<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TorrentFreak Interviews a Lawyer Defending 500 File-Sharers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/</link>
	<description>Torrent News, Torrent Sites and the latest Scoops</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:21:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Victims of WiFi Theft Not Responsible For Illegal Uploads (TF) &#124; Direct2News</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-495725</link>
		<dc:creator>Victims of WiFi Theft Not Responsible For Illegal Uploads (TF) &#124; Direct2News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-495725</guid>
		<description>[...] decision in Frankfurt as “sensational”, Christian Solmecke, a lawyer currently defending around 500 file-sharers told TorrentFreak: “The future will show us what the highest court in Germany - the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] decision in Frankfurt as “sensational”, Christian Solmecke, a lawyer currently defending around 500 file-sharers told TorrentFreak: “The future will show us what the highest court in Germany &#8211; the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almost Everything &#187; Good news for file sharer in Germany</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-484851</link>
		<dc:creator>Almost Everything &#187; Good news for file sharer in Germany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-484851</guid>
		<description>[...] Solmecke, a lawyer working at lawyers Wilde &amp; Beuger and currently defending around 500 file-sharers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Solmecke, a lawyer working at lawyers Wilde &amp; Beuger and currently defending around 500 file-sharers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharing 2999 Songs, 199 Movies Becomes &#8216;Safe&#8217; in Germany &#124; TorrentFreak</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-484796</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharing 2999 Songs, 199 Movies Becomes &#8216;Safe&#8217; in Germany &#124; TorrentFreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-484796</guid>
		<description>[...] Solmecke, a lawyer working at Lawyers Wilde &amp; Beuger and currently defending around 500 file-sharers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Solmecke, a lawyer working at Lawyers Wilde &#38; Beuger and currently defending around 500 file-sharers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victims of WiFi Theft Not Responsible For Illegal Uploads - Clone-Zone FxP - Worldwide Warez Forum</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-472357</link>
		<dc:creator>Victims of WiFi Theft Not Responsible For Illegal Uploads - Clone-Zone FxP - Worldwide Warez Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 02:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-472357</guid>
		<description>[...] the decision in Frankfurt as “sensational”, Christian Solmecke, a lawyer currently defending around 500 file-sharers told TorrentFreak: “The future will show us what the highest court in Germany - the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the decision in Frankfurt as “sensational”, Christian Solmecke, a lawyer currently defending around 500 file-sharers told TorrentFreak: “The future will show us what the highest court in Germany &#8211; the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victims of WiFi Theft Not Responsible For Illegal Uploads&#160;at IDTorrent Blog</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-453844</link>
		<dc:creator>Victims of WiFi Theft Not Responsible For Illegal Uploads&#160;at IDTorrent Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-453844</guid>
		<description>[...] in Frankfurt as &#8220;sensational&#8221;, Christian Solmecke, a lawyer currently defending around 500 file-sharers told TorrentFreak: &#8220;The future will show us what the highest court in Germany - the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Frankfurt as &#8220;sensational&#8221;, Christian Solmecke, a lawyer currently defending around 500 file-sharers told TorrentFreak: &#8220;The future will show us what the highest court in Germany &#8211; the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victims of WiFi Theft Not Responsible For Illegal Uploads &#124; test</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-449984</link>
		<dc:creator>Victims of WiFi Theft Not Responsible For Illegal Uploads &#124; test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-449984</guid>
		<description>[...] in Frankfurt as &#8220;sensational&#8221;, Christian Solmecke, a lawyer currently defending around 500 file-sharers told TorrentFreak: &#8220;The future will show us what the highest court in Germany - the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Frankfurt as &#8220;sensational&#8221;, Christian Solmecke, a lawyer currently defending around 500 file-sharers told TorrentFreak: &#8220;The future will show us what the highest court in Germany &#8211; the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zwartbaard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Victims of WiFi Theft Not Responsible For Illegal Uploads</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-448240</link>
		<dc:creator>Zwartbaard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Victims of WiFi Theft Not Responsible For Illegal Uploads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-448240</guid>
		<description>[...] decision in Frankfurt as &quot;sensational&quot;, Christian Solmecke, a lawyer currently defending around 500 file-sharers told TorrentFreak: &quot;The future will show us what the highest court in Germany - the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] decision in Frankfurt as &#8220;sensational&#8221;, Christian Solmecke, a lawyer currently defending around 500 file-sharers told TorrentFreak: &#8220;The future will show us what the highest court in Germany &#8211; the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victims of WiFi Theft Not Responsible For Illegal Uploads &#124; CyberLaw Blog</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-447000</link>
		<dc:creator>Victims of WiFi Theft Not Responsible For Illegal Uploads &#124; CyberLaw Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-447000</guid>
		<description>[...] decision in Frankfurt as &#039;sensational&#039;, Christian Solmecke, a lawyer currently defending around 500 file-sharers told TorrentFreak: &#039;The future will show us what the highest court in Germany - the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] decision in Frankfurt as &#8217;sensational&#8217;, Christian Solmecke, a lawyer currently defending around 500 file-sharers told TorrentFreak: &#8216;The future will show us what the highest court in Germany &#8211; the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victims of WiFi Theft Not Responsible For Illegal Uploads &#124; TorrentFreak</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-446977</link>
		<dc:creator>Victims of WiFi Theft Not Responsible For Illegal Uploads &#124; TorrentFreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-446977</guid>
		<description>[...] in Frankfurt as &#8220;sensational&#8221;, Christian Solmecke, a lawyer currently defending around 500 file-sharers told TorrentFreak: &#8220;The future will show us what the highest court in Germany - the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Frankfurt as &#8220;sensational&#8221;, Christian Solmecke, a lawyer currently defending around 500 file-sharers told TorrentFreak: &#8220;The future will show us what the highest court in Germany &#8211; the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: German Court Decision Hands Big Win to File-Sharers&#160;at IDTorrent Blog</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-316854</link>
		<dc:creator>German Court Decision Hands Big Win to File-Sharers&#160;at IDTorrent Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 09:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-316854</guid>
		<description>[...] to Christian Solmecke, a lawyer defending file-sharers in Germany, the system typically operated like this: &#8220;Based [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Christian Solmecke, a lawyer defending file-sharers in Germany, the system typically operated like this: &#8220;Based [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zwartbaard.nl &#187; Blog Archive &#187; German Court Decision Hands Big Win to File-Sharers</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-315286</link>
		<dc:creator>Zwartbaard.nl &#187; Blog Archive &#187; German Court Decision Hands Big Win to File-Sharers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-315286</guid>
		<description>[...] to Christian Solmecke, a lawyer defending file-sharers in Germany, the system typically operated like this: &quot;Based on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Christian Solmecke, a lawyer defending file-sharers in Germany, the system typically operated like this: &#8220;Based on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miniGandalf</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-268041</link>
		<dc:creator>miniGandalf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-268041</guid>
		<description>Please, stop the ditribution of the film &quot;Steal this film II&quot;.
This film is a very bad and sad film about the problem how
to deal with the new possibility of file sharing and pear-to-pear technology.

