<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TorrentFreak &#187; quantum computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/tag/quantum-computing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 19:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Could Quantum Computing Kill Copyright?</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/could-quantum-computing-kill-copyright-110731/</link>
		<comments>http://torrentfreak.com/could-quantum-computing-kill-copyright-110731/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 11:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Jones]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speculation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=37923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The basis of copyright law is individuality and creativity. Yet ever increasing computing power and storage space could mean that in just a few short years, computing could throw copyright into chaos.<p>Source: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com">TorrentFreak</a>, for the latest info on <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/copyright-issues/">copyright</a>, <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/pirate-talk/">file-sharing</a> and <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/which-vpn-services-take-your-anonymity-seriously-2014-edition-140315/">anonymous VPN services</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/images/quantum_computing_sm.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-37925" title="quantum_computing_sm" src="http://torrentfreak.com/images/quantum_computing_sm-150x142.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="142"></a>The relationship between technology and law is a difficult one. Law attempts to put rigid walls around society, to define can and cannot. Technology, on the other hand, attempts to turn cannot into can.</p>
<p>Making it even harder is the reality that laws tend to lag about a decade behind technology. It took 10 years for the legality of the video cassette to be <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betamax_case" target="_blank">decided</a>, and even now new laws are being <a title="Anti-Piracy Bill a Threat to Innovation and Free Speech, U.S. Senator Says." href="http://torrentfreak.com/anti-piracy-bill-a-threat-to-innovation-and-free-speech-u-s-senator-says-110527/">written</a> to deal with P2P, a decade after BitTorrent was first <a title="BitTorrent Turns 10: Happy Birthday!" href="http://torrentfreak.com/bittorrent-turns-10-110702/">debuted</a>.</p>
<p>While these two technologies have caused problems for copyright owners, by disrupting the status-quo around distribution, the incredibly fast growth in both computing power and storage could soon lead to a fundamental shake-up in copyright.</p>
<p>As it stands in US law (and remember, US law <a title="U.S. Resume Controversial File-Sharing Domain Seizures (Updated)" href="http://torrentfreak.com/us-resume-file-sharing-domain-seizures-110201/">rules</a> throughout the world, &nbsp;even if it&#8217;s <a title="Sports Streaming / Torrent Links Site Victorious in Court" href="http://torrentfreak.com/sports-streaming-torrent-links-site-victorious-in-court-100510/">legal</a>, or you&#8217;ve <a title="TVShack: The Human Cost of Extradition, a Mother’s Story" href="http://torrentfreak.com/tvshack-the-human-cost-of-extradition-a-mothers-story-110712/">not been there</a> in decades) the creator of a picture is the copyright holder. Even if you drop the resolution, or reduce the number of colours to simpler shades, it is still <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110625/01030814852/if-jay-maisels-photograph-is-original-artwork-then-so-is-pixelated-cover-kind-bloop.shtml" target="_blank">considered</a> by many to be under the original copyright.</p>
<p>So, what if you could create every possible picture? What if you took a fairly low resolution (say 500&#215;500) and a reasonably low colour mix (say 256 colours) and tried to create every single image? What then would be the state of copyright? It&#8217;s the visual&nbsp;equivalent&nbsp;of the&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem" target="_blank">infinite&nbsp;monkey theorem</a>.</p>
<p>If you could do it, then the project would own all the copyrights, to every image not already copyrighted. Furthermore, since it&#8217;s an independent creation with no outside reference to draw upon, works and images similar to those already copyrighted are not infringing.</p>
<p>There is that word though &#8211; &#8216;<em><strong>if</strong></em>&#8216;. 500&#215;500 with 256 colours might seem like a small, grainy picture now, but it&#8217;s a massive field of data. 250,000 pixels, each with 256 possible shades comes to 9.802&nbsp;*10<sup>602059</sup> and that&#8217;s a large number; 9 with <strong>six hundred thousand zeros</strong> after it!</p>
<p>“You would pretty much need a quantum computer and massive storage space for this to become even slightly feasible,” says Stephen Brooks, head of the <a href="http://stephenbrooks.org/muon1/" target="_blank">Muon1 DPAD</a> project based at the RAL near Oxford.</p>
<p>The problem is clear. At present the distributed.net RC5-72 brute force <a href="http://stats.distributed.net/projects.php?project_id=8" target="_blank">effort</a> has been going on for 8½ years, and is only 1.7% done.</p>
<p>“Creating an image is faster than cracking an RC5 key but not that much, and there&#8217;s still space issues,&#8221; says Brooks. &#8220;You could easily fill 1Gb per hour, per user.”</p>
<p>However, while it&#8217;s not feasible now, 20 years down the line it may well be possible. Already some strong <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/11/07/18/1919210/Breakthrough-Toward-Quantum-Computing" target="_blank">progress</a> has been made towards quantum computing and with technological progress as rapid as ever in this field, it&#8217;s a question of sooner, rather than later.</p>
<p>In a very real sense, technology might kill copyright in our lifetime.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com">TorrentFreak</a>, for the latest info on <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/copyright-issues/">copyright</a>, <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/pirate-talk/">file-sharing</a> and <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/which-vpn-services-take-your-anonymity-seriously-2014-edition-140315/">anonymous VPN services</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://torrentfreak.com/could-quantum-computing-kill-copyright-110731/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
