<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TorrentFreak &#187; preformance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/tag/preformance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com</link>
	<description>Torrent News, Torrent Sites and the latest Scoops</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:55:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How BitTorrent Clients Slow Down Windows</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/how-bittorrent-clients-slow-down-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://torrentfreak.com/how-bittorrent-clients-slow-down-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ernesto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bittorrent Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Off The Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azureus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bitcomet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preformance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/how-bittorrent-clients-slow-down-windows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In general BitTorrent clients are not the most &#8220;resource using&#8221; applications. But how do they actually affect, and slow down Windows? Thepcspy compared the three most popular BitTorrent clients. And it seems that uTorrent is indeed entitled to be called &#8220;the lightweight client&#8221;. The mean boot time of Azureus, Bitcomet and uTorrent were compared on [...]<p>Source: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/how-bittorrent-clients-slow-down-windows/">How BitTorrent Clients Slow Down Windows</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In general BitTorrent clients are not the most &#8220;resource using&#8221; applications. But how do they actually affect, and slow down Windows? </p>
<p><a href="http://www.thepcspy.com/articles/other/what_slows_windows_down/3">Thepcspy</a> compared the three most popular BitTorrent clients. And it seems that <a href="http://www.utorrent.com/">uTorrent</a> is indeed entitled to be called &#8220;the lightweight client&#8221;.</p>
<p>The mean boot time of Azureus, Bitcomet and uTorrent were compared on a Windows XP Pro clean install. </p>
<li><strong>Azureus</strong> 2.5.0.0 (+ Java Runtime) was slowing windows down the most. The test revealed a delay in the average boot time of <strong>4.44%</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Bitcomet</strong> came in second with an average delay of 1.67 seconds, that is a slowdown of <strong>2.22%</strong>. </li>
<li><strong>uTorrent</strong> is the winner of these three BitTorrent clients, adding 1.33 seconds to Windows&#8217; average boot time. A <strong>1.78%</strong> slowdown, almost three times less than Azureus.  </li>
<p>However, to put things into perspective, Norton Internet Security 2006 caused a 57.78% slowdown.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/how-bittorrent-clients-slow-down-windows/">How BitTorrent Clients Slow Down Windows</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://torrentfreak.com/how-bittorrent-clients-slow-down-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

