TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

The Famous Mongo56 Returns to BitTorrent

In 2005, Mongo56 was a household name in the BitTorrent community. Much to the disappointment of hundreds and thousands of users, the site collapsed under its own success and the DDoS attacks that accompanied it. But now, nearly 4 years later, the brand name has resurfaced.

Although it won’t ring any bells with the ‘younger’ torrenters, the name Mongo56 will certainly bring back some great memories for BitTorrent veterans who have been around for more than four years.

In 2005 the site was one of the largest BitTorrent trackers around, operating without a searchable index of torrent files much like OpenBitTorrent and PublicBitTorrent are doing right now. As of today there are still a few older torrents floating around that use the tracker which has been unresponsive for years.

However, back in the day its role with most BitTorrent users was vital, since clients did not support more than one tracker for a torrent, which meant that a download would simply stop working if the tracker was experiencing downtime.

During 2005, Mongo56 broke several records. It was the first XBNBT based tracker to run with more than 100,000 peers connected, and it broke the XBTT tracker record when it hit 763,000 peers. Great times were ahead, so it seemed, but continuous attacks on the tracker caused it to close prematurely.

“As of December 1st 2005 Mongo56.org will no-longer exist. I am sorry about this, but after over a month of battling flood attacks and the like it’s time to kill the tracker,” the site’s owner informed its users.

Since Mongo56 went down, thousands of new trackers have come and gone, and now, at the end of 2009 where standalone trackers have had somewhat of a revival, the name Mongo56 has resurfaced.

The operator of the new tracker hosted on the Mongo56.co.cc domain has no connection with the operators of the old tracker, but simply wants to reintroduce the brand name. “I used the name simply because I loved how much of a following they had, and I knew that domain would bring back good memories,” TorrentFreak was told.

Unlike most other standalone trackers, the new Mongo56 uses the PeerTracker software, and seems to be running smoothly for now. But, with DHT, PEX and multitracker torrents, tracker uptime is not as crucial as it was back in 2005. Nevertheless, Mongo56′s introduction is a welcome one – BitTorrent users can never have too many options when it comes to finding other peers.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • duek

    This makes me wonder what other big torrent site’s use for tracker sofware…

  • Eran

    Hmm, this’d be like me setting up a new site called ThePirateBay after the shutdown though.

  • ELana

    welcome and glad to have you aboard matey

  • Anonymous

    .co.cc = free domain? If they don’t even have the cash for a domain, I’m dreading there uptime graphs in a month or 2.

  • Akshay

    good one..letz me chk whtz new in this

  • Alex

    @4 annonymous you’re thinking of .co.nr. .co.cc is a country domain, like .us.

  • Jon

    Yo ho ho and a bottle of rum! The more the merrier ;)

  • RoestVrijStaal

    I understand the good signal, but with a free domain service you’ll be soon disconnected by the service provider and bullied by the anti-p2p.

    Look what I found:
    http://www.co.cc/whois/whois.php?domain=mongo56&button=Whois+Lookup

  • Anonymous

    @6 Alex
    CO.CC – Free Domain name registration + Free DNS service.
    http://www.co.cc/

  • diarRIAA

    Ouch. They’re set up in the US. It’ll be shut down, extorted or quickly handed over to the media companies in no time so they can flog ring tones and DRM infected content.

  • Gargamel

    Just another IP Farming site for the RIAA & MIAA. Like shooting fish in a barrel.

  • Owner – jpayne10

    i am the owner, i will be purchasing a new domain soon, as for the comments about ip harvesting. Completely false, and yes, it is hosted in the US, but since it is a pure tracker, and the structure of Peer Tracker dosent allow direct ip gathering, and my Host has confirmed that they will not close down my site without proof of Direct Transfer of Copyrighted Files. and furthermore, with understanding of the US legal system, there is no mechanism that can close a website of this kind. my site currently only has 3 files & a database. none else. and if any organization would like 2 doubt that, i would be more than happy 2 prove it.

  • louise

    php tracker? lolz

  • Anon

    PeerGuardian blocks Savvis, and this somehow involves it, from what I can tell.

    see for yourselves

    http://i222.photobucket.com/albums/dd301/pepsirules92/savvis.png

  • Owner – jpayne10

    i know that peer guardian blocks that ip currently, the connection that the site is currently using runs through their hub, so it may or may not be blocked. im chating with bluetack about this.

