Comments on: ACS:Law (Gay) Porn Letters Target Pensioners, Married Men

By: October and Linux. « ModernityBlog

October and Linux. « ModernityBlog — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:38:20 +0000

[...] the headlines, but not all of the story has come out in the mainstream media. Here’s a few other views on ACS [...]

By: Leaked Emails Reveal Profits of Anti-Piracy Cash Scheme RapidShare, MegaUpload, HotFile Free Full Version Warez Download with Crack, Serial, Keygen | Downloads and News

Thu, 07 Oct 2010 04:38:23 +0000

[...] entire website and email database to the outside world. Hundreds of people have meanwhile started to dissect the contents of the mails, and are sharing their findings in forums and in comments posted [...]

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:55:35 +0000

Proof that ACS:Law DID NOT and CAN NOT stop sharing, employing these firms is futile

http://acslaw.blogspot.com/2010/10/filewatch-proof-that-acslaw-did-not-and_06.html

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:09:28 +0000

Why not join the anti-ACS:Law Facebook group: http://www.facebook.com/pages/ACSLaw-cannot-be-trusted/121547364567738?ref=ts

Please invite all your friends!

Let’s send Crossley back to the gutter from where he crawled!

By: 4chan all’assalto degli avvoltoi del copiright |

4chan all’assalto degli avvoltoi del copiright | — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:01:27 +0000

[...] di Crossley stesso (“questo weekend mi compro una Lambo o una Ferrari?”), degli improbabili utenti del file sharing bersagliati dalle lettere minatorie della società e soprattutto la verità sulla “strategia di [...]

By: Andrew Verycrossley

Andrew Verycrossley — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:09:00 +0000

As every man and his dog now has a copy of the ACS “you have been downloading Porn email” I wonder how many have been sent by 3rd parties to friends, Judges, Police Chiefs, MP’s etc just for a laugh…..?

By: anon

anon — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:32:08 +0000

well done 4chan…dont always approve but this is the best thing ive heard in a very long while..modern day robin hood!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:29:31 +0000

…….:::::::: WANKERS Proudly Present :::::::…….

ACS:Law’s ‘Share This, Get Sued’ Forbidden Music Pack

DiRECTORY NAME: ACS.Law.Forbidden.Music.Pack.READNFO-WANKERS

http://acslaw.blogspot.com/2010/09/breaking-news-pirates-release-acslaw.html

By: Leaked Emails Reveal Profits of Anti-Piracy Cash Scheme @ blog.idtorrent.org

Leaked Emails Reveal Profits of Anti-Piracy Cash Scheme @ blog.idtorrent.org — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:03:01 +0000

By: 14thchapter

14thchapter — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 19:47:50 +0000

Andrew Crossly (having concerns about his reputation) contacted Andrew Hopper QC. On Hopper’s website http://www.ahqc.com/ he is described as ‘solicitor and Queen’s Counsel; still a very rare combination’.

Here is one of Hopper’s suggestions:

from: andrew.hopper@ahqc.com
subject: RE: SRA
to: andrew.crossley@acs-law.co.uk
24/08/2010 10:11

6. I have come across a service designed to protect reputations damaged by the internet. My own IT guy is involved. This is how he describes it; it may be of interest: There are 2 aspects to the work:- Prevention and Removal. The basic principle is that we identify the clients key properties to protect:- Company Name; Director Names; Staff Names; Product Names; Service Names. For prevention, we aim to dominate the first 5 pages of Google with search results to pages we control. We build mini websites, social media profile pages, articles, hub pages, to flood the internet with positive information. We create it in such a way that no one suspects it is done purposely for brand protection. If there is negative press (any website) that is already published, we use tactics to move those web page results off the first 5 pages of Google. Normally no one searches past the first 5 pages. We also help manage their brand/reputation on social media sites (Facebook/Twitter etc..) by registering all available profiles in their name and holding them to prevent anyone getting them and publishing negative information. We also monitor Staff commentary on social media sites about their “work” to ensure they are not writing negatively about their company, boss or clients. The cost is typically £150 per month for a minimum of 12 months, as it can sometimes take 3 – 4 months to see any results. (due to the way Google works)