You just have 0 clue, and it’s better that way

More and more people are using VPN’s out of basic privacy concerns.

If you think Torrent Freedom’s VPN is too expensive, then you know nothing about a good VPN. From what I hear, Relakks leaks really bad and is very slow and inconsistent.

I use Xerobank which is $35 a month, but I look at other services. http://xerobank.com/ Torrent Freedom is very resonably priced for the type of service that they offer. And it appears that the competetion is getting pretty darn pissed off…..judging by many of these posts, hehe! This is good. Competition is good.

goldens redesigned their website, and /they animated the damn dog/.

You literally click on a dog’s ass to download the VPN installer.

Holy fuck, stay away.[/quote]

Glad you like it – we designed it just for you, Mr. ‘of Nazareth.’ :-)

Peace,

Fausty
fausty@torrentfreedom.net

goldens redesigned their website, and /they animated the damn dog/.

You literally click on a dog’s ass to download the VPN installer.

Holy fuck, stay away.

Anyway to get Torrent Freedom to ignore one programm I don’t want to go through the VPN?

Thanks

If you can’t even be bothered to READ AND UNDERSTAND THE FUCKING POST.. then it is utterly pointless trying to engage you in a discussion with ANY meaning, because no doubt you would be unable to do that either.[/quote]

Funny that. I was thinking the same thing.

If you can’t even be bothered to READ AND UNDERSTAND THE FUCKING POST.. then it is utterly pointless trying to engage you in a discussion with ANY meaning, because no doubt you would be unable to do that either.

If you think Faust’s service is ‘risk free’ then you are an even bigger imbecile than I took you for in the first place.

Umm.. no…I’d pay this freak to dl TV and other things (you DID read that bit didn’t you?).. completely RISK FREE.

..so with you’re inability to read and understand the point of the post, and as you don’t even bother to acknowledge my comment about the comparative damage to society caused by one party over the other, I have a difficult time accepting your comment of ‘brain transplants’, as having more relevance to this discussion than mine.

unless you’re up against Chuck Norris mate…

I mean, pay this freak so you can watch TV episodes? Why dont you just get cable!

I swear, there are some real intellectually challenged people who comment on here, and Wibble, you are one of them ( or prehaps, Faust himself ).

Yeah, I think I will make that my mission for the month.

Faust, Fausty, Doug or whatever other name you go by, your arrogance is catching up with you quickly. Go crawl back under what scummy rock you crawled out from under. You arnt welcome here.

SWK is cute when she’s angry :-)

This is our most desperate hour. Help me, Obi-Wan Kenobi; you’re my only hope!

Peace, [/quote]

Speaking as one once bitten, I can tell you this is typical Fausty. He will ridicule the least likely/provable accusation and completely avoid every legit question of competence.
He moved to Canada after investors, creditors, and customers started closing in on his last scheme. I wonder where he’ll hide this time?

If he can (and it still hasn’t been proven to anyone’s satisfaction) provide a completely 100% annonymous, untracked, unmonitored and unlogged service for me to get my fix of TV and other things then I’ll use it, and be quite happy to hand him money to do it…

Quite frankly I’m more disgusted at the so called legitimate authorities actions in voiding freedom of speech and expression, the voilation of our inalienable right to privacy and the criminalisation of the perpetrators of minor misdemeanors.

Fuk it.. Faustys type of scum has become the new Robin Hood.

Pass me my fiddle.

SWK is cute when she’s angry :-)

This is our most desperate hour. Help me, Obi-Wan Kenobi; you’re my only hope!

Peace,

fausty@torrentfreedom.net

Read post numbers:
157
158
169
170
179
181
183

There are others, but most are flame warring between posts

While you are calling people names like a 15 year old, let me give you an update.

FIRST I gave them the benefit of the doubt. This was all I was doing in my comments.

WELL I had issues with the service. So I raised a ticket. In the ticket I asked some questions that basically has conifrmed a few of the things many have been saying. I gave them MORE than enough info to know where to go with my issue.

