<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: uTorrent Backs Artist, Bundles Album With New Downloads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-backs-artist-bundles-album-with-new-downloads-100816/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-backs-artist-bundles-album-with-new-downloads-100816/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:19:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: monster</title>
		<link>/utorrent-backs-artist-bundles-album-with-new-downloads-100816/#comment-699931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[monster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 06:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=26280#comment-699931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now people seem angry about this, several have mentioned the Ask toolbar which is really really awful.

...but lets think of it this way, the Ask toolbar is a simple tax on the stupid. If you are stupid enough to install software with it&#039;s default settings then you get what you are given, If you don&#039;t bother to read what you&#039;re being asked while installing then the same thing goes.

I just reinstalled windows on my machine and so downloaded among other things a new copy of utorrent. Paz was actually surprisingly good, I downloaded it simply because it was offered and really what is the downside to that?
Two or three of the tracks have made it onto my default playlist and there are a few others that I don&#039;t mind either. Rather better than most albums commercially produced.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now people seem angry about this, several have mentioned the Ask toolbar which is really really awful.</p>
<p>&#8230;but lets think of it this way, the Ask toolbar is a simple tax on the stupid. If you are stupid enough to install software with it&#8217;s default settings then you get what you are given, If you don&#8217;t bother to read what you&#8217;re being asked while installing then the same thing goes.</p>
<p>I just reinstalled windows on my machine and so downloaded among other things a new copy of utorrent. Paz was actually surprisingly good, I downloaded it simply because it was offered and really what is the downside to that?<br />
Two or three of the tracks have made it onto my default playlist and there are a few others that I don&#8217;t mind either. Rather better than most albums commercially produced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DERP</title>
		<link>/utorrent-backs-artist-bundles-album-with-new-downloads-100816/#comment-698885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DERP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=26280#comment-698885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This &quot;you&#039;re not paying for it so you can&#039;t complain&quot; shit is one of the most retarded things you can say, and a fallacy on top of that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This &#8220;you&#8217;re not paying for it so you can&#8217;t complain&#8221; shit is one of the most retarded things you can say, and a fallacy on top of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaptain Krunch</title>
		<link>/utorrent-backs-artist-bundles-album-with-new-downloads-100816/#comment-698607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaptain Krunch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 22:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=26280#comment-698607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s it.  Every time I see uTorrent news, I am going to advertise Tixati the new and powerful BitTorrent client.  Tixati is 100% free, contains no spyware, no ads, and no gimmicks.  Builds are available  for Windows and Linux native versions.  Tixati was created by the same person who created WinMX.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s it.  Every time I see uTorrent news, I am going to advertise Tixati the new and powerful BitTorrent client.  Tixati is 100% free, contains no spyware, no ads, and no gimmicks.  Builds are available  for Windows and Linux native versions.  Tixati was created by the same person who created WinMX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UTorrent distributing music bundled with torrent downloads &#124; MyCE &#8211; My Consumer Electronics</title>
		<link>/utorrent-backs-artist-bundles-album-with-new-downloads-100816/#comment-698115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UTorrent distributing music bundled with torrent downloads &#124; MyCE &#8211; My Consumer Electronics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 04:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=26280#comment-698115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] want to continue to build on the successes that we have already seen with Pioneer One and the Yes Men,&#8221; said Jenna Broughton, BitTorrent [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] want to continue to build on the successes that we have already seen with Pioneer One and the Yes Men,&#8221; said Jenna Broughton, BitTorrent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what?</title>
		<link>/utorrent-backs-artist-bundles-album-with-new-downloads-100816/#comment-698035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[what?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=26280#comment-698035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seriously? Nice to get free shit but not shit i don&#039;t want. This is like putting a free tampon in every Kid&#039;s Meal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously? Nice to get free shit but not shit i don&#8217;t want. This is like putting a free tampon in every Kid&#8217;s Meal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P2PTalk &#187; uTorrent Promotes Hip-Hop Artist through Downloads</title>
		<link>/utorrent-backs-artist-bundles-album-with-new-downloads-100816/#comment-698013</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[P2PTalk &#187; uTorrent Promotes Hip-Hop Artist through Downloads]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=26280#comment-698013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (via TorrentFreak) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (via TorrentFreak) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uTorrent Promotes Hip-Hop Artist through Downloads</title>
		<link>/utorrent-backs-artist-bundles-album-with-new-downloads-100816/#comment-697996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[uTorrent Promotes Hip-Hop Artist through Downloads]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=26280#comment-697996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (via TorrentFreak) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (via TorrentFreak) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: check out brad sucks</title>
		<link>/utorrent-backs-artist-bundles-album-with-new-downloads-100816/#comment-697966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[check out brad sucks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=26280#comment-697966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[they should support guy named &quot;brad sucks&quot; - great musician, check him out, he offers all of his music for free (direct) download (mp3) and also offers to buy CD if you like it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they should support guy named &#8220;brad sucks&#8221; &#8211; great musician, check him out, he offers all of his music for free (direct) download (mp3) and also offers to buy CD if you like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verthik</title>
		<link>/utorrent-backs-artist-bundles-album-with-new-downloads-100816/#comment-697949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verthik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=26280#comment-697949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Simon for responding in the comments section of TF. Though it does sadden me to see you take the stance that you have. I hope you do understand that necessarily by definition pragmatism is immoral. Open Source is the only way to go to make this world a better place, as it turns a zero sum game into a positive sum game. If you really want to see this world become a better place the change must come from the bottom up. Top down solutions have never and will never work.

