TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

uTorrent For Linux Is Coming, Finally

Five years after uTorrent was released for the Windows platform the development team has announced that it’s working on a Linux version of the torrent client. The massive demand from users is cited as one of the main reasons why Linux users will have a native uTorrent application this coming summer.

utorrneuTorrent for Windows saw its first public release in September 2005 and soon became the most widely used BitTorrent application. Every month, more than 50 million people use uTorrent and this number continues to grow alongside BitTorrent’s ever-increasing user base.

Ever since uTorrent was released, Mac and Linux users have begged the developers to release a version of the client designed to work on their computers. In 2006, when uTorrent was sold to BitTorrent Inc., the company announced that a Mac version was coming. In 2008, nearly two years after the announcement, it was finally released to the public.

With the the release of the Mac version, Linux users were the only ones left out in the cold, but this is about to change. The uTorrent development team has just announced that they are working on a Linux version of the client. Further details on the time line and an eventual release date are not available at the moment.

The Linux version is the most backed idea on uTorrent’s recently introduced Idea Bank. The Idea Bank is prominently featured on uTorrent’s website and allows users to submit and vote for ideas they want to see implemented. In just a few weeks the idea of a Linux version has been supported by 3254 people. This huge demand from users is one of the main reasons why the Linux version is now in progress.

“Since launching our Idea Bank on uTorrent.com there has been significant demand for a native client for Linux,” BitTorrent Inc. spokesperson Jenna Broughton told TorrentFreak. “We obviously want to do our best to deliver whenever we see a good fit between our goals and capabilities and what our users say they want.”

“We are committed to bringing a lightweight uTorrent client that embraces the usability and features of our Windows and Mac clients to Linux users,” Broughton said. The exact feature-set of the Linux client will remain a secret for now, but in common with other versions of uTorrent it wont be Open Source.

The release date for the client is unknown at this point but unlike the Mac version it should come out relatively quickly. “While the exact specs as well as the timing are still being developed, we expect uTorrent for Linux to be available for download later this summer,” we were informed.

Whether or not the uTorrent Linux release will ever reach the massive market share it has on Windows remains to be seen. The Mac version has been well received but it is by no means the most used BitTorrent client on the platform. Whatever happens, it’s definitely good to see that uTorrent will soon be available on all three major platforms.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Kjell T. Ring

    rTorrent killer?

  • hulkusz

    finally

  • morris

    We’ve the utorrent version for mac, it’s basically a stripped down version. With almost no functionality.

  • politux

    I’ll stick with KTorrent. Why would I want a closed application for my Open system?

  • lol

    dam
    now i won’t be able to spot a fellow linux user in a torrent swarm anymore ;(

  • TPBGirl

    Ohh wait until the mafiaa finds out. They just can’t get ahead of the game. lol

    “Sharing is caring” :D

  • muscbuzz

    Looking forward to trying it.

  • Anonymous

    transmission 4 lif3

  • LRN

    “…Mac and Linux users have begged…” – which is why i’m using Azureus. I don’t have to *beg* anyone.

  • Debian User

    There is actually no need for a µTorrent for Linux. There are plenty of alternatives. I use kTorrent. It is far superior in the usage. For example downloading tv series with rss works better than the µTorrent crap. Later… will be µTorrent open source? Hell no! Supporting various different distributions will be a hell for the maintainers. The Linux version will be soon dropped for this reason.

  • Pingback: Equipo de desarrollo de Utorrent está trabajando una versión para Linux [EN]

  • Phoenix

    not open source !
    useless …

  • BlueMac

    you know why Mac usage hasn’t been rising? B/c the mac client is a piece of crap. It doesn’t have half the features of the windows client (like the basic torrent management ones).

  • Pingback: Slackware 13.1: A Linux Distro That Gets Out of the Way | Linux World Info

  • Tomasz

    Who cares. We already have KTorrent which is even better. And even more, it is completely free and open source software.

  • jordsti

    rTorrent is the best !

  • lul

    utorrent is garbage compared to transmission or rtorrent. it’s nice, but most for the most part, this will be ignored by the gnu/linux community

  • Alex

    Can’t wait! Finally a decent GUI client for my seedbox!

  • 133t

    finally

  • 24235426

    lol, closed source for my open source linux? No thanks!

  • Ninja

    Awesome. Although ktorrent is a pretty good client that fulfills my needs when I’m on Linux >_>

    Hope they do a good job!

  • StopTheMadness

    This is too little, too late. Pointless.

    Ktorrent on my Mepis/KDE4 machine is my one-stop shop.

    But do deliver it for the Mac fans.

  • bomb

    wow linux users bitch alot. thought you bunch would be happy you have a little more choice. if you dont like it dont bitch dont read dont download simple.

  • Pingback: uTorrent????Linux?? | eMule fans ?????

