Comments on: Torrent Clients Compared

By: notasignleid

notasignleid — Sat, 10 Feb 2007 17:21:25 +0000

Any one tried the latest bitcomet? I just eats up CPU time!!! Dunno tried multiple settings but just keeps on eating CPU!

By: t d

t d — Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:47:56 +0000

Bitcomet has the highest speed for me. I was dling a trailer. azureus stuck at 5 kbs and bitcomet crapped to 60kbs

By: my new name

my new name — Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:57:17 +0000

What The heck? I tried Bitcomet & Utorrent with same torrent file. The result, My bitcomet suck all the speed and went up more than 80k and my Utorrent juz stay at 0

By: Yolla

Yolla — Sat, 04 Mar 2006 06:47:07 +0000

Thanks Freak, ÂµTorrent is very good.
It’s lite and easy and doesn’t eat my ram.
And here comes my 2thanks clicks :-).

By: Anton

Anton — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:45:25 +0000

I thing bit coment is faster then azerus but my freind has azerus end it works faster, en whe have the same internet conacion

By: teknokool.net » links for 2005-12-16

teknokool.net » links for 2005-12-16 — Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:01:41 +0000

[...] Torrentfreak Â» Torrent Clients Compared utorrent, bitcomet, and azureus compared. (tags: bittorrent) [...]

By: Redth

Redth — Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:14:57 +0000

Naturally, uTorrent and Bitcoment are written in more native languages. Azureus is a java application, so it’s probably not going to run as fast.

By: Ernesto

Ernesto — Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:08:43 +0000

Where would science be without a debate ;-)

By: tac1

tac1 — Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:07:05 +0000

Tried the same myself with azureus & uTorrent. On each occassion Azureus commenced downloading quicker & faster.