<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leading BitTorrent Admins Discuss The Future of BitTorrent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/</link>
	<description>Torrent News, Torrent Sites and the latest Scoops</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-329710</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-329710</guid>
		<description>I agree with Anon 787 completely. 
We need a protocol that enables users to be anonymous without using too much resources or bandwidth. 
Who can develop something like that? I would like to support them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Anon 787 completely.<br />
We need a protocol that enables users to be anonymous without using too much resources or bandwidth.<br />
Who can develop something like that? I would like to support them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: new films</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-278570</link>
		<dc:creator>new films</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-278570</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;new films...&lt;/strong&gt;

oh, good times. I donÂ’t hear people talking about Â“leveling FallujahÂ” much anymore....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>new films&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>oh, good times. I donÂ’t hear people talking about Â“leveling FallujahÂ” much anymore&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molly</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-222574</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-222574</guid>
		<description>I still want to know if I can get fined by downloading DVRip videos.
Molly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still want to know if I can get fined by downloading DVRip videos.<br />
Molly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molly</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-221920</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 17:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-221920</guid>
		<description>I just want to know if it is legal or not to download torrent movies. I got a notice from my server that warned me of using too much bandwidth and they suggested it was from Torrent usage. Molly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to know if it is legal or not to download torrent movies. I got a notice from my server that warned me of using too much bandwidth and they suggested it was from Torrent usage. Molly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: receiptbill &#187; Community Media: Selected Clippings - 11/14/07</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-221555</link>
		<dc:creator>receiptbill &#187; Community Media: Selected Clippings - 11/14/07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-221555</guid>
		<description>[...] at the moment. However, there&#039;s no doubt that there will be changes in the future. &#8212;&gt; http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at the moment. However, there&#8217;s no doubt that there will be changes in the future. &#8212;&gt; <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/" rel="nofollow">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: careybagsbon</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-218693</link>
		<dc:creator>careybagsbon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-218693</guid>
		<description>Greetings to all. 
 
Prompt the best online shop on sale of Books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings to all. </p>
<p>Prompt the best online shop on sale of Books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timeFalls</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-215341</link>
		<dc:creator>timeFalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-215341</guid>
		<description>the future of bittorrent lies in its security.


from a personal perspective, i believe we need to implement more security features, for example transport encryption needs stepping up, and perhaps measures such as sharing information with trusted IPs from private trackers to prevent the M/RIAA from undertaking their sneaky shit on the public trackers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the future of bittorrent lies in its security.</p>
<p>from a personal perspective, i believe we need to implement more security features, for example transport encryption needs stepping up, and perhaps measures such as sharing information with trusted IPs from private trackers to prevent the M/RIAA from undertaking their sneaky shit on the public trackers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BPCITY &#187; A bittorrent jÃ¶vÅ‘je</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-215064</link>
		<dc:creator>BPCITY &#187; A bittorrent jÃ¶vÅ‘je</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-215064</guid>
		<description>[...] torrentfreak csinÃ¡lt egy interjÃºt a nagyobb torrent trackerek adminjaival, amiben a legnÃ©pszerÅ±bb fÃ¡jlcserÃ©lÅ‘ rendszer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] torrentfreak csinÃ¡lt egy interjÃºt a nagyobb torrent trackerek adminjaival, amiben a legnÃ©pszerÅ±bb fÃ¡jlcserÃ©lÅ‘ rendszer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utilitygeek</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-214503</link>
		<dc:creator>Utilitygeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-214503</guid>
		<description>@anonymous:

It&#039;s not true that I can stop my computer from uploading?  I can&#039;t turn it off?  I can&#039;t unplug it?  I can&#039;t run my torrent client in, say, a VM and reset the VM?  How does cryptography help here?  How does it prevent me from installing a client that lies about what it&#039;s ratio is?

I agree there there are some who are more interested in making their content available, but the fact that they&#039;ve put their content on BT shows they *are* interested in reducing bandwith and, so, are concernew with leechers.

The major reason for using BT is to share bandwith with those downloading/seeding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@anonymous:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not true that I can stop my computer from uploading?  I can&#8217;t turn it off?  I can&#8217;t unplug it?  I can&#8217;t run my torrent client in, say, a VM and reset the VM?  How does cryptography help here?  How does it prevent me from installing a client that lies about what it&#8217;s ratio is?</p>
<p>I agree there there are some who are more interested in making their content available, but the fact that they&#8217;ve put their content on BT shows they *are* interested in reducing bandwith and, so, are concernew with leechers.</p>
<p>The major reason for using BT is to share bandwith with those downloading/seeding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-214315</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-214315</guid>
		<description>Utilitygeek, that&#039;s not true. It is possible by using cryptographic methods appropriately but you can doubt whether it would be worth the overhead.

