Transmission Becomes Default BitTorrent Client for Ubuntu

Written by Ernesto on January 30, 2008 

The popular cross-platform BitTorrent client Transmission, praised by its users for being full-featured but lightweight, is now officially the new default client for Ubuntu.

transmissionTransmission is already included in the 4th Alpha release of Hardy Heron, and is set to replace the Gnome BitTorrent client that Ubuntu has used up until now. A stable version of Ubuntu 8.04 is expected to be released in April 2008.

Transmission has gained a lot of popularity over the last year, and is considered to be one of the fastest and lightweight BitTorrent clients. It is an Open Source project, and the application is currently available on almost every operating system except Windows. Similar to uTorrent, it focuses on being lightweight, while including all the features a demanding BitTorrent user needs.

The Transmission team describes it as follows: “Transmission has been built from the ground up to be a lightweight, yet powerful BitTorrent client. Its simple, intuitive interface is designed to integrate tightly with whatever computing environment you choose to use. Transmission strikes a balance between providing useful functionality without feature bloat.”

Transmission uses little resources, and we’ve heard of people running it on their routers, NAS devices and even mobile phones. There is also a great WebUI for Transmission, called Clutch. With Clutch you can easily monitor and control your torrents remotely. Today, the Clutch team has released version 0.3, and instructions on how to get started are over here.

Downloads and more information about Ubuntu Hardy Heron can be found in the Ubuntu Wiki.

transmission

Previously: ISP Ordered to Reveal Identities of BitTorrent Anime Sharers

Next: The Pirate Bay: The Site is Safe, Even If We Lose in Court

83 Responses

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 » Show All

26 Jan 31, 2008 at 02:22 by Anonymous

Utorrent no thanks,i will never use it again since the creator of utorrent have been sleeping with the enemy…Transmission is not bad but would like a blocklist in it.I agree that deluge crash all the time.

I will stick to KTORRENT.

27 Jan 31, 2008 at 02:27 by x

transmission rules

28 Jan 31, 2008 at 02:28 by fsh

[quote comment="276509"]Utorrent no thanks,i will never use it again since the creator of utorrent have been sleeping with the enemy…Transmission is not bad but would like a blocklist in it.I agree that deluge crash all the time.

I will stick to KTORRENT.[/quote]
utorrent is only for windows morons we are talking about linux

29 Jan 31, 2008 at 02:41 by xabbott

I’ve been using Deluge as well. It’s come a long way. The ui is very close to utorrent.
It has block list support via plugins. Really the plugins make it extensible or minimal as you need.
But I understand why it’s not default for Ubuntu/Gnome. It’s still a young project.

30 Jan 31, 2008 at 02:52 by obscur156

Yes,i agree with you XABBOTT.
Using utorrent is a nonsense under linux.Windows apps under linux pffff.

I have made the swith to linux because i was sick of winblow$…
Will be my first anniversary in febuary with ubuntu and very happy with it.

31 Jan 31, 2008 at 03:10 by kornflake

no where i d/l from allows dht so its ok to leave out infact its good for the noobs

http://www.seedmore.org
kornflake

32 Jan 31, 2008 at 03:16 by Anonymous

[quote comment="276386"]nothing beats utorrent + wine.[/quote]

except for deluge.

33 Jan 31, 2008 at 03:38 by Ice

Utorrent rocks anyway and all others i don’t know.also Ubuntu is a stable linux flavor but utorrent should come out with a linux version too bcoz if this transmission if it is not having the DHT support then it sucks.

34 Jan 31, 2008 at 03:52 by Vish

Deluge is prepping up to be a good native Linux client. I have used transmission, didn’t find it too intuitive. It lacks the features

35 Jan 31, 2008 at 04:22 by Julien

[quote comment="276516"]utorrent is only for windows[/quote]You can use µtorrent under Linux with Wine…

About Deluge, i tried it and it wasn’t stable… oO

My choice would definitely go to Ktorrent, but Transmission is a good choice for those who don’t need many features.