It&#039;s also sad to see people continualy defend their actions as being just because they are actions taken in the pursuit of monetary gain. What I find even more disheartening is that these same people have absolutly no idea of what the &quot;money&quot; they are trying to hoard really represents. You would have to agree that you can not pay a debt with a debt. So why are you focused on hoarding liabilty funds? Federal Reserve Note&#039;s are just that, and continual novations of debt with the U.S. Federal Government and all U.S. Citizens as Co-Sureties helps no one but the Creditors. I think you would also agree that operating in a positive sum game whereby debt is of-set and settled, rather than novated, is a much better solution. 

It still amazes me from time to time how prescient certain people from the past have been, but then I am just forced again to remember that there is nothing new under the sun.  

&quot;America is said to be the arena on which the battle of freedom is to be fought; but surely it cannot be freedom in a merely political sense that is meant. Even if we grant that the American has freed himself from a political tyrant, he is still the slave of an economical and moral tyrant. Now that the republic — the res-publica — has been settled, it is time to look after the res-privata, — the private state, — to see, as the Roman senate charged its consuls, &quot;ne quidres-PRIVATA detrimenti caperet,&quot; that the private state receive no detriment.(15)

[16]    Do we call this the land of the free? What is it to be free from King George and continue the slaves of King Prejudice? What is it to be born free and not to live free? What is the value of any political freedom, but as a means to moral freedom? Is it a freedom to be slaves, or a freedom to be free, of which we boast? We are a nation of politicians, concerned about the outmost defences only of freedom. It is our children&#039;s children who may perchance be really free. We tax ourselves unjustly. There is a part of us which is not represented. It is taxation without representation. We quarter troops, we quarter fools and cattle of all sorts upon ourselves. We quarter our gross bodies on our poor souls, till the former eat up all the latter&#039;s substance.