What&#039;s even more dubious is whether there is something like a perfect ratio and whether it would actually improve anything. If you force people to have a good ratio, even though most have asymmetric bandwidth, they&#039;ll simply move on. There are many people who don&#039;t really care about leeching anyway because they are more interested in making their stuff available than downloading themselves. I mean, just imagine, how would the world-wide web look like if it made use of ratios? &quot;Sorry you can&#039;t browse this website because you don&#039;t have any homepage.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Utilitygeek, that&#8217;s not true. It is possible by using cryptographic methods appropriately but you can doubt whether it would be worth the overhead.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s even more dubious is whether there is something like a perfect ratio and whether it would actually improve anything. If you force people to have a good ratio, even though most have asymmetric bandwidth, they&#8217;ll simply move on. There are many people who don&#8217;t really care about leeching anyway because they are more interested in making their stuff available than downloading themselves. I mean, just imagine, how would the world-wide web look like if it made use of ratios? &#8220;Sorry you can&#8217;t browse this website because you don&#8217;t have any homepage.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213866</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213866</guid>
		<description>The Future is so much exciting! A different protocol will evolve! Much secure filesharing is what we foresee! and the entertainment industry should embrace the P2P!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Future is so much exciting! A different protocol will evolve! Much secure filesharing is what we foresee! and the entertainment industry should embrace the P2P!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squeak</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213865</link>
		<dc:creator>Squeak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213865</guid>
		<description>I think that the future may involve war-driving and traveling sneaker-nets.  Thumbdrives pack a huge amount of data now and are only gonna get bigger.

You take your thumbdrive with it&#039;s cargo of goodies and use a public computer to upload your crap packed in an unlabeled .rar with a few added nonsense files to confuse the hash to a public storage space.  Then you go to your Listing space and list the url of your file and the name of your file.  

A current incarnation of this is Rapid-Share for storage and Blogger.com for listing and commenting on the files.  For security, each member could require an invite or something as we do now...and sense the uploading is done elsewhere, such as a cyber cafe or on public PC&#039;s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the future may involve war-driving and traveling sneaker-nets.  Thumbdrives pack a huge amount of data now and are only gonna get bigger.</p>
<p>You take your thumbdrive with it&#8217;s cargo of goodies and use a public computer to upload your crap packed in an unlabeled .rar with a few added nonsense files to confuse the hash to a public storage space.  Then you go to your Listing space and list the url of your file and the name of your file.  </p>
<p>A current incarnation of this is Rapid-Share for storage and Blogger.com for listing and commenting on the files.  For security, each member could require an invite or something as we do now&#8230;and sense the uploading is done elsewhere, such as a cyber cafe or on public PC&#8217;s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solidus</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213806</link>
		<dc:creator>Solidus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213806</guid>
		<description>I think the next protocol will be something more steam based. But more flexible where people will actually be able to afford music/movies/video games on a low income budget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the next protocol will be something more steam based. But more flexible where people will actually be able to afford music/movies/video games on a low income budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utilitygeek</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213593</link>
		<dc:creator>Utilitygeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213593</guid>
		<description>To those who want to force a ratio:  It will never happen.  I can simply pull my network cable when the DL is done.  Move the file.  Re-install the client.  There will always be ways around it.  That said, please seed.  It&#039;s only polite.

Personally, I&#039;d like to see the cloud be able to act as a sort of informal torrent site.  My client can define a local cloud (the definition of local is up for debate) and be able to show me new torrents in my local cloud, allow me to search against a cache of &quot;local&quot; torrents, etc.  Because my cloud may not be the same cloud as that of a user three hops from me, with some smart caching, clients could do both &quot;local&quot; and &quot;semi-local&quot; searches or announcements by checking the files available on systems that are outside my cloud, but one &quot;cloud-hop&quot; from me.  If connections and a count of available files was also available, the client could make multiple hops to find the clients in linked clouds with the largest caches.  Search would be slow, but if you set up &quot;triggers&quot;, you could simply set up a system that identified matches, put them in an unstarted queue, and allowed you to either start them or list them as ignorable.