  • Owner – jpayne10

    well, i have confirred that it is not allways running through Savvis’ Datacenter. http://mongo56.co.cc/mongo56.png

  • Owner – jpayne10

    well, i have confirmed that it is not always running through Savvis’ Datacenter. http://mongo56.co.cc/mongo56.png

  • Anon

    Hmmm, maybe its an ISP thing.

  • Owner – jpayne10

    ya, idk why it is, but i will try 2 map out where all of the connections 2 the server are.

  • Ahmed1337x

    VERY NICE NEWS!!

  • my 2 cent car crash.

    The org. was also blocked by pg2 from what I remember back in the day.

  • Owner – jpayne10

    should i go.com, .net,, .info, or other? anyone wishing 2 help me choose?

  • ptsick

    Can’t access the site.

  • Joe

    uhm, wtf is this article supposed to prove?

    The title is misleading, this new site is ripping off the idea of an old site. This is not really something that should be written about, especially since the owner is asking users in these comments for advice???

  • Owner – jpayne10

    im not asking for advice joe, im simply asking what the bt community would like the site 2 be, and furthermore, no one is forcing you to use the site or read this article, and unless you want a phoenix like return, then plz dont complain.

  • Ahmed1337x

    .com or .org would be nice :)

  • Owner – jpayne10

    .org is taken for now, .com/.net/.info is what im looking twards

  • Ahmed1337x

    .info isn’t good, .com and .net is better. are u the same owner btw? that owned the one for 4 years ago?

  • LoL

    Of course she isnt! Just someone trying to make a quick buck off the name

  • Owner – jpayne10

    no, i was just a loyal fan. but times have changed, and i think its time that the name returned. and i cant register .org until 2010-10-20, but i will try 2 register that once it is available. Also, i will try 2 move away from Peer Tracker as soon as possible, whats interesting is that within 1 hr of going public (being submitted 2 trackon)i had over 800 active torrents. although that is not exact, its still considerable.

  • Ahmed1337x

    Nice, I liked the site too. Glad you could take it back ;) wish you good luck

  • Caleb Withers

    Tell me when it has some peers on it. Then I might bother.

  • http://neuron2neuron.blogspot.com Ben Jones
  • Folks, don’t listen to BJ’s crap about blocklists

    Oh, please STFU. “Every competent authority”, my ass. Please keep your uninformed opinions to yourself.

    That’s without a doubt the most irresponsible post Ben Jones has ever made.

  • omfg

    “That’s without a doubt the most irresponsible post Ben Jones has ever made”

    agree :) and he should really explaint how you increase your risk with blocking ip’s ;)

    • http://neuron2neuron.blogspot.com Ben Jones

      It’s quite simple.

      It all depends on WHAT you’re blocking.

      If the IPs you block are almost all not the ‘logging’ IPs, and the ones that are doing the logging are intentionally (or maybe not intentionally) not on the list, you end up with a greater chance of connecting to a logging IP. And let’s remember, there’s absolutely NO way to tell if an IP is logging you for later ‘pre-settlement letter’. It’s not as if it does anything differently.

      In fact, it can be fairly easy to identify those using the lists. Just try and connect to IPs on a torrent from two different systems; one on a blocklisted IP, and the other on a non-blocklisted IP. If you can connect to it with the non-listed one, but can’t with the listed one, it’s probably running the list.

      It’s not rocket-science, nor is it exactly unknown – it’s been common knowledge with anti-p2p companies for years. Blocklists don’t work, and have never worked, except to identify the stupid filesharer, that thinks they’re being protected.

      Oh, and just so we’re clear, remind me of those AntiP2P companies you’re blocking? Bittorrent Inc./µTorrent, ESET antivirus update servers, GoDaddy’s email server, the German Chaos Computer Club – I could go on and on…

  • pq

    I am extremely disappointing at Ben Jones post being that he is supposed to know all about p2p and all. Seeing his blog at http://neuron2neuron.blogspot.com/search/label/Peerguardian , I can see that he wants others to totally ditch blocklist. Although he has some valid arguments, when the blocklist were first created before widely known about and whatnot, they were actually pretty reliable. That is not to say that they are not though. Yes is some org wants to get you bad, they will try to evade the list and all but may or may not be discovered. As revealed by the media centre emails (sp?) not all of the monitoring ip addresses were on the blocklist at the time. Some were however so they were at least some protection than without any. The media centre had accounts on many (they claimed all but not totally true since there is no way to do that unless you are God) but had media crap on like every p2p network monitoring. If I get rid of at least one monotoring agency, that is better than having it there. While it has always been said that this is not the best protection, its better than nothing at all. Also check out http://www.peerblock.com and since I heard about it on torrentfreak, its only right to mention that it works better than pg2 as it was supposed to be the neXt step in evolution (it works better too) and most of the list seem to update. pg2 had problems and I had to like save the list so many times to keep them being lost and sometimes it would not even update for months.

