<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vuze Reinvents Its BitTorrent Client</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/</link>
	<description>Torrent News, Torrent Sites and the latest Scoops</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter84peter</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-508405</link>
		<dc:creator>peter84peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-508405</guid>
		<description>.. and all the old die-hard azureus-fans would think your 
company is pretty cool..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.. and all the old die-hard azureus-fans would think your<br />
company is pretty cool..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter84peter</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-508403</link>
		<dc:creator>peter84peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-508403</guid>
		<description>amc1 wrote (about trackers banning  Vuze Bob ):
&quot;Weren’t people saying that months ago, and it still didn’t happen?&quot;

You mean at about the same time you released a Vuze Bob version that actually had &quot;Vuze&quot; as client ID ?
How come you switched it back to &quot;azureus&quot; then ?

Why don&#039;t you just make a azureus2.jar without the Bob UI and
make it available as a download for those who know how to use a browser
and a media-player ? Since you say it only takes 5 minutes you would save a lot of time that you are wasting defending Bob each new release .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amc1 wrote (about trackers banning  Vuze Bob ):<br />
&#8220;Weren’t people saying that months ago, and it still didn’t happen?&#8221;</p>
<p>You mean at about the same time you released a Vuze Bob version that actually had &#8220;Vuze&#8221; as client ID ?<br />
How come you switched it back to &#8220;azureus&#8221; then ?</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you just make a azureus2.jar without the Bob UI and<br />
make it available as a download for those who know how to use a browser<br />
and a media-player ? Since you say it only takes 5 minutes you would save a lot of time that you are wasting defending Bob each new release .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amc1</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-506393</link>
		<dc:creator>amc1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-506393</guid>
		<description>@68 - if you&#039;ve got something in particular that we can look at, post on our forums, perhaps we can see how things are.

@69 - I think that&#039;s been fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@68 &#8211; if you&#8217;ve got something in particular that we can look at, post on our forums, perhaps we can see how things are.</p>
<p>@69 &#8211; I think that&#8217;s been fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quassum</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-506058</link>
		<dc:creator>Quassum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-506058</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s hope they finally fixed my bug report in this version. Have been manually removing that ugly progress bar that&#039;s always at 75% for me. The &quot;Automatically remove inactive items&quot; option stopped working after the 3.0 update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hope they finally fixed my bug report in this version. Have been manually removing that ugly progress bar that&#8217;s always at 75% for me. The &#8220;Automatically remove inactive items&#8221; option stopped working after the 3.0 update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suomynona.Eno</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-506006</link>
		<dc:creator>Suomynona.Eno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-506006</guid>
		<description>@amc1 (well if you&#039;re lurking around)
I got the latest as a fallback to Halite 0.3.1.1. But of course I&#039;m in the &quot;classic&quot; UI camp, having the option to switch between UIs are still good though for experimenting purposes. Installed size on hdd remains 20+-ish Mbs which is good. There&#039;s NONE of that old clunk and heft, in fact I think 4.0.0.0 seems to improve in many ways at that. 1 puzzling thing that I just can&#039;t seem to figure are at Vuze&#039;s ability at peer connections local or remote and the ability to dodge hefty throttling. I don&#039;t quite know how to specify it but for lack of better examples, I&#039;ll put Halite in the perspective. Halite seems to be able to connect to as many as it could to those on plain text encryption and RC4 as well. It can hold them down, lets me use the set UL slots effectively when I can seed. Of course it&#039;s evident that I get better DL consistency. The older Vuze 3.1.0.0 works actually the same but halfway through it panned out the same as the current.Any hints as to why? To those having issues with DHT, no offense but I can&#039;t seem to reproduce the issue. Even disabled, Vuze are able to perform as advertised. Plus I don&#039;t see any diffs of DHT enabled or disabled, I leave it disabled 99% of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@amc1 (well if you&#8217;re lurking around)<br />
I got the latest as a fallback to Halite 0.3.1.1. But of course I&#8217;m in the &#8220;classic&#8221; UI camp, having the option to switch between UIs are still good though for experimenting purposes. Installed size on hdd remains 20+-ish Mbs which is good. There&#8217;s NONE of that old clunk and heft, in fact I think 4.0.0.0 seems to improve in many ways at that. 1 puzzling thing that I just can&#8217;t seem to figure are at Vuze&#8217;s ability at peer connections local or remote and the ability to dodge hefty throttling. I don&#8217;t quite know how to specify it but for lack of better examples, I&#8217;ll put Halite in the perspective. Halite seems to be able to connect to as many as it could to those on plain text encryption and RC4 as well. It can hold them down, lets me use the set UL slots effectively when I can seed. Of course it&#8217;s evident that I get better DL consistency. The older Vuze 3.1.0.0 works actually the same but halfway through it panned out the same as the current.Any hints as to why? To those having issues with DHT, no offense but I can&#8217;t seem to reproduce the issue. Even disabled, Vuze are able to perform as advertised. Plus I don&#8217;t see any diffs of DHT enabled or disabled, I leave it disabled 99% of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeadingTheNet</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-505853</link>
		<dc:creator>LeadingTheNet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 10:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-505853</guid>
		<description>I like the new theme and everything and don&#039;t care if it is a resource hog I have 4 gigs of RAM. Vuze 4 rocks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new theme and everything and don&#8217;t care if it is a resource hog I have 4 gigs of RAM. Vuze 4 rocks :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GC</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-505852</link>
		<dc:creator>GC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 10:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-505852</guid>
		<description>My dislike for Vuze is surpassed only by my dislike for uTorrent - to that end, use NoVuze!