  • Tomasz

    @21 Well we are happy to have more choice if the new offring is better than what already exists. In this case you get something that is inferior to existing clients and on top of it all closed. Then I guess it is no wonder we “bitch”.

  • ghindo

    Good to see it ported, but there are already so many good torrent clients for Linux! Transmission, Deluge, KTorrent, rTorrent, etc. etc.

  • StopTheMadness

    No worry, @21, we Linux guys have plenty of choice. Ktorrent, Vuse, Deluge, a few others, and about 300 odd distros to run them on.

    But most Linuxers demand open sourced apps, and would bother with closed-sourced only when open sourced solutions aren’t there or lacking in capability.

    For example, I use the closed-sourced nVidia driver because the open sourced driver still blows. It may improve…eventually. But for now, I want my geforce to work as expected.

  • 1000blabbities

    @21

    Too little, too late brah.

    All I can say is that uTorrent wants to develop for Linux now??? It’s been 5 years. We’ve had native solutions for quite a while, that have hammered out through many versions and have had many of the bugs worked out. Not too mention uTorrent is Wine compliant. So if anyone really wants to utilize it they can run it through Wine.

    The thing is that the developers are probrably wasting time on this, when they could be putting more effort toward the main client on Windows.

    Seriously, Transmission is golden. Deluge is golden. rtorrent is golden (for some people). Plus there is plenty more.

    Really, what would be the benefit of having uTorrent on Linux, THIS LATE in the GAME??

    http://blabbities.tumblr.com

  • Dragonfly

    Well, this is a little late!

    We already have very good and Open Source Bittorrent clients on Linux :
    KTorrent, qBittorrent, Deluge, Vuze, … to name a few.

  • 1337 h8ter

    aww… mommas basement dwellers should be sooooo happy

  • Anonymous

    fuk yea

  • Jeff

    Too late for me, two years ago I used uTorrent in wine, later I realized that all it had going for it was being popular. I’m much happier with rtorrent.

  • Finally

    Grrrreat!

  • Linux User

    Too late, I already found rTorrent, hard to get used to it but its working much better.

  • Paul

    Deluge is all I need.

  • spc

    There isn’t anything better than transmission.
    Comes with native GTK, QT -and CLI (tr-cli + screen – yeah) clients, eats half of memory of Ktorrent, Deluge (python app – very heavy).
    Transmission is gold standard for torrent client with great attention for details and people’s needs.

    Belated, closed utorrent – yeah right…

  • Matthew

    Well good on Utorrent for listening to what its customers want. I personally never use Linux, since I don’t code. Perfectly happy with my Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit OS, but still good on Utorrent

  • WLS

    I take it all the naysayers weren’t part of the 3254 people that voted for a Linux version.

    I’ve been using uTorrent in Wine since I discovered torrent and I’ll give the Linux version a shot. Tried most of the rest and they aren’t as nice as far as I can tell.

    qBittorrent comes close though.

  • ???

    This is too little, too late. KTorrent is sophisticated enough now.

  • files sh_are_

    i dunno i still use bit tyrant and occasionally Ti xati when I want total control over my transfers. Bit tyrant is good because all those fak ed stats clients don’t do any good using this cli ent as it auto adjust to their fa king ratio chea ting self.

    re-up com ment b/c it didn’t post on tf

  • rakshasha

    rtorrent > *

  • Agafaba

    Funny, uTorrent gets the most votes on their idea bank by far and yet everyone bitches when they do it… screwed if you do and screwed if you dont I suppose.

  • GODLiKE

    Maybe most of the ppl who commented here wouldn’t be “bitching” if the app was coming to Linux in an open source envelope.

    Seriously, only on a very rare and few specific cases there’s a real need to be using closed source on Linux: NVIDIA driver, CXoffice (only if you need things like excel macros to work), and maybe a couple more which I can count with one hand.

    If you come to Linux close-sourced, it’s because there’s some “business” you’re trying to “protect”. But you should also know that to be successful in this “business”, being open source/free software is almost a requirement.

  • StopTheMadness

    What 40 said: “If you come to Linux close-sourced, it’s because there’s some “business” you’re trying to “protect”. But you should also know that to be successful in this “business”, being open source/free software is almost a requirement.”

    This is why Linux users have a strong dislike and/or distrust of Microsoft, especially these days.
    M$ is trying real hard to make themselves look friendly to open source, but practically all hardcore Linuxers know it’s fake; M$ is trying to weasel their way in so they can destroy the open source movement from the inside.

    So what does that have to do with uTorrent?

    Consider who hates the freedom of torrent the most, and attempt to ‘monetize’ it regardless of the PR disaster they make for themselves. Would they manipulate (read, pay off or threaten) the makers of a torrent client to serve them?
    Count on it.

    Just sayin’.

  • Anonymous

    this is so coolll………….

