<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: uTorrent 1.7 Stable Finally Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:56:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-479758</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 04:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-479758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I noticed a previous commenter remarking &quot;My firewall has caught it on severl occasions trying to &quot;send e-mail&quot;&quot;.

Regardless of whether or not ÂµTorrent is to be trusted, this is not indicative. When an e-mail program needs to send a message, it connects to a typical port on the mail server (25). As the BitTorrent protocol can operate on any random port, sometimes you connect to someone via their port 25, and your firewall misinterprets this.

This should be avoided by enabling &quot;bt.no_connect_to_services&quot; in the advanced options, so long as 25 is listed as one of the ports.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed a previous commenter remarking &#8220;My firewall has caught it on severl occasions trying to &#8220;send e-mail&#8221;&#8221;.</p>
<p>Regardless of whether or not ÂµTorrent is to be trusted, this is not indicative. When an e-mail program needs to send a message, it connects to a typical port on the mail server (25). As the BitTorrent protocol can operate on any random port, sometimes you connect to someone via their port 25, and your firewall misinterprets this.</p>
<p>This should be avoided by enabling &#8220;bt.no_connect_to_services&#8221; in the advanced options, so long as 25 is listed as one of the ports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niraj</title>
		<link>/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-450601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[niraj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-450601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[my lan ip is 72.20.34.145
and i m using utorrent 1.7, but from two days i m not getting to connect with the trackers it always say firewall/router is blocking the incoming connection

i forwarded the port for the router and even turn of the antivirus and firewall but even affter that i m not getting the connection which results me download speed &lt;10kbps but my upload is fine and is 25kbps

tell me how can i resolve the problem or how do i know which port is open for the incoming connection]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my lan ip is 72.20.34.145<br />
and i m using utorrent 1.7, but from two days i m not getting to connect with the trackers it always say firewall/router is blocking the incoming connection</p>
<p>i forwarded the port for the router and even turn of the antivirus and firewall but even affter that i m not getting the connection which results me download speed &lt;10kbps but my upload is fine and is 25kbps</p>
<p>tell me how can i resolve the problem or how do i know which port is open for the incoming connection</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boizy</title>
		<link>/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-381681</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boizy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 08:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-381681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only the later versions of  uTorrent a problem, so too is BitComet BC).

BC was found to be tranferring up to 5GBytes/night to IP addresses located in P.R. China when its DHT was switched on.

None of this traffic was torrent related and did not appear in BC&#039;s own stats.

Reports to the BC forum about this, after initial silence, led to, character assassination by a BC supporters club (aka &quot;the management&quot; under cover) and was finally followed by deletion of the thread when the actual chinese ip addresses (so people could block them) and traffic details were posted to the thread. This traffic was shown to be encrypted. BC management did nothing to remove this offending code by a year later. It was realized that others had reported this before but their reports were ignored/cleverly deflected.
 
After 7 days of hostile responses from BC supporters and posting of the chinese IP&#039;s, the poster had his pc attacked for some 12hours from over 400+ (probably a bot DOS attack) ip addresses with billions of packets. With numerous attempts to hack various ports. The next day the posters ISP offically changed the (fixed) IP address of the poster and then blocked all traffic to it at their external firewall! The same day the thread was deleted. Attempts to post about the dos attack on the BC forum were blocked.   

I use utorrent1.6.1, Azureus2.5.0.4  and don&#039;t use BC at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only the later versions of  uTorrent a problem, so too is BitComet BC).</p>
<p>BC was found to be tranferring up to 5GBytes/night to IP addresses located in P.R. China when its DHT was switched on.</p>
<p>None of this traffic was torrent related and did not appear in BC&#8217;s own stats.</p>
<p>Reports to the BC forum about this, after initial silence, led to, character assassination by a BC supporters club (aka &#8220;the management&#8221; under cover) and was finally followed by deletion of the thread when the actual chinese ip addresses (so people could block them) and traffic details were posted to the thread. This traffic was shown to be encrypted. BC management did nothing to remove this offending code by a year later. It was realized that others had reported this before but their reports were ignored/cleverly deflected.</p>
<p>After 7 days of hostile responses from BC supporters and posting of the chinese IP&#8217;s, the poster had his pc attacked for some 12hours from over 400+ (probably a bot DOS attack) ip addresses with billions of packets. With numerous attempts to hack various ports. The next day the posters ISP offically changed the (fixed) IP address of the poster and then blocked all traffic to it at their external firewall! The same day the thread was deleted. Attempts to post about the dos attack on the BC forum were blocked.   </p>
<p>I use utorrent1.6.1, Azureus2.5.0.4  and don&#8217;t use BC at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-361920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-361920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TO ALL DOWNLOADERS....!!!!
I am a debut artist who&#039;s just recorded one of the most expensive debut albums in recent history. 