http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4281737/Azureus2.jar%5Bv3.1.1.0_NoVuze%5D

@55 (amc1)
&quot;Vuse 4.0 is currently NOT supported by our tracker,&quot; - mass pm on one of my private trackers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My dislike for Vuze is surpassed only by my dislike for uTorrent &#8211; to that end, use NoVuze!</p>
<p><a href="http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4281737/Azureus2.jar%5Bv3.1.1.0_NoVuze%5D" rel="nofollow">http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4281737/Azureus2.jar%5Bv3.1.1.0_NoVuze%5D</a></p>
<p>@55 (amc1)<br />
&#8220;Vuse 4.0 is currently NOT supported by our tracker,&#8221; &#8211; mass pm on one of my private trackers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RestoredFaithInVuze</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-505269</link>
		<dc:creator>RestoredFaithInVuze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-505269</guid>
		<description>As a long time Azureus user, I was about to abandon what is now called Vuze when they switched the UI to utter crap in the Vuze release.

Azureus has been one of the staple bit torrent clients for a lot of people, and prior to being renamed and having it&#039;s user interface screwed up by trying to be first in the gold rush to monetize azureus for the purpose of ads, content and movie downloads they did a horrible job with the fist release of Vuze (formerly azureus).

I used Azureus primarily simply because a bit-torrent client is a bit-torrent client is a bit-torrent client... it was functional enough even with the sluggish UI and the use of Java.

Azureus was good enough until Vuze came along and totally screwed up the user interface.  I&#039;m happy to say that Vuze is much cleaner now and is back to satisfactory status.

Bit-torrent clients don&#039;t really matter that much, as long as they are usable and get the job done, and don&#039;t slow my computer to a crawl or annoy the crap out of me with bad UI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a long time Azureus user, I was about to abandon what is now called Vuze when they switched the UI to utter crap in the Vuze release.</p>
<p>Azureus has been one of the staple bit torrent clients for a lot of people, and prior to being renamed and having it&#8217;s user interface screwed up by trying to be first in the gold rush to monetize azureus for the purpose of ads, content and movie downloads they did a horrible job with the fist release of Vuze (formerly azureus).</p>
<p>I used Azureus primarily simply because a bit-torrent client is a bit-torrent client is a bit-torrent client&#8230; it was functional enough even with the sluggish UI and the use of Java.</p>
<p>Azureus was good enough until Vuze came along and totally screwed up the user interface.  I&#8217;m happy to say that Vuze is much cleaner now and is back to satisfactory status.</p>
<p>Bit-torrent clients don&#8217;t really matter that much, as long as they are usable and get the job done, and don&#8217;t slow my computer to a crawl or annoy the crap out of me with bad UI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nova versão do Vuze permite pesquisar em trackers privados de torrents &#124; Remixtures</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-505223</link>
		<dc:creator>Nova versão do Vuze permite pesquisar em trackers privados de torrents &#124; Remixtures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-505223</guid>
		<description>[...] leiam o changelog. O director executivo da companhia Gilles Bianrosa conversou com a NewTeeVee e o TorrentFreak a propósito do presente e do futuro da [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] leiam o changelog. O director executivo da companhia Gilles Bianrosa conversou com a NewTeeVee e o TorrentFreak a propósito do presente e do futuro da [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mister_playboy</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-505087</link>
		<dc:creator>mister_playboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-505087</guid>
		<description>You can bring up the &quot;old&quot; style advanced view from 3.x by clicking on the right hand View button.  This is located in the upper right area of My Library screen.

As stated, the new view omits important basic torrent information such as seeds and peers, upload speed, etc.

For example, a seeding torrent went to &quot;queued&quot;, and that got me to checking my settings as I don&#039;t have a limit on # of seeding torrents... I switched views, saw I had no leechers, and solved the mystery.