36 Jan 31, 2008 at 05:35 by obscur156

Agreed with kornflake, dht should stay out of transmission and yes its good for noobs.

I hope one day people will get over it with utorrent.Sorry fanboys.

For me transmission is just missing ip blocklist,if it comes in a near futur,i will use it.

KTORRENT for me right now but it can change.

37 Jan 31, 2008 at 05:53 by chow

I used Linux exclusively since about 2004. Mostly just used the X version of bittorrent and now ktorrent. Found transmission in the repo’s of my distro (pclinuxos) so I am going to give it a try. One of the difficulties I have had in trying to get windows users to try linux is the perception that linux is difficult to use. So even if a torrent client is lean on features but is easy to use. It is not an all together bad idea to include such an app as a default distro. Particularly one ideal for new linux users like ubuntu.

38 Jan 31, 2008 at 07:15 by neeks

My perception of Transmission, on OSX at least, is that it’s a pile of bug riddled crap. Sure, Azureus is heavy and OSX has pathetic Java support, but at least it gets the job done right.

39 Jan 31, 2008 at 08:04 by harley

Didn’t Transmission have a long-standing bug that cause it to corrupt data and endlessly request the same packets from trackers? Wasn’t Trasmission banned from a number of private trackers because of the drain that bug caused?

That bug may be fixed now, but their quality control leaves much to be desired. I’ll stick with KTorrent.

40 Jan 31, 2008 at 12:48 by ollie

bad move
nearly every release has some sort of major problem: from the early versions with not honoring the announce interval, the middle releases with corrupting files, bad ratio reporting and memory leaks up to the infamous 0.9x branch (file corruption *again*, router death, problems connencting to official BitTorrent, BitTornado, ABC, etc.) and the 1.0 to 1.0.3 releases are easy to shot down remotely:
http://trac.transmissionbt.com/ticket/667

Of course, those bugs are fixed, sometimes they are really fast doing that. But one can indeed wait, with which bugs they will surprise us (tracker staff and the other peers in the swarm) next. Indeed, quality control is bad - and Transmission isn’t worth the trouble at all.

41 Jan 31, 2008 at 14:31 by tallman

Latest rtorrent for the masses!

ollie, +1

42 Jan 31, 2008 at 16:45 by Anonymous

Ubuntu users can’t handle rTorrent.

No offense towards them.

43 Jan 31, 2008 at 16:57 by Mark

Awesome!
Transmission is by far the best. No bloat, just functional interface. It’s not as awesome as on the mac, but I completely support this decision.

44 Jan 31, 2008 at 17:48 by .

It certainly looks like a Gnome application - extremely simplistic. Too simplistic for my taste, but then again I don’t use Gnome anyway.

I’ve been quite happy with KTorrent, which ships with Kubuntu.

45 Jan 31, 2008 at 18:58 by ,

What, graphics for a BT app?

I have used, use, and will use Aria2.

46 Jan 31, 2008 at 19:17 by Anonymous

Ktorrent has DHT, PeerGuardian, File pre-allocation, Zeroconf and UPnP.

Go KDE!

47 Jan 31, 2008 at 20:42 by K...

Use uTorrent and get familiar with RIAA and same sort of organizations. Because uTorrent is now officially maintained and marketed by BitTorrent Inc. uTorrent sends all your usage data to RIAA’ cheers!

48 Jan 31, 2008 at 21:28 by lulz

Yes, best client for X is Ktorrent, it has DHT, PeerGuardian, zeroconf, UPnP, web interface and more.

49 Jan 31, 2008 at 21:49 by Amorrn

Deluge Torrent is awesome on Ubuntu. It was my default client while my Windows box was out of service.

50 Jan 31, 2008 at 22:22 by Julius

[quote comment="276325"]No DHT.

Nice try, NEXT![/quote]

DHT is for amateurs.

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 » Show All

Responses are closed

All remaining responses will continue to be archived. Use the TorrentFreak forums if you want to discuss something.