The EU parliament agreed for the second time that internet cut-off requires a tribunal, and not a milician judgement without any proof (not to speak about the guilt suspicion).

It is not enough for a recommandation to be adopted though. EU parliament is the weakest of three major EU institutions. EU is not really democratic, you know. Now, the EU commission (one member per country; exclusively composed of lobbyists) shall not censor it (as it can; but with the EU parliament elections in june, the commission will be elected again, by the new MPs, so it fears them; for now, at least).

And then, it has to pass the ministers council from EU (ministers and heads of states from the EU). This is where Sarkozy pressured against the first vote of the 48/138 amendment (as he failed pressuring on the commission), managing to get it canceled from the telecommunication laws package it belongs to (secretly “negociating” in the corridors, during a debate pause that was intended to last a few dozen minutes, and ended up during several hours). Which is happening again, blocking this law package another time, and forcing the MPs to vote this amendment a third time.

Now, as a lot of money is engaged by this law package, and as a large majority of EU MP voted this package, there are big chances everybody will be pissed by France government attitude, and that this amendment will be adopted for the THIRD time! Which shall happen next autumn, hopefully with success and final integration within the telecommunication package.

By the meantime, France parliament and senate will have adopted 3-strike (not to say it will be constitutional; this is the only hope for this debilitated law to be canceled here, if enough national MP call for the constitutional council to check it), and it will take a long time for EU to fine France for not respecting EU directives. Then, a few people in France, a majority of them most probably innocent, will have their internet cut off, just so to remember them fear is the only thing they can expect from their government. Sarkonazi’s goal is just to buy time, so he can frighten as much people as possible. It is how he’s been elected, after all (fear the suburbs, fear the strangers, fear the others, fear sharing anything with your neighboor, fear the cops, fear driving, fear what you don’t know; fear whatever as long as you fear! As I said, it works on roughly a third of the people, who are then so desorientated, or just craving for more control for the worst kind, they’d do anything they’re told, which is enough to get him elected; anyway, if it doesn’t work, he’ll say it is the vilainish Europe’s fault, as he often says, and will ask to be mandated so that he’ll be able to fight Europe; poor France is reduced to “fear whatever” as a mandala).

so one saying anything gainst that “own goverment”.. that in eu… he says same thing eu decieded…. gets him fired …. what the f

69.118.19.57
69.118.22.236
69.126.123.144
173.2.92.76
173.2.92.0
173.2.92.255

TF1 also offered illegally more broadcasting time to Sarko during his campaign for the presidency and have never stopped doing so since his election.

So no one should be surprised to see that poor dude loosing his job. Sarko has implemented a fascist regime in France, and uses his jewish root to bring the new world order in action.
Sarko is a ripper of liberties

Sarkozy is jewish. Is the media in France owned by jews like in the USA and Britain? That would explain their bias.

> Why do the French people tolerate Sarkozy’s existence?

Plain and simple: because there’s nothing in front of this dwarf.

Don’t take me wrong: I fucking hate him. But socialists, the traditional “opposition” in France, are not even able to react properly in front of the 3-strike project.

Only a small dozen of MP from their ranks participate to the debate in the national parliament. The vast majority of them remain silent. Many of the abstentions for the EU 138 amendment to remind fundamental rights such as internet access cannot be suspended without a judge ? They come from the ranks of the french socialists!

Guy Bono, one of the initiators of the 138 amendment may be one of them, this party is so debilitated Bono (without a doubt the most popular and reknown french socialist in EU parliament, since this amendment) will not be amongst lists of candidates for next month european elections. Shall we consider him punished?

During the first pre-vote at the french senate (whose role is to tell if a project can reach parliament or not), guess which proportion of socialist old senile senators decided 3-strike was a perfectly acceptable project to vote? 100%. Not a single one opposed.

One of the most known ancient socialist ministers? Jack Lang, ex-minister of culture (sic!): an old senile, now MP, who says he doesn’t understand the opposition to 3-strike project, and affirms he will vote in favor of it!

This week, four old “artists” (more than 70 year old to average) wrote a letter to the socialist party, accusing them of not being against evil free-market deregulation (sic), by opposing 3-strike law. What did the head of this party do? Poor stupid Martine Aubry cryed (litterally, with salted, wet and real tears) on the phone when she got to discuss with one of those “artists”. Gogolène Royal is not the only one touched by nervous breakdown, it seems (though the story doesn’t tell yet if Aubry presented excuses, like Royal always do this time – we only know she cryed like an own-shit-splattered baby).

Catherine Trautman, a EU MP responsible for finding a compromise with the commission after the vote of the net disconnection… what did she do? She wrote a compromise telling a judge was not necessary, while a milice court with corporate accusations without proofs was enough, from the moment the country where it took place said it was legal (thus blessing 3-strike).

Except for a few rare exceptions, french socialists are no more than a bunch of low-life traitorous and bastardish cunts. No way I would ever vote for them. No way I would even dare to help one of them if this monkey was dying at my feet. See a french socialist? Demolish it. Chances to go wrong are very light, as their treatorous weakness and idiocracy is what made the election of Sarkozy a sinister reality in first line. As for the rest of the parties, next most popular may be the christian democrats (led by François Bayrou): though he seemed in favor of a global licence during the presidential elections of 2007, he’s now perfectly silent.

Sad, but true: 3-strike and this first consequence (prequel, should I say) is just one of many illustrations there is NO believable political opposition to Sarkozy in France, nearly all subjects wise. Though he doesn’t aggregate more than a third of the votes, electoral system is made so it is enough for him to gain executive (presidency, which nominates ministers) and legislative (MP) powers – by definition, fascists are the best to blindly unite (their emblem having been in fascist Italy a bunch of focusing beams); the others can only gather, which they are now dramatically unable to do. France as a democracy? Bullshit. Sarkozy will be reelected in 2012, if no one dares to decapitate him and his bunch of minions up this time: not any doubt. United fascists Vs. the others ungathered: match is already set. Worst? France really deserves it.