<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Hollywood be the Next Bailout Candidate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/</link>
	<description>Torrent News, Torrent Sites and the latest Scoops</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kultura 2.0 &#187; Archiwum bloga &#187; Bailout - czy w kolejce ustawi? si? tak?e przedstawiciele Hollywood?</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-522150</link>
		<dc:creator>Kultura 2.0 &#187; Archiwum bloga &#187; Bailout - czy w kolejce ustawi? si? tak?e przedstawiciele Hollywood?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 05:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-522150</guid>
		<description>[...] - zosta? niedawno &#8220;s?owem roku sieciowego s?ownika Merriam-Webster&#8221;. Wed?ug Bena Jonesa ze skrajnie propirackiego serwisu TorrentFreak nast?pnym kandydatem domagaj?cym si? wsparcia pa?stwa mog? by? bran?e filmowa i [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; zosta? niedawno &#8220;s?owem roku sieciowego s?ownika Merriam-Webster&#8221;. Wed?ug Bena Jonesa ze skrajnie propirackiego serwisu TorrentFreak nast?pnym kandydatem domagaj?cym si? wsparcia pa?stwa mog? by? bran?e filmowa i [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roze</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521732</link>
		<dc:creator>Roze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 20:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521732</guid>
		<description>Now you (who may be a hired industry advocate) are grasping at straws. It is downtrodden by money because it makes the culture non-existent. Also, the MAFIAA ought to be brought down so that they will change their ways, or go extinct. They are the dinosaurs, and they ought to go extinct. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you (who may be a hired industry advocate) are grasping at straws. It is downtrodden by money because it makes the culture non-existent. Also, the MAFIAA ought to be brought down so that they will change their ways, or go extinct. They are the dinosaurs, and they ought to go extinct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nealefelaen</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521856</link>
		<dc:creator>Nealefelaen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 06:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521856</guid>
		<description>If the industry was brought down we would still have things to download - there is a system where people are making things that are not tied in with how you are seeing copyright. Creative Commons. That you think there wouldn&#039;t be any content is ridiculous, people will still write, people will still sing, people will still make movies. We do not need a distribution industry in this day and age where the distribution can be done for free. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the industry was brought down we would still have things to download &#8211; there is a system where people are making things that are not tied in with how you are seeing copyright. Creative Commons. That you think there wouldn&#039;t be any content is ridiculous, people will still write, people will still sing, people will still make movies. We do not need a distribution industry in this day and age where the distribution can be done for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521607</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521607</guid>
		<description>Maybe the industry could go kill themself. Look at steam and valve their doing great because they give a fuck about something. Giving a fuck isnt hard but most are to lazy and dum to think about it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the industry could go kill themself. Look at steam and valve their doing great because they give a fuck about something. Giving a fuck isnt hard but most are to lazy and dum to think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ragnarok</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521606</link>
		<dc:creator>ragnarok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521606</guid>
		<description>you know all those poor actors in NYC who will work for practically nothing? 
 
i&#039;m sure you could screen them and find some decent ones in there... ones that won&#039;t cost millions. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know all those poor actors in NYC who will work for practically nothing? </p>
<p>i&#039;m sure you could screen them and find some decent ones in there&#8230; ones that won&#039;t cost millions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoebe</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521791</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoebe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521791</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe Hollywood would ever ask for a bailout anyway. Let&#039;s leave it to the bankers and automakers... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t believe Hollywood would ever ask for a bailout anyway. Let&#039;s leave it to the bankers and automakers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALIS</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521680</link>
		<dc:creator>ALIS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521680</guid>
		<description>Come on, does anybody really think hollywood needs a bailout? If they go and ask, it just means they are greedy bastards. If they make billios of dollars every year you really think they run out of money because people dont buy their crap for a while? If they cant survive with one billion less then let them burn. 
 
