How thick-witted have you to be to fail to see that:

“an abolishment of copyright or copyright enforcement would make big budget blockbusters like the dark knight a thing of the past as they’d no longer be financially feasible to create.”

i’m not talking about now, i’m talking about soon, i’m talking about the eventuality you pirates seem to want. if you fail to understand this simple concept after three posts explaining it to you, i give up.

No longer “financially feasible”?

How thick-witted have you to be to fail to see that:

“filesharing sure hasn’t done a damn thing to stop The Dark Knight from grossing A BILLION DOLLARS worldwide, or keep it from being on track to becoming the highest grossing film in cinema history.”

?

no, you nonsensical retard, no.

an abolishment of copyright or copyright enforcement would make big budget blockbusters like the dark knight a thing of the past as they’d no longer be financially feasible to create.

Oh?

You must mean sea pirates(Yarr!), because filesharing sure hasn’t done a damn thing to stop The Dark Knight from grossing A BILLION DOLLARS worldwide, or keep it from being on track to becoming the highest grossing film in cinema history.

Or perhaps you do mean filesharers, and you just happen to be a clueless moron?

That’s a seriously flawed point of view. It may be possible for profits and piracy to live together – that’s not what I’m getting at. What I mean is do you think that the film industry strives to produce anything other than qulity IE. content that people will want to see in other words. That’s what they have done up until now, way before TDK was fimed.

Personally I found The Dark Knight to be decidely average. I enjoyed it but didn’t think it was outstanding by any means. In my mind the film’s best point was Ledger’s portrayal of The Joker. Without such a great performance I think I probably would have called this film watchable but poor.

jess
http://www.anonweb.eu.tc

Anyway still worth viewing & hope it wins many awards as its better than most films that were released this year.

get out of your parent’s basement.

..and is called on it by user ‘Me’ (#37), who replies: “You’re seriously suggesting that torrent users seed between 700GB and 1.3TB for each film they download?”

NC backpeddles furiously; “No, where did I suggest that?”

Erm…… Lemme think. perhaps in “The Very Last Thing You Said ™”?

NC, torrents aren’t given out in bunches – they’re _shared_. That’s the whole point. It’s a mathematical function, a geometric progression, an exponential curve. Your ‘thousands’ happen towards the end of the sharing cycle – you just misinterpret the data (once again,
no surprise there).

NC: “And OK, 1000’s is a gross exaggeration but the principle still stands.”

No it doesn’t. EOS.

NC: “With the average tracker user you’d be lucky if they seeded back 20% actually though…”

Oh reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeally…

NubCakes, the scat-king of P2P, responded: “Extortion? Examples of this? BTW, Being given the choice to purchase a luxury item at a certain price is not extortion you over-dramatic little girl.”

My retort: As clearly stated, the extortion in question derives from no commodity price-fixing in any way. The point is being made regarding ‘copyright law’.

Explain what part of this you don’t understand, Nubsy? Help will be provided in the form of a walk-through.

Here’s your starter for ten: what exactly in the way of “luxury items” does the MPAA produce?

I submit to you, sir, that it is _your_ argument that is fellacious & not the OP.

Good day.

No, where did I suggest that? And OK, 1000′s is a gross exaggeration but the principle still stands.

With the average tracker user you’d be lucky if they seeded back 20% actually though…

You’re seriously suggesting that torrent users seed between 700GB and 1.3TB for each film they download?

What are are: on drugs or mentally challenged? Because you can’t see the difference between giving one single copy to someone you know and thousands of copies to complete strangers who then give thousands more copies out…

@32 : “People would want to go, once the MPAA stop trying to extort people with copyright law and actually try to do their job.”

Extortion? Examples of this? BTW, Being given the choice to purchase a luxury item at a certain price is not extortion you over-dramatic little girl.

“Why is copying stuff being considered badbadbad and given laughable names like “piracy” but gibing away books for free isnt?”

Your demonstrating the fact that your mother slept with your uncle to concieve you again…

“…Those scumbags continue their extortion…”

Again, examples of extortion? Or are you just being wildly over-dramatic like a young female high-school student. I sure as shit hope you dont start raving on about culture being held back, and conscioness also, because according to you mainstream media is utter garbage so how could we be extorted to purchase it then?

@34 : “To be honest, apart from the Joker, I thought the film was pretty damn average. I don’t see what all the fuss was about.”

Amen to that … 15 year-olds seem to rave about it but to anybody that’s been watching films for years and has even a small amount of brain-cells it was unoriginal, predictable and not that well performed – except for Ledger, who as you say made the film.

dark night dvdrip? no wai!

gonna wait for HDrip

@16
People would want to go, once the MPAA stop trying to extort people with copyright law and actually try to do their job.

@30
‘Tis true, and ’tis a bad thing. Why would it be a good thing for the industry to make any money? Those scumbags continue their extortion through copyright, so it is good at all to continue funding them.

Roze
http://www.10ch.org/

It is STILL making bucketloads of money.

Some of these people who are posting comments are retards.
Like the one who said torrents are bad because they are linked to piracy. WTF?!?

hahaha