Comments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those who want to force a ratio:  It will never happen.  I can simply pull my network cable when the DL is done.  Move the file.  Re-install the client.  There will always be ways around it.  That said, please seed.  It&#8217;s only polite.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d like to see the cloud be able to act as a sort of informal torrent site.  My client can define a local cloud (the definition of local is up for debate) and be able to show me new torrents in my local cloud, allow me to search against a cache of &#8220;local&#8221; torrents, etc.  Because my cloud may not be the same cloud as that of a user three hops from me, with some smart caching, clients could do both &#8220;local&#8221; and &#8220;semi-local&#8221; searches or announcements by checking the files available on systems that are outside my cloud, but one &#8220;cloud-hop&#8221; from me.  If connections and a count of available files was also available, the client could make multiple hops to find the clients in linked clouds with the largest caches.  Search would be slow, but if you set up &#8220;triggers&#8221;, you could simply set up a system that identified matches, put them in an unstarted queue, and allowed you to either start them or list them as ignorable.</p>
<p>Comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soujirou7</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213567</link>
		<dc:creator>Soujirou7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213567</guid>
		<description>Wow, that is the first time I&#039;ve seen promiscuous used in a non-sexual way.  Cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that is the first time I&#8217;ve seen promiscuous used in a non-sexual way.  Cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KennyG101</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213548</link>
		<dc:creator>KennyG101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213548</guid>
		<description>Meck78.. do you actually understand the BT protocol? Because from your comment you don&#039;t seem to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meck78.. do you actually understand the BT protocol? Because from your comment you don&#8217;t seem to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meck78</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213539</link>
		<dc:creator>Meck78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213539</guid>
		<description>That BT is hard to beat is something I&#039;d call myth. As a software developer I can think of plenty of weeknesses and improvements. That&#039;s probably why the Pirate Bay tries to create a new, better protocol from scratch. BT was more or less a quick hack, as you can see by the fact, that it bases on HTTP, a protocol much less than optimal for file access (which is why many sites still offer their HTTP downloads as FTP downloads, too) - HTTP was designed for browsing webpages and filling out forms and clicking on links. BT surely works quite well and it gets the job done, but that does not mean you can&#039;t do any better. I still only use BT occasionally, I don&#039;t know any better alternative currently either - but IPv6 is going to push through sooner or later and it offers completely new possibilities. E.g. using multicast, a single user could send a piece of data to 30 other users at once, still the data block only has to go once over his Internet line. Something impossible with the way BT currently works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That BT is hard to beat is something I&#8217;d call myth. As a software developer I can think of plenty of weeknesses and improvements. That&#8217;s probably why the Pirate Bay tries to create a new, better protocol from scratch. BT was more or less a quick hack, as you can see by the fact, that it bases on HTTP, a protocol much less than optimal for file access (which is why many sites still offer their HTTP downloads as FTP downloads, too) &#8211; HTTP was designed for browsing webpages and filling out forms and clicking on links. BT surely works quite well and it gets the job done, but that does not mean you can&#8217;t do any better. I still only use BT occasionally, I don&#8217;t know any better alternative currently either &#8211; but IPv6 is going to push through sooner or later and it offers completely new possibilities. E.g. using multicast, a single user could send a piece of data to 30 other users at once, still the data block only has to go once over his Internet line. Something impossible with the way BT currently works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmac</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213528</link>
		<dc:creator>dmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213528</guid>
		<description>seriously 10 years ago it was strictly  napster and limewire for me now its all about the bit torrent. I believe that the next decade will show some newer and better tech for sure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seriously 10 years ago it was strictly  napster and limewire for me now its all about the bit torrent. I believe that the next decade will show some newer and better tech for sure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Coward</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213458</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213458</guid>
		<description>About that comment (#19) on being tor-like exit nodes: wouldn&#039;t a person (e.g RIAA helper) connected to you still see you uploading music to them regardless of who&#039;s traffic you were hiding? (would you get an infringement notice due to seeding?) It&#039;s not as though you have a copy, although you do have a part of it...

Though that makes me wonder, could you get out of it if you say that your machine was mindlessly routing possibly copyright infringing content, like your isp&#039;s routers do every day...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About that comment (#19) on being tor-like exit nodes: wouldn&#8217;t a person (e.g RIAA helper) connected to you still see you uploading music to them regardless of who&#8217;s traffic you were hiding? (would you get an infringement notice due to seeding?) It&#8217;s not as though you have a copy, although you do have a part of it&#8230;</p>
<p>Though that makes me wonder, could you get out of it if you say that your machine was mindlessly routing possibly copyright infringing content, like your isp&#8217;s routers do every day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: die?</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213411</link>
		<dc:creator>die?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213411</guid>
		<description>Listen to all, plucking a feather from every passing goose, but follow no one absolutely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen to all, plucking a feather from every passing goose, but follow no one absolutely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KennyG101</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213296</link>
		<dc:creator>KennyG101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213296</guid>
		<description>In a few years no one will bother watching new main stream movies , even if they are free, because they will have realised 99.999% are shite. They will be giving them away with microwave pop corn. 
   Many p2p ers will suddenly realise that they have 100 TBs of cack filling up boxes of DVDs that they never intended to watch but just got because they could. 
 The complete criterion collection will be sold on Market Stalls for the price of a packet of cigarettes.
  TVs will be 100 inch but the most popular channel will be of snow scenes as the outside temperatures top 60 Celsius. 
 TPB will have bought out Sony Studios.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a few years no one will bother watching new main stream movies , even if they are free, because they will have realised 99.999% are shite. They will be giving them away with microwave pop corn.<br />
   Many p2p ers will suddenly realise that they have 100 TBs of cack filling up boxes of DVDs that they never intended to watch but just got because they could.<br />
 The complete criterion collection will be sold on Market Stalls for the price of a packet of cigarettes.<br />
  TVs will be 100 inch but the most popular channel will be of snow scenes as the outside temperatures top 60 Celsius.<br />
 TPB will have bought out Sony Studios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kisli</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213169</link>
		<dc:creator>Kisli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213169</guid>
		<description>eh, why bother.
In 10 years even possessing a computer will be considered as an act of terrorism.
In 50 years it will be irrelevant, since technology and education will be  privileges that only tiny minority will be allowed to access.
Pw2P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eh, why bother.<br />
In 10 years even possessing a computer will be considered as an act of terrorism.<br />
In 50 years it will be irrelevant, since technology and education will be  privileges that only tiny minority will be allowed to access.<br />
Pw2P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213147</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213147</guid>
		<description>5 years later ,p2p will be dead. people will getting movie from site like youtube ,veoh , ...

this also mean the end of **AA suing people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5 years later ,p2p will be dead. people will getting movie from site like youtube ,veoh , &#8230;</p>
<p>this also mean the end of **AA suing people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twizz</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213090</link>
		<dc:creator>twizz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213090</guid>
		<description>i dont see the technology in dispute currently
it&#039;s the law which sourrounds it&#039;s use which is being defined at present. 