What became really obvious to me is that they do not know openvpn (which is what they use) AT ALL or they would have had the answer for me. This was a relativly easy question for their tech support to answer (I got the answer myself)

I am not going to go into specifics on it as I am still seeing this through. You can call Akbar all you want. But unlike TF and a number of other people I went the extra mile and dugg out more info that at least confirmed the speculation everyone is posting.

AT LEAST NOW THERE IS SOME PROOF for me at least. But I will show you how to expose them even further.
My question was simple and one I could have answered myself. I just chose to be a n00b about it and post it to them and see what they would say after reading so many of the comments here.

For the moment I am keeping my “proof” vague enough that they might speculate as to who I am but not know who I am. Again this is a CYA thing. I am taking steps to make sure IF they try to pull something it will blowup in their faces. @Kooladez Calling me a dick for actually investigating claims people are making says alot more about you than anything.

Giving people the benefit of the doubt then proving them right or wrong makes more sense. In this case the community nailed that there is likely some skeevy practices going on. They certainly are not what they claim to be. Their tech support basically showed me that.

Whois can be misleading these days. Once it was more definitive on who owned what. Now that info can be altered and hidden and can have 3rd parties register on behalf of the actual registrant. Colos can often clump info like this. The owner of these domains could also be doing it on behalf of someone else. Considering the purpose of the service in itself would need someone who is dubious (like an animal fucker and convicted drug felon) to help them run it and keep the MAFIAA from tracking it down. So the part of them not knowing who owns what and all that could actually be true. The problems I found are with the implementation of the service vs technical knowledge of the service. If their tech support does not know what the hell they are talking about with a basic question…then I have no reason to trust that they will know what the hell they are doing in implementing it since it sounds like only 4 or 5 guys are running the show.

That all said, I will agree that TorrentFreedom is NOT what it promises. The sites security practices, the obvious lack of knowledge of openvpn in my own experiences with them (you can put this to the test too with your own “issues” if you use Linux).

So at least for my part I am convinced they are not what they say they are. And now that I have armed you with some more info you can at least take that info and provide further proof for yourself and quit calling people dicks for taking an innocent until proven guilty approach. There are other instances besides this one where the registrant is a scumbag who actually is the reg of a legit site. It is good to at least investigate and get the scoop.

This is what TorrentFreak SHOULD have done, but did not. Seems to me that this site is just a fanboi site for torrenting and hyping things without any substance. This was the case here at least. Hopefully they learn from this.

@ TorrentFreak: keep up the good work folks!

I WILL USER PEER GURADIAN IF I AM CONCERNED ABOUT MY PIRACY!

ASKING PEOPLE TO PAY FOR IS LIKE ROBBING!

TORRENTFREEDOM SUX! FUCK THEM!

You are clearly a complete dick sir!

There, as I said, do your own damned research, and low and behold, Spell It Out did, and hey presto!

Thanks Spell It Out. Saves me the task :D

Companies house has no “Old Blood Investments Ltd”. Dearest TF you’ve been had. Do you homework next time.

Subpoena my Tor outproxy :o)

Torrentfreedom.com = 81.173.31.80
goldens.com = 81.173.31.80

http://81.173.31.80 = a generic Cpanel host.

Torrentfreedom.com:
———————–
Administrative Contact:
Old Blood Investments, Ltd.
DNS1: NS1.BANEKI.ORG
DNS2: NS2.BANEKI.ORG

Goldens.com:
———————–
Registrant:
Old Blood Investments, Ltd.
Administrative Contact:Spink,Douglas
DNS1: NS1.BANEKI.ORG
DNS2: NS2.BANEKI.ORG

Baneki.org
———————–
Registrant:
Old Blood Investments, Ltd.
(same canadian address as the above)

Administrative Contact , Technical Contact :
Old Blood Investments, Ltd.
ds@wrinko.net

wrinko.net = 81.173.31.80, and http://wrinko.net == goldens.com

http://goldens.com/contact.php == “Fausty, our CTO/CZO:fausty@goldens.com”

I won’t bother linking to all the previously est. Google links re: dogs. Archive.org has wrinko.net.

So, yes, that’s too many red flags.

Hey TF admins – where’s your reaction?

haha yep thats classic.