With respect to a true culture and manhood, we are essentially provincial still, not metropolitan, — mere Jonathans. We are provincial, because we do not find at home our standards; because we do not worship truth, but the reflection of truth; because we are warped and narrowed by an exclusive devotion to trade and commerce and manufactures and agriculture and the like, which are but means, and not the end.&quot;
http://thoreau.eserver.org/life2.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Simon for responding in the comments section of TF. Though it does sadden me to see you take the stance that you have. I hope you do understand that necessarily by definition pragmatism is immoral. Open Source is the only way to go to make this world a better place, as it turns a zero sum game into a positive sum game. If you really want to see this world become a better place the change must come from the bottom up. Top down solutions have never and will never work.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also sad to see people continualy defend their actions as being just because they are actions taken in the pursuit of monetary gain. What I find even more disheartening is that these same people have absolutly no idea of what the &#8220;money&#8221; they are trying to hoard really represents. You would have to agree that you can not pay a debt with a debt. So why are you focused on hoarding liabilty funds? Federal Reserve Note&#8217;s are just that, and continual novations of debt with the U.S. Federal Government and all U.S. Citizens as Co-Sureties helps no one but the Creditors. I think you would also agree that operating in a positive sum game whereby debt is of-set and settled, rather than novated, is a much better solution. </p>
<p>It still amazes me from time to time how prescient certain people from the past have been, but then I am just forced again to remember that there is nothing new under the sun.  </p>
<p>&#8220;America is said to be the arena on which the battle of freedom is to be fought; but surely it cannot be freedom in a merely political sense that is meant. Even if we grant that the American has freed himself from a political tyrant, he is still the slave of an economical and moral tyrant. Now that the republic — the res-publica — has been settled, it is time to look after the res-privata, — the private state, — to see, as the Roman senate charged its consuls, &#8220;ne quidres-PRIVATA detrimenti caperet,&#8221; that the private state receive no detriment.(15)</p>
<p>[16]    Do we call this the land of the free? What is it to be free from King George and continue the slaves of King Prejudice? What is it to be born free and not to live free? What is the value of any political freedom, but as a means to moral freedom? Is it a freedom to be slaves, or a freedom to be free, of which we boast? We are a nation of politicians, concerned about the outmost defences only of freedom. It is our children&#8217;s children who may perchance be really free. We tax ourselves unjustly. There is a part of us which is not represented. It is taxation without representation. We quarter troops, we quarter fools and cattle of all sorts upon ourselves. We quarter our gross bodies on our poor souls, till the former eat up all the latter&#8217;s substance.</p>
<p>With respect to a true culture and manhood, we are essentially provincial still, not metropolitan, — mere Jonathans. We are provincial, because we do not find at home our standards; because we do not worship truth, but the reflection of truth; because we are warped and narrowed by an exclusive devotion to trade and commerce and manufactures and agriculture and the like, which are but means, and not the end.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://thoreau.eserver.org/life2.html" rel="nofollow">http://thoreau.eserver.org/life2.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Morris (uTorrent/BitTorrent team)</title>
		<link>/utorrent-backs-artist-bundles-album-with-new-downloads-100816/#comment-697938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon Morris (uTorrent/BitTorrent team)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=26280#comment-697938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@36 (Nick) - I&#039;m not sure what “DIAF” means but it doesn’t sound nice and I hope it doesn’t happen. Like many people on the internet we&#039;re looking for sustainability. I’m sorry you have such a problem with us – I don’t think we ever did anything bad to you. But in the spirit of transparency, here’s a couple of reactions:
(1)	We make no secret of the fact that we’re trying to make money – we live in the real world where people pay bills each month and salaries help with that. We have to be pragmatic. 
(2)	Although many traditional media companies believe that coercion is a reasonable tool to get their customers to give them money, we’re not so naïve. Switching costs are low (people are really not locked in to our software) so we must try to do things that will be popular and create value. Sometimes that value will be something we can make money out of. Sometimes (as with Paz) there is no revenue for us. But things like optional promotions seemed like a reasonable experiment… do people really howl with outrage when there’s an advert half way through the latest Mad Men episode? You can choose not to watch it – or even skip it if you have a DVR. It doesn’t seem like such an evil thing? (I concede that on this final point you have been more forgiving than others on this comment thread – but the unconstrained vitriol and sense of entitlement on the part of some others is discouraging to say the least…)
(3)	You may love open source, but open source development is a method that’s very different from closed source development. We love open source too and have made many contributions. But there’s a difference between open-sourcing uTorrent software and transforming uTorrent into an open source project. It happens that uTorrent was never an open source project (even before we bought it). Transitioning it to an open source project is something that would be very time-consuming and wouldn’t obviously buy us much other than a PR win. (Really – there’s very few open source projects out there that have more than a handful of meaningful contributors.) And just opening up a version of the software has zero benefits to us. In fact it would probably be really bad for our users – it would just allow every traffic shaping and interdiction company out there to dig into the code for weaknesses – not something we’re prepared to expose our users to just to claim a PR win. So we keep it closed, not because we oppose “open source” but because there’s not a compelling enough case to open it. I think this reasoning is once again pragmatic and very far from immoral as you claim.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@36 (Nick) &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure what “DIAF” means but it doesn’t sound nice and I hope it doesn’t happen. Like many people on the internet we&#8217;re looking for sustainability. I’m sorry you have such a problem with us – I don’t think we ever did anything bad to you. But in the spirit of transparency, here’s a couple of reactions:<br />
(1)	We make no secret of the fact that we’re trying to make money – we live in the real world where people pay bills each month and salaries help with that. We have to be pragmatic.<br />
(2)	Although many traditional media companies believe that coercion is a reasonable tool to get their customers to give them money, we’re not so naïve. Switching costs are low (people are really not locked in to our software) so we must try to do things that will be popular and create value. Sometimes that value will be something we can make money out of. Sometimes (as with Paz) there is no revenue for us. But things like optional promotions seemed like a reasonable experiment… do people really howl with outrage when there’s an advert half way through the latest Mad Men episode? You can choose not to watch it – or even skip it if you have a DVR. It doesn’t seem like such an evil thing? (I concede that on this final point you have been more forgiving than others on this comment thread – but the unconstrained vitriol and sense of entitlement on the part of some others is discouraging to say the least…)<br />
(3)	You may love open source, but open source development is a method that’s very different from closed source development. We love open source too and have made many contributions. But there’s a difference between open-sourcing uTorrent software and transforming uTorrent into an open source project. It happens that uTorrent was never an open source project (even before we bought it). Transitioning it to an open source project is something that would be very time-consuming and wouldn’t obviously buy us much other than a PR win. (Really – there’s very few open source projects out there that have more than a handful of meaningful contributors.) And just opening up a version of the software has zero benefits to us. In fact it would probably be really bad for our users – it would just allow every traffic shaping and interdiction company out there to dig into the code for weaknesses – not something we’re prepared to expose our users to just to claim a PR win. So we keep it closed, not because we oppose “open source” but because there’s not a compelling enough case to open it. I think this reasoning is once again pragmatic and very far from immoral as you claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