We&#039;ve been through a honeymoon period - a lawless vacuum on a new frontier - a place where no law existed.

But as each case occurs - the law makes itself present and defines it&#039;s own power regarding this area.

I think we are dealing with something much more complicated than the ascent of vhs, dvd or mp3, it&#039;s a much bigger equation - with simply many more people and devices and cultural forms involved. 

I think the rise of law to this area will continue to be complicated and in it&#039;s way innovative. It&#039;s law which will define the extent of power of the &#039;pullers&#039; - the consumers, who dictate over and above the former suppliers &amp; their old models of manufacturing culture.

But Law is the final word. it is extremely powerful in it&#039;s influenece on the mind of the masses. It can irradicate whole realities - it can put back developments for a whole generation (upto 20 years) and inturrupt what would have been a natural organic process of growth. 

The way the Law is being defined at present is intense. It&#039;s on a day-by-day basis. It&#039;s still open - could swing 100% one way or another. 
It is the new frontier within the frontier and once established, it carries the last laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont see the technology in dispute currently<br />
it&#8217;s the law which sourrounds it&#8217;s use which is being defined at present. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been through a honeymoon period &#8211; a lawless vacuum on a new frontier &#8211; a place where no law existed.</p>
<p>But as each case occurs &#8211; the law makes itself present and defines it&#8217;s own power regarding this area.</p>
<p>I think we are dealing with something much more complicated than the ascent of vhs, dvd or mp3, it&#8217;s a much bigger equation &#8211; with simply many more people and devices and cultural forms involved. </p>
<p>I think the rise of law to this area will continue to be complicated and in it&#8217;s way innovative. It&#8217;s law which will define the extent of power of the &#8216;pullers&#8217; &#8211; the consumers, who dictate over and above the former suppliers &amp; their old models of manufacturing culture.</p>
<p>But Law is the final word. it is extremely powerful in it&#8217;s influenece on the mind of the masses. It can irradicate whole realities &#8211; it can put back developments for a whole generation (upto 20 years) and inturrupt what would have been a natural organic process of growth. </p>
<p>The way the Law is being defined at present is intense. It&#8217;s on a day-by-day basis. It&#8217;s still open &#8211; could swing 100% one way or another.<br />
It is the new frontier within the frontier and once established, it carries the last laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fingerless Bob</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213082</link>
		<dc:creator>Fingerless Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213082</guid>
		<description>;&#039;lsAOL0-Sew.&#039;:sd v:&quot;&gt;cx&#039;
 c&gt; c
XD
?xsd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>;&#8217;lsAOL0-Sew.&#8217;:sd v:&#8221;&gt;cx&#8217;<br />
 c&gt; c<br />
XD<br />
?xsd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smart1</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213075</link>
		<dc:creator>Smart1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213075</guid>
		<description>dumb Americans.. sigh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dumb Americans.. sigh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lephron</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213050</link>
		<dc:creator>Lephron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-213050</guid>
		<description>What I see for the future is things getting easier. Right now it isn&#039;t that easy to download your favourite TV shows or new films (it&#039;s not hard, but it&#039;s not as simple as something like YouTube).

I already see progress in this area. For example, http://www.foxtorrent.com/ lets you download torrents directly in your browser, and sites like http://www.flixflux.co.uk and http://www.thesprawl.se organise torrents and link it with other data to make is much easier to find films and tv shows your after. 

In the future I think the whole process will be automated. New TV shows and films will be automatically downloaded based on your preferences. It&#039;s exciting times!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I see for the future is things getting easier. Right now it isn&#8217;t that easy to download your favourite TV shows or new films (it&#8217;s not hard, but it&#8217;s not as simple as something like YouTube).</p>
<p>I already see progress in this area. For example, <a href="http://www.foxtorrent.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxtorrent.com/</a> lets you download torrents directly in your browser, and sites like <a href="http://www.flixflux.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.flixflux.co.uk</a> and <a href="http://www.thesprawl.se" rel="nofollow">http://www.thesprawl.se</a> organise torrents and link it with other data to make is much easier to find films and tv shows your after. </p>
<p>In the future I think the whole process will be automated. New TV shows and films will be automatically downloaded based on your preferences. It&#8217;s exciting times!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: astrospliff</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212938</link>
		<dc:creator>astrospliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212938</guid>
		<description>less seeded torrents should stick to you for a day-2 or until 0.1 ratio. 
just dreamweavin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>less seeded torrents should stick to you for a day-2 or until 0.1 ratio.<br />
just dreamweavin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212855</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 05:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212855</guid>
		<description>I think exeem was a very good idea, just poorly executed.  I think an exeem type piece of software is the future.  There can still be sites that host the files that point to the downloads, but no centralized tracker..

Jordan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think exeem was a very good idea, just poorly executed.  I think an exeem type piece of software is the future.  There can still be sites that host the files that point to the downloads, but no centralized tracker..</p>
<p>Jordan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prentice</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212818</link>
		<dc:creator>Prentice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212818</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;212778&quot;]My Wishlist for future versions of bittorent:

1. Tor-like anonymous options enabled by default (everyone becomes an exit router &amp; everyone gains from it). Donating of bandwidth as an exit router mandatory (i.e. min 25% of your bw).