Maybe they should try a few good ways to not lose so much money. Pay &quot;actors&quot; 10 million instead of 25. Even 10 million is way too much for little acting in some crappy movies... Make less movies, most of the shit they produce isn&#039;t even watchable. And last but not least, MAKE BETTER MOVIES. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, does anybody really think hollywood needs a bailout? If they go and ask, it just means they are greedy bastards. If they make billios of dollars every year you really think they run out of money because people dont buy their crap for a while? If they cant survive with one billion less then let them burn. </p>
<p>Maybe they should try a few good ways to not lose so much money. Pay &quot;actors&quot; 10 million instead of 25. Even 10 million is way too much for little acting in some crappy movies&#8230; Make less movies, most of the shit they produce isn&#039;t even watchable. And last but not least, MAKE BETTER MOVIES.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NubCakes</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521676</link>
		<dc:creator>NubCakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 08:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521676</guid>
		<description>&quot;The banking collapse of recent weeks has brought many questions to people&#8217;s minds. How can an industry with no apparent self control or desire to self-regulate, lose billions in an orgy of greed and opulence, making bad decision after terrible decision with no consequences?&quot; 
 
Many commentators would disagree with that view entirely.  Put extremely simply, in the early 1990s Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac were forced, via legislation no less, to provide loans to low income borrowers, so called sub-prime loans.  These loans carried a high risk of the borrowers defaulting.  Freddie and Fannie&#039;s boards both disagreed with the legislation due to the risk of default.   These loans were then sold to other entities and spread throughout the world economy, people defaulted in large numbers and credit was thus harder to come by.  The root cause of this current crisis is at the US governments feet. 
 
The movements of  markets is largely due to people&#039;s confidence and perception about what the future holds rather than inherent attributes of the companies within it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;The banking collapse of recent weeks has brought many questions to people&rsquo;s minds. How can an industry with no apparent self control or desire to self-regulate, lose billions in an orgy of greed and opulence, making bad decision after terrible decision with no consequences?&quot; </p>
<p>Many commentators would disagree with that view entirely.  Put extremely simply, in the early 1990s Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac were forced, via legislation no less, to provide loans to low income borrowers, so called sub-prime loans.  These loans carried a high risk of the borrowers defaulting.  Freddie and Fannie&#039;s boards both disagreed with the legislation due to the risk of default.   These loans were then sold to other entities and spread throughout the world economy, people defaulted in large numbers and credit was thus harder to come by.  The root cause of this current crisis is at the US governments feet. </p>
<p>The movements of  markets is largely due to people&#039;s confidence and perception about what the future holds rather than inherent attributes of the companies within it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NubCakes</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521667</link>
		<dc:creator>NubCakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 07:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521667</guid>
		<description>Roze: &quot;The only way to oppose this is through the popular will. In a democratic government, no business can ever trump the will of the people.&quot; 
 
Oh yes they can.  I dont live in the USA but it seems to me that when people are happy some of them choose not to vote and vice-versa&quot;.  Basically at the moment it seems to me the vast majority of voters are not interested in copyright issues and hence wont vote on it. 
 
&quot;Now, I know that some people here think that there is a massive conspiracy between lobbyists and the government, and that somehow the lobbyists have so much power, that they can dictate the policies of government. That is completely untrue.&quot; 
 
Once again your too black and white in your thinking.  Business interests would not spend large amounts of money on lobbyists if they recieved nothing in return at least some of the time.  It&#039;s hardly a conspiracy, it&#039;s a well-known and established procedure. 
 
&quot;To impose copyright on non-commercial usages is to claim ownership of ideas and thoughts for private usages, and to enforce it is thus tantamount to thought police&quot; 
 
No it does not.  Copyright applies to any expressible form of an idea or information that is substantive and discrete.  A thought is not substantive in any fashion. 
 
&quot;Rather, it is their own fault for bad business practices (such as failing to create good movies).&quot; 
 
Creating a bad movie is not a &quot;bad business practice&quot;.  If there was a way to make every movie good don&#039;t you think that movie studios would be onto it?  It is impossible to ensure that every work is &quot;good&quot; and hence and point not worth making in your  arguement against copyright.  And who decides what is &quot;good&quot; in any case?  One way is popular opinion, which means it makes a lot of money which is in opposition to your idea that &quot;money makes art bad&quot;.   
 