The default UI is going downhill, no doubt about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can bring up the &#8220;old&#8221; style advanced view from 3.x by clicking on the right hand View button.  This is located in the upper right area of My Library screen.</p>
<p>As stated, the new view omits important basic torrent information such as seeds and peers, upload speed, etc.</p>
<p>For example, a seeding torrent went to &#8220;queued&#8221;, and that got me to checking my settings as I don&#8217;t have a limit on # of seeding torrents&#8230; I switched views, saw I had no leechers, and solved the mystery.</p>
<p>The default UI is going downhill, no doubt about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Freak</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-505068</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Freak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-505068</guid>
		<description>I like it.  Looks great, works great.  I think they did a great job of integrating the classic (advanced) UI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it.  Looks great, works great.  I think they did a great job of integrating the classic (advanced) UI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monster_mack</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504922</link>
		<dc:creator>monster_mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504922</guid>
		<description>I started off with bittornado, then changed to azureus. But then, it changed to vuze,and became very resource heavy, I changed to utorrent. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started off with bittornado, then changed to azureus. But then, it changed to vuze,and became very resource heavy, I changed to utorrent. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ha</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504731</link>
		<dc:creator>ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504731</guid>
		<description>Ive been an azureus user for years but there are some major annoying problems with the client that remain to be fixed. Its implimention of DHT is absolute crap. The Vuze wiki likes to blame it on &#039;bad routers&#039; when those router are probably the most widely used equipment on residential connections. No other client I&#039;ve tried completely kills internet browsing whith DHT/PEX enabled, so I fail to understand why Vuze does.

Another is adware. Yep, Vuze now has advertisements. Just great. Thats what I like to see in a bittorrent client, damn adverts that cannot be disbaled. Funny thing is most of the time its a targeted advert for Virgin Media broadband, which I already have. 

Next is the changes to the UI. When using the library in list view, double click no longer opens the detail, but Explorer. Details need to be accessed via context which is crap. Also, in Uploading, there is no column for upload speed. WTF.

Last but not least, toolbars. Yeah I know you can untick the box and not have them installed, but why the fork are they even there in the first place. Every god damn installer now seems to want to install some shitty toolbar.

As time goes on, Vuze just becomes more FAIL. I&#039;ve downloaded Deluge and am seriously considering ditching Vuze once and for all because as fr as I&#039;m concerned they have completely lost the plot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive been an azureus user for years but there are some major annoying problems with the client that remain to be fixed. Its implimention of DHT is absolute crap. The Vuze wiki likes to blame it on &#8216;bad routers&#8217; when those router are probably the most widely used equipment on residential connections. No other client I&#8217;ve tried completely kills internet browsing whith DHT/PEX enabled, so I fail to understand why Vuze does.</p>
<p>Another is adware. Yep, Vuze now has advertisements. Just great. Thats what I like to see in a bittorrent client, damn adverts that cannot be disbaled. Funny thing is most of the time its a targeted advert for Virgin Media broadband, which I already have. </p>
<p>Next is the changes to the UI. When using the library in list view, double click no longer opens the detail, but Explorer. Details need to be accessed via context which is crap. Also, in Uploading, there is no column for upload speed. WTF.</p>
<p>Last but not least, toolbars. Yeah I know you can untick the box and not have them installed, but why the fork are they even there in the first place. Every god damn installer now seems to want to install some shitty toolbar.</p>
<p>As time goes on, Vuze just becomes more FAIL. I&#8217;ve downloaded Deluge and am seriously considering ditching Vuze once and for all because as fr as I&#8217;m concerned they have completely lost the plot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h33t</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504659</link>
		<dc:creator>h33t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504659</guid>
		<description>#44 by IHateVuze 
&quot;I hate what Vuze is and what it represents.

Been using the last version of Azureus 2 (2.5.0.4) since version 3 has nothing decent other than corporate filth.&quot;

there is a shred of truth in there. bittorrent vets, like many people, may resent the commercialisation of their traditional tools and emblems.
this is where Vuze is weak, Azureus was a huge symbol for file sharers, Vuze was the sell out

the transition of our networks into the mainstream does not necessarily mean we lose our identity. i actually believe the file sharing identity is something very special and unique and difficult to dilute or pervert

bittorrent was always about freedom from vulgar media cartel commercialization. bittorrent is the liberating tool where the people take back what was taken from them, their music, their art, their creativity, their ownership of their work, their right to share their knowledge their ideas their property their opportunities their benefits their lives

Vuze you did not have to leave us, you can still hire yourself a professional marketer and segment your products and markets to better hit your targets. the all singing all dancing marvellous machine is a huge mistake. your marketing management needs replacing

http://www.h33t.com where it is h0t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#44 by IHateVuze<br />
&#8220;I hate what Vuze is and what it represents.</p>
<p>Been using the last version of Azureus 2 (2.5.0.4) since version 3 has nothing decent other than corporate filth.&#8221;</p>
<p>there is a shred of truth in there. bittorrent vets, like many people, may resent the commercialisation of their traditional tools and emblems.<br />
this is where Vuze is weak, Azureus was a huge symbol for file sharers, Vuze was the sell out</p>
<p>the transition of our networks into the mainstream does not necessarily mean we lose our identity. i actually believe the file sharing identity is something very special and unique and difficult to dilute or pervert</p>
<p>bittorrent was always about freedom from vulgar media cartel commercialization. bittorrent is the liberating tool where the people take back what was taken from them, their music, their art, their creativity, their ownership of their work, their right to share their knowledge their ideas their property their opportunities their benefits their lives</p>
<p>Vuze you did not have to leave us, you can still hire yourself a professional marketer and segment your products and markets to better hit your targets. the all singing all dancing marvellous machine is a huge mistake. your marketing management needs replacing</p>
<p><a href="http://www.h33t.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.h33t.com</a> where it is h0t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pebl</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504644</link>
		<dc:creator>Pebl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504644</guid>
		<description>I never liked Vuze. From what I read I will like 4.0 even less. If they listened to their users I must be a big exception, which I doubt. I&#039;m still using the old Azureus UI and that was not left there without reason.