  • pq

    PeerBlock lets you control who your computer “talks to” on the Internet. By selecting appropriate lists of “known bad” computers, you can block communication with advertising or spyware oriented servers, computers monitoring your p2p activities, computers which have been “hacked”, even entire countries! They can’t get in to your computer, and your computer won’t try to send them anything either.

    I have seen servers that have been raided by the fbi and police show up on the logs. Why those servers are still online and why they are connecting is ? Ben Jones, perhaps you would like to explain how it is better to connect to those raided servers and how it is better to connect to them than not too?

  • omfg

    @Ben Jones

    You should really read http://www.cs.ucr.edu/~anirban/Anir-networking07.pdf this paper.

    Not using any blocklist software is practically guaranteed to logged by some random anti p2p company / government / big cooperation.

    Are blocklists foolproof ? no
    Will blocklist give you 100% protection ? no of course not

    Will they stop at least some logging – yes they will = win

    In my country it’s only illegal activity as long as i upload 100% to someone and that could be proven – but if i block this ip range its rather impossible to actually prove that i actually commited some sort of crime – this is where blocklists come in handy – identify me but as long as i block something i won’t upload 100%. Of course you could always hop on another ip range and wait for my upload but that would mean you have to get a list of all seeders, pick out those who use a blocklist, hop on another ip range block all those without the blocklist cause they aren’t the target anymore and wait for my upload .. way to much effort for any anti p2p company that are mostly behind “big fishes”.

    We ALL know that its not 100% safe but even if it only blocks 2% of all those nasty ips (and i guess its pbly more) thats fine for me. i also block (on torrent ports only of course) all known ip ranges from the country i live in – just in case – cause my connection is decent enough to use foreign connections only.

    Oh, and just so we’re clear, remind me of those AntiP2P companies you’re blocking? Bittorrent Inc./µTorrent, ESET antivirus update servers, GoDaddy’s email server, the German Chaos Computer Club – I could go on and on…

    and i could counter all those by a massive list of actual anti-p2p companies we are actually blocking – guess i’d win that argument by 1000:1 ;) (beside that utorrent shoud be blocked .. involvement with any p2p company should be punished)

    (no native speaker so there might be shtload of speeling mistakes, grammar etc ..)

  • RoestVrijStaal

    @Owner – jpayne10:
    Make sure that if you can’t be tracked down easy:
    if you want to register a domain, it’s recommend to use the whois privacy protection of the domain registrar. A lot of torrent-related sites do that and it cost nothing at all.
    A few registrars to mention are NameCheap.com with WhoisGuard, GoDaddy.com with DomainsByProxy and moniker.com.

    I think NameCheap is the best option for now. GoDaddy can do some weird this (like the myBittorrent kidnapping) and torrentsites who are customer of Moniker seems to be quicker taken down than torrentsites @NameCheap or GoDaddy.

  • RoestVrijStaal

    Oh, i forgot to mention:
    If you have enough money, maybe you can use http://www.katzglobal.com, but I don’t have any experience with them.

  • Quartz

    I too condemn the usage of piss poor blocklists, as a network operator of a well known p2p system we too know that our entire infrastructure was blocked by blutak who where rude abusive nd paranoid. There is a valid usage for blocklists but when they fall at the simplest hurdle and block dynamically allocated IP’s used by ordinary folks you have to ask just how far does the incompetence go ?

    Blindly trusting a blocklist is for the foolish,and with only one group playing god we are likely to always suffer their stupidity.

  • hmmm

    co.cc is full of fail , and this sucks a copycat

  • mustangx

    can’t say welcome back obviously but surely can say welcome to the bt world Mongo56 . Wish you best of luck. And as always thanks for the story torrentfreak, I’d be bored with out the articles added here and on my other daily read sites and blogs.

  • Lo Fo Cha #6

    @42 yes this is an occurrence that has happened to others before. It has been noted that once you get put on a blocklist, it is hard if not impossible to get off of it. There is more than one blocklist and it should be worth mentioning. As for which is the best/etc, I always advise people to ask questions b/c not asking questions is sometimes the mistake people make.