There are more problems with the film.
So, this film does not contribute making file sharing legal. 
I try to discuss some of my points.

1. Bad title
I wonder, why you named it &quot;stealing&quot;. From my point of view,
this should be called &quot;copying&quot;.
Stealing is the word for doing the action of &quot;pirates of intellectual properies&quot; called by the layers in order to have more chances to prosecute the other side.

What i do in a P2P connection, is not stealing, it is copying.
And here we have a hudge difference. I never would steal.

2. People without morality?
Very bad, that some of the speakers do not have any connection with morality.
I hear &quot;we will share everything...no one will ever never stop us sharing everything...&quot;.

There are some sort of materials - i do not want to give a list, because this may be different for other culture, but there is one, i must mention: killing peolpe - which are not allowed to be distributed. This is so from a moral point of view.
And i hope, this wont be allowed from the justice, too, in any country. 

3. No answer to the phenomen &quot;intellectual property&quot;
There is a very short text in the middle of the film about intellectual property.
The young man, who is speaking, is speaking about one on the most interessting problem of file sharing.

What is the answer for his questons? No one of the &quot;Kings of freedom fighters for file sharing&quot; has an answer. So i have the impression, all these guys have simple not understood the matter. This is sad.

4. file sharer == people unable to comminicate
After seeing this film, i have the feeling, file sharer are mostly young people, who are not able
to communicate about the the new technical possibilities given by P2P technology. They want to use this as unrestricted as possible, and &quot;basta&quot;. (&quot;Uff, i have spoken!&quot;)

This new technology has effects on the society, too, and we should no negligate this.