I will switch to uTorrent and will not even try 4.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never liked Vuze. From what I read I will like 4.0 even less. If they listened to their users I must be a big exception, which I doubt. I&#8217;m still using the old Azureus UI and that was not left there without reason.</p>
<p>I will switch to uTorrent and will not even try 4.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmmm</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504635</link>
		<dc:creator>hmmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504635</guid>
		<description>stfu with your crapware, amc1

your plan is to attract noobs ? all the companies who do so have evil on mind.

so, stfu, and if possible, get fucked by a donkey :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stfu with your crapware, amc1</p>
<p>your plan is to attract noobs ? all the companies who do so have evil on mind.</p>
<p>so, stfu, and if possible, get fucked by a donkey :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504621</link>
		<dc:creator>Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504621</guid>
		<description>I will use Vuze while 2.x interface is here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will use Vuze while 2.x interface is here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amc1</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504597</link>
		<dc:creator>amc1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504597</guid>
		<description>@55 - &quot;haha, now just to wait until vuze gets banned from trackers.&quot;

Weren&#039;t people saying that months ago, and it still didn&#039;t happen?

http://torrentfreak.com/azureus-is-dead-vuze-goes-social-080616/comment-page-5/#comment-422233</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@55 &#8211; &#8220;haha, now just to wait until vuze gets banned from trackers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Weren&#8217;t people saying that months ago, and it still didn&#8217;t happen?</p>
<p><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/azureus-is-dead-vuze-goes-social-080616/comment-page-5/#comment-422233" rel="nofollow">http://torrentfreak.com/azureus-is-dead-vuze-goes-social-080616/comment-page-5/#comment-422233</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmmm</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504562</link>
		<dc:creator>hmmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504562</guid>
		<description>haha, now just to wait until vuze gets banned from trackers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha, now just to wait until vuze gets banned from trackers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504551</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504551</guid>
		<description>Oh fuck! iTunes-like gay interface!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh fuck! iTunes-like gay interface!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vuze 4.0, P2P con interfaz de iTunes</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504531</link>
		<dc:creator>Vuze 4.0, P2P con interfaz de iTunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504531</guid>
		<description>[...] Via TorrentFreak [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via TorrentFreak [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504530</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504530</guid>
		<description>OK I use uTorrent (but I did use Az 2.2 back in &#039;04-5). I checked out Az 4.0 and it makes sense to cater to everyone. BitComet does this too... uTorrent does not because I think the community feels UNIX standards apply... make it simple, make it work well, make it small, make it fast.

@ 4 All the major players support magnet: I think
@ 7 Why don&#039;t you use labels? Search like iTunes is http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=3735
@ 14 They are the same program http://www.azureuswiki.com/index.php/Azureus_2_and_Vuze#For_the_.22I_don.27t_like_Vuze.22_crowd
@ 17 Indeed I agree. uTorrent packs great efficiency for usage, only lacking &quot;whiz-bang&quot; UI candy in a (now) 263 KiB executable
@ 20 See #14 comment
@ 22...If you have to ask here for open source clients... You tried Transmission/Deluge .. use libtorrent forks
@ 23 Here here ;) RTFM
...
@ 40 amc sorry I didn&#039;t see your response on page 2
@ 41 It&#039;s java :/
@ 45 It&#039;s java :/
@ 46 Get off it. Test it yourself or stifle, FUD is the language of http://mafiaa.org
@ 48 Not everyone uses their main computer for torrenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK I use uTorrent (but I did use Az 2.2 back in &#8217;04-5). I checked out Az 4.0 and it makes sense to cater to everyone. BitComet does this too&#8230; uTorrent does not because I think the community feels UNIX standards apply&#8230; make it simple, make it work well, make it small, make it fast.</p>
<p>@ 4 All the major players support magnet: I think<br />
@ 7 Why don&#8217;t you use labels? Search like iTunes is <a href="http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=3735" rel="nofollow">http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=3735</a><br />
@ 14 They are the same program <a href="http://www.azureuswiki.com/index.php/Azureus_2_and_Vuze#For_the_.22I_don.27t_like_Vuze.22_crowd" rel="nofollow">http://www.azureuswiki.com/index.php/Azureus_2_and_Vuze#For_the_.22I_don.27t_like_Vuze.22_crowd</a><br />
@ 17 Indeed I agree. uTorrent packs great efficiency for usage, only lacking &#8220;whiz-bang&#8221; UI candy in a (now) 263 KiB executable<br />
@ 20 See #14 comment<br />
@ 22&#8230;If you have to ask here for open source clients&#8230; You tried Transmission/Deluge .. use libtorrent forks<br />
@ 23 Here here ;) RTFM<br />
&#8230;<br />
@ 40 amc sorry I didn&#8217;t see your response on page 2<br />
@ 41 It&#8217;s java :/<br />
@ 45 It&#8217;s java :/<br />
@ 46 Get off it. Test it yourself or stifle, FUD is the language of <a href="http://mafiaa.org" rel="nofollow">http://mafiaa.org</a><br />
@ 48 Not everyone uses their main computer for torrenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Izkata</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504529</link>
		<dc:creator>Izkata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504529</guid>
		<description>Another Azureus 3 user here.  I only made the switch to that codebase when I found out about one of the new plugins that doesn&#039;t work with Azureus 2, but I&#039;ll never switch to the new interface.

