Comments on: VPN Provider Details DMCA and User Data Requests in Transparency Report

By: crimghost

crimghost — Sun, 23 Feb 2014 00:06:00 +0000

If I lived in North Korea and wanted to be rich, I’d start a VPN. Even if their only revenue were ad driven, they’d make a bundle, all due to an environment created by the US Government.

By: brownskie

brownskie — Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:25:00 +0000

What I find funny is people who use vpn to send plain text email through their google accounts while they chat on their facebook accounts.. Then yell privacy breach when their vpn comes out and says we have morals and tracked a pedo through our service. And now said vpn is a bad guy.. Fuck is wrong with you people.

By: Guest

Guest — Wed, 06 Nov 2013 03:00:00 +0000

Source?

By: perfect_failure

perfect_failure — Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:33:00 +0000

Sorry, I made that comment before i read the proxy.sh terms and conditions. They are quite thorough.

EDIT: that last sentence doesn’t come across as sarcastic as i meant it to.

By: brownskie

brownskie — Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:01:00 +0000

Thanks have already done that many many years ago. They weren’t to happy about it either.

By: brownskie

brownskie — Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:01:00 +0000

:P i smile while i walk. It scares the shit out of people.

By: brownskie

brownskie — Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:00:00 +0000

Good on you.. but by using it you’re approving what it does. And it does lots of naughty things. Sorry but we all need to stop using ignorance as a defence for the crap we approve of by using it’s services/products.

By: brownskie

brownskie — Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:58:00 +0000

Same thoughts same ideas. I’ve given them the big middle finger by having nothing to do with them.

By: TorrentFreakster

TorrentFreakster — Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:55:00 +0000

Many religions harm others specially children.
“Do X or you will go to hell!”

Does that mean any religious talk or surfing is forbidden?

Politically harmful. Is it harmful to tell the truth about a politician and have them fired?
Is it harmful to demand equal rights when a politician is trying to do the opposite?

While i agree on the pedophilia point (within logic and reason eg Blocking porn sites, etc What is done in UK is not reasonable or logical).
I object strongly to “any sexually highly offensive content such as pornography”

There are many fetishes out there that may seem offensive to a specific group of people.

It is basically like saying “I find your views offensive. You are not allowed to say or think it anymore. Why? Because of my viewpoint and because i think and say so.”

What makes your viewpoint any more right than others?

If we let this be allowed. What if another group gets popular. That big group think what you are thinking and doing is wrong. Will you accept it and stop or will you find it unfair and none of their business?

This sort of thing is not allowed because it is a double edge sword. No winners in the end. Only pain, unfairness, suffering.

What am I saying?
Your thinking is vague, open to interpretation and blatantly wrong! ;D
You are not allowed to talk any more about it. I find your viewpoint offensive. By your own rules, you should now stop it.

See what I did there?

By: TorrentFreakster

TorrentFreakster — Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:34:00 +0000

Legally obligated to say what exactly?

What are you referring to more specifically?

Legally obligated to publicly lie to their users?
Isn’t that in itself technically illegal?

“Come to us. We will protect your privacy. *Later* No, we really do not protect your privacy. Psych suckers!”