&quot;The idea that they should just be given money because they are a business is just ridiculous.&quot; 
 
That isn&#039;t what&#039;s happening here. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roze: &quot;The only way to oppose this is through the popular will. In a democratic government, no business can ever trump the will of the people.&quot; </p>
<p>Oh yes they can.  I dont live in the USA but it seems to me that when people are happy some of them choose not to vote and vice-versa&quot;.  Basically at the moment it seems to me the vast majority of voters are not interested in copyright issues and hence wont vote on it. </p>
<p>&quot;Now, I know that some people here think that there is a massive conspiracy between lobbyists and the government, and that somehow the lobbyists have so much power, that they can dictate the policies of government. That is completely untrue.&quot; </p>
<p>Once again your too black and white in your thinking.  Business interests would not spend large amounts of money on lobbyists if they recieved nothing in return at least some of the time.  It&#039;s hardly a conspiracy, it&#039;s a well-known and established procedure. </p>
<p>&quot;To impose copyright on non-commercial usages is to claim ownership of ideas and thoughts for private usages, and to enforce it is thus tantamount to thought police&quot; </p>
<p>No it does not.  Copyright applies to any expressible form of an idea or information that is substantive and discrete.  A thought is not substantive in any fashion. </p>
<p>&quot;Rather, it is their own fault for bad business practices (such as failing to create good movies).&quot; </p>
<p>Creating a bad movie is not a &quot;bad business practice&quot;.  If there was a way to make every movie good don&#039;t you think that movie studios would be onto it?  It is impossible to ensure that every work is &quot;good&quot; and hence and point not worth making in your  arguement against copyright.  And who decides what is &quot;good&quot; in any case?  One way is popular opinion, which means it makes a lot of money which is in opposition to your idea that &quot;money makes art bad&quot;.   </p>
<p>&quot;The idea that they should just be given money because they are a business is just ridiculous.&quot; </p>
<p>That isn&#039;t what&#039;s happening here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NubCakes</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521664</link>
		<dc:creator>NubCakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 07:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521664</guid>
		<description>If the industry was bought down you would have nothing to download because very few if any people are going to spend their own moneyto make films &amp; TV to give away for nothing. 
 
If America is not a culture why the hell are you always rambling about culture being downtrodden by money and this can be fixed by taking money out of the equation then? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the industry was bought down you would have nothing to download because very few if any people are going to spend their own moneyto make films &amp; TV to give away for nothing. </p>
<p>If America is not a culture why the hell are you always rambling about culture being downtrodden by money and this can be fixed by taking money out of the equation then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mehaerty&#039;s</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521656</link>
		<dc:creator>mehaerty&#039;s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521656</guid>
		<description>The French bailed out the steel and textile industry in the 70&#039;s; 10 years later the cost came to 70 billion, they could have started a new industry with those funds all because they refused to embrace technology, same thing happened to Leyland. 
 
If we are to have a better industry some times you need a forest fire to allow the sun to penetrate the soil and there you get re-birth. 
 
Ford where in trouble when we had a booming economy, if they prop up a failing industry the welfare effects will be devestating. New tech green cars are the way forward, as is a new and improved music and movie industry, based on realism. 
 
The problem is the allure the labels have on the artists, the artists are not immune to Aston Martins, Country Houses, Don P, Caviar, Designer Clothes..........generally keeping up with the jonses. I know they have a image to portray but where are the Shawshank Redemptions, Godfathers, real films. 
 