2. Forced Encryption (header+payload) enabled by default.

3. Video (Read TV) Streaming through it a la delayed Sattelite TV access to all channels in the world (encrypted &amp; annonymous).

4. Continuous developtment of Intelligent code to circumvent the toughest ISP throttling/blocking techniques out there. ISP throttling is likely to become and even greater threat to bittorent than the MAFIAA&#039;s &amp; CRIA&#039;s of the world.

5. Expand the protocol to support other Internet protocols (i.e. Email, music streaming, tucows/linux/patching distros, etc) such that other unprotected protocols gain from the anonymity of bittorent, and the encryption. In return, ISPs have less reason to block it because it will be increasingly be used for legit reasons.

6. Allow for MD5 like encrypted signatures of people who upload torrents so that we can distinguish a real AXXO from a fake one (and also clean up 90%+ of all the fake torrents out there).

Beyond that, I wish Torrent tracker admins also increased security today:

1) All torrent sites should run ONLY on httpS (SSL). There&#039;s no excuse not to (ok so it sucks up more CPU), but it kills ISP &amp; law snooping.

2) Torrent site admins should continue to work together and develop BEST PRACTICES list for how to setup a torrent site, with special focus on security. For instance the following should be part of the list of step by step instructions:

a) How to configure HTTPS
b) How to run encrypted partitions on all your servers.
c) How to automatically delete all user related log files that could be used to identify users.
d) Establish secret code words between original senior site admins for the purpose of sending secret urgent messages (i.e. &quot;Hey I&#039;m going to 7/11 to grab a slurpee&quot;)... which actually means &quot;hey I got busted, delete everything &amp; go hide&quot;.
e) Any forum rooms and/or IRC sould all run over forced encrypted connections. There&#039;s no excuse not to.
f) How to perform encrypted backups of key server configs to offshore secure sites.

I&#039;m sure others can come up with even more ideas.

Anon787[/quote]


Beautiful.  Brilliant.  These are the only important parts of next-gen P2P, and in the past three years I have seen zero development on any of these fronts.  I can only hope that the R&amp;D is going on underground, but reality calls for something more tangible.

  With respect to additional suggestions, all that&#039;s left is (I can&#039;t remember the name for it), ability of the network to operate even with a significant proportion of corrupted/infected nodes.

  But for now, the ISP-throttling DPI is a cat and mouse game, and in over three years, DPI has been advancing nonstop, whereas BT came up with a half-hearted &quot;header encryption&quot;.  We are losing: developers save us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="212778"]My Wishlist for future versions of bittorent:</p>
<p>1. Tor-like anonymous options enabled by default (everyone becomes an exit router &amp; everyone gains from it). Donating of bandwidth as an exit router mandatory (i.e. min 25% of your bw).</p>
<p>2. Forced Encryption (header+payload) enabled by default.</p>
<p>3. Video (Read TV) Streaming through it a la delayed Sattelite TV access to all channels in the world (encrypted &amp; annonymous).</p>
<p>4. Continuous developtment of Intelligent code to circumvent the toughest ISP throttling/blocking techniques out there. ISP throttling is likely to become and even greater threat to bittorent than the MAFIAA&#8217;s &amp; CRIA&#8217;s of the world.</p>
<p>5. Expand the protocol to support other Internet protocols (i.e. Email, music streaming, tucows/linux/patching distros, etc) such that other unprotected protocols gain from the anonymity of bittorent, and the encryption. In return, ISPs have less reason to block it because it will be increasingly be used for legit reasons.</p>
<p>6. Allow for MD5 like encrypted signatures of people who upload torrents so that we can distinguish a real AXXO from a fake one (and also clean up 90%+ of all the fake torrents out there).</p>
<p>Beyond that, I wish Torrent tracker admins also increased security today:</p>
<p>1) All torrent sites should run ONLY on httpS (SSL). There&#8217;s no excuse not to (ok so it sucks up more CPU), but it kills ISP &amp; law snooping.</p>
<p>2) Torrent site admins should continue to work together and develop BEST PRACTICES list for how to setup a torrent site, with special focus on security. For instance the following should be part of the list of step by step instructions:</p>
<p>a) How to configure HTTPS<br />
b) How to run encrypted partitions on all your servers.<br />
c) How to automatically delete all user related log files that could be used to identify users.<br />
d) Establish secret code words between original senior site admins for the purpose of sending secret urgent messages (i.e. &#8220;Hey I&#8217;m going to 7/11 to grab a slurpee&#8221;)&#8230; which actually means &#8220;hey I got busted, delete everything &amp; go hide&#8221;.<br />
e) Any forum rooms and/or IRC sould all run over forced encrypted connections. There&#8217;s no excuse not to.<br />
f) How to perform encrypted backups of key server configs to offshore secure sites.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure others can come up with even more ideas.</p>
<p>Anon787[/quote]</p>
<p>Beautiful.  Brilliant.  These are the only important parts of next-gen P2P, and in the past three years I have seen zero development on any of these fronts.  I can only hope that the R&amp;D is going on underground, but reality calls for something more tangible.</p>
<p>  With respect to additional suggestions, all that&#8217;s left is (I can&#8217;t remember the name for it), ability of the network to operate even with a significant proportion of corrupted/infected nodes.</p>
<p>  But for now, the ISP-throttling DPI is a cat and mouse game, and in over three years, DPI has been advancing nonstop, whereas BT came up with a half-hearted &#8220;header encryption&#8221;.  We are losing: developers save us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon787</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212778</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon787</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212778</guid>
		<description>My Wishlist for future versions of bittorent:

1. Tor-like anonymous options enabled by default (everyone becomes an exit router &amp; everyone gains from it). Donating of bandwidth as an exit router mandatory (i.e. min 25% of your bw).