There is a bad feeling in me, after seeing this film.
The message of the film is: steal this film, and steal other films too, because this is possible!

I am sorry to write this, but i do think:
 - this is a bad film.
 - the next film must have an other title and must reflect more morality and knowledge about intellectual propery.
 
I want to use file sharing, but without shaming for what i am doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, stop the ditribution of the film &#8220;Steal this film II&#8221;.<br />
This film is a very bad and sad film about the problem how<br />
to deal with the new possibility of file sharing and pear-to-pear technology.</p>
<p>There are more problems with the film.<br />
So, this film does not contribute making file sharing legal.<br />
I try to discuss some of my points.</p>
<p>1. Bad title<br />
I wonder, why you named it &#8220;stealing&#8221;. From my point of view,<br />
this should be called &#8220;copying&#8221;.<br />
Stealing is the word for doing the action of &#8220;pirates of intellectual properies&#8221; called by the layers in order to have more chances to prosecute the other side.</p>
<p>What i do in a P2P connection, is not stealing, it is copying.<br />
And here we have a hudge difference. I never would steal.</p>
<p>2. People without morality?<br />
Very bad, that some of the speakers do not have any connection with morality.<br />
I hear &#8220;we will share everything&#8230;no one will ever never stop us sharing everything&#8230;&#8221;.</p>
<p>There are some sort of materials &#8211; i do not want to give a list, because this may be different for other culture, but there is one, i must mention: killing peolpe &#8211; which are not allowed to be distributed. This is so from a moral point of view.<br />
And i hope, this wont be allowed from the justice, too, in any country. </p>
<p>3. No answer to the phenomen &#8220;intellectual property&#8221;<br />
There is a very short text in the middle of the film about intellectual property.<br />
The young man, who is speaking, is speaking about one on the most interessting problem of file sharing.</p>
<p>What is the answer for his questons? No one of the &#8220;Kings of freedom fighters for file sharing&#8221; has an answer. So i have the impression, all these guys have simple not understood the matter. This is sad.</p>
<p>4. file sharer == people unable to comminicate<br />
After seeing this film, i have the feeling, file sharer are mostly young people, who are not able<br />
to communicate about the the new technical possibilities given by P2P technology. They want to use this as unrestricted as possible, and &#8220;basta&#8221;. (&#8221;Uff, i have spoken!&#8221;)</p>
<p>This new technology has effects on the society, too, and we should no negligate this.</p>
<p>There is a bad feeling in me, after seeing this film.<br />
The message of the film is: steal this film, and steal other films too, because this is possible!</p>
<p>I am sorry to write this, but i do think:<br />
 &#8211; this is a bad film.<br />
 &#8211; the next film must have an other title and must reflect more morality and knowledge about intellectual propery.</p>
<p>I want to use file sharing, but without shaming for what i am doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hadron</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-264223</link>
		<dc:creator>Hadron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-264223</guid>
		<description>Believe it or not, but it&#039;s not a misprint.

True, we haven&#039;t had that much cases in court. But many, many German people are threatened by letters from lawyers containing: &quot;Pay a few hundred bucks (Euros, to be correct) as compensation for the rightholder and for our fee, than we will not take you to court, which would cost you ten times more. Additionally, you have to sign a contract &#039;For the next 30 years I will never again upload the game/mp3/porn/software&#039;.&quot;

This is not scam or a dumb threat one could ignore. Without going into details, it is a legal action to  act this way. Think of it as a cease and desist letter, but with fees, the lawyers have a right to get from the one who receives the letter.

German law. German politicans. A reason to emigrate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe it or not, but it&#8217;s not a misprint.</p>
<p>True, we haven&#8217;t had that much cases in court. But many, many German people are threatened by letters from lawyers containing: &#8220;Pay a few hundred bucks (Euros, to be correct) as compensation for the rightholder and for our fee, than we will not take you to court, which would cost you ten times more. Additionally, you have to sign a contract &#8216;For the next 30 years I will never again upload the game/mp3/porn/software&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is not scam or a dumb threat one could ignore. Without going into details, it is a legal action to  act this way. Think of it as a cease and desist letter, but with fees, the lawyers have a right to get from the one who receives the letter.</p>
<p>German law. German politicans. A reason to emigrate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mona Lisa overdrive</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-264027</link>
		<dc:creator>Mona Lisa overdrive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-264027</guid>
		<description>200,000 ???
Surely that&#039;s a misprint, in the US, there were only 40,000 claims in 5 years.