Know we have gone from PoP to talent contests (Simon Cowell), from Shawshank to comic book heros. The industry speaks for itself...........Boring!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The French bailed out the steel and textile industry in the 70&#039;s; 10 years later the cost came to 70 billion, they could have started a new industry with those funds all because they refused to embrace technology, same thing happened to Leyland. </p>
<p>If we are to have a better industry some times you need a forest fire to allow the sun to penetrate the soil and there you get re-birth. </p>
<p>Ford where in trouble when we had a booming economy, if they prop up a failing industry the welfare effects will be devestating. New tech green cars are the way forward, as is a new and improved music and movie industry, based on realism. </p>
<p>The problem is the allure the labels have on the artists, the artists are not immune to Aston Martins, Country Houses, Don P, Caviar, Designer Clothes&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.generally keeping up with the jonses. I know they have a image to portray but where are the Shawshank Redemptions, Godfathers, real films. </p>
<p>Know we have gone from PoP to talent contests (Simon Cowell), from Shawshank to comic book heros. The industry speaks for itself&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..Boring!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roze</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521747</link>
		<dc:creator>Roze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 04:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521747</guid>
		<description>And, when the problem was first realized, the people who were making money from these were vehemently against reforming legislation to solve the problem, so that they could just continue making money. Although the government was the initial cause, the reason why the problem was not solved later was because of the pressure of those who were benefiting from it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, when the problem was first realized, the people who were making money from these were vehemently against reforming legislation to solve the problem, so that they could just continue making money. Although the government was the initial cause, the reason why the problem was not solved later was because of the pressure of those who were benefiting from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: illuminati</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521651</link>
		<dc:creator>illuminati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 03:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521651</guid>
		<description>awww why not give them all the money they want, htey just give it to ubber rich and then the USA is more in debt for nothing, you get sued and then pay taxes that goto them as well HAHA what a loser country, and bunch a nit wits. 
 
This is why obama got in right joe biden and the mpaa tie in? 
And now we see the police state interent formed, YES the uSSa is now almost complete. 
The nazi style that inbreds hollywood entertainment and htought control with the bushite military and corporate control. 
YES we must take all the money now before the people see that ACTA is all about us getting as much as we can before they take back there lives and our alien brothers come and take over earth. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awww why not give them all the money they want, htey just give it to ubber rich and then the USA is more in debt for nothing, you get sued and then pay taxes that goto them as well HAHA what a loser country, and bunch a nit wits. </p>
<p>This is why obama got in right joe biden and the mpaa tie in?<br />
And now we see the police state interent formed, YES the uSSa is now almost complete.<br />
The nazi style that inbreds hollywood entertainment and htought control with the bushite military and corporate control.<br />
YES we must take all the money now before the people see that ACTA is all about us getting as much as we can before they take back there lives and our alien brothers come and take over earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lerianis</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521650</link>
		<dc:creator>Lerianis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 03:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521650</guid>
		<description>I agree totally. Hollywood shot themselves in their feet by not jumping on the digital download bandwagon a long time ago, without DRM. Now, they are whining that &quot;We are dying!&quot; when the reason that they are dying is because they have not adapted to the modern world by: lowering prices, offering more convenient ways to get their hardware, etc. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree totally. Hollywood shot themselves in their feet by not jumping on the digital download bandwagon a long time ago, without DRM. Now, they are whining that &quot;We are dying!&quot; when the reason that they are dying is because they have not adapted to the modern world by: lowering prices, offering more convenient ways to get their hardware, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goat</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521646</link>
		<dc:creator>goat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 03:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521646</guid>
		<description>not helping you hollywood you shot yourself in the foot now its time for you to go </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not helping you hollywood you shot yourself in the foot now its time for you to go</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roze</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521735</link>
		<dc:creator>Roze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 03:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521735</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh yes they can.&quot; 
Sounds like an industry advocate saying &quot;we are all powerful.&quot; Now, pay attention to what happened to the tobacco industry. The people are able to defeat you industry scum. 
 
&quot;Business interests would not spend large amounts of money on lobbyists if they recieved nothing in return at least some of the time.&quot; 
But they are not all-powerful, if the popular will opposes them. It is a conspiracy theory to say that they are omnipotent. 
 
&quot;Copyright applies to any expressible form of an idea or information that is substantive and discrete.&quot; 
The idea that copyright applies to anything &quot;substantive and discrete&quot; is laughable. Now, you industry scum, pay attention to this fact: copyright applies to something ABSTRACT and NOT CONCRETE and applies to MERE IDEAS. Thus, they are ideas and thoughts, and to police them is thought police. They want a MAFIAA Gestapo to do just that. 
 
&quot;Creating a bad movie is not a &#039;bad business practice&#039;.&quot; 
However, not caring about the movie is a bad business practice. The fact is that they were interested in making money rather than the worth of the movie itself. That is a bad business practice. 
 
&quot;And who decides what is &#039;good&#039; in any case?&quot; 
Although it is subjective, something that is bad is simply just bad. 
 