2. Forced Encryption (header+payload) enabled by default.

3. Video (Read TV) Streaming through it a la delayed Sattelite TV access to all channels in the world (encrypted &amp; annonymous).

4. Continuous developtment of Intelligent code to circumvent the toughest ISP throttling/blocking techniques out there. ISP throttling is likely to become and even greater threat to bittorent than the MAFIAA&#039;s &amp; CRIA&#039;s of the world.

5. Expand the protocol to support other Internet protocols (i.e. Email, music streaming, tucows/linux/patching distros, etc) such that other unprotected protocols gain from the anonymity of bittorent, and the encryption. In return, ISPs have less reason to block it because it will be increasingly be used for legit reasons.

6. Allow for MD5 like encrypted signatures of people who upload torrents so that we can distinguish a real AXXO from a fake one (and also clean up 90%+ of all the fake torrents out there).

Beyond that, I wish Torrent tracker admins also increased security today:

1) All torrent sites should run ONLY on httpS (SSL). There&#039;s no excuse not to (ok so it sucks up more CPU), but it kills ISP &amp; law snooping.

2) Torrent site admins should continue to work together and develop BEST PRACTICES list for how to setup a torrent site, with special focus on security. For instance the following should be part of the list of step by step instructions:

a) How to configure HTTPS
b) How to run encrypted partitions on all your servers.
c) How to automatically delete all user related log files that could be used to identify users.
d) Establish secret code words between original senior site admins for the purpose of sending secret urgent messages (i.e. &quot;Hey I&#039;m going to 7/11 to grab a slurpee&quot;)... which actually means &quot;hey I got busted, delete everything &amp; go hide&quot;.
e) Any forum rooms and/or IRC sould all run over forced encrypted connections. There&#039;s no excuse not to.
f) How to perform encrypted backups of key server configs to offshore secure sites.

I&#039;m sure others can come up with even more ideas.