Azureus has a reputation of being powerful and complicated - and they can&#039;t shake that image, because it&#039;s true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Azureus 3 user here.  I only made the switch to that codebase when I found out about one of the new plugins that doesn&#8217;t work with Azureus 2, but I&#8217;ll never switch to the new interface.</p>
<p>Azureus has a reputation of being powerful and complicated &#8211; and they can&#8217;t shake that image, because it&#8217;s true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504518</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504518</guid>
		<description>OK I use uTorrent (but I did use Az 2.2 back in &#039;04-5). I checked out Az 4.0 and it makes sense to cater to everyone. BitComet does this too... uTorrent does not (UNIX: simple,small,fast,good)

@ 4 All the major players support magnet: I think
@ 7 Why don&#039;t you use labels? Search like iTunes is http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=3735
@ 14 They are the same program http://www.azureuswiki.com/index.php/Azureus_2_and_Vuze#For_the_.22I_don.27t_like_Vuze.22_crowd
@ 17 Indeed I agree. uTorrent packs great efficiency for usage, only lacking &quot;whiz-bang&quot; UI candy in a (now) 263 KiB executable
@ 20 See #14 comment
@ 22...If you have to ask here for open source clients... You tried Transmission/Deluge .. use libtorrent forks
@ 23 Here here ;) RTFM
@ 40 amc sorry I didn&#039;t see your response on page 2
@ 41 It&#039;s java :/
@ 45 It&#039;s java :/
@ 46 Get off it. Either test it yourself prove uTorrent is badware (someone will always believe you, but most people will prove you wrong with more proof) FUD is the language of http://mafiaa.org
@ 48 Not everyone uses their main computer for torrenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK I use uTorrent (but I did use Az 2.2 back in &#8217;04-5). I checked out Az 4.0 and it makes sense to cater to everyone. BitComet does this too&#8230; uTorrent does not (UNIX: simple,small,fast,good)</p>
<p>@ 4 All the major players support magnet: I think<br />
@ 7 Why don&#8217;t you use labels? Search like iTunes is <a href="http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=3735" rel="nofollow">http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=3735</a><br />
@ 14 They are the same program <a href="http://www.azureuswiki.com/index.php/Azureus_2_and_Vuze#For_the_.22I_don.27t_like_Vuze.22_crowd" rel="nofollow">http://www.azureuswiki.com/index.php/Azureus_2_and_Vuze#For_the_.22I_don.27t_like_Vuze.22_crowd</a><br />
@ 17 Indeed I agree. uTorrent packs great efficiency for usage, only lacking &#8220;whiz-bang&#8221; UI candy in a (now) 263 KiB executable<br />
@ 20 See #14 comment<br />
@ 22&#8230;If you have to ask here for open source clients&#8230; You tried Transmission/Deluge .. use libtorrent forks<br />
@ 23 Here here ;) RTFM<br />
@ 40 amc sorry I didn&#8217;t see your response on page 2<br />
@ 41 It&#8217;s java :/<br />
@ 45 It&#8217;s java :/<br />
@ 46 Get off it. Either test it yourself prove uTorrent is badware (someone will always believe you, but most people will prove you wrong with more proof) FUD is the language of <a href="http://mafiaa.org" rel="nofollow">http://mafiaa.org</a><br />
@ 48 Not everyone uses their main computer for torrenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wonderboy</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504486</link>
		<dc:creator>wonderboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504486</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t say I&#039;m all that enthusiastic about that Vuze branch. Their new web site looks like a company site, and I have a distinct feeling they split from Azureus hoping they might make some serious money in business environments.

Given that I run Azureus in console mode on a server and &quot;Vuze&quot; is all about the client interface I couldn&#039;t be that much interested anyway. What bothers me though is that Azureus was a resource hog already, especially memory wise, and it looks like they&#039;re not going to improve on this matter. How anyway, it&#039;s Java.