  • KingKong

    I’ve been using vuze on my Ubuntu. and it works pretty well. but it uses more resources because of the Java application used.

    but utorrent will always be the best… :D

  • Pingback: uTorrent para Linux, muy pronto « Kaze-kun's Blog

  • Rabbi Torrentstein

    I’m glad to see uTorrent is finally coming to Linux but with all the better alternatives, this does seem rather pointless – and it won’t be Open Source? Fail! Besides, as previously mentioned, Linux users who still want to use uTorrent can use Wine and it’ll work just fine. Eh, it’s a shame – I had a feeling uTorrent would eventually go in the crapper… RIP -l-

  • Harquebus

    hooray!

  • guy

    nobody cares. closed source crap can go screw it self on other platforms.

    rtorrent <3

  • Anonymous

    I use Deluge but uTorrent is welcome because of new users:
    “Can I run uTorrent (without using Wine)?
    - Yes, you can.
    - That’s great! I’m gonna try Linux.”
    :F

  • Egomaniacal

    After nobody cares anymore…

  • Anonymous

    The only true benefit of this is that now linux distros will be just a little bit more appealing to new users, like #47 said.

  • chuche

    I, for one, welcome uTorrent for Linux. I don’t really care that we have so many others already. I have never liked any of the alternatives as much as I have uTorrent. They either take too long to load (like Deluge or heavy-ass kTorrent) or don’t have the same features, hell, they don’t even look the same. So for familiarity and for how lightweight it should be, I welcome it. I use Linux because Windows slows down over time, no matter how hard I try to keep it clean/de-fragmented. I don’t use it to “code” or “hack” or however Windows fanboys want to stereotype Linux. It’s a bitch though to start up wine for something that’s supposed to be lightweight to begin with (i.e. winedevice.exe, services.exe, utorrent.exe)… GTK+ apps look horrible on KDE (i.e. Deluge). I want my bittorrent client to be a GUI not CLI or text-based (rTorrent). Once again, I welcome uTorrent for Linux.

  • Mike K

    I have been using uTorrent under Wine for years. Most of the time it works but it can be a little sluggish and flaky.

    I’m very glad to here they will have Linux version. I have Scumcast as my ISP and the new UTP is the only way to prevent throttling. It may be true that KTorrent 4.0 has UTP but that won’t be shipped by Linux distros for about a year.

  • R

    I’ve been using uTorrent under WINE, and I can’t wait for this. We’re still stuck with 1.8.5 because 2.0 uses some functions that aren’t supported by WINE, so it’ll be great to get a native client.

  • Pingback: SYSTEMA

  • dg100

    I’m hugely surprised at the number of complaints, although I’m sure I shouldn’t be. Several thousand Linux users went to the website and asked for the damn thing, presumably because they AREN’T happy with the FOSS alternatives currently on offer – if some users don’t like the application, so what? Why are they complaining?

    I tried the open-source alternatives when I was using Linux and, frankly, while they may have moved on since then, they really weren’t very good at the time. Even today, there seem to be far too few clients around that are fully protocol-compliant, reasonably-featured, efficient and reliable.

    I think that any addition to the list of good clients would be something to applaud, not criticise.

    I think that if uT were to become open-source their dismissive sneering would turn to gushing praise overnight.

    This obvious ideologically-motivated insecurity does the Linux world a grave disservice and it’s the main reason I finally abandoned Linux as a dead-end OS over a year ago. Once you see past its caring-&-sharing facade, it’s clear the community harbours many deeply unpleasant and anti-social attitudes, smug self-superiority being the least of it.

    If Linux-users ever want the OS to be anything other than the platform every major hardware and software developer would prefer to ignore, they may want to think more carefully about how they present themselves, particularly in situations like this.

    This is uTorrent, one of the more important developers holding out the hand of friendship, offering respect and support to the Linux community. If all the majority of that community really can do is bitch and moan in return, it doesn’t deserve to survive.

    And it won’t.

  • user

    Nice, ill be good for seedbox indeed :)

  • sisters of funk

    Heh, no source means no running it on special CPU architectures, ie MIPS/PPC/ARM

    I’m guessing they’ll only provide perhaps one binary build, x86_64.

    So no Android/N900 users, you can’t run it on your phone. :P

  • truth

    BREAKING…. pirate bay opens a dating service online..pirate dating .com

    This is not a joke

  • Grateful

    Attention uTorrent developers….

    I am grateful for your work and look forward to the release. I have used uTorrent on XP for a number of years and have been very pleased with the program. I always wanted Utorrent on Linux as I also use Xubuntu. uTorrent on Linux is important for me as I will be a full-time Xubuntu user when Microsoft drops updates and support for XP.

    I have used all the other top clients in Linux and a Windows environment and frankly none of the others really compare to uTorrent.

    I love it.

    Please don’t be dismayed by all these ungrateful negative people. I don’t know why they are saying these things. Just because an OS has some software, we should never say that we don’t need any more development. We always need that….especially when it comes from such a notable developer of an excellent program.