Anon787</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Wishlist for future versions of bittorent:</p>
<p>1. Tor-like anonymous options enabled by default (everyone becomes an exit router &amp; everyone gains from it). Donating of bandwidth as an exit router mandatory (i.e. min 25% of your bw).</p>
<p>2. Forced Encryption (header+payload) enabled by default.</p>
<p>3. Video (Read TV) Streaming through it a la delayed Sattelite TV access to all channels in the world (encrypted &amp; annonymous).</p>
<p>4. Continuous developtment of Intelligent code to circumvent the toughest ISP throttling/blocking techniques out there. ISP throttling is likely to become and even greater threat to bittorent than the MAFIAA&#8217;s &amp; CRIA&#8217;s of the world.</p>
<p>5. Expand the protocol to support other Internet protocols (i.e. Email, music streaming, tucows/linux/patching distros, etc) such that other unprotected protocols gain from the anonymity of bittorent, and the encryption. In return, ISPs have less reason to block it because it will be increasingly be used for legit reasons.</p>
<p>6. Allow for MD5 like encrypted signatures of people who upload torrents so that we can distinguish a real AXXO from a fake one (and also clean up 90%+ of all the fake torrents out there).</p>
<p>Beyond that, I wish Torrent tracker admins also increased security today:</p>
<p>1) All torrent sites should run ONLY on httpS (SSL). There&#8217;s no excuse not to (ok so it sucks up more CPU), but it kills ISP &amp; law snooping.</p>
<p>2) Torrent site admins should continue to work together and develop BEST PRACTICES list for how to setup a torrent site, with special focus on security. For instance the following should be part of the list of step by step instructions:</p>
<p>a) How to configure HTTPS<br />
b) How to run encrypted partitions on all your servers.<br />
c) How to automatically delete all user related log files that could be used to identify users.<br />
d) Establish secret code words between original senior site admins for the purpose of sending secret urgent messages (i.e. &#8220;Hey I&#8217;m going to 7/11 to grab a slurpee&#8221;)&#8230; which actually means &#8220;hey I got busted, delete everything &amp; go hide&#8221;.<br />
e) Any forum rooms and/or IRC sould all run over forced encrypted connections. There&#8217;s no excuse not to.<br />
f) How to perform encrypted backups of key server configs to offshore secure sites.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure others can come up with even more ideas.</p>
<p>Anon787</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212767</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212767</guid>
		<description>lets start with opening torrent spy up to US users</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lets start with opening torrent spy up to US users</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212764</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212764</guid>
		<description>lets just start with opening torrentspy up to US users</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lets just start with opening torrentspy up to US users</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fatla00</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212693</link>
		<dc:creator>fatla00</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212693</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll just have to see. People today still use Limewire even though the Bit Torrent Revolution has already hit, so whatever may change in the future will never bring an end to Bit Torrent. (Though you could argue that no one using Bit Torrent is an idiot so when the next big thing comes along, we&#039;ll All flock to it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll just have to see. People today still use Limewire even though the Bit Torrent Revolution has already hit, so whatever may change in the future will never bring an end to Bit Torrent. (Though you could argue that no one using Bit Torrent is an idiot so when the next big thing comes along, we&#8217;ll All flock to it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Hewitt</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212686</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Hewitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212686</guid>
		<description>Well I read in one of the more recent articles on TF that the next protocol will be more focused on the security of users and taking into account some new threats in todays world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I read in one of the more recent articles on TF that the next protocol will be more focused on the security of users and taking into account some new threats in todays world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swe</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212678</link>
		<dc:creator>swe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212678</guid>
		<description>The darknet will take over the world in 2048.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The darknet will take over the world in 2048.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redbeaver</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212669</link>
		<dc:creator>redbeaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212669</guid>
		<description>Hmm, in the beginning there was Morpheus, but that got slammed, abused etc. There you didn&#039;t need to go to sites and see whats available, one server would tell you what is available for Morpheus. Then came Bitorrent, a safer way for the websites to provide data as the actual file isn&#039;t on the server, but where can it go from there... Well I think based on laws, Bittorrent is pretty much unbeatable unless you like to threat server providers like the demonoid story. But on the other hand unlike Morpheus which was just one program. The tech. with Bittorrent broke off the concept of one program/server showing the availability of files into branches as in a torrent site would host their own torrent files so because of 1 person it wouldn&#039;t ruin it for the community. So based on that unless there is an even better way to protect the providers I don&#039;t think anything can defeat or surpass Bittorrent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, in the beginning there was Morpheus, but that got slammed, abused etc. There you didn&#8217;t need to go to sites and see whats available, one server would tell you what is available for Morpheus. Then came Bitorrent, a safer way for the websites to provide data as the actual file isn&#8217;t on the server, but where can it go from there&#8230; Well I think based on laws, Bittorrent is pretty much unbeatable unless you like to threat server providers like the demonoid story. But on the other hand unlike Morpheus which was just one program. The tech. with Bittorrent broke off the concept of one program/server showing the availability of files into branches as in a torrent site would host their own torrent files so because of 1 person it wouldn&#8217;t ruin it for the community. So based on that unless there is an even better way to protect the providers I don&#8217;t think anything can defeat or surpass Bittorrent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BitFuture</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212635</link>
		<dc:creator>BitFuture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212635</guid>
		<description>Personally, I see BitTorrent or it&#039;s predecesor as being faster, easier, used by more people and legal.
The government can&#039;t always live with thir heads in the sand.
Something has to change.
Besdes, think how much faster internet speeds are going to be in a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I see BitTorrent or it&#8217;s predecesor as being faster, easier, used by more people and legal.<br />
The government can&#8217;t always live with thir heads in the sand.<br />
Something has to change.<br />
Besdes, think how much faster internet speeds are going to be in a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahoy Matey!</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212629</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahoy Matey!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212629</guid>
		<description>I predict in 5 years every admin may possibly be in jail begging donations for their legal defense like OINK....sad but nevertheless a possibility...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I predict in 5 years every admin may possibly be in jail begging donations for their legal defense like OINK&#8230;.sad but nevertheless a possibility&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeC123</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212628</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeC123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212628</guid>
		<description>With the current state of the torrent community, I am more concerned and focused on now as opposed the next generation of p2p. It&#039;s going to be difficult for the major trackers to find a way to make keeping the site open worth the barrage of threatening letters and law suits. And with more and more countries adopting copyright laws, the idea of moving to a more liberal nation is lessening. 
There&#039;s no reason that Mininova or a similar site can&#039;t take over where Demonoid left off in terms of community. All it would take is requiring registration and tracking ratios. Maybe making the user interface for leaving comments a little simpler. Commenting on a torrent is very under-rated in my opinion. That is one of the things that I liked about Demonoid, the comments and the community!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the current state of the torrent community, I am more concerned and focused on now as opposed the next generation of p2p. It&#8217;s going to be difficult for the major trackers to find a way to make keeping the site open worth the barrage of threatening letters and law suits. And with more and more countries adopting copyright laws, the idea of moving to a more liberal nation is lessening.<br />
There&#8217;s no reason that Mininova or a similar site can&#8217;t take over where Demonoid left off in terms of community. All it would take is requiring registration and tracking ratios. Maybe making the user interface for leaving comments a little simpler. Commenting on a torrent is very under-rated in my opinion. That is one of the things that I liked about Demonoid, the comments and the community!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trentino</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212616</link>
		<dc:creator>trentino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212616</guid>
		<description>hydra :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hydra :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#124;v&#124;aS</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212615</link>
		<dc:creator>&#124;v&#124;aS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212615</guid>
		<description>I think that the SecureP2P project by TPB is looking pretty decent from the brief bit I have read about it (securep2p.net).