Either way, I&#039;m not excited. First reason they&#039;ll give me I&#039;m gonna switch to something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m all that enthusiastic about that Vuze branch. Their new web site looks like a company site, and I have a distinct feeling they split from Azureus hoping they might make some serious money in business environments.</p>
<p>Given that I run Azureus in console mode on a server and &#8220;Vuze&#8221; is all about the client interface I couldn&#8217;t be that much interested anyway. What bothers me though is that Azureus was a resource hog already, especially memory wise, and it looks like they&#8217;re not going to improve on this matter. How anyway, it&#8217;s Java.</p>
<p>Either way, I&#8217;m not excited. First reason they&#8217;ll give me I&#8217;m gonna switch to something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mister_playboy</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504441</link>
		<dc:creator>mister_playboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504441</guid>
		<description>You can have both Azureus 2.5.0.4 and the newest Vuze on your computer at the same time, if you want.  They even share program data back and forth seamlessly.

As for the constant memory usage concerns... some of you need to get a computer from the 21st century, perhaps?  Memory is made to be used, after all.  No P2P program uses enough memory to trip up any contemporary computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can have both Azureus 2.5.0.4 and the newest Vuze on your computer at the same time, if you want.  They even share program data back and forth seamlessly.</p>
<p>As for the constant memory usage concerns&#8230; some of you need to get a computer from the 21st century, perhaps?  Memory is made to be used, after all.  No P2P program uses enough memory to trip up any contemporary computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnarchyNow</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504437</link>
		<dc:creator>AnarchyNow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504437</guid>
		<description>vuze is written in java which means it&#039;s already bloated to death like everything in java and now they bloat it even more, I don&#039;t know what &quot;users&quot; have wanted all this useless crap</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vuze is written in java which means it&#8217;s already bloated to death like everything in java and now they bloat it even more, I don&#8217;t know what &#8220;users&#8221; have wanted all this useless crap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504436</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504436</guid>
		<description>As a long-time AZ user (Still using 3 with advanced) this may be the final push I need to switch to Deluge.

uTorrent just isn&#039;t an option for me, as I do not trust the closed-source nature of the application, especially given their parent company&#039;s affiliations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a long-time AZ user (Still using 3 with advanced) this may be the final push I need to switch to Deluge.</p>
<p>uTorrent just isn&#8217;t an option for me, as I do not trust the closed-source nature of the application, especially given their parent company&#8217;s affiliations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avokicchi</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504435</link>
		<dc:creator>Avokicchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504435</guid>
		<description>Lol. Like so many programs this one is becoming more bloated and more bloated, incorporating tons on unrelated and unneccesary features, turning it into a giant , slow, bloated &quot;media portal&quot; like program. Which nobody uses and everyone hates.
Like Realplayer. Even Winamp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol. Like so many programs this one is becoming more bloated and more bloated, incorporating tons on unrelated and unneccesary features, turning it into a giant , slow, bloated &#8220;media portal&#8221; like program. Which nobody uses and everyone hates.<br />
Like Realplayer. Even Winamp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IHateVuze</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504433</link>
		<dc:creator>IHateVuze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504433</guid>
		<description>I hate what Vuze is and what it represents.

Been using the last version of Azureus 2 (2.5.0.4) since version 3 has nothing decent other than corporate filth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate what Vuze is and what it represents.</p>
<p>Been using the last version of Azureus 2 (2.5.0.4) since version 3 has nothing decent other than corporate filth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdrianSwears</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504430</link>
		<dc:creator>AdrianSwears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504430</guid>
		<description>uTorrent
uTorrent
uTorrent
uTorrent
uTorrent

FTW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uTorrent<br />
uTorrent<br />
uTorrent<br />
uTorrent<br />
uTorrent</p>
<p>FTW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504425</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504425</guid>
		<description>I dunno.. Once bitten.. Azureus was good. Since they changed to this Vuze thing it was nothing but fail. And Java? No thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno.. Once bitten.. Azureus was good. Since they changed to this Vuze thing it was nothing but fail. And Java? No thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dereks</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504416</link>
		<dc:creator>Dereks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504416</guid>
		<description>What I really want is less memory usage. That&#039;s what would have made me switch back to it. 
Otherwise - I pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I really want is less memory usage. That&#8217;s what would have made me switch back to it.<br />
Otherwise &#8211; I pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amc1</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504411</link>
		<dc:creator>amc1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504411</guid>
		<description>@30

&quot;Was using Azureus for a long time and like a lot of Azureus user got miffed when they started to cram Vuze onto us.

...

So I probably won’t be going be back to Vuze anytime soon as I don’t want to install Java to use it.&quot;

So you don&#039;t want to use Vuze because it needed Java, but you were happy to use Azureus even though it need Java?

@31
&quot;Vuze v4.0.0.0 rc5 - 9,085,368kB&quot;
9 gigabytes? I don&#039;t think you mean that.

