TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Warez Scene News Site Helped By Google After Wrongful Takedowns

When organized groups release pirated content onto the Internet, one of the requirements is that they package a so-called NFO (information) file with the release.

These files are text-based but often include so-called ASCII art. Their purpose is to present details on the file they accompany. A typical NFO for a game might include the title, the name of the group making the release, the date of release, the machine the release is designed for, plus any special instructions needed for it to run.

Over the years people have sought to archive thousands of NFO files and present them in searchable databases. One such example can be found at NFORush.net. The site is purely informational and carries no copyrighted content, but some big companies can’t seem to appreciate that.

“Google has been notified, according to the terms of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), that some of your materials allegedly infringe upon the copyrights of others,” Google has informed the site several times this year.

The problem? Microsoft’s automated anti-piracy crawlers can’t tell the difference between pirated Xbox360 games such as Madagascar 3, and tiny, copyright-free text files such as this one. The result? Google has been de-indexing NFORush pages at the behest of Microsoft.

Fortunately, Google has an appeals process, one which the admin of NFORush has been resorting to to repair his standing with Google.

“Google just informed me that they reviewed the content of my site and that the pages
will be reincluded in the Google index shortly,” NFORush’s admin told TorrentFreak.

Although wrongful takedowns aren’t exactly unusual, it is encouraging to see Google take care over putting other people’s mistakes right once they’re informed. If those doing the takedowns could follow the same example, that would be an even better development.

This post is from the News Bits section of TorrentFreak where we present stories from around the web in a concise summary format. Full TorrentFreak articles can be found here. If you have a tip please let us know. News Bits have their very own RSS feed
  • http://twitter.com/ArmEagle ArmEagle

    Now go sue Microsoft for illegal use of the DMCA system.

    • :D

       And while we’re at it, let’s have another United States v Microsoft Corporation for their multitude of violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 and their corporate monopoly.

      Triple play lawsuit, killing 3 birds with one stone.

      • Danny

        “Getting 3 birds stoned at once”
        Or
        “Nobbing 3 birds with one Jonny!”

        Are funnier analogy’s.

        • Mwhahaha

          And neither is as funny as your dreadful attempt to pluralise the word analogy.

          (If you’re going to be picky then let’s all be picky…)

    • Guest

       Fuck Micro$oft. I use Linux.

    • Nick

       bitch got told

    • Ophelia Millais

      To have standing to sue, you need to be able to demonstrate harm. “My text files couldn’t be found on Google” isn’t going to get you very far.

      • torrent freakster

        Take a page from the mpaa/riaa. Make stuff up. Use a “magical” formula to show the millions of dollars he lost due to this malicious action of the microsofts bad crawler.

        Even better make such crawlers illegal to use. Every single DMCA must be filled personally by a human with verifiable proof that it really was filled by a human.

        • DannyUfonek

          This proof could be something like fingerprints or even better, fresh blood.

  • john doe

    I wonder what will they do to prevent further future automated takedowns of this same content.

    • Ishigidydigidy

      Nothing.  Absolutely nothing.

      • Mwhahaha

        Well no, their correct strike rate’s probably pretty good. As there’s no legal penalty for false notices why should they alter how they do things? 

        If only 1 per cent of their take down requests are ill informed and of those only 40 per cent of wrongfully accused people can be bothered to complain, that’s just 2 problems for them per  500 take downs.

        False take downs should be charged at a prohibitive rate.

        • john doe

          I’m talking about what will GOOGLE do to prevent further requests for this again.
          Like making a “safelist”. :)

        • torrent freakster

          Automated takedowns should be outlawed. Machines cant do this right and cause too much harm both to reputation of the site and its owner.

          Doesn’t ‘Defamation of character’ apply here ?

  • Hogspace

    Simple, make a DMCA request cost $5000, returnable if it’s found to be valid.

    • Anyone

      much too low
      make it 100k per takedown request and we’re getting somewhere

      • The_seventh_guest

        Why not 350000 per take down? That’ll even things a lot

        • The Guy

          350k? How about 1mil? Then the content industries will have to think twice about any ridiculous lawsuits that involve takedowns from then on.