    Lets think about http://www.itshidden.com for a sec. When they launched their service, their ip range was being blocked by pg2 on some list it allowed you to check (which?) The service after it was announced to the world has some downtime as lots of things do but anyways it was blocked by the list. After they worked out the downtime and heard feedback from people (they actually knew it was blocked when they launched) but didn’t worrry about it too much. Now that they have the issues worked out, I haven’t heard of any complaints. I’m sure somewhere they could still be blocked but overall its good. Work your issues out and then resume. Perhapse you should host or whatever you do with your range that is blocked send it to a vpn = unblock. There are enough around to make this an easy issue to be resolved. If one is blocked, try another. Case solved. Now I am going to go back to blocking my connections through my peerblock as for I don’t like people corrupting my downloads. How about running a vpn over your peerblock? Itshidden.com then peerblock = happy?

  • Anonymous

    Never bothered using a blocklist since I understand what a dynamic ip address is.
    Much safer to go with a vpn provider that doesn’t log stuff imo.

  • Blocklist User

    I use PeerBlock and love how it blocks a lot of the ad sites and other web use tracking sites from trying to monitor what I do on the web. It has a feature that allows you to permanently block or unblock any ip address or range that you want to. I will unblock an ip/range if I know its a legit site, if not it remains blocked. It may be a bit of work at times or not a snap for someone less technically inclined, but it is still fairly simple to use and effective enough for my uses.

    Ben, you once worked in IP rights enforcement, so please tell us what difference it makes whether I run a blocklist or not. Also, could you please provide relevant supporting links or documents for this statement…

    Every independent test has found them ineffective as best, and actually INCREASING risk at worst. There’s a reason why every competent authority related to bittorrent recommends AGAINST using blocklists.

    The link provided by omfg is from what I would consider a ‘competent authority’ and they disagree with your claims about blocklists.

  • http://neuron2neuron.blogspot.com Ben Jones

    There is one thing that undermines that paper (which is the only one to give any positive spin to using blocklists). It’s explained quite well on page 2
    “Note that it is not our intention here to examine how accurate and comprehensive these lists are, though this would be interesting and challenging future work.”

    Interestingly, it also says that the majority of the entries are not anti-p2p.

    The paper is highly flawed, and doing an analytical correction of it is something I’ve had on the to-do list for a while. However, since the central premise is that the lists are accurate, and it works from there, the paper is fatally flawed, as there are countless examples that show they are NOT accurate at all (why not try the physical study done by the University of Washington where they actually used the blocklists and saw NO reduction in notices, if anything they increased. To quote their paper “We have further demonstrated that IP blacklists, a standard method for avoiding systematic monitoring, are wholly ineffective given current identification techniques and provide only limited coverage of likely monitoring agents.”

    Here’s the thing, you see. There is no way to tell if an IP is logging you. Contrary to Bluetack’s claims, it doesn’t act differently. If you use utorrent, go to the logging tab, and select all the peer traffic logging options – you’re now doing exactly as they’re doing – logging all your actions and the IPs you do it with. you’re not changing anything.There are plugins to do it with Vuze as well. If you can’t tell, how can you add them to a list? You can’t.

    pq – the IPs you refer to were MediaDefender. The low-hitrate was a test done by Slyck, a month after the IPs leaked. With a full set of lists, (that comprised some 30% of ALL IPs blocked) there was only around 3% of these IPs actually blocked. Substantially lower than the rate you would probably get if you added at random, which suggests selecting to avoid. Add in that NO-ONE (not even the people behind peerguardian) actually know who’s behind bluetack, should raise some questions. Absolutely no-one knows who they are, has met them in person etc. yet you put your trust in them.

    “We ALL know that its not 100% safe but even if it only blocks 2% of all those nasty ips (and i guess its pbly more) thats fine for me.”
    This is the problem with thinking only in absolutes. If say 2% is blocked, BUT 30% of ‘innocent’ IPs are blocked, that means you’re more likely to connect to the 98% of bad ones unblocked. The relative proportions are skewed more, giving the ‘guilty’ IPs an effectively bigger IP share. Absolutes don’t matter, it’s the proportion between them.

  • Blocklist User

    I’m still waiting for relevant links or supporting documents. You simply repeating what you claim does not provide ‘independent proof’ for me. You were an IP rights enforcer at one time, and you appear to still have that mindset.

