<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: uTorrent Mac vs. Azureus Mac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/</link>
	<description>Torrent News, Torrent Sites and the latest Scoops</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:20:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: wondergrl</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-283608</link>
		<dc:creator>wondergrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-283608</guid>
		<description>Any new news on when the utorrent for mac is coming out. Transmission is still working way too slow on my mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any new news on when the utorrent for mac is coming out. Transmission is still working way too slow on my mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-268559</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-268559</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using Transmission 1.01 and it is bad ass. I get 100kbs to 300kbs all the time. Average 150kbs. I will still get uTorrent for Mac when it comes. Note, use Bitjunkie it has the most seeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using Transmission 1.01 and it is bad ass. I get 100kbs to 300kbs all the time. Average 150kbs. I will still get uTorrent for Mac when it comes. Note, use Bitjunkie it has the most seeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shree Mulay</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-236942</link>
		<dc:creator>Shree Mulay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-236942</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using uTorrent Windows Edition on my Mac OSX via CrossOver Trial Edition which works for 30 days.  IT IS 10 TIMES FASTER THAN AZUREUS!  I got the instructions on running uTorrent at http://torrentfreak.com/how-to-run-utorrent-in-osx/  It is well worth your time to do this!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using uTorrent Windows Edition on my Mac OSX via CrossOver Trial Edition which works for 30 days.  IT IS 10 TIMES FASTER THAN AZUREUS!  I got the instructions on running uTorrent at <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/how-to-run-utorrent-in-osx/" rel="nofollow">http://torrentfreak.com/how-to-run-utorrent-in-osx/</a>  It is well worth your time to do this!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhunt8</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-225673</link>
		<dc:creator>jhunt8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 03:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-225673</guid>
		<description>where is utorrent for mac? how much bloody longer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where is utorrent for mac? how much bloody longer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Davis</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-223863</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-223863</guid>
		<description>Azereus is just mad that it is sooooo slow and it takes up so much RAM. Please utorrent save me from Azereus soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Azereus is just mad that it is sooooo slow and it takes up so much RAM. Please utorrent save me from Azereus soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toak</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-134208</link>
		<dc:creator>Toak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-134208</guid>
		<description>MKB: Ofcourse it will be universal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MKB: Ofcourse it will be universal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKB</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131765</link>
		<dc:creator>MKB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131765</guid>
		<description>Will this client be universal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will this client be universal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131652</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131652</guid>
		<description>Ah, finally!
I dropped Azureus for the Mac because it eats up your resources, and to be quite honest, that is about the only reason I see to change Torrent-clients at all.

I can also recommend Transmission, a very cool and light client, with an amazing arsenal of options beneath it&#039;s friendly user-interface.

But, I will of course try ÂµTorrent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, finally!<br />
I dropped Azureus for the Mac because it eats up your resources, and to be quite honest, that is about the only reason I see to change Torrent-clients at all.</p>
<p>I can also recommend Transmission, a very cool and light client, with an amazing arsenal of options beneath it&#8217;s friendly user-interface.</p>
<p>But, I will of course try ÂµTorrent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131501</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131501</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t know bout ya but i got 2.4MB connection i tried all clients all sucks except Azureus from what i know i think Azureus Da Best torrent client ever.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t know bout ya but i got 2.4MB connection i tried all clients all sucks except Azureus from what i know i think Azureus Da Best torrent client ever&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 8472</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131197</link>
		<dc:creator>The 8472</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131197</guid>
		<description>Btw, w/o describing the exact test procedure it&#039;s a bit hard to believe any stats. Since default settings vary  (such as number of connections, number of upload slots) and download speeds also depend on the swarm, luck (since clients are picked at random) etc. the your test results are not really trustworthy.

And then there are torrents where the client&#039;s implementation doesn&#039;t play a role at all: the overseeded ones.

So please be more careful when comparing speed...

The CPU/Memory consumption on the other hand is obvious ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw, w/o describing the exact test procedure it&#8217;s a bit hard to believe any stats. Since default settings vary  (such as number of connections, number of upload slots) and download speeds also depend on the swarm, luck (since clients are picked at random) etc. the your test results are not really trustworthy.</p>
<p>And then there are torrents where the client&#8217;s implementation doesn&#8217;t play a role at all: the overseeded ones.</p>
<p>So please be more careful when comparing speed&#8230;</p>
<p>The CPU/Memory consumption on the other hand is obvious ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: di0rz`</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131191</link>
		<dc:creator>di0rz`</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131191</guid>
		<description>I agree, the speed has nothing to do with the client used. Azureus isn&#039;t a loweight client and everybody know it,  otherwise it wouldn&#039;t be coded in java.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the speed has nothing to do with the client used. Azureus isn&#8217;t a loweight client and everybody know it,  otherwise it wouldn&#8217;t be coded in java.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blah</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131183</link>
		<dc:creator>Blah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131183</guid>
		<description>Holy crap those speeds are fast. The absolute max I get is around 150kbs. You must have a crazy internet connection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy crap those speeds are fast. The absolute max I get is around 150kbs. You must have a crazy internet connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasper van Weerd</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131156</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasper van Weerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131156</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;131152&quot;]You guys should stop taking articles from slyck.com get your own fucking ideas![/quote]

My compliments on your motivation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="131152"]You guys should stop taking articles from slyck.com get your own fucking ideas![/quote]</p>
<p>My compliments on your motivation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernesto</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131155</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131155</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;131152&quot;]You guys should stop taking articles from slyck.com get your own fucking ideas![/quote]

Can you give me one other article that was inspired by a Slyck post?

Don&#039;t think so...

Besides that, we&#039;re all friends in the P2P news scene ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="131152"]You guys should stop taking articles from slyck.com get your own fucking ideas![/quote]</p>
<p>Can you give me one other article that was inspired by a Slyck post?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t think so&#8230;</p>
<p>Besides that, we&#8217;re all friends in the P2P news scene ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GiantBearn</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131152</link>
		<dc:creator>GiantBearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131152</guid>
		<description>You guys should stop taking articles from slyck.com get your own fucking ideas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys should stop taking articles from slyck.com get your own fucking ideas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kos</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131145</link>
		<dc:creator>Kos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131145</guid>
		<description>The people on slyck should be warned. bogus article on their site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people on slyck should be warned. bogus article on their site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabret00the</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131131</link>
		<dc:creator>sabret00the</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131131</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;131102&quot;]It&#039;s no surprise that Azureus uses a lot of RAM.

Does UPnP work in the mac uTorrent client? It sure doesn&#039;t on PC, while Azureus UPnP works great.

It&#039;s nice to get your client in active mode without jumping through hoops to forward ports on a router.[/quote]

UPnP works great for me on PC (uTorrent)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="131102"]It&#8217;s no surprise that Azureus uses a lot of RAM.</p>
<p>Does UPnP work in the mac uTorrent client? It sure doesn&#8217;t on PC, while Azureus UPnP works great.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to get your client in active mode without jumping through hoops to forward ports on a router.[/quote]</p>
<p>UPnP works great for me on PC (uTorrent)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131102</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-mac-vs-azureus-mac/#comment-131102</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s no surprise that Azureus uses a lot of RAM.

Does UPnP work in the mac uTorrent client? It sure doesn&#039;t on PC, while Azureus UPnP works great.

It&#039;s nice to get your client in active mode without jumping through hoops to forward ports on a router.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s no surprise that Azureus uses a lot of RAM.</p>
<p>Does UPnP work in the mac uTorrent client? It sure doesn&#8217;t on PC, while Azureus UPnP works great.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to get your client in active mode without jumping through hoops to forward ports on a router.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
