<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TorrentFreak &#187; radiohead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/tag/radiohead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com</link>
	<description>Torrent News, Torrent Sites and the latest Scoops</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:07:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Radiohead Leak Their New Track To BitTorrent</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/radiohead-leak-their-new-track-to-bittorrent-090817/</link>
		<comments>http://torrentfreak.com/radiohead-leak-their-new-track-to-bittorrent-090817/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>enigmax</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Off The Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P2P and Filesharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiohead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[These Are My Twisted Words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=16226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the last few days a new Radiohead song was mysteriously released onto the Internet. The track is called "These Are My Twisted Words" and until today it was unclear where it had come from. Now, thanks to a post on the band's blog, it seems the boys could've had it planned all along, as they are now linking to the song on Mininova.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radiohead are no strangers to BitTorrent after the well-documented pay-what-you-like &#8220;In Rainbows&#8221; album unofficially racked up many thousands of downloads using the protocol.</p>
<p>Late last week the band&#8217;s BitTorrent link was revitalized after a new Radiohead track leaked onto the Internet. After this advance release of &#8220;These Are My Twisted Words,&#8221; rumors began to grow that Radiohead themselves might be behind the &#8216;leak&#8217;.</p>
<p>Speculation grew on the back of comments made by Thom Yorke of the band to The Believer: &#8220;We&#8217;ve actually got a good plan, but I can&#8217;t tell you what it is, because someone will rip it off. But we&#8217;ve got this great idea for putting things out&#8221;. </p>
<p>Today, on the band&#8217;s <a href="http://www.radiohead.com/deadairspace/">Dead Air Space</a> blog, Jonny Greenwood (lead guitar and keyboard) seems to solve the mystery:</p>
<blockquote><p>So here&#8217;s a new song, called &#8216;These Are My Twisted Words&#8217;.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been recording for a while, and this was one of the first we finished.<br />
We&#8217;re pretty proud of it.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s other stuff in various states of completion, but this is one we&#8217;ve been practicing, and which we&#8217;ll probably play at this summer&#8217;s concerts. Hope you like it.</p></blockquote>
<p>At the bottom of the post are two links to downloads, one directly from <a href="http://www.waste.uk.com/Store/waste-radiohead-twisted+words.html">Waste</a> and the other the <a href="http://www.mininova.org/tor/2846416">original torrent</a> uploaded to Mininova a few days ago. In fact, it was uploaded <a href="http://www.mininova.org/tor/2846487">twice</a>.</p>
<p>An enthusiastic commenter on Mininova exclaims: &#8220;OMFG! This torrent is being redirected from the radiohead official store, so there&#8217;s no album, just this song finished, this is very edgy, i mean thom yorke is way ahead from any other artist, at least we know he&#8217;s not doing his music to get some profit, at least not anymore, this is history being made, again, GREAT!&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds like the first of many happy listeners.</p>
<p>Mininova is happy with Radiohead&#8217;s move also. The site&#8217;s co-founder Erik Dubbelboer told TorrentFreak: &#8220;It&#8217;s great to see that artists use Mininova to distribute and promote their content for free. We encourage everyone to do this, which is why we provide our Content Distribution <a href="http://www.mininova.org/apply">service</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Radiohead uploaded the torrent the old fashioned way though, seeding it themselves. Apparently they are well aware of the latest developments in the BitTorrent community, as they used the newly founded <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/openbittorrent-tracker-muscles-in-on-the-old-pirate-bay-090705/">OpenBitTorrent</a> tracker.</p>
<p>Article from: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com">TorrentFreak</a>, check out our new blog at <a href="http://freakbits.com">FreakBits</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://torrentfreak.com/radiohead-leak-their-new-track-to-bittorrent-090817/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NiN&#8217;s Donation Model Doesn&#8217;t Work for Most Artists</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/nins-donation-model-doesnt-work-for-most-artists-081025/</link>