&quot;One way is popular opinion, which means it makes a lot of money which is in opposition to your idea that &#039;money makes art bad&#039;. &quot; 
Now, it is quite clear that you are a hired industry advocate. The fact is that even if it were popular opinion (which, in fact, is sometimes unreliable), it still entails that money makes art bad, since that is the popular opinion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Oh yes they can.&quot;<br />
Sounds like an industry advocate saying &quot;we are all powerful.&quot; Now, pay attention to what happened to the tobacco industry. The people are able to defeat you industry scum. </p>
<p>&quot;Business interests would not spend large amounts of money on lobbyists if they recieved nothing in return at least some of the time.&quot;<br />
But they are not all-powerful, if the popular will opposes them. It is a conspiracy theory to say that they are omnipotent. </p>
<p>&quot;Copyright applies to any expressible form of an idea or information that is substantive and discrete.&quot;<br />
The idea that copyright applies to anything &quot;substantive and discrete&quot; is laughable. Now, you industry scum, pay attention to this fact: copyright applies to something ABSTRACT and NOT CONCRETE and applies to MERE IDEAS. Thus, they are ideas and thoughts, and to police them is thought police. They want a MAFIAA Gestapo to do just that. </p>
<p>&quot;Creating a bad movie is not a &#039;bad business practice&#039;.&quot;<br />
However, not caring about the movie is a bad business practice. The fact is that they were interested in making money rather than the worth of the movie itself. That is a bad business practice. </p>
<p>&quot;And who decides what is &#039;good&#039; in any case?&quot;<br />
Although it is subjective, something that is bad is simply just bad. </p>
<p>&quot;One way is popular opinion, which means it makes a lot of money which is in opposition to your idea that &#039;money makes art bad&#039;. &quot;<br />
Now, it is quite clear that you are a hired industry advocate. The fact is that even if it were popular opinion (which, in fact, is sometimes unreliable), it still entails that money makes art bad, since that is the popular opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MEGNA</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521644</link>
		<dc:creator>MEGNA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 03:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521644</guid>
		<description>My 2 cents hollywood makes shit so it should die... 
Or the usa could give them 1000billion dollars to compensate all the money the damn pirates steal from their ships chests of goldz... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 2 cents hollywood makes shit so it should die&#8230;<br />
Or the usa could give them 1000billion dollars to compensate all the money the damn pirates steal from their ships chests of goldz&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IPT, TL, SCC</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521643</link>
		<dc:creator>IPT, TL, SCC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 03:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521643</guid>
		<description>Pirate bay totally blow hard, move to private trackers and you&#039;ll never go back!!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pirate bay totally blow hard, move to private trackers and you&#039;ll never go back!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k12</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521641</link>
		<dc:creator>k12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 03:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521641</guid>
		<description>my 2 cents for hollywood is, eat shit and die. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my 2 cents for hollywood is, eat shit and die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stfus pal</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/will-hollywood-be-the-next-bailout-candidate-081223/#comment-521637</link>
		<dc:creator>stfus pal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 02:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=7058#comment-521637</guid>
		<description>There you go again retarded troll, pushing your employers social engineering again. Your employers at the mpaa/riaa didn&#039;t create or control the web,maybe in your wet dreams you wish they did but they don&#039;t.  
 
Thanks for inspiring many more people that read here to share &amp; not pay you &amp; your employers for a copywrong law imposed on media. Soon the artists &amp; consumers will be free of you capitalist pigs. 
 
You should really go get a real job &amp; also not comment on blogs were your narrow minded views are laughable =0) 
 
influence and tax revenue hahahahahahahahahaha </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There you go again retarded troll, pushing your employers social engineering again. Your employers at the mpaa/riaa didn&#039;t create or control the web,maybe in your wet dreams you wish they did but they don&#039;t.  </p>
<p>Thanks for inspiring many more people that read here to share &amp; not pay you &amp; your employers for a copywrong law imposed on media. Soon the artists &amp; consumers will be free of you capitalist pigs. </p>
<p>You should really go get a real job &amp; also not comment on blogs were your narrow minded views are laughable =0) </p>
<p>influence and tax revenue hahahahahahahahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
