<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TorrentFreak &#187; encrypted_transfers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/tag/encrypted_transfers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:38:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Rogers Fights BitTorrent by Throttling All Encrypted Transfers</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/rogers-fighting-bittorrent-by-throttling-all-encrypted-transfers/</link>
		<comments>http://torrentfreak.com/rogers-fighting-bittorrent-by-throttling-all-encrypted-transfers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ernesto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM and Other Evil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Off The Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azureus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encrypted_connections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encrypted_traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encrypted_transfers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic_shaping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utorrent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/rogers-fighting-bittorrent-by-throttling-all-encrypted-transfers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In its ongoing war against BitTorrent, Canadian ISP Rogers decided to throttle all encrypted traffic. ISPs and BitTorrent client developers are playing an ongoing cat-and-mouse game, but Rogers really crosses the line here. A very bold move, to say the least, which affects not only BitTorrent users, but everyone who is using encrypted transfers. <p>Source: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com">TorrentFreak</a>, for the latest info on <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/copyright-issues/">copyright</a>, <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/pirate-talk/">file-sharing</a> and <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/which-vpn-services-take-your-anonymity-seriously-2014-edition-140315/">anonymous VPN services</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://torrentfreak.com//images/rogers.gif" align="right" alt="rogers canada internet bittorrent encryption"><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/canadian-isp-is-throttling-bittorrent-traffic/">Last year</a> Rogers was one of the first ISPs to throttle BitTorrent traffic because it generated &#8220;too much&#8221; bandwidth. The developers of uTorrent and Azureus soon countered this move and <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/encrypting-BitTorrent-to-take-out-traffic-shapers/">added support for encrypted transfers</a> to their clients, that&#8217;s where the cat-and-mouse game started. Encryption seemed to work for well for most Rogers clients, until this week. </p>
<p>Rogers realized that the bit-shaping applications they were using to limit the traffic that is generated by BitTorrent weren&#8217;t effective anymore, and started to <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1859/125/">throttle all encrypted transfers</a> as well. As a consequence, people have trouble connecting to encrypted e-mail services, and other applications that rely on encrypted connections. </p>
<p>Rogers is <a href="http://www.azureuswiki.com/index.php/ISPs_that_are_bad_for_BT">not the only ISP</a> that tries to cut down the BitTorrent traffic. Last year we had a discussion whether traffic shaping is <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/traffic-shaping-good-or-bad/">good or bad</a>, and both BitTorrent users and ISPs had some good arguments. However, limiting all encrypted transfers is a completely different story, it affects a wide range of customers, not only the ones using BitTorrent.</p>
<p>What makes it even more ridiculous is that Rogers still advertises with the slogan <strong>&#8220;for sharing large files and much more&#8221;</strong>. Last time I checked BitTorrent was still the best way to share large files, but I guess the people at Rogers don&#8217;t want their customers to share large files after all. </p>
<p>Rogers&#8217; competitor Shaw is also limiting BitTorrent traffic, but at least they still leave encrypted traffic untouched (for now).</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com">TorrentFreak</a>, for the latest info on <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/copyright-issues/">copyright</a>, <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/pirate-talk/">file-sharing</a> and <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/which-vpn-services-take-your-anonymity-seriously-2014-edition-140315/">anonymous VPN services</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://torrentfreak.com/rogers-fighting-bittorrent-by-throttling-all-encrypted-transfers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
