Comments on: Towards a RSS 2.0 BitTorrent Standard

By: SqrtBoy

SqrtBoy — Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:54:44 +0000

I am amazed to see that people still try to bring me down using any means …

Anyone smart enough will just skip the stupid gossip and with knowledge on the topic will see that this white paper is a serious document. I am providing the community with quality open-source scripts since two years now, and I will continue, whatever the gossips and rumors say, because they are plain wrong ! All those who launched these kind of rumors are now gone, I am still there working for the community.

Back to the topic, I am also in talk with several webmasters so a new revision can be made and we reach a standard on a workgroup basis.

By: renegade

renegade — Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:29:06 +0000

I wouldn’t touch anything Sqrtboy does/suggests with a bargepole. There is a thread in the community leaders area of filesoup where the old Snarf-it.org owner gave sqrtboy some space on his server for free. The space was purely for helping him with his bittorrent-support and phpsoft sites, when the owner noticed heavier than normal bandwidth drain he tracked down the reason – several tv episodes being uploaded via bittorrent by sqrtboy, on the snarf-it server! That would surely be a criminal offence if the authorities had taken down that server and found a) a bittorrent site and b) illegal files being seeded.

Anyway I tell this story to illustrate my point that he is not to be trusted, this white paper is sure to be dooomed as many other bittorrent site admin hate him as well (justified).

If you want proof what I say is true visit this thread:

http://filesoup.co.uk/forum/phpsoft-and-bittorrent-support-scam-by-sqrtboy-t113392.html

..ask for community leader access if u can’t view torrentfreak, your bound to get it :).

By: jhumu

jhumu — Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:13:53 +0000

RSS sucks, ATOM is way better