Please correct the headline.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>200,000 ???<br />
Surely that&#8217;s a misprint, in the US, there were only 40,000 claims in 5 years.</p>
<p>Please correct the headline.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-263946</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-263946</guid>
		<description>@21 The stamp imprint is on the bottom of the stamp. The writing on the side shows what the stamp prints. It is not backwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@21 The stamp imprint is on the bottom of the stamp. The writing on the side shows what the stamp prints. It is not backwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scare Tactics122</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-263681</link>
		<dc:creator>Scare Tactics122</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-263681</guid>
		<description>lawyers not necessary
defend yourself with
1.a sword
2.a knife
3.a gun
4.a rock launcher
5.gatlin gun
6.grenade
7.atomic bomb
8.laser blade
9.nukes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lawyers not necessary<br />
defend yourself with<br />
1.a sword<br />
2.a knife<br />
3.a gun<br />
4.a rock launcher<br />
5.gatlin gun<br />
6.grenade<br />
7.atomic bomb<br />
8.laser blade<br />
9.nukes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James.</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-263451</link>
		<dc:creator>James.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-263451</guid>
		<description>Why is EVIDENCE written backwards on that stamp in the pic.  Hmm..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is EVIDENCE written backwards on that stamp in the pic.  Hmm..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melted Metal Web Radio</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-263233</link>
		<dc:creator>Melted Metal Web Radio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-263233</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much, TorrentFreak, and Christian Solmecke, for providing such an informative interview. All I can say is that the German music industry is already at a stage that the American music industry is about to enter. But, I believe that the American congress, and upcoming administration, will come to much less &#039;blunted&#039; legal remedies in the pursuit of solutions for the plights of copyright holders. I have always said that the (major) labels must adhere to the realities of the new web pricing systems for music (as Steve Jobs has clearly envisioned, defended, and executed), and stop suing their customers, who, by the way, will &#039;Never&#039; forget all of this. As far as the incrimination of all use of p2p programs, I would just say that here in America, let&#039;s outlaw all guns .. (you know the rest). I simply think that it is high time that the labels &#039;get smart&#039;, and a lot &#039;less tough&#039;.

Melted Metal Web Radio
http://www.meltedmetal.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much, TorrentFreak, and Christian Solmecke, for providing such an informative interview. All I can say is that the German music industry is already at a stage that the American music industry is about to enter. But, I believe that the American congress, and upcoming administration, will come to much less &#8216;blunted&#8217; legal remedies in the pursuit of solutions for the plights of copyright holders. I have always said that the (major) labels must adhere to the realities of the new web pricing systems for music (as Steve Jobs has clearly envisioned, defended, and executed), and stop suing their customers, who, by the way, will &#8216;Never&#8217; forget all of this. As far as the incrimination of all use of p2p programs, I would just say that here in America, let&#8217;s outlaw all guns .. (you know the rest). I simply think that it is high time that the labels &#8216;get smart&#8217;, and a lot &#8216;less tough&#8217;.</p>
<p>Melted Metal Web Radio<br />
<a href="http://www.meltedmetal.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.meltedmetal.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uk_pirate</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-263207</link>
		<dc:creator>uk_pirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-263207</guid>
		<description>ipfilter.dat + encryption &gt; legal threats</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ipfilter.dat + encryption &gt; legal threats</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breno</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-263191</link>
		<dc:creator>Breno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/torrentfreak-interviews-a-lawyer-defending-500-file-sharers-080114/#comment-263191</guid>
		<description>wow...

I&#039;m in Germany and all this scaries me a lot...


Till now I wasn&#039;t sued for file- sharing. Does anybody know how long does it take between the receiving of a threatening letter and the getting caught by a spying software ?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in Germany and all this scaries me a lot&#8230;</p>
<p>Till now I wasn&#8217;t sued for file- sharing. Does anybody know how long does it take between the receiving of a threatening letter and the getting caught by a spying software ?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