    The naysayers may be connected to the other clients in some way and they are afraid of losing their hegemony?

    For me, your progress in the Linux community is VERY big news.

    Please keep up the good work.

    A feature I believe that uTorrent needs to add is the “bind” feature that Vuze has. This enables you to bind your client to a VPN or proxy interface so that if the VPN or proxy goes down, your client also stops all activity and therefore will not leak your ip through your regular connection. People have used VPNETMON and configured their firewalls to prevent this from happening, but simply selecting a bind feature in the client is the most user friendly way to do it. You could design it so that all downloads or uploads are paused without the activity. VPNETMON crashes the client and this is not good as a file check has to occur every time you restart your client.

    To research this in Vuze, go to “advanced network settings” and you will see the “bind to local ip or interface” selection. Also, note the selection at the very bottom that says “enforce ip bindings even when interfaces are not available”.

    Also, please research ways to make the user experience of uTorrent more anonymous (not displaying ips, preventing your ip from being displayed in other clients, etc.).

    Long live uTorrent!

  • Lunaru

    “In just a few weeks the idea of a Linux version has been supported by 3254 people.” Thats not true. It got 1248 supporters. What you are saying are the number of votes.

  • dfdf

    No one reads ur essays on Torrent Freak no one has the attention span expect the guy who writes novels on here…

    ———–
    The Pirate Bay Couples With Meezoog Belowdecks To Launch Dating Site
    ————————
    Time Warner Cable “a good ISP for copyright infringers”

    arstechnica.com — Lawyers suing thousands of P2P users in federal court aren’t pleased with Time Warner Cable’s plan to quash their subpoenas and scuttle their lawsuits. The company is nothing but a pirate sanctuary, say the lawyers, and it risks being sued for infringement if it keeps stalling.
    —————–

  • redcam

    @53

    So your saying that the operating system (Linux) that powers more than 70% of the web is going to die?

    Wow, just wow

  • Pingback: uTorrent llegará pronto a Linux | MuyLinux

  • Calimore

    I use uTorrent on my windows machine and really like it.

    So thanks to the developers for reaching out to the linux world by offering uTorrent for another platform. I’d love to see much more software ported to Linux as this might help Users coming from Windows to make the transition to another OS without being overwhelmed by new software. That way tehy can stick to what they know.

    On the other hand I must admit that the open-source alternatives available for Linux serve my purposes just fine and thus I probably won’t switch to a closed source software for my Linux Bittorrent needs.

    So even if I won’t use uTorrent on my Linux machine, thanks to Bittorrent Inc. for adding another fine software to the global Linux software library.

  • omfg

    neh there are enough opensource clients

  • Anonymoose

    Thanks but no thanks. Do not want.

  • AnarchyNow

    We don’t need this N$A/MAFIAA ridden trojan horse, when it’ll be 100% free-software under GPL, we’ll reconsider, till then we’ll keep on using the hundreds of better and open alternatives.

  • bomb

    at 57

    have you even tried 7? xp is shit compared, providing you have hardware that isn’t 2 years old

  • Jack Jack

    @53 Jun 02, 2010 at 07:56 by dg100

    You just stereotyped about 50% of all people that use a computer in this world.

    If you do not believe in the “sharing is caring” ideology that’s your own choice and I respect it. You cannot however label people that do believe in it as people with a superiority complex and anti-social attitudes. I support Linux because it promotes transparency and trust through the use of open-source software and for the fact that there is a constant push for improvement by almost every member of the community.

    If you are comfortable with this society again that’s your own choice, don’t condemn the people who are not and thus try to create something better. Even if it is in something as minute as an OS.

    As for uTorrent in Linux, I welcome it but won’t be using it as it’s closed-source.

  • phishybongwaters

    You know what, it really doesn’t matter to me if it’s closed or open source when it comes to my torrent client. I use utorrent on my windows box, and will end up using the linux version (if I like it) on any linux boxes i might throw up. I can run a torrent download box pretty efficiently with even a simple LiveOS linux distro, with less overhead and lower system requirements.

    As long as the client has functionality, does what i want and need it to do, and doesn’t do any nasty stuff under the hood (I pay close attention to my router logs for internal and external traffic) The only thing going on under the hood of utorrent, if enabled, is DHT.

    As long as the linux port stays true to the current Utorrent setup I’ll bite. I could care less if there’s an open source alternative honestly as my choice in FREE torrent client has no impact on anything other than the client i end up using.

    If you want to get all high and mighty and declare every software choice to be only open source, on principle, great for you, I totally respect that. As long as you understand it in no way hurts the closed source community. Keep the preaching to yourself would be my opinion on that.