I would hope, especially after we have seen large trackers such as OiNK and Demonoid go under, that a decentralized tracker-free system can be developed. If this is not possible, a less tracker reliant system would also be an excellent start.

&#124;v&#124;aS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the SecureP2P project by TPB is looking pretty decent from the brief bit I have read about it (securep2p.net).</p>
<p>I would hope, especially after we have seen large trackers such as OiNK and Demonoid go under, that a decentralized tracker-free system can be developed. If this is not possible, a less tracker reliant system would also be an excellent start.</p>
<p>|v|aS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spycopy</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212610</link>
		<dc:creator>spycopy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212610</guid>
		<description>I forsee the next big thing will be streaming content. For example I can stream a music video from nuclear blast in 30 seconds, but it could take  20 minutes or longer to DL the video via torrent or less. but streaming a DL will be fast. Have a good night</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forsee the next big thing will be streaming content. For example I can stream a music video from nuclear blast in 30 seconds, but it could take  20 minutes or longer to DL the video via torrent or less. but streaming a DL will be fast. Have a good night</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212603</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212603</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;212575&quot;]&quot;Technology is always evolving and I have little doubt that 5 or 10 years from now we will be using a different protocol&quot;

Did you mean, &quot;I have little doubt that 5 or 10 years from now we will be using the same protocol&quot; ?

In any case, with technology you can always expect the unexpected as long as

people continue to show interest in a specific field. Hopefully we&#039;ll have plenty of hard-working innovative minds on our side trying to concoct some new breed of file-sharing technology to facilitate our sharing endeavors. I am also hopeful that the industry also evolve and reconsider their seemingly now ineffective and outdated approach towards customers and development of new media.[/quote]

i am sorry but are you retarded? the sentence was stated correctly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="212575"]&#8220;Technology is always evolving and I have little doubt that 5 or 10 years from now we will be using a different protocol&#8221;</p>
<p>Did you mean, &#8220;I have little doubt that 5 or 10 years from now we will be using the same protocol&#8221; ?</p>
<p>In any case, with technology you can always expect the unexpected as long as</p>
<p>people continue to show interest in a specific field. Hopefully we&#8217;ll have plenty of hard-working innovative minds on our side trying to concoct some new breed of file-sharing technology to facilitate our sharing endeavors. I am also hopeful that the industry also evolve and reconsider their seemingly now ineffective and outdated approach towards customers and development of new media.[/quote]</p>
<p>i am sorry but are you retarded? the sentence was stated correctly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wCao</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212591</link>
		<dc:creator>wCao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212591</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;212555&quot;]dunno[/quote]

lmao</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="212555"]dunno[/quote]</p>
<p>lmao</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Consuming Hatred</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212575</link>
		<dc:creator>Consuming Hatred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212575</guid>
		<description>&quot;Technology is always evolving and I have little doubt that 5 or 10 years from now we will be using a different protocol&quot;

Did you mean, &quot;I have little doubt that 5 or 10 years from now we will be using the same protocol&quot; ?

In any case, with technology you can always expect the unexpected as long as   people continue to show interest in a specific field. Hopefully we&#039;ll have plenty of hard-working innovative minds on our side trying to concoct some new breed of file-sharing technology to facilitate our sharing endeavors. I am also hopeful that the industry also evolve and reconsider their seemingly now ineffective and outdated approach towards customers and development of new media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Technology is always evolving and I have little doubt that 5 or 10 years from now we will be using a different protocol&#8221;</p>
<p>Did you mean, &#8220;I have little doubt that 5 or 10 years from now we will be using the same protocol&#8221; ?</p>
<p>In any case, with technology you can always expect the unexpected as long as   people continue to show interest in a specific field. Hopefully we&#8217;ll have plenty of hard-working innovative minds on our side trying to concoct some new breed of file-sharing technology to facilitate our sharing endeavors. I am also hopeful that the industry also evolve and reconsider their seemingly now ineffective and outdated approach towards customers and development of new media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Consuming Hatt</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212572</link>
		<dc:creator>Consuming Hatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212572</guid>
		<description>&quot;Technology is always evolving and I have little doubt that 5 or 10 years from now we will be using a different protocol&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Technology is always evolving and I have little doubt that 5 or 10 years from now we will be using a different protocol&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: #</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212557</link>
		<dc:creator>#</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212557</guid>
		<description>I hope we have a highly advanced completely anonymous decentralized protocol (but still using tracker type sites, just we need a lot of them; some big, some small).

I hope the next protocol isn&#039;t just &quot;bittorent with our names on it&quot;, but a radically different protocol.

My prediction? Major sites will fall, new sites will come up. We will mourn the loss and be thankful to all the fallen sites have given us, while trying to make the new sites the best they can be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope we have a highly advanced completely anonymous decentralized protocol (but still using tracker type sites, just we need a lot of them; some big, some small).</p>
<p>I hope the next protocol isn&#8217;t just &#8220;bittorent with our names on it&#8221;, but a radically different protocol.</p>
<p>My prediction? Major sites will fall, new sites will come up. We will mourn the loss and be thankful to all the fallen sites have given us, while trying to make the new sites the best they can be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212555</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/the-future-of-bittorrent-071113/#comment-212555</guid>
		<description>dunno</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dunno</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

