up to 80%

Internet in Aus is already overpriced but now its gonna be slowed too …

“but putting dentists and tuckshops onto the list seemed a little ludicrous and pointless even for a government hell bent on censorship”

Rather than blindly accepting Conroy’s comments (he’s a pollie FFS, of course he’s lying), why don’t you spend a few minutes checking for yourself? It would’ve been quicker for you to Google the facts than it was for you to write such claptrap.

The dentist’s site was hacked by Russian CP merchants, it was removed and he subsequently shifted his site to a more secure host.

Because he did not and could not know he was on the SECRET blacklist he had no way of having his site removed once it was OK. OK?

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/technology/qld-dentist-furious-over-blacklist/2009/03/19/1237054974422.html

seems some users here can’t descriminate.

I believe the word you’re looking for is discriminate, smartass.

If or when you’re able to master basic English language, then maybe we’ll talk. Until then I’m not feeling too hopeful of learning much from you. :(

What? Are you an idiot? Tor is small because not that many people are using it. Just adopt the technology and it will grow. There is nothing keeping it small to call for something else for ‘mass deployment’.

“Mirrors utilizing pics with the names of the banned websites incorporated within, and the Censor cops would have to open-eyeball each pic to determine just where each pic leads.”

As opposed to looking at the hypertext links? LOL. I love it when technologically illiterate people say something really stupid.

“Incase you’re curious I wouldn’t visit them sites. I tried one near the top and it was pics of aborted foetuses :(.”

So? Seems like you are exactly the kind of a pussy that the nanny nation needs to ‘protect’.

Not as exciting as political banning I know.

Tell your friends . . .

Their is no need for an onhoust democratic government to censor the web and they know it.

Remember knowledge is power. Without the knowledge we wouldn’t act.

Such a f__king loser

Its common sense that makes nobs like you look so empty headed cause you dont have any.

Cant believe you were dumb enough to think i dont know the difference between common sense etc, actually i can believe it.

Roped into that one hey simpleton.

Wrote letters to conroy….
hahahaha

Instead of trying to be a combo of internet tough guy and intelligent sheeple. Too retardo to know the difference betwen ‘common sense’ & ‘elementary’. Go back to jerking off your Daddy so he doesn’t smash you in the head some more after he rapes yu.

I’m defending this scheme whatsoever – indeed, I’ve written letters to Stephen Conroy (telco minister), Mike Rann (Premier of SA) and Kevin Rudd (Prime Minister of Australia) and attended the December protests in my state – but putting dentists and tuckshops onto the list seemed a little ludicrous and pointless even for a government hell bent on censorship.

http://www.minister.dbcde.gov.au/media/media_releases/2009/014

Now, will TF add a postscript to this article? The minister may well be telling lies regarding this being a fake of course.

See that, thats the unintelligent comment nub cakes, seems elementary to you but to rest of us its common sense.

As far as the iinet case goes you should be able to tell us as your helping with the prosecution.

Slaves shall f__king server

2010 FTW

So who said TF was a forum where free speech applied anyway? They pay for the hosting so they can delete any and all comments if they wish.

Surprisingly, for a supposed “troll” – seems some users here can’t descriminate in their own mind their suspicions from reality (where they can’t know either way) – none of my comments have ever been deleted to my knowledge.

Not that many of those users even know what the true definition of troll actually is… schill would be a better word for what they’re thinking but oh well, newbs huh?

Similarly, P2P blocklists end up punishing a lot of innocent sites (and even seedboxes) simply due to the misfortune of having a having a similar IP address to a known abuser.

Who blocks ONE SINGLE video on youporn?

Yeah, they’re bureocrats and all, but come on, this strains belief.

RT
http://www.online-privacy.pro.tc

Is that anything to do with the fact that we are only almost 4 years into a maximum 5 year term? He can call an election whenever he wants, but won’t since Mr. Cameron is guaranteed to get in.

Or is it because you believe that Mr. Brown is unelected (he was elected as MP for Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath and as party leader by members of the Labour Party, and finally was asked by the Queen to form a government)

The word is overturned.

Not overruled.

Would it be possible, or is it planned in IPv6 (I am unsure) to rebuild large sections of the web to work as a blacknet? Relying on every connection being encrypted as a standard to every other connection?

If I understand, under current UK law the ISP would just record the data anyway – not their problem that its encrypted and we get Waqui Jaqui throwing a fit with her database finaly working!… with Anonymised and encrypted traffic.

Not talking about TOR, thats too small scale, but is there a project working on creating something like this for mass deployment?

http://isitup.org/check/wikileaks.org

At my school TorrentFreak is banned because it’s apparently a porn site… There is a button I can click which reports sites that are filtered under incorrect categories to I clicked it about two weeks ago and still it’s blocked as a porn site.

Bastards.

All censorship does is brings the world a step closer to being run like China.

readable version can be found at scribd.com. do a little search there and it will show right up ;)

@ 18

NubCakes is trying but, as you know, he isn’t getting paid to trying not to look like idiot (unfortunately it usually turns out like that very often),he is getting paid for trolling us. Trolling is hard work, you can even say an art and NubCakes is trying to to his best. Unfortunately successful trolling needs skills that NubCakes don’t have yet … but as you see he is trying very hard.

What exactly did I say that was unintelligent?

“Like tell us how the iinet case is going at least.”

Google is your friend.

Also, I think that blocking any website is contrary its own purpose: if it is to stop child abuse websites, then blocking them will not do anything, and if it is to apprehend people who visit them, then blocking them will also not do anything to catch them, and is even worse because there are no proper court procedures for this block-list.

You practically had to get a teacher to sign in for you if you wanted to do research since so many things were blocked. The ironic part was that they missed 9/10ths of the ads, and because the lists were so over the top nobody cared if you set a bunch off.

Generally it’s not deliberate interference for a specific site, but some idiot who doesn’t know how to create the blacklists properly and as a result generates false positives. (Hell, they blocked BBC for a week.)

The general guideline is better to block it than to have someone do something dangerous and to their credit most schools with draconian rules like that have no problems with viruses, no matter how retarded the people using the computers are.

This is why there is an Australian Sex Party.

“Tired of ‘hypocrites’ and ‘wowsers’ (an Australian slang term for an obtrusively puritanical person)?”” – asks Breaking Free, continuing

The Sex Party hopes to save their nation from such people. The woman you see in this video is the party’s convenor, Fiona Patten, the head of the Eros Association, the national adult retail and entertainment lobby group.

What has triggered this new party line? Patten says the trigger has been the Australian government’s decision to place a mandatory filter on the Internet.

found on p2pnet site.

God nub cakes can you say something intelligent just once, please man just ONCE!!!

Like tell us how the iinet case is going at least.

2010 FTW

Well those organisations probably don’t wish users of their network to be reading about torrent-related subjects or using Bittorrent on their networks … seems elementary to me.

We here in the UK are _STILL_ waiting for one…”

Not for a few years at least… bottom line is this filter, unless something changes dramatically, won’t effect the wau many people vote as they consider other issues much more important than a few thousand sites they probably would never visit anyhow being blocked.