    Just like the maffia you have not provided any proof to your claims! Condoms are not 100% effective against pregnancy or transferring STDs, but I don’t plan on diddling the pink without one, just because its not completely effective.

    Give me some evidence of what your claiming and I’ll STFU, until then I’m using a rubber!

    • http://neuron2neuron.blogspot.com Ben Jones

      I’ve given you evidence. Slyck’s study, University of washington’s study (which had lots of DMCA noties even with the blocklists running, and with twice the frequency, although correlation does not imply causation). Basic common sense and simple networking+protocol knowledge also shows they don’t work. The only thing that supports the use of blocklists is the paper you mentioned, which says right at the start that it will not address the accuracy or effectiveness of the lists. All the paper actually says, is “IPs that are on the list, are prevented from connecting to computers running the lists” (it helps to actually read the paper!) When talking about the effectiveness of blocklists, it’ kind of pointless to provide, as evidence stuff that says clearly that it makes no effort to address that very point.

      Put it this way – can you think of ways to get around the blocklist right now? What about if you had a $1500 budget? Now remember, they’ve been thinking those thoughts for 6-7 years, and have a much greater budget. Despite what you think, antiP2P companies are not stupid, brazen yes, but stupid no. They may make stupid statements, like the Village people claim the other day, but they make it because they can, and because they can try and intimidate where the facts don’t work.

      If Bluetack wants to be more ‘accepted’, then the first thing they should do, is go public with their identities. For all you know, ‘m0nk’ is John Giaccobi, and ‘m00re’ works for UK-FACT. Firstaid I don’t think is old enough to be employed, based on dealings that I, and others have had with him.

  • lonewolf

    A pity the ‘noid forums are down. There were some very good notes by GreatWizard on why PG2 is fail.

    Whether you believe in blocklists or not, there should be at least one thing we can all agree on:

    Smart downloading = happy downloading.

    That means not jumping on new movies, tvshows, games, and music the moment it appears on the net. Patience is a virtue – waiting a few weeks will not kill you, and is probably a better bet in terms of avoiding at least some of the initial heat in a big-release-leak. That is not to say that it is foolproof, but it does help.

    Not being stupid with what you download helps too. Studios like Sony,BMG, and the other giants are notorious for their logging. Avoiding content like that is a good idea.

    For music/movie lovers – look into buying the damn movie later! It makes for excellent defense. You might be guilty of downloading, but the damages that can be brought against you will be far less severe considering that, if you own at least one copy of everything you downloaded, that there are no real damages inflicted upon the plaintiff. There might still be penalties, but it wont be as bad.

    And you could always use a seedbox, which is (personally) the best way to do it.

    I mean, blocklists or not, stupid downloaders are going to get caught. If you jump on that brand spanking new hollywood hit the minute it hits torrents, someone *will* find you. Too many eyes to not get caught by someone.

    Wait a week. Or a month. Get netflix, or the rough equivalent, in your area. Be smart about what you download – and you’ll download for longer.

  • Anon

    Ooo! what a nice little flamewar I started. Now would probably be a good time to share my opinions on blocklists. The way I see it, don’t download anything newly released, either on DVD or in theatres, run PeerGuardian, IMO it can’t hurt, and only download from small swarms.

    You have to get in their head, if you were trying to harvest IP’s, which would you choose, the 1000 peer cam of sherlock holmes or the 17 peer swesub dvdrip of ace ventura?

    I think the key is just simple intelligence.

    • http://neuron2neuron.blogspot.com Ben Jones

      “You have to get in their head, if you were trying to harvest IP’s, which would you choose, the 1000 peer cam of sherlock holmes or the 17 peer swesub dvdrip of ace ventura?”
      Every copy of the film you’re paid to monitor. If they’re not being paid to monitor it (and thus be authorized) then that’s copyright infringement for them to. It’s not a freelance situation, where they can just pick any film they want to, and go for that. If the rights-holders want Sherlock protected, they will monitor Sherlock, if they want Ace Ventura monitored, how many people are on sherlock is immaterial.

  • my 2 cent car crash.

    Bluetack may be behind the updates in your country Mr. Jones. But not mine.

    That is when they were working. Pg2 site has on page one advice to use http://www.peerblock.com . They may have moved on.

    I have seen it action blocking files that certain entertainers have paid anti p2p to watch over.

    If you like you could try this yourself as a test. I don’t need to read reports. After seeing this myself.