Goldens.com is hosted on the same IP address (81.173.31.80) as TorrentFreedom, and is a very similar service. The WHOIS is identical as well; it’s pretty obvious that they’re run by the same person.

Goldens.com used to be “Timberline Retrievers”, a breeder of Golden Retrievers. There are a number of references (easily found using Google) to doug@goldens.com as “Douglas Spink”.

The Goldens.com FAQ (http://goldens.com/faq.php) specifically names “Fausty” as the operator of the site.

“Fausty” is well-known in animal sex forums. One relevant link is http://www.elitezoo.com/Inferno-Backand33-t1928.html&pid=38876&mode=threaded (WARNING: may contain explicit content), on which a user named “Fausty” posts with the subtitle “goldens.com Chief Zoo Officer”. “Zoo” is short for “zoophile”, or “animal molester”.

Finally, Spink’s arrest for cocaine smuggling is documented at http://alex.golub.name/log/2005/04/02/spink-pleads-innocent-only-might-have-slept-with-that-retriever/

I can’t take people seriously who quote other peoples comments.

But you do make a point with all googleing. At anyrate I am not worried as I am covered. If this turns out to be a scam I am out 17 bucks. I can live with that. It was worth trying just to expose. But I also noticed there were alot of comments back in the day when secureIX and Relakks started too. So only time will really tell what the scoop is.

The ONLY thing people have posted about this guy is that his name is Douglas Spink. Where is the actual proof that he is indeed the person running TorrentFreedom? All I see are people accusing with no actual linking or proof of any kind save their own word.

Then there is are the bigger idiots who take the hearsay and spit it back out as facts. Their site looks crappy granted. If the service works then great. I dont really much care about the site unless it is working. The fact that noone has taken it down means that it has to have some measure of security.

Hahahaha.

Priceless:D

… until I clicked on the “goldens.com” site.

Because nothing says “We Are Secure and trustworthy” like a giant graphic of a dog’s nutsack on the front page.

And there’s, like, muscle dog graphics everywhere. In the background. On the documents.

Christ.

Im still waiting for Torrentfreak guys to post a formal statement concerning this issue.

Most people tend to trust this site for its news and reviews of such things, so it would only be right for the TFreak guys to put the record straight and either confirm or dismiss what has been said here, for their users safety if nothing more.

If they fail to do this, then you, as the readers, should be outraged and send in your discontent viz email to wake these guys up. By publishing the article in the first place, they have opened up innocent readers here to real danger and a risk of them losing their hard earned bucks to Faust.

How about it Enigmax, do we get a statement from you or what?

File sharing has, and always will be free. Shitesters like Faust are just proffiting from dumb net users fear of the RIAA. Wake up people! You have more chance of being struck by lightning than be sued for stealing warez and movies.

Would you really want to put your money into the pocket of a drug smuggler/animal molester/scam artist/narc? since Faust is all 4 of these.[/quote]

1. Correct, there is a very low chance of being sued for downloading media; but there is a 100% chance [read: is currently occuring] that lots of colleges and businesses currently mass-throttle all [read ALL, not just bitTorrent] traffic.

2. If he is this creep, then stay the hell away from him; but if you make these allegations, then justify them; give at least a reasonable SOURCE for your allegations; otherwise, you may well just be mafIAA trying to keep users from something that works, or is almost working.[/quote]

Have you not even read this thread? I think the exposure of the lack of security of this “service” is more than enough.

I dont see why i have to do your research FOR you.It isnt rocket science to connect the dots together and find out for yourself that this guy is indeed, who people here say he is, and what he is “into”, and his criminial “affiliations”.

I posted on here to confirm allegations made previously by another poster here because people need to be aware of WHO this guy is, for their owned damned safety and security. I could have quite easily left it alone and said nothing. Its no skin off my nose, and if you had even half a brain, you would see by the posts alone on this thread ( as well as the interview with Faust ) that he is indeed an over-confident, arrogant and evil psychopath who is just interested in making a few bucks.

And lets not even mention the EXPOSED security issues relating to this service, that has been documented on this thread ( and not to mention still in googles cache ).

Source? Just open your eyes is all you need to do.