    Utorrent is not riddled with anything, it’s not made “by the man” it’s simply a free torrent client that happens to be closed source as they would prefer full control over the development of their project, instead of freeing it in the wild allowing anyone with a bit of python coding skill the ability to clone it.

    honestly, i think they could easily put out some source code as open source and let the community have at it, it’s not going to stop me from choosing their tried and true client over various clones of various build numbers.

    You think having it open source is safer? You’d better get your butt over to a wikki article and get schooled up quick. Open source means anyone anywhere can have at the source, you’d never actually know for sure what you are getting.

    closed source, in the case of utorrent, makes me comfortable as I’ve run it through the gambit of tests and it’s fine, and I can trust their developers (while keeping an eye on my logs)

  • Anonymous

    @ 5x the size and 1/3x the features as the Windows version, the resource-hungry Mac version should not have even been called ?torrent.

    Will the upcoming Linux version also be bloated and feature-bare?

  • Anonymous

    @ 5x the size and 1/3x the features as the Windows version, the resource-hungry Mac version should not have even been called ?torrent.

    Will the upcoming Linux version also be bloated and feature-bare?

  • Pingback: uTorrent, también en Linux -- Linux Los Angeles

  • RIAAtarded

    good news if it is a true port with full functionality. Another port like MAC won’t win anyone over. Having cross platform apps though help users move from different OSes because there is a certain familiarity that eases the transition so I applaud the effort. Only caveat would be give it all the feature so it can be a real alternative.

  • Pingback: A Native uTorrent client for Linux might be dropped | Kabatology ~ Open Source, Linux

  • Afficianado

    Deluge for me.

  • politux

    @67 phishy

    It saddens me how misinformed an individual can be about the benefits of an open source development model. I prefer free and open software to closed and proprietary software because anyone can view the source code and modify and improve it. This is not a threat or a concern as you stated in your comment.

    It is ironic that you tell people to read a “wikki” [sic] article to back up your position. Wikipedia is a perfect example of an open development model, or in modern parlance “crowdsource.” Because anyone can edit the articles the end result is the work of many individuals cooperating on a global level. Seeing a connection to the open source software development model yet?

    Millions of eyes working on something will always be better than a small group of corporate developers.

    Also, you capitalize the word “FREE” to highlight the fact that uTorrent is offered for download at no cost. However, when the Linux community describes software as free they mean the user is free. Free from DRM, free from an overly restrictive End User License Agreement.

    If you somehow get comfort knowing your software is controlled by a corporation I feel sorry for you.

  • EvgenijM86

    Won’t use it, because KTorrent is as good while having GPL. If they can’t trust their user, hiding what is inside – then why would I trust them?

  • slack

    “but in common with other versions of uTorrent it wont be Open Source.”

    why would anyone that use linux as their main desktop what to use close source app? Its time to send a donation to the ktorrent ->GPL<- project.

  • Sam

    “You think having it open source is safer? You’d better get your butt over to a wikki article and get schooled up quick. Open source means anyone anywhere can have at the source, you’d never actually know for sure what you are getting.”

    This isn’t true. Yes anyone can modify the source but they can’t just modify the official binaries whenever they please like they can a wiki article (and even then there are some restrictions on wiki’s). It doesn’t work that way.

  • me

    @#1 Kjell T. Ring. No, it won’t be an rtorrent killer because 1/ it can’t run on small headless soho-routers, and 2/ it probably won’t be open-source.

    It’s an nice addition to existing bittorrent clients on Unix-like operating systems though… at least for those who aren’t paranoid enough w.r.t. security of some closed binary blob. ;)

  • rillo

    I’ve used ktorrent, rtorrent and most of that GPL stuff at one time or another, it’s all good..but it sure seems to me like utorrent connects a lot better than any of them, especially on slower torrents with very few and slow seeds..I’ve watched ktorrent show the same seed for hours and never connect to it, switch over to utorrent and connected to that same peer in a split second. I’ve used it on wine for a couple of years without any issues, except maybe one – I don’t dig wine explorer, perhaps this up and coming release will let me right click and open them in konqueror :lol:

  • dg100

    To avoid further confusion, I’ll try and clarify what I said @53.

    I have no problem with the ideals of Free and Open Source Software, or with the idea of an OS and software based upon them. I don’t think anyone here is criticising these very laudible sentiments (and in any case, this is not the place for such an off-topic debate).

    What I – and a very great number of people besides myself – find objectionable is the openly contemptuous attitude of a great many users here today who don’t seem able to grasp the fact that they are behaving in a way that is deeply immature, obnoxious and unpleasant.

    I mean, the thing hasn’t even been written yet and there are already people calling it crap. That’s just not right.

    It’s like seeing one child offer to bring his favourite toy over to another child’s backyard and play, only to be told they’re evil and to go away if they’re not prepared to give the toy away permanently.

    Why should developers be banned from making a living?

    This is the Torrentfreak article of uTorrent’s entry into the Linux market. The chances are, some or even all of them will read the criticism. How do you think this will make them feel?

