:19 +0000

hopefully, the idiot film maker has just signed his own career death warrant (metaforically speaking). if he never sells another disk and no one goes to see or hire future works, perhaps he will then realise what an absolute f*****g nob-brain he has been and how big a can of worms he has opened. i wonder how long it will be before his personal privacy, not work, is invaded and how he will react. bet he wont be a happy bunny. and as for Espen Tøndel, he is just a lying arsehole, who should never be allowed to practice law!

By: Aman

Aman — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:41:46 +0000

I am not so surprised with rejection from Supreme Court.