Anyway - just wanted to mention that the old Azureus interface is still there for those who want it, even in this release:
http://www.azureuswiki.com/index.php/The_Azureus_Experience</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@30</p>
<p>&#8220;Was using Azureus for a long time and like a lot of Azureus user got miffed when they started to cram Vuze onto us.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>So I probably won’t be going be back to Vuze anytime soon as I don’t want to install Java to use it.&#8221;</p>
<p>So you don&#8217;t want to use Vuze because it needed Java, but you were happy to use Azureus even though it need Java?</p>
<p>@31<br />
&#8220;Vuze v4.0.0.0 rc5 &#8211; 9,085,368kB&#8221;<br />
9 gigabytes? I don&#8217;t think you mean that.</p>
<p>Anyway &#8211; just wanted to mention that the old Azureus interface is still there for those who want it, even in this release:<br />
<a href="http://www.azureuswiki.com/index.php/The_Azureus_Experience" rel="nofollow">http://www.azureuswiki.com/index.php/The_Azureus_Experience</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U torrents user</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504404</link>
		<dc:creator>U torrents user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504404</guid>
		<description>I changed from Azureus to U torrents when they launched Vuze didnt look the look or feel. Doubt i will ever go back to azureus not unless they revamp it and go back to old school azureus !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I changed from Azureus to U torrents when they launched Vuze didnt look the look or feel. Doubt i will ever go back to azureus not unless they revamp it and go back to old school azureus !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gonz</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504391</link>
		<dc:creator>Gonz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504391</guid>
		<description>@22 Deluge. Best damn bittorrent client I ever used.
uTorrent&#039;s really really good, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@22 Deluge. Best damn bittorrent client I ever used.<br />
uTorrent&#8217;s really really good, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: az user</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504384</link>
		<dc:creator>az user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504384</guid>
		<description>like the idea of the auto detection.
And the turning on of encryption.

 Sometimes I see peers that don&#039;t connect &amp; wonder if they have theirs off. As i run my clients with it on full.

 Vuze is doing a balancing act.
Those that seek paid content (keeping isp honest ).
 And the mainstream bt users.
It seems this is a hard act.
but kudos to az/vuze for doing so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like the idea of the auto detection.<br />
And the turning on of encryption.</p>
<p> Sometimes I see peers that don&#8217;t connect &amp; wonder if they have theirs off. As i run my clients with it on full.</p>
<p> Vuze is doing a balancing act.<br />
Those that seek paid content (keeping isp honest ).<br />
 And the mainstream bt users.<br />
It seems this is a hard act.<br />
but kudos to az/vuze for doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatever</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504380</link>
		<dc:creator>whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504380</guid>
		<description>@20 Agreed, absolutely. Java is often a slow beast and uTorrent is very snappy. I was merely questioning the reasoning for flaming an app&#039;s performance based on its appearance, which are two separate things, when done properly. Basing your opinion on the underlying technology, however, DOES make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@20 Agreed, absolutely. Java is often a slow beast and uTorrent is very snappy. I was merely questioning the reasoning for flaming an app&#8217;s performance based on its appearance, which are two separate things, when done properly. Basing your opinion on the underlying technology, however, DOES make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ju</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504378</link>
		<dc:creator>ju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504378</guid>
		<description>only thing about the current vuze version (hereon called azureus) is the way theyre trying to make it almost a social networking type thing. adding friends and crap like that. its a torrent client. u need it to download torrents, thats it. doesnt need a media player or anything else because different people prefer different players. and while no one says u MUST use the provided media player, its just another little piece of memory use.if it werent for security updates and such i&#039;d still be using 2.5. that is azureus. vuze is a gay name</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>only thing about the current vuze version (hereon called azureus) is the way theyre trying to make it almost a social networking type thing. adding friends and crap like that. its a torrent client. u need it to download torrents, thats it. doesnt need a media player or anything else because different people prefer different players. and while no one says u MUST use the provided media player, its just another little piece of memory use.if it werent for security updates and such i&#8217;d still be using 2.5. that is azureus. vuze is a gay name</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504376</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504376</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll give Azureus a whirl - interesting comments. 

http://www.boatpride.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll give Azureus a whirl &#8211; interesting comments. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.boatpride.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.boatpride.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MPAA</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504365</link>
		<dc:creator>MPAA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504365</guid>
		<description>fucking looks liek a mac app</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fucking looks liek a mac app</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a guy</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504361</link>
		<dc:creator>a guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504361</guid>
		<description>It looks good for beginners but i&#039;m not switching.

You can easily use VLC for playback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks good for beginners but i&#8217;m not switching.</p>
<p>You can easily use VLC for playback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JudasConstant</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504340</link>
		<dc:creator>JudasConstant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504340</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s complete bloatware with a lot of stupid web 2.0 social components. The fact that it runs in JAVA is such a waste of system resources. uTorrent or Transmission are much better options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s complete bloatware with a lot of stupid web 2.0 social components. The fact that it runs in JAVA is such a waste of system resources. uTorrent or Transmission are much better options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504335</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504335</guid>
		<description>uTorrent v1.81 - 263kB
Vuze v4.0.0.0 rc5 - 9,085,368kB

