<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TorrentFreak &#187; fake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/tag/fake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com</link>
	<description>Torrent News, Torrent Sites and the latest Scoops</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:13:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>MediaDefender&#8217;s Decoy Effectiveness on BitTorrent Sites</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/mediadefender-decoy-effectiveness-on-bittorrent-sites-070922/</link>
		<comments>http://torrentfreak.com/mediadefender-decoy-effectiveness-on-bittorrent-sites-070922/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ernesto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-Piracy Gangs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Off The Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torrent Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediadefender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/mediadefender-decoy-effectiveness-on-bittorrent-sites-070922/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MediaDefender's <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/mediadefender-emails-leaked-070915/">email</a> and <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/mediadefender-anti-piracy-tools-leaked-070920/">anti piracy tool</a> leaks gave the world a unique insight into the workings and the effectiveness of their BitTorrent decoy operations. So how effective <em>were</em> they? And which sites were best protected against these fake torrents? Let's find out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://torrentfreak.com//images/media-defenders.jpg" title="This is really Fucked!" align="right" alt="MediaDefender's Decoy Effectiveness on BitTorrent Sites" />MediaDefender determines the effectiveness of their spoofs and decoys by analyzing the top search results for the file in question, mostly movies and music albums. If 2 out of 10 top search results are fake files spread by them, their effectiveness is 20% on that particular BitTorrent site. Their goals is of course to get as many fake files in there, hoping people will end up downloading useless data.</p>
<p>There is a lot of variance in the reported effectiveness between BitTorrent sites and the different decoy projects. We scanned through most of the reports and it seems that <a href="http://thepiratebay.org">The Pirate Bay</a> and <a href="http://mininova.org">Mininova</a> were best protected against fake files whereas MediaDefender was more effective on sites like BiteNova and TorrentPortal. </p>
<p>Niek from Mininova, the toughest site to get onto according to MediaDefender, wrote a <a href="http://blog.mininova.org/articles/2007/09/15/about-the-mediadefender-leaked-emails/">blog post</a> in response to the leaked MediaDefender emails. He sums up some of the quotes that show how well protected Mininova is. Niek adds, &#8220;We can only be grateful for the many nice words from our friends at MediaDefender. All thanks go to our great moderating team, who did (and do) great work.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Pirate Bay has always been one of MediaDefender&#8217;s main targets because this site is often mentioned in the press. Unfortunately for MediaDefender The Pirate Bay is also one of the sites that is well protected against fake files. </p>
<p>In July, Brokep from The Pirate Bay <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/the-piratebay-wants-mediadefender-to-walk-the-bankruptcy-plank/">already told us</a> that they were doing all they can to block Media Defender from accessing their trackers. &#8220;We block them and some other torrent sites do as well.&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>This apparently annoyed MediaDefender, as we can see from one of their emails regarding the effectiveness of their decoys for Micheal Moore&#8217;s Sicko: &#8220;we still have no presence on Pirate bay which is a site they [Weinstein?] are likely watching as it was mentioned in the AdAge article they referenced.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here is an example of an effectiveness report for &#8220;Fantastic 4: Rise of the Silver Surfer&#8221; based on the top search results. Note that an effectiveness of 100% means that all the torrents that showed up in the search results (top 6/10/15) were fake. </p>
<blockquote><p>BiteNova: 100%<br />
Bittorrent.am 27%<br />
Btjunkie 20%<br />
Btmon 15%<br />
BushTorrent 100%<br />
ExtraTorrent 47%<br />
Fenopy 100%<br />
FlixFlux 23%<br />
FullDLS 32%<br />
IsoHunt 100%<br />
Meganova 100%<br />
Mininova 0%<br />
Monova 35%<br />
MyBittorrent 91%<br />
NewTorrents 0%<br />
Novatina 98%<br />
PirateBay 0%<br />
Snarf-it 74%<br />
TorrentBox 32%<br />
TorrentLocomotive 47%<br />
TorrentPortal 100%<br />
TorrentReactor 0%<br />
TorrentSpy 4%<br />
TorrentValley 77%<br />
TorrentView 27%<br />
Torrentz 22%<br />
Underground 0%<br />
WorldNova 97%<br />
Yotoshi 92%</p></blockquote>
<p>Article from: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com">TorrentFreak</a>, check out our new blog at <a href="http://freakbits.com">FreakBits</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://torrentfreak.com/mediadefender-decoy-effectiveness-on-bittorrent-sites-070922/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