    A suggestion: if Linux-users here really don’t want anything closed-source to appear on Linux, then I suggest they put their money where their mouths are: go to the Idea Bank (link at the top of the page), register and open a request to stop Linux development.

    On your way out, you can write emails to the proprietary owners and developers of any and all graphics and sound cards, mobo chipsets, audio and video codecs, etc and ask them to withdraw their permissions and drivers as well.

  • rillo

    yep, just like flashplayer, without libflashplayer.so there’s a lot of sites and videos you simply can’t view. The open flash players hardly play anything, and if they do it’s quite blocky.. I guess you can either be stubborn or use what works the best

  • yo

    Azureus have almost all ideas suggested by utorrent users…. :)

  • dave

    Glad to hear it. Unfortunately (for them), uTorrent is about two years too late to win me back.

    Transmission became the standard BT client for Ubuntu about a year after I switched, and its updates have long since added all the features I’ve wanted. Why should I bother switching now, especially to a closed variant?

    If I’m ever forced to return to windows, I’ll consider them again. But I’d advise uTorrent not to hold its breath.

  • Joe Bob

    A lot of people here are saying they’d rather use an open source client.

    You can vote here for uTorrent to go open source:

    http://utorrentideas.uservoice.com/forums/47263-torrent-for-windows/suggestions/720332-opensource

  • Freeleech

    Great news! Now we only need it to be open-sourced under GPL. ;-)

  • netuser

    Ahh cool, utorrent for linux, that’s awesome news! WINE is still buggy and running utorrent on WINE has owayz given me tough time (port issues etc)… Thank god we finally shud have a ut for linux finally !

  • atiti

    I guess it shouldnt take too long to have a Linux version, since if it has been ported to Mac once, its not such a huge jump to go to Linux..

  • lksd

    erm… uTorrent not for Linux but for ubuntu newbies perhaps.

    I don’t see any point in using uTorrent on Linux. While on Fedora I was quite happy with rTorrent.

    Transmission is a joke not a client. Deluge has bugs even in comments and icons, and crashes even before you start it. Ktorrent seams nice. :)

  • Pingback: Linux Version for uTorrent to Be Released Soon

  • Pingback: P2PTalk » Linux Version for uTorrent to Be Released Soon

  • voo

    There is actually no need for a µTorrent for Linux. There are plenty of alternatives. I use kTorrent. It is far superior in the usage. For example downloading tv series with rss works better than the µTorrent crap. Later… will be µTorrent open source? Hell no! Supporting various different distributions will be a hell for the maintainers. The Linux version will be soon dropped for this reason.

  • dwpbike

    ray

  • Pingback: uTorrent Linux edition – People want it because….? « OpenBytes

  • Agafaba

    Anyone who thought that uTorrent would be made open source simply because they decided to make a Linux version is fooling themselves. The demand is there regardless of open/closed source… if you dont believe me go check the idea bank yourself. Either its in demand or uTorrent does so much people simply couldnt think of any other ideas.

    Open source is both reliable and unreliable at the same time… Wikipedia is the best example, everyone can edit it and it is an amazing resource. Wikipedia however isnt a trusted source because ANYONE can edit it, including those who have incorrect information. With closed source you might not have the same manpower and resources available, but it is more consistent. Excluding one or the other is foolish, you dont ignore one tool in the toolbox just because its a different colour, you use whatever works best in your situation.

  • The United Hackers Association

    won’t matter they are making p2p software illegal in canada conservatives with help of liberals

  • Dr

    on a 1 Gbps line uTorrent is absolutly the nuts! :)
    The speed I see is unreal sometime’s
    around 50.5 MB/s upload on a Pack.
    Thanks
    Dr

  • Pingback: uTorrent For Linux Is Coming, Finally « Chicago Mac/PC Support

  • Bob

    Big Fucking Deal. uTorrent isn’t even open source. Transmission ftw.

  • crux

    what does nobody like transmission? seems pretty lightweight to me, and it has integrated blocklists too..

  • maCfatDonalds

    No wonder linux users crying for it next to crappy bt clients such as Azureus which slow like hell, bittornado based clients which fail to dl many torrents.
    Torrentflux is long dead etc.
    You can use bitthief which is gonna eat your whole cpu time but queuing in the torrents to it is a pain in the ass.

    Hope they will keep utorrent as fast as it is in windows.

  • ted

    I like all the bashing against closed sourced. *ALL* the torrent clients are crap when it comes to linux client, libtorrent is nice but does support encryption or all that fancy gizmozes and gadgets. Im tired of running utorrent in wine and would like a linux binary so it can play nice in bsd land

  • suikodian

    I never begged for a release of uTorrent. KTorrent is much better in my opinion.