    If you really want to see it in action try it on an axxo file on a public tracker. ; )

  • ejonesss@hotmail.com

    nslookup mongo56.co.cc 66.152.162.116

    nslookup 66.152.162.116 116-162-152-66-dedicated.HostDone.com

    i think he should have moved to where the piratebay is now .

    however the page has much of the same content as openbittorent does so it make me think it is run by the same people.

  • deep throat

    yeah right, there can never be enough mushrooms growing.

  • Anon

    @53 Well, you could take it a step further and figure that(assuming the same studio owns both, I know they don’t) they’d be more likely to pay for Sherlock Holmes than Ace Ventura. Which one is worth more to them?

  • http://neuron2neuron.blogspot.com Ben Jones

    @ 54
    you say you’ve seen it yourself, that’s not true. It’s not looking up who owns an IP in real time. It’s got a list of IPs, each of the entries in the list has a label. When an IP is blocked the label is put up. It doesn’t mean that the label is accurate. If they did a global replace, changing “BayTSP” to “God”, would that proof of the existance of the Almighty? After all, the program says he’s trying to connect to you! There are significant problems with the accuracy of the lists, and the most common justification for people using the lists, is that the lists tell people they’re working.

    Oh, and the lists are different from the program. Peerblock says use the lists at iblocklist, which shows mostly lists from… Bluetack (also the default for Peerguardian. Oh, and Fakir, the guy behind iblocklist, a big BlueTack supporter (got lots of logs where he supports their wild-assed claims, so don’t expect his own lists to be any better)

    There is a nice comparison to be made with these blocklist programs, and that’s to the scamware virus scanners. You’ve seen the popups and adverts, that say you’re infected, not download this free program to protect you. Same thing. This says it’s protecting you (It’s not and never has) and gives you lots of blocks for what it claims to be ‘bad’ IPs, like the scamware virii scanners claim to be detecting and cleaning up virii)

    @57 – from the point of view of damages, they’re both worth the same. If anything, since the revenue stream for Ace Ventura has dried up, it may be worth more as a way to maximise franchise income. It could potentially even be easier to get a bigger judgement, as in court it could clearly be proven that there were multiple easy ways to obtain the movie without infringing copyright. Whereas, the only way to see Sherlock is at an expensive cinema, or a poor quality cam.
    And trying to use an assumption you say is false, to make your point is a little… strange to say the least.

  • Some Person

    Utilizing a ipfilter is in fact a good thing.

    Lets avoid the aspect of the “lists” aka BlueTack as yes we can question how useful those lists are all day.

    Now, contrary to Ben Jones confusing statement that its like the scam virus scanners, the actual ipfilter software does indeed work. No… PG, blockpost and protowall (for common MS ones) don’t sit there and randomly generate random text to fool you.

    And if your skeptical of BlueTack lists (like Ben Jones argues in a confusing manner) you can simply make and use your own lists. Nobody said you couldn’t, and when loaded into whatever ipfilter you use, yes it will block that communication.

    And if you are still scared of the common MS ones, run a nix gateway with a ipfilter, as yes they work too.. So ipfilters are a good thing, and its up to you, the user to determine what kind of list(s) you see fit to use.

    So lets not confuse the ipfilter software with the lists used!

    And lets face reality, there are other means to obtain files, that is considerably safer. And no I don’t mean “private” trackers…

    People put content out there for the “real” motive of free information, not to measure their e-penis with how much ratio they have, and seeds… lol

    And guess what? The nature of those beasts is to do exactly what is “bad” in torrent land… leech.

    Sharing in p2p land isn’t caring, its getting logged and proving you uploaded.

    As time goes on and more draconian laws get passed worldwide, this will become considerably more relevant.

    O well…

  • Anon

    @58 Yeah, Ace Ventura is just the first “older” movie that popped into my head. I suppose I could’ve gone back and found a Warner Brothers film from the 90′s, I just didn’t. :P

  • Jay

    Hahahaha!! A free .co.cc “domain”… Its not even a domain, its a freakin’ sub-domain.

    They can’t even afford a $9 .com or a $1.50 .info… Sad lmao.

    I give this tracker a week lol.

  • Anonymous
  • Owner – jpayne10

    fyi, i wasn’t going 2 go public as soon as i did, but who cares, after all its not your but whose on the line now is it?

  • torrent wiki
  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

  • Feds Seize Cash from Major Bitcoin Exchange’s Dwolla Account

    The U.S. Government has taken a significant action against the web’s top Bitcoin exchange by seizing...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.