Come on Lorenzo, go cry again at the US House Judiciary Committee that you raked in 100M in just under 4H of broadcast but lost, let’s say, (200streams x $1500 licensing fees) = $300K.

Or is this a bold move to get the demise of their own casino’s to the background and can hustle the ones they still owe money to by telling them “that the UFC lost some money so we can’t pay you”.

Good work torrentfreak on finding the one group of people that I could care less about.

=]

Seems to me the only people the UFC can target are direct hosts.. Not torrenters..

This is nothing more than a formal tantrum. They wont win any of this. I mean, come on, the UFC doesn’t even have a lot of capital. Don’t bankrupt your entire business suing people that have no money to repay you, dummy.

Oh, how I hate meat-heads.

READ IT FULL STORY BELOW

freakbits.com/ufc-hits-bar-with-640000-lawsuit-0106

unfortunately for him.. he doesnt know what the internet is.

We look forward to destroying you..

also lol at the ppl saying it’s rehearsed. Getting knocked out cold is real. haha calling these guys gay or something because they are both men with bodies pressed against each other. I’m sure that’s what they are thinking “man this guy has a nice ass” while he is beating the brakes off your face. Be a man and go fight another guy.. see how gay that feels to you while he is causing serious damage to your body.

On a lighter note didn’t know the ppv had commercials in it. Since I watch all tv related stuff on my cpu, I have forgotten what a commercial is.. hehe

If UFC wants people to buy the PPV, then stop putting out shitty cards. Having 14 cards a year when only about 5 of them are good means less people buying. That or stop charging nearly $50 bucks for online stream.

lol

I am confused though at how a business can grow each year and have climbed from 300,000 to between 600,000 and 1 million buys yet are losing from piracy. I also think they are looking for someone to blame for the global economy. They need to realise that in the last year, EVERYONE was affected.
I know plenty that canceled their paytv this last year due to a lack of money.

Where is your evidence for this assertion?

UFC = Stage rehearsed = YES

are you being ripped off = YES

Are you fool enough to come back and pay for this rubbish = MAYBEE

I did not know of the streaming sites before I read this. Thanks!

The more they fight piracy the more it grows!

and ur right @ all the ads they have while ur trying to watch the fight…it just may as well be on regular TV

long live the cappers!! ;)

~~~and btw, Don`t Feed The Troll!!~~~

Those guys want to amputate their own foot because it is hurting them LoL

There is an old saying “learn to take the good with the bad”

But somehow I don’t think this people will understand what that means.

They clearly don’t understand how the Internet works. You will have people stealing instead of buying but put out a good enough product and filesharers will gladly pony up the dough. Deal out crap and they’ll just watch it for free. The proof is in the pudding, more exposure is good, no matter if you are seeing immediate profit or not. They may not pay for that PPV but they may next time, and they may buy your ridiculously expensive t-shirts, work out equipment, trading cards, sweaters; whatever you throw out in the long run. I know, I have friends that are mobile billboards for UFC.

The only thing you do is piss off the casual viewer and guarantee they will never become a consumer. If you want to be the big bad wolf and make sure we know who owns the content then fine. But guess what, instead of occasionally buying a overpriced product of yours maybe we’ll just steal the show and never drop a dime on your over-hyped junk. Then when you lose a couple hundred million instead of a couple dimes you can really blame the pirates. Until then shut your mouth, take an economics class and leave the business to the grownups, alright?

They dont know what they are up against but they will soon find out.

We all know you’re illiterate, you don’t have to keep pointing it out.

Even though we’re just a few days into 2010, I think it’s safe to say that Dana White has already secured the Dipshit of the Year award.

@Lawlatovs
“I loled hard at the blatant bias of these statements.”

What blatant bias, moron?

UFC 107 garnered 620,000 pay per view buys. That’s a fact.

According to UFC, the pay per view buys aren’t generating enough money. That’s also a fact.

Wherein lies the bias of reporting these two facts, exactly? Can you explain please?