  • Coutreau

    I can only hope for linux users that their version of utorrent won’t be the same pile of shit the OSX version is. OSX version is a crippled waste of HD space (though significantly better than the first release [not saying much]). They basically told all mac users, “Oh hey, here’s utorrent, but don’t expect the same functionality as the Windows version”. Linux users can probably expect the same.

  • Ansari

    A lot of closed source ports end up being really crippled. The excuses are endless. I use KTorrent right now and I’m very pleased with it.

  • Tux_the_penguin

    Transmission FTW

  • gnusay

    boycott closed-source. period.

  • TerribleTony

    Pah! KTorrent is much better.

  • gnusay

    #comment-666254
    50 Jun 02, 2010 at 06:58 by chuche

    about the GTK+ apps look issue:
    please try http://labs.trolltech.com/page/Projects/Styles/GtkStyle or http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=9714

  • freeman

    qBittorrent Rocks!!!!! Who needs uTorrent?!?!

  • Anon

    On windows I always used utorrent, then I went to linux and found deluge.

    Dont really need this anymore..but meh cool that their making it for the people that requested it I suppose.

  • hms-one

    The problem with closed source software for Linux is that it is generally unsupported by the creators. They just can’t keep up with the faster dev cycle of OSS.

    libflash 10.XX is STILL buggy. It still leaves full screen when you adjust the volume and it still is incompatible with Firefox 3.6 + Flashblock.(white box!) I sometimes also get the ‘please install flash’ icon and some players(like [as]) just don’t work at all. Closed software that gets ported to ‘nix is invariably buggy, and users are not allowed to fix it because of copyright. Users are left to beg corporations to make their products work right with their systems and are generally ignored while simple bugs go unfixed release after release despite massive user feedback from the Linux community.

    If all bittorrent inc. are gonna do is release a broken, incompatible, feature stripped POS and then not allow users to fix it, then they shouldn’t even bother. If they actually intend to build a real ‘nix client AND support it, well good luck and more power to ya.

  • Anon

    I used uTorrent with wine after switching to Ubuntu in ’06 and trying a few linux clients. I didn’t like them. Then I got more comfortable with the cli and tried out rTorrent. It works very well. rTorrent also seems to out-perform uTorrent…untested tho.

    I’ll Stick with rTorrent.

    In anycase I would agree that a uTorrent port be opensource

    @53 I’d like to see your sources.

  • Pingback: uTorrent vihdoin myös Linuxille | Digilelut

  • Stark

    I’m amazed that developers still bother with Linux.

    I guess it’s hard to learn from the mistakes of others, but I’m sure they will learn from their own.

  • foo

    no, thanks.

  • Anonymous

    Ktorrent is simply better. We don’t need proprietary and closed source utorrent for linux

  • Patience

    I think I’ll stick with µTorrent 1.6.1 Build 490 with Wine 1.2.

    http://www.filehippo.com/download_utorrent/2253/

  • Pingback: Utorrent for Linux

  • Anonymous

    Sorry – I’m not letting a closed source application on my open system. Instead of protecting your freedom allowing you to download anything, actually uTorrent restricts everything even further, since you do not have access to change it.

  • Pingback: uTorrent llegará pronto a GNU/Linux « Red-Orbita

  • clarjon1

    What.
    The.
    Hell.

    Alright, first off.

    I am an avid Linux user
    I run PCLinuxOS 2010, i’ve been running Linux for 8 years.
    I enjoy my open source apps
    Love ‘em to death.

    HOWEVER.

    There are quite a few things that I am not liking seeing here, especially from the Linux community.

    Number One: ODEAR IT IS CLOSED SOURCE BAD BAD BAD!

    Alright.
    Fine, boycott closed proprietary software. Hope you don’t have an ATI, or Nvidia card, or use a broadcom Wifi card, for example.
    Why?
    Well, dontcha know that they use PROPRIETARY CLOSED SOURCE modules and firmware?
    OooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOoooooh but that’s different! you say.
    NO. it is NOT different.
    Closed source is closed source is closed source is closed source. You don’t pick and choose.

    Again. Closed source is closed source. Got that?
    Now, go boycott your closed-source apps, let’s see how long you last with your 3d gaming without your acellerated 3d hardware.

    Yeah.

    That’s what I thought.

    Although closed source can be seen as hostile, there are times when it can be beneficial.

    Did anyone ever think that perhaps why uTorrent is closed source is due to, oh I don’t know, perhaps agreements with other companies, or perhaps that’s their business model.
    What a shocker
    They need to have a way to keep money coming in so they can keep developing!

    Oh, the horror! After all, everyone knows that hard working developers don’t need a paying job, or already have a good one!

    Granted, they could release an open source fork of their product, like Sun did with StarOffice and OpenOffice back in the day… They just might do that!
    Or like with TuxRacer
    or Wine, the wine team have a proprietary version of wine out, how eeeeeeeeeevil

    *eyeroll*

    Oh, another one, TeamViewer. Great app, very easy, works equally well on all three platforms, but is closed source. Oh my, how evil and twisted of them.

