You may claim that, but as we established the other day. which you didn’t seem to disagree with, Spotify and all other authorised services is technology belonging to a even older century, since they offer an clearly inferior service compared to P2P filesharing.

Spotify etc has several limitations, and consumes meaningless economical resources that adds additional cost. P2P filesharing has none of those limitations, and it functions for free, demanding no economical resources that aren’t already there. In a normal universe, where the rest of us lives, a service which has several consumer hostile limitations, a service which requires meaningless economical resources, is considered an invention belonging to an older century than an invention which has no limitations, demands no economical resources and offer a better product.

So if filesharing is technology from the 20th century, Spotify and all the other authorized services belong to the 19th century.

It will never happen. The companies involved are extremely jealous of their monopolies. The second such an attempt is made the project instantly falls to bits and pieces when EMI, SONY and Warner try to take a 90% cut each.
That spotify succeeded until launch was a minor miracle. Even so, the terms a spotify-signed artist with a label endures make even the normal “indentured serfdom”-contracts look generous.

“So you ARE trying to censor me. I have the same right as everybody else to write on this blog.
World English Dictionary (one of the meanings of censor):
“any person who controls or suppresses the behaviour of others”
That’s exactly what you’re trying to do.”

I have a slew of posts from you where you expressly make the claim that said definition of censorship is not valid. Of course, this would be when a government agency implements said censorship against pirates which you for some reason felt should not abide by the same rules…
So which of your completely contradictory statements would you consider true and which one an outright lie? You can hardly claim veracity of both.
Honestly, Your ability to hang yourself with your own petard is, by now, becoming rather amusing…

And the only retort you can use to save face is – as usual – trying to defuse the factual statements made against you.

As for “Ad hominem”…remind me, please, in which post on this forum you decided to actually claim Fredrika, by virtue of arguing with you, was the most evil person on earth, by necessity bypassing the likes of Hitler, Stalin and Bin Laden all at once?

You do not have the required credibility to say anything about either lies or ad hominems. Those phenomena are your stock in trade and have been for three years or more.

One of the main reasons PPTP can be considered unsafe is also that it leaks the ipv6 protocol addressation. So if you use PPTP, always disable ipv6.

That said breaking a PPTP encryption still requires resources. Meaning there is no profit in going after a few million filesharers when it takes significant amounts of time for each one you target.