The same fraudulant activity obviously takes place when formats are changed and once more you are paying for the same content in a new media, you cant have it both ways Reasoned, either its licenced and the recording industry are fraudsters or its purchased and they are then liars.

Feel free to make a response although I dont think theres anything you can say to refute the obvious.

You do know that copyrights were never invented with the purpose of lasting for eternity as corporate cash-cows.

Copyrights were originally meant to last 10 years to compensate the creator after which the intellectual property falls to the public domain.

Greedy shit heads have managed to extend it well beyond 100 years after the original creator and most of their kids have passed. And these copyrights are held by the corporations and not the individuals responsible for it.

“Another bit of sophistry is that you “own” the music, and we all know you don’t. You don’t own the story in a book nor the motion picture either, they are all licensed, in effect an allowance is granted. The only thing you own is the cd itself, the hardcover, the dvd itself. But you never own the content. Never did. Another Dingo lie.”

_____________

Well, obviously the only person here who are blatantly lying is you, Reasoned Nazi.

The CD is only a medium, and any person who buys a CD are buying the content, not the medium. Dingo is right when he says that you are a thief for thinking that you could limit the legitimate rights of ownership from the consumers after that you sold (transferred) the content to them.

This goes against the basic right of ownership. You basically are saying that the consumers don’t have any rights for their new acquired property, this is obviously a gross violation to the universal right of ownership, which permits to the new owner to enjoy their acquired property in an exclusive way.

I assume that today the lawyers are in extreme incompetents, for not seeing this as an argument impossible of refuting in a court. The right of ownership is universal, and this is above of any copyright law.

BTW, Reasoned Nazi; are you (and the others in the record music business) communists? I say this because the communists are the only individuals on the world who don’t recognize the ownership of the citizens and also the communists think that are entitled to dispose of the goods of the persons.

(i’m absolutely not against piracy)

If this is true then this exec would in fact represent the copy holders and thus make whatever files he provided Authorized, yes?

This little tid bit seems to have escaped moste here.