    Oh, and there’s Flash.

    Shall I go on?

    My second point, why it is needed.
    Sure, it may end up being crap, but it’s brand recognition. As one commenter has said, or at least referred to, earlier is that people will be more willing to switch if they have a few FAMILIAR things to work with.

    Switching from Windows to Mac? Hey, there’s iTunes, Firefox, you can even get Word for the Mac. Oh, look, people are happy, they have things they know how to use!

    Same kind of thing with Linux.
    Sure, you can make it look like Linux, but a lot of users are not friendly towards a little something called the Learning Curve.

    Get ‘em used to things like TeamViewer when helpin them. Introduce them to Linux. “Oh look, uTorrent, i know how to use that! And look, Teamviewer! And firefox! and OpenOffice!”

    The more apps that are available between the operating systems, to use as a jumping point, the better, in my opinion.

    But hey.
    That’s just me.
    Don’t have to take my word for it.

  • Pingback: uTorrent para GNU/Linux en camino | Linux Zone

  • Anonymous

    Transmission works fine for me. Deluge is already a pretty good alternative of uTorrent in Linux (and even offers a thing or two that uTorrent doesn’t have). I like uTorrent and used it when I had Windows because of it’s great performance and features. I’m not sure it’ll work that good for Linux though. It’s not about closed or opened source. It’s about the fact that there are maybe hundreds of different distributions (and believe me – not all are based on Debian, RHL or SUSE). That leads to many stability and performance issues even by propriety software. I’m curious though how things will work out for the little guy. :)

  • Anonymous

    As for uTorrent and the fact its source is closed – I’m sure that more than 2/3 of the people who say “I don’t want it because it’s not open source on my open source system…” no (almost) nothing about open source and its (dis)advantages. Not to mention that many of you use closed source and propriety software in your Linux distro without even knowing it. :D

  • Pingback: uTorrent para GNU/Linux en camino | Ayuda Linux

  • AnonRock

    “…in common with other versions of uTorrent it wont be Open Source.”

    wat

  • Anonymous

    “With the the release of the Mac version, Linux users were the only ones left out in the cold, but this is about to change.”

    The whole world is not Windows+Mac+Linux! Perhaps marginal, but lots of other systems exist.

    “We obviously want to do our best to deliver whenever we see a good fit between our goals and capabilities and what our users say they want.”

    But if, what the users want, doesn’t fit with BitTorrent, Inc.’s goals, they will ignore it.

    I have to agree I expect µTorrent for Linux to be way worse than the Windows version, but the closed source means little. I need to give KTorrent a go, but rtorrent is pure garbage.

  • slinky

    meh, what’s the big deal?

    rtorrent is the finest torrent client out there. If people want gui just use deluge.

  • -

    stop flaming if utorrent user love this tool then thay will use’t if not then thay won’t

  • Anonymous

    I’ll stick with rTorrent…

  • Anonymous

    We don’t need closed source mpaa tracking software on our backs, thanks but no thanks.

  • Pingback: danitxu.com » Techfreedom Berriak 20100531+7

  • noCS

    Normally I really wouldn’t care if a program is closed source or not on Linux, but in a case where a certain lobbying group could slip something in the program virtually undetected, I need to see some source.

  • Pingback: pligg.com

  • Pingback: What I Use to get Things Done on my Lucid Lynx « Technically Possible

  • fxvcxxvc

    112, stop wasting break lines. Not only that but have a point, not just bashing around. Everyone’s comment isn’t that important at all.

  • Anoymous

    @24

    Because it happens that you know what to do with the source code of the Nvidia drivers right!?!?!?

  • clarjon1

    122
    Sorry, i’ll try to save the monitor paper by using less break lines. We happy now?

  • lmao

    all respect to utorrent, but do a research before you start. GNU/linux is full of great torrent clients already. In fact, i miss ktorrent when im forced to use windows.

  • Pingback: Un mundo libre » Blog Archive » uTorrent para GNU/Linux en camino

  • Corporate Monkey

    Deluge is awesome and it is similar to Utorrent. Since Deluge exists on Linux, I dont find myself wanting to migrate.

  • Vishal Telangre

    I just hate those all third-party tools and packages which are not based on open source philosophy!!! If I’m a ubuntu user (then obviously a BitTorrent user), then why I chose to such a non-sense and useless torrent client?

    -1 from me!

  • nunya

    If its not open source, they can shove it right up their arse, I’ll stick with ‘transmission’ or ‘rtorrent’ or any of a dozen other OPEN SOURCE products.

    Not to mention, who knows what backdoors they might stick in their lame ass utorrent client, if they wont reveal source.

  • dodo

    I would probably give it a shot. I really liked using it back when I used to use windows. Also, if you are so paranoid and worried about the source I am sure the final version of the application can be reverse engineered for inspection…

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.