We have just released my debut album as a FREE HQ Mp3 download. 

It was a tough decision for us to make because of the vast amounts spent on the album. We had two of the biggest record producers in the world work on it.... at Peter Gabriel&#039;s Realworld studio and at Abbey Road studio in london.

Despite all that, we recognise the massive potential the internet and free albums in particular offers. We launched last friday and have already had 1000&#039;s of DL&#039;s all over the world.

Come over and download for FREE.. it takes 2 minutes to DL because we have a dedicated server.

www.jackrubinacci.com
Thanks
Jack]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO ALL DOWNLOADERS&#8230;.!!!!<br />
I am a debut artist who&#8217;s just recorded one of the most expensive debut albums in recent history. </p>
<p>We have just released my debut album as a FREE HQ Mp3 download. </p>
<p>It was a tough decision for us to make because of the vast amounts spent on the album. We had two of the biggest record producers in the world work on it&#8230;. at Peter Gabriel&#8217;s Realworld studio and at Abbey Road studio in london.</p>
<p>Despite all that, we recognise the massive potential the internet and free albums in particular offers. We launched last friday and have already had 1000&#8242;s of DL&#8217;s all over the world.</p>
<p>Come over and download for FREE.. it takes 2 minutes to DL because we have a dedicated server.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jackrubinacci.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jackrubinacci.com</a><br />
Thanks<br />
Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tina</title>
		<link>/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-309504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-309504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i use version  utorrent 1.6 and lately i can open it but it wont connect to any of the seeders/leechers its showing.Bear in mind my peerguardian is running whenever i use the program (i wouldn&#039;t run it without it) I can&#039;t even connect with utorrent&#039;s homepage to check what the problem is.....its seriously starting to piss me off what is going on here?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use version  utorrent 1.6 and lately i can open it but it wont connect to any of the seeders/leechers its showing.Bear in mind my peerguardian is running whenever i use the program (i wouldn&#8217;t run it without it) I can&#8217;t even connect with utorrent&#8217;s homepage to check what the problem is&#8230;..its seriously starting to piss me off what is going on here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-295909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-295909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, any &quot;Hack the max half-open TCP connection&quot; patch for the Vista version? i m trying out using wireless &amp; is hardly moving. some advise pls?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, any &#8220;Hack the max half-open TCP connection&#8221; patch for the Vista version? i m trying out using wireless &amp; is hardly moving. some advise pls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-217196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-217196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m running uTorrent 1.6 (build 474) and on starting up PG2 blocks a connection to 72.20.34.145:6881

Is this the same thing as 1.7+ is doing, and if so, how is 1.6 any better? (alternatively, how is 1.7 any worse?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m running uTorrent 1.6 (build 474) and on starting up PG2 blocks a connection to 72.20.34.145:6881</p>
<p>Is this the same thing as 1.7+ is doing, and if so, how is 1.6 any better? (alternatively, how is 1.7 any worse?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: private</title>
		<link>/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-192181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[private]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-192181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;private...&lt;/strong&gt;

...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>private&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Dot</title>
		<link>/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-187885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[No Dot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-187885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That URL should be http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/6940/78302557is7.gif

(no dot)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That URL should be <a href="http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/6940/78302557is7.gif" rel="nofollow">http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/6940/78302557is7.gif</a></p>
<p>(no dot)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rita</title>
		<link>/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-182883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rita]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 23:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-17-stable-finally-released/#comment-182883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Woops, the stuff I was quoting broke my message. A screenshot of the data packet is at http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/6940/78302557is7.gif. The data is similar to the stuff in other DHT packets (that follow immediately afterwards to a variety of other IP&#039;s). I don&#039;t think it&#039;s anything dodgy - just DHT]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woops, the stuff I was quoting broke my message. A screenshot of the data packet is at <a href="http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/6940/78302557is7.gif" rel="nofollow">http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/6940/78302557is7.gif</a>. The data is similar to the stuff in other DHT packets (that follow immediately afterwards to a variety of other IP&#8217;s). I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s anything dodgy &#8211; just DHT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