        • John Spartan

          You’re all wrong, it needs to be a bajillion PER.
          as a fee, non returnable :)

        • Anyone

          it’s funny that even $50 was too much for a copyright troll when a site charged that

          that just shows how silly their cited numbers of their “losses” are

      • Mwhahaha

        You’d be better off having an incremental scale, so one small developer who suffers directly can get his program take down with a penalty of say £20 is he’s wrong, (after all accidents do happen). 

        Then say if you have 10 incorrect take downs it jumps to £100, at 25 it hits £500, at 50 bogus take downs it costs you £1,000, then 5000, 10,000 and 25,000 at the next three multiples of 50 take downs.

        Each time you hit the next price bracket, the cost of all previous requests rises and you have to pay the balance retrospectively. So 50 bogus claims would cost you £50,000. 100 would be £0.5m, 150 would be 1,500,000.

        They’d soon start using real people to check their facts rather than bots with that kinda penalty.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Don-Dilly/1624894683 Don Dilly

       Even $100 refundable less a $10 processing fee would put pay to automated tools spewing out tens of thousands of DMCA take downs per day and make it cost effective to have human oversight and verification of the results their tools generate.

      While the DMCA notification system was well intended, I dont think politicians forsaw the rampant abuse of the system by media companies using automated tools to generate spurious takedowns.

      What is more troubling is when the media companies then use the number of takedowns issued (many false) to justify claims that piracy is out of control and demand increased powers.

  • Anonymous

    the ‘infringing’ content should be checked first and taken down second, not the other way round. that would prevent a lot of mistakes and things getting ‘lost’ for good, including the number of page views recorded, and make those that just want stuff removed go for that option just for the hell of it because they cant be penalised for doing so.

    • Joska

      This!
      The presumtion of innocence does not apply here and nobody ever got penalized for wrongful accusation. That’s really fucked up!

  • Decimus

    These large companies see their product’s name on something and immediately demand that it be taken down.  Fascism at its finest.

  • FreeInternet777

    Change NFO to USA

  • Waseihou

    Is there some some search engine that does not delink such content? Time to stop using google for some stuff if they are censoring content. Does anyone know something worthwhile?

    • Anyone

      duckduckgo is a good alternative, despite the silly name (but google was a silly name once upon a time as well ;))

      • Mwhahaha

        yeah I use ddg for some things, google for others, mainly maps, images etc. which ddg don’t offer.

      • Joska

        The problem with ddg is that it’s just not as good at finding things as google.  It and also ixquick are worth a try especially when you are searching for some sensitive stuff you wouldn’t like to be logged; but my experience is that google finds much more and more relevant things than the abovementioned search engines. Tracking is bad for privacy (obviously), but it sure helps improveing the service.

         

  • Pingback: Warez Scene News Site Helped By Google After Wrongful Takedowns | OccuWorld

  • FreeInternet777

    I use ddg.  Seem to use it more and more.  I guess this is the beginning of the end of google. Thats the dotcom world though.

    • Letmebeme

       i stopped using DDG because of the censorship… your kids eyes will not burn out of their sockets if the see a tit!

      • torrent freakster

        1. When a couple gets kids many parents get sick in the head and “forgets” suppress how it was when they grew up.
        2. Religion. Most have sexually suppressive rules. “We cant have sex so why should the rest of the world be allowed to ?”

        Now if you mix religion and parents whining about their “poor” kids seeing naked people. Boom you have a news story.

        That religious people are very vocal and in your face about it also helps.

        And morons will of course listen to these other morons and cause trouble for the enlightened smart people that actually know seeing naked people doesnt hurt kids at all.

        Politicians just listen because even morons count as voters.

        So how stupid is ie america ? Well about 48% of americans think their religion is real.

        Scary isnt it ?

        and america got nukes and they got the balls to whine about iran getting nukes, oh please…

        If the smart people had some balls they would put the dumb people on their own land and let fight and cause trouble among themselves.

        Or perhaps we can create a virus that kills dumb people only, that would actually be more economic. “Release and let it work” ;D

        Yes, i’m a very tired and cranky man. No patience for dumb people. They only cause trouble. They are not even good enough to serve as slaves.

      • iAmsterdam

        what censorship do you mean, i just started using ddg, so is this a wrong choice? because i agree with your opinion…

  • Pingback: Lastest Warez News « Businessmania

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.