TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Survey Shows Huge Demand for Legal P2P

A recent study on the music consumption habits of today’s youth shows that most of them download music illegally. However, music is more popular than ever and 80 percent of the participants indicate that they would pay for a legal filesharing service, if only one was available.

The survey, conducted by British Music Rights among 773 British respondents between the age of 14-24, shows some interesting results. The survey tapped into the music consumption habits of young people and results suggest that most of them would be interested in paying for a decent “legal” filesharing service.

Technology has made it easier for everyone to enjoy, and share music. The Internet has changed the way people interact with music. Sites like OiNK made it easy to find and share virtually every piece of music ever produced. Services like last.fm made it easy to discover new artists and interact with other fans.

Music might be more popular than ever among today’s youth. Indeed, the survey shows that the vast majority of the younger generation owns an MP3 player nowadays, including up to 93% of 14-17 year olds. If people had to pick three items to take with them to a desert island, 73% would take their music collection.

For most participants these music collections are acquired illegally, as the study shows that 63% – nearly two-thirds of the respondents – use filesharing services to download copyrighted music. On average they download 53 tracks a month, but some of the heavy downloaders say they download up to 5,000 tracks a month.

The average MP3 collection contains 1,770 tracks but some contained as many as
75,000. The average size of the music collection does not differ among age groups but there is a huge different in the proportion of pirated vs. paid music. The younger participants, aged 14-17, indicated that over 60% of their collection consisted of pirated music, compared to 13% for the age group 25 and up.

The survey also explored whether people would be interested in paid filesharing services that offer licensed tracks. Of all the participants, 73% said they would be interested in such a service and that figure went up to 80% for the people who already use filesharing services.

The respondents indicated that they are most interested in “download to own” services, streaming services are less popular with only 35% expressing an interest. The study further shows that people would continue to buy CDs and visit concerts if they were allowed to share legally, mostly because they want to support certain artists.

British Music Right Concludes from their survey: “There is a terrific opportunity for the music industry to grasp right now. This survey shows just how much respondents love and value music, and
highlights that a significant amount of that value is currently unmonetised.”

We couldn’t agree more with this conclusion, as we have said time and time again. The Internet and filesharing technologies make it possible to make production (of the copies) and distribution costs disappear, yet the prices still don’t change. Why? Because the industry insists on clinging onto its old business models.

The music industry should focus on monetizing filesharing networks instead of bringing them down. Sharing is a good thing and there are tons of possibilities to profit from it.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Strange..

    Last I knew, P2P was legal in many countries.

  • Sharing

    Sharing is caring

  • Peter Green

    I say they should allow free downloading for personal use.

  • ass

    ME TO Peter Green

  • qm2003

    Lets do the time warp.

    I demand pre dcma times !

  • Jolidog

    On other news, scientists ran a study and came to the conclusion that Water is in fact WET!

  • adam

    with all the free music online youtube and everywhere else who needs to use p2p anyways? you can find albums without bitorrent or limewire. you just got to look, imeem last fm and others. if you search hard enough you can find anything.

  • YATTI

    Its not like they can’t stop selling cds… If they diddnt create thousands of excess cds they probably wouldnt lose so much..

    @ adam… You are completly correct.. Its scary what my nieces can do with youtube…

    @ #1 (Strange..) The music industry is holding on… The Canadian DMCA is one of their latest efforts.. If this continues we will have no countries left lol..

    Just remember all… The Pirate Bay will never die…

    Long Live P2P!…

  • Anonymous

    If something like OiNk existed for a reasonable fee (all different formats and all) I would gladly pay for it. However, the music industry believes it is fine for me to pay $15 for a CD, which I don’t want due to the general annoyance of it (I’m always on the run and I don’t have anywhere to store them). Or I can pay $10 for a shitty MP3 rip. I want LOSSLESS rips that are PERFECT and affordable. Until then, the RIAA can kiss my money goodbye.

  • Anonymous

    Indeed, it is the control that is just terrible. People should be able to do what they want with their music files, including edit, redistribute, mix, or in some other way CHANGE and show to others. The music industry doesn’t seem to get it.

  • blah

    If something like OiNk existed for a reasonable fee (all different formats and all) I would gladly pay for it. However, the music industry believes it is fine for me to pay $15 for a CD, which I don’t want due to the general annoyance of it (I’m always on the run and I don’t have anywhere to store them). Or I can pay $10 for a shitty MP3 rip. I want LOSSLESS rips that are PERFECT and affordable. Until then, the RIAA can kiss my money goodbye.

    +1 :)

    It needs to be DRM free too & FLAC!

  • andyness

    Let me answer the questions:
    How many tracks is your music collection? About 30 000.

    How many is aquired legal? I’d say 0,01%.

    Would you pay for a legal service? No way. What I would do would have been a monthly fee to get access to a service where I can download for free.

  • Binsy

    I agree with this one hundred percent. The only reason “pirate” communities exist is because they are filling a gap in the market. I made a film about this as part of my uni degree this year. Its called “SharingMusic” and is about the past present and future of the music industry. Check it out at google videos if you’re interested.

  • Sharing is a good thing

    ‘and there’s lots of possibilities to monetize it?’

    Sharing is caring, is free. If its monetized, its not sharing, closest is SELLING a copy using file sharing PROTOCOL, not sharing!

    Get your words right!

  • http://www.eZee.se www.eZee.se

    @sharing, you said it brother.

    @Peter Green, many people have been saying that for years, problem is the right people dont hear it or choose to ignore it.