		<comments>http://torrentfreak.com/nins-donation-model-doesnt-work-for-most-artists-081025/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 17:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ernesto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Off The Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P2P and Filesharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiohead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year, several established bands have decided to give away their music for free, while giving fans the option to donate whatever they seem fit. For Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails it was a great success since they made more money from the donation model than they would have otherwise. However, it seems that this doesn't hold for less established artists. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After hearing the success stories of Radiohead and NiN, several people opined that this should be the future business model of the music industry. Give your music away for free, and fans will line up in the donation queue. This should work, right? NiN <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/14/arts/14arts-SALESFORNINE_BRF.html?_r=1&#038;ref=arts&#038;oref=slogin">made $1.6 million</a> in the first week their album was available for download, and Radiohead said it made <a href="http://blog.wired.com/music/2007/12/thom-yorke-disc.html">more money</a> online than with all of their other albums combined.</p>
<p>The big advantage NiN and Radiohead have, of course, is that they already have a huge fanbase. From a standing start it would be difficult for relatively unknown bands to give their music away, and it would be much harder to get people to donate. To see if this would indeed be the case, and to get an impression of how much revenue an artist can generate from the donation model, we decided to crunch the numbers from <a href="http://www.jamendo.com/en">Jamendo</a>.</p>
<p>Jamendo is one of the largest music sharing sites where users have the option to donate to artists they would like to support. Since the site launched in June 2005, close to half a million users have signed up. In three years, the site has turned into one of the largest music sharing communities. However, it seems like the donate buttons are gathering dust.</p>
<p>Before we go into detail, we want to make it clear that Jamendo is one of the best free music services on the Internet, as it brings together artists and fans. This post is not an attempt to write about how Jamendo failed, because the site is much more than a &#8216;download and donate&#8217; platform. What we want to show, however, is that donation based music models are not money magnets for the average artist.</p>
<p>We decided to examine the total number of donations up until October 25, 2008, and the results are quite revealing. Of the 423968 users, 1650 have donated something, little under 0.5%. In total, these users were good for 2712 donations adding up to just over $36,000. This translates into an average of little over $10 per donation. The largest donation on Jamendo thus far was 200 Euros ($250), impressive, but not as impressive as <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2007/10/trent_reznor_and_saul_williams.html">the $5000</a> NiN&#8217;s Trent Reznor donated when he downloaded his &#8216;free copy&#8217; of Radiohead&#8217;s album.</p>
<p>The top grossing artist on Jamendo is <a href="http://www.jamendo.com/en/artist/rob.costlow">Rob Costlow</a>, with just over $1000 in donations over three years. On Jamendo, his two albums were downloaded more than 50,000 times, and over half a million people have streamed his music on the site. Jamendo currently has close to 10,000 artists (not all of them accept donations), and 648 of those received at least one donation. To some this all sounds quite disappointing, but does this mean that artists shouldn&#8217;t use donation based services such as Jamendo?  </p>
<p>The answer to this question is simple. If their goal is to make thousands of dollars from it, probably not. However, that is not what most artists intend to do. They want their music to be heard, create an audience and pick up some fans here and there. The people who download their music for free, and like it, are potentially the people who visit their gigs, buy merchandising, and tell their friends about this great band they discovered. Lesser known artists will never be able to generate a decent income from donations, but making their music available for free sure is part of a <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/artists-see-a-future-with-bittorrent-081013/">viable business model</a>.</p>
<p><em>Update: In the title of the article we used &#8220;NiN&#8217;s Donation Model&#8221;, this is not completely accurate. Radiohead had more of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiohead#In_Rainbows_and_independent_work_.282005.E2.80.93present.29">donation model</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine_Inch_Nails#Ghosts_I.E2.80.93IV_and_The_Slip_.282008.E2.80.93present.29">than NiN</a>. </em></p>
<p>Article from: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com">TorrentFreak</a>, check out our new blog at <a href="http://freakbits.com">FreakBits</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://torrentfreak.com/nins-donation-model-doesnt-work-for-most-artists-081025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
