<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TorrentFreak &#187; fac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/tag/fac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:38:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>James Blunt: Disconnecting Music Pirates is &#8220;Critical&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/james-blunt-disconnecting-music-pirates-is-critical-090921/</link>
		<comments>http://torrentfreak.com/james-blunt-disconnecting-music-pirates-is-critical-090921/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[enigmax]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Off The Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Blunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lily Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Mandelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An increasing number of British musicians are making their opinions known on the issue of illicit file-sharing. Despite Peter Mandelson's proposals which ostensibly support the music industry, musicians are divided. Today it's the turn of James Blunt, who feels the proposed "disconnection" legislation is critical to the industry's survival.<p>Source: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com">TorrentFreak</a>, for the latest info on <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/copyright-issues/">copyright</a>, <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/pirate-talk/">file-sharing</a> and <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/which-vpn-services-take-your-anonymity-seriously-2014-edition-140315/">anonymous VPN services</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sir, I want to put my hand up in support of Lily Allen. She’s asking British musicians to galvanise over a serious crime: the death of a great British industry — our music business. The world over, people are stealing music in its millions in the form of illegal file-sharing. It’s easy to do, and has become accepted by many, but people need to know that it is destroying people’s livelihoods and suffocating emerging British artists.&#8221;</p>
<p>These are the words of singer songwriter James Blunt in <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/letters/article6841788.ece">The Times</a> today, in response to the <a href="http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&#038;friendId=36707169&#038;blogId=510114316">opinions</a> of Lily Allen published and republished a thousand times last week. Allen had taken a swipe at Radiohead&#8217;s Ed O&#8217;Brien and Nick Mason, the Pink Floyd drummer, after they came out and said that file-sharing is beneficial for artists.</p>
<p>Both O&#8217;Brien and Mason are members of the Featured Artists Coalition (FAC), which <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/artists-dont-want-pirate-fans-to-be-disconnected-090518/">opposes</a> plans by Peter Mandelson to disconnect persistent file-sharers, but they are becoming quite a problem for the rest of the industry.</p>
<p>The major labels, who hold the opposite opinion on the issue of unauthorized downloading, have been in intensive talks with FAC over the last week, trying to reach some sort of consensus on the way ahead. Somehow the music industry needs to show a united front to the government, but at the moment that seems very unlikely. Yesterday FAC said that so far they have failed to find a way forward with the rest of the industry.</p>
<p>“[The] power to demand suspensions of accounts is only achievable through a wide-scale invasion of personal privacy which we believe would result in a dangerous reduction in the rights to protection of the individual. Putting this power in place would reduce the civil liberties of every one of us in the country in order to afford a disincentive threat to a small minority of ‘egregious offenders’. We believe this would be both disproportionate and unenforceable,&#8221; said FAC in a statement.</p>
<p>FAC said that while it negotiated with the labels all last week, they cannot be moved from their insistence that file-sharers should be disconnected from the Internet. FAC says it is steadfast in its opposition to this route.</p>
<p>In an attempt to soften their edges and appear less aggressive, UK Music, yet another music industry umbrella organization, has removed the actual word &#8220;disconnection&#8221; from its press releases and statements. However, even a cursory glance at their current wording shows that this omission is purely cosmetic, instead stating: &#8220;&#8230;..Ofcom should be granted appropriate and proportionate powers as directed by the secretary of state.&#8221; Of course, Ofcom are the people that are being proposed to have the power to disconnect file-sharers.</p>
<p>So as FAC and the British public stand on one side, Peter Mandelson, the record labels and the likes of Lily Allen and now James Blunt stand on the other.</p>
<p>&#8220;At long last the Government is looking to legislate to protect the industry,&#8221; writes Blunt, while completely forgetting that the UK has some perfectly good copyright laws to deal with, surprisingly, copyright infringement.</p>
<p>&#8220;Peter Mandelson is looking to engage the internet service providers who, in my opinion, handle stolen goods, and should take much more responsibility,&#8221; Blunt continues, while forgetting that as a carrier, under the law ISPs have no responsibility for the traffic they carry or the actions of their subscribers.</p>
<p>&#8220;How this legislation pans out, and if it goes through at all, is critical to the survival of the British music business; critical to thousands of jobs; and critical to our ability to nurture and develop great musicians and the songs and albums that we would hope to listen to in the future,&#8221; Blunt concludes.</p>
<p>Bringing in draconian laws to scare the public into buying music is not the answer. Taking away people&#8217;s Internet is definitely not the solution. The labels need to realize this and instead provide some high quality all-you-can-eat music services at a price that everyone can afford.</p>
<p>And as UK ISP Virgin Media sends its message to the government that a &#8220;heavy-handed, punitive regime will simply alienate consumers&#8221; and that &#8220;persuasion not coercion&#8221; is the key to solving this illicit file-sharing &#8216;problem&#8217;,  I&#8217;ll end with a few lines from martial artist and best-selling author Geoff Thompson&#8217;s book <em>Watch My Back</em>, as he writes about a gang trying to impose their will on others;</p>