    @Jolidog, LOL, thanks…i needed that!

    Just feels like we have been shouting from the towers for ages telling these morons they can have our money… but instead of 15 bucks stright up by one guy buying their product and 40 ignoring it they get the same 15 bucks by 20 taking it and fewer ignoring it… but noooooo they want to make a killing at it _NOW_ and want us to buy their CDs which just takes up damn space.

    Plus they would even save on distribution and physical manifacturing costs because its online, plus it would be good for the environment…

    Anyway, why am i repeating something we all know… maybe coz its just so feking frustrating.

    cheers!

    http://www.eZee.se – Copyright is copyWRONG

  • justice

    P2P is legal and has never been against the law.

    The files on P2P are illegal.

    Misleading headline.

  • Damn

    @ 9:

    I agree with you :)

    Just had to say

  • [-jesus-]

    If a company does come out with “legal” p2p they will most likely end up capping the amount of songs you are allowed to download anyways…

  • web design company

    They have a wonderful money-making system right in front of their faces and refuse it. Idiots.

  • Peter P

    I believe in free alternatives to CDs and tapes just as there’s always been. In the digital age, the internet and file sharing make that possible.

    If the law required that I pay for that; a reasonable amount like say 50c an album, then I would pay it. Even at that rate I wouldn’t be able to afford much, since I am poor and its already hard enough just to survive, with the existing costs of being online also.

    However, the music industry already extorts money through various PC related channels, and besides, all the millions they’ve scammed from litigation and ripping off artists more than covers the value of p2p activity, so the leeches deserve to have it taken off them, not constantly streamed in.

  • BlanK

    I’d like some legal music sharing, if the music industry doesn’t get any of my money. Only people who get my money are the artists if I happen to like them.

  • Peter P

    @12. Why would you pay for that when it’s probably still called illegal, and only offers you peace of mind and a false sense of security?

  • Squeak

    It’s not about money. It’s about control. The **AA’s want to CONTROL the people by controlling the music.

  • Finn

    They did a pretty same survey in Finland some time ago and almost everybody was interested in pay n’ all you can eat service. 80% on the people had downloaded entertainment illegally and every tenth was at sope point the original seeder/releaser. Nothing new here, move along :)

  • a/s/l

    ummm, i certainly wouldn’t pay for a p2p service, i like getting things for free and will continue to do so. ebooks, applications, movies, TV shows, music, sheet music – i can get it all with torrents. why would i want to pay for it? i will never ever pay for a computer file, there will ALWAYS be a way to get stuff for free and i will ALWAYS take that option, no-one should be suckered into paying for digital music and video. i feel sorry for and pity those who buy all their music from itunes. if i’m going to buy music i’ll either buy a ticket to see a live show or buy a vinyl (or CD if the vinyl ain’t available).

  • a/s/l

    not to mention there would be a major seeding problem on a pay-for p2p service. if i was paying to download stuff i certainly wouldn’t be uploading it too, after all i’d have done my bit for the service by paying for it, why should i waste my bandwidth by voluntarily seeding? and if the service providers demanded similar seeding requirements to private trackers i don’t think they’d do much business.

  • Wildclaw

    Any service that would try to replace my use of free p2p would have to compete (yes compete) in several areas. Here is what free p2p provides for me:

    * Near instant availability – No need to go to the store to buy something

    * Very large selection – From software to music to tv to movies. There is a lot availible, far more than any legal download service that focuses on a single small area, and even within that area only have a small part of everything due to legal issues.

    * Constant price – That p2p is free isn’t as important as it being a constant price, independent on how much I use it. I hate having to select between two pieces of information that can be copied indefinitly just because I couldn’t afford both. Price per item simply doesn’t make sense on (near) infinitly replicatable goods.

    * Good Service – Distributors on p2p usually provide products with good quality and no restrictions focusing on providing the best experience for everyone. Meanwhile legal services seems to do everything they can to prevent you from using information you buy as you want, using techniques such as properitary formats, DRM and streaming to dictate usage.

    I may have missed something, but I think the above represent the big points for many people. I know that I won’t budge on any of the above.

  • rade

    “The Internet and filesharing technologies make it possible to make production (of the copies) and distribution costs disappear, yet the prices still don’t change. Why?”

    -good frikin question.

    PS Right on Peter Green

  • dr00py Nutz

    “music is more popular than ever”

    who writes this shit? and why do i continue to read it?

  • John Bluefoot

    Legal P2P? Where the heck is the fun in that? All you’ll be able to get is a bunch of Mickey Mouse songs! No thanks. I’ll pass.

    JT
    http://www.FIreMe.to/udi

  • Reacto

    P2P is legal already…

  • @ 6

    haha!

  • ron burgandy

    I doubt there’s a HUGE amount of money to be made in the sector… I mean, unless you fill torrents with crappy “1millionth downloader” ads

  • Baux

    Was this poll taken in Valhalla (Sweden)?

  • Lord of Pirates

    If you’re going to pay to share stuff, why not just buy it in the first place? People aren’t the brightest sometimes, not to mention that if it were getting licensed music, the only thing corporations seem to care about for filesharing, then they would probably remove other content.

  • Anonymous

    “If people had to pick three items to take with them to a desert island, 73% would take their music collection.”
    What about picking a helicopter, a shitload of fuel and a ship (a huge one)?

  • D-VRX

    Why pay for commercial file sharing when there are far superior protocols out there.

  • yellapieman

    niniff.com/?YIT

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.