No contest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uTorrent v1.81 &#8211; 263kB<br />
Vuze v4.0.0.0 rc5 &#8211; 9,085,368kB</p>
<p>No contest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504332</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504332</guid>
		<description>Was using Azureus for a long time and like a lot of Azureus user got miffed when they started to cram Vuze onto us. Got over it and learned how to hide the Vuze client while using Azureus. I really liked all those extra features it had but, alas I had to switch to Utorrent because I could never solve the memory leak involved with leaving Azureus on 24/7. The people at Vuze says it isn&#039;t there problem and to be fair, they may be right. It&#039;s probably a Java thing. So I probably  won&#039;t be going be back to Vuze anytime soon as I don&#039;t want to install Java to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was using Azureus for a long time and like a lot of Azureus user got miffed when they started to cram Vuze onto us. Got over it and learned how to hide the Vuze client while using Azureus. I really liked all those extra features it had but, alas I had to switch to Utorrent because I could never solve the memory leak involved with leaving Azureus on 24/7. The people at Vuze says it isn&#8217;t there problem and to be fair, they may be right. It&#8217;s probably a Java thing. So I probably  won&#8217;t be going be back to Vuze anytime soon as I don&#8217;t want to install Java to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504325</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504325</guid>
		<description>It still runs using java
that in its self will stop alot of people from using it.
Also it looks to much like itunes/any other mac application
Azureus died at 2.2.5.0
This is just beating a dead horse...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It still runs using java<br />
that in its self will stop alot of people from using it.<br />
Also it looks to much like itunes/any other mac application<br />
Azureus died at 2.2.5.0<br />
This is just beating a dead horse&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504324</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504324</guid>
		<description>I added a few vuze search templates to the all in one search and it was quite effective in getting results very quickly.  However, I can see where this will take away revenue from trackers who need the traffic for advertising etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I added a few vuze search templates to the all in one search and it was quite effective in getting results very quickly.  However, I can see where this will take away revenue from trackers who need the traffic for advertising etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504323</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504323</guid>
		<description>By mainstreaming Bittorrent, while it seems like a great idea, does this mean that people will become careless with their downloads and bittorrent might become too popular?  The consequences of this are that new laws could be passed (the governments of the world will make up laws whether or not it violates their constitutions, especially if big business supports them) and that Bittorrent may go the way of P2P networks.

I don&#039;t know many people who don&#039;t know how to use bittorrent.  And not all of my friends are techno-geeks.  The people who don&#039;t know how to use bittorrent wouldn&#039;t know out about the new vuze anyway, nor would they even want to download material in such a manner because of the legal implications.  Of course there&#039;s the new µTorrent for Mac coming out that has a similar search function, and XTorrent for Mac with it&#039;s search function.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By mainstreaming Bittorrent, while it seems like a great idea, does this mean that people will become careless with their downloads and bittorrent might become too popular?  The consequences of this are that new laws could be passed (the governments of the world will make up laws whether or not it violates their constitutions, especially if big business supports them) and that Bittorrent may go the way of P2P networks.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know many people who don&#8217;t know how to use bittorrent.  And not all of my friends are techno-geeks.  The people who don&#8217;t know how to use bittorrent wouldn&#8217;t know out about the new vuze anyway, nor would they even want to download material in such a manner because of the legal implications.  Of course there&#8217;s the new µTorrent for Mac coming out that has a similar search function, and XTorrent for Mac with it&#8217;s search function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h33t</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504318</link>
		<dc:creator>h33t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504318</guid>
		<description>the power of Azureus was the advanced options

queuing 800 torrents to automatically seed was relatively easy once you read and understood the configuration page

then the vuze interface arrived, disaster, looks terrible and they lose their market share to uTorrent

now they try again to dumb down and win back the &quot;n00b market&quot;

@Azureus team, you guys forgot your core competancy, you forgot what made you great, you cannot be both the best AND the n00b client

your investors are banking on you as a content distribution platform, now a media player, omg you guys are trying to be all things to all men, big mistake

look at bittorrent.com and vuze.com and weep. those sites are confused

i still use Azureus in advanced old style gui. i am ashamed and as soon as uTorrent implements advanced seed queuing then i will be outta here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the power of Azureus was the advanced options</p>
<p>queuing 800 torrents to automatically seed was relatively easy once you read and understood the configuration page</p>
<p>then the vuze interface arrived, disaster, looks terrible and they lose their market share to uTorrent</p>
<p>now they try again to dumb down and win back the &#8220;n00b market&#8221;</p>
<p>@Azureus team, you guys forgot your core competancy, you forgot what made you great, you cannot be both the best AND the n00b client</p>
<p>your investors are banking on you as a content distribution platform, now a media player, omg you guys are trying to be all things to all men, big mistake</p>
<p>look at bittorrent.com and vuze.com and weep. those sites are confused</p>
<p>i still use Azureus in advanced old style gui. i am ashamed and as soon as uTorrent implements advanced seed queuing then i will be outta here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/vuze-reinvents-its-bittorrent-client-081013/#comment-504316</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5567#comment-504316</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using Vuze since the 3.0 version, but not with the iTunes style interface. Instead it is setup like Azureus was before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Vuze since the 3.0 version, but not with the iTunes style interface. Instead it is setup like Azureus was before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