<p><em>This crew had gained respect in the city, but it was respect born through fear; stolen not given. Respect is worthless unless it&#8217;s earned. Any half-wit can point a loaded gun and demand respect but it brings hate with it. Real respect encourages co-operation and understanding</em></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com">TorrentFreak</a>, for the latest info on <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/copyright-issues/">copyright</a>, <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/pirate-talk/">file-sharing</a> and <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/which-vpn-services-take-your-anonymity-seriously-2014-edition-140315/">anonymous VPN services</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://torrentfreak.com/james-blunt-disconnecting-music-pirates-is-critical-090921/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>163</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Artists Strike Back at Greedy Music Labels</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/top-artists-strike-back-at-greedy-music-labels-090311/</link>
		<comments>http://torrentfreak.com/top-artists-strike-back-at-greedy-music-labels-090311/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ernesto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Off The Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=10835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years music industry lobbyists, headed by the RIAA, have gone after illegal file-sharers - supposedly in the best interests of the artists. Unexpectedly, a group of top musicians has started its very own lobby group to avoid being exploited by these very same record labels, who tend to abuse copyrights for their own sake.<p>Source: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com">TorrentFreak</a>, for the latest info on <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/copyright-issues/">copyright</a>, <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/pirate-talk/">file-sharing</a> and <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/which-vpn-services-take-your-anonymity-seriously-2014-edition-140315/">anonymous VPN services</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The music industry and its lobbyists often claim they protect the right of artists with their copyright extension plans and anti-piracy efforts. In reality, however, they tend to ignore the people who actually create the music, while making sure that a steady flow of cash goes into the pockets of the label&#8217;s bosses.</p>
<p>In an attempt to have their voices heard, a group of leading musicians have started their own lobby group, the <a href="http://www.featuredartistscoalition.com/">Featured Artists Coalition</a> (FAC). The group includes members such as Robbie Williams, Radiohead and Travis and aims to end the extortion-like practices of the record labels and allow artist to gain more control over their own work.</p>
<p>Last year, Travis experienced the aggressiveness of the labels <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/travis-defends-fan-from-ifpi-threats-080731/">first hand</a>. When the band encouraged fans to share one of their songs with friends, IFPI went after a fan who posted the song on his website. The IFPI realized that it made a mistake and backed off, but it clearly shows that the labels are out of touch with reality. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, the example above is just the tip of the iceberg. In Europe, music industry lobbyists have managed to strike deals with Internet service providers to go after those people who download music illegally. The artists were never involved in these negotiations though, and many of them oppose the aggressive stance of the labels which turns fans into criminals.</p>
<p>“The digital landscape is changing fast and new deals are being struck all the time, but all too often without reference to the people who actually make the music. Just look at the recent MoU on file-sharing between labels, government and the ISPs. Artists were not involved,&#8221; Brian Message, co-manager of Radiohead said.</p>
<p>Similarly, Europe is currently planning to extend copyright on audio recordings from <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/music-copyright-pension-extension-moves-forward-090213/">50 to 95 years</a>, gently pushed by music industry lobbyists of course. Again, the musicians prefer a lowering of the current copyright term to 35 years instead. </p>
<p>The artists feel that the record labels are using copyright on the artists&#8217; work to their advantage, restricting free access. “It’s like taking out a mortgage on a house, paying off the mortgage and you still don’t end up owning the house,” Radiohead guitarist Ed O’Brien <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/article5883885.ece">said</a>. </p>
<p>Another worry for the artist is the revenue on digital sales. Quite often, the deals record labels make for selling music online are vague and the artists don&#8217;t get paid at all. Last year we already reported on one such artist who found his music on iTunes, but <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/pirated-by-itunes-artist-turns-to-bittorrent-080206/">never received a penny</a>. Frustrated, he decided to upload his music onto BitTorrent sites so people could download it for free.</p>
<p>According to Radiohead&#8217;s Ed O’Brien, who&#8217;s also a member of the newly formed lobby group, this is not an isolated incident. “The music companies did a deal with Nokia recently, so they could launch phones with access to all sorts of music. We think they all received advances from Nokia, but nobody is saying who got what &#8211; and we think some of that money should go to the artists,” he said. </p>
<p>The newly formed lobby of top musicians hopes to set the record straight, and is demanding fair compensation for all artists. They believe musicians should have control over their own work instead of being the puppets of record label bosses. We can&#8217;t say that we blame them.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com">TorrentFreak</a>, for the latest info on <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/copyright-issues/">copyright</a>, <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/pirate-talk/">file-sharing</a> and <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/which-vpn-services-take-your-anonymity-seriously-2014-edition-140315/">anonymous VPN services</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://torrentfreak.com/top-artists-strike-back-at-greedy-music-labels-090311/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
