<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AFACT v iiNet &#8211; The BitTorrent Battle Begins</title>
	<atom:link href="https://torrentfreak.com/afact-v-iinet-the-bittorrent-battle-begins-091006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://torrentfreak.com/afact-v-iinet-the-bittorrent-battle-begins-091006/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 21:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking @ blog.idtorrent.org</title>
		<link>/afact-v-iinet-the-bittorrent-battle-begins-091006/#comment-608289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking @ blog.idtorrent.org]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17719#comment-608289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five, day six and day [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five, day six and day [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 7 – Investigators Condoned Infringement? @ blog.idtorrent.org</title>
		<link>/afact-v-iinet-the-bittorrent-battle-begins-091006/#comment-607930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AFACT v iiNet: Day 7 – Investigators Condoned Infringement? @ blog.idtorrent.org]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17719#comment-607930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five and day [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five and day [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking &#8211; FUCK THE RIAA</title>
		<link>/afact-v-iinet-the-bittorrent-battle-begins-091006/#comment-607674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking &#8211; FUCK THE RIAA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17719#comment-607674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five, day six and day [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five, day six and day [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking &#124; InstantIdiocy</title>
		<link>/afact-v-iinet-the-bittorrent-battle-begins-091006/#comment-607632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking &#124; InstantIdiocy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17719#comment-607632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five, day six and day [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five, day six and day [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking : Porn Newz - Adult Industry News, Events &#38; Articles</title>
		<link>/afact-v-iinet-the-bittorrent-battle-begins-091006/#comment-607622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking : Porn Newz - Adult Industry News, Events &#38; Articles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17719#comment-607622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five, day six and day [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five, day six and day [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking &#124; We R Pirates</title>
		<link>/afact-v-iinet-the-bittorrent-battle-begins-091006/#comment-607550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking &#124; We R Pirates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17719#comment-607550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five, day six and day [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five, day six and day [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking - P2P Talk?</title>
		<link>/afact-v-iinet-the-bittorrent-battle-begins-091006/#comment-607535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking - P2P Talk?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17719#comment-607535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five, day six and day [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five, day six and day [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 6 – IP Address Alone Is Not Enough @ blog.idtorrent.org</title>
		<link>/afact-v-iinet-the-bittorrent-battle-begins-091006/#comment-607428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AFACT v iiNet: Day 6 – IP Address Alone Is Not Enough @ blog.idtorrent.org]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17719#comment-607428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four and day [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four and day [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 7 – Investigators Condoned Infringement? &#124; InstantIdiocy</title>
		<link>/afact-v-iinet-the-bittorrent-battle-begins-091006/#comment-607383</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AFACT v iiNet: Day 7 – Investigators Condoned Infringement? &#124; InstantIdiocy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17719#comment-607383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five and day [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five and day [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 7 – Investigators Condoned Infringement? &#8211; FUCK THE RIAA</title>
		<link>/afact-v-iinet-the-bittorrent-battle-begins-091006/#comment-607379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AFACT v iiNet: Day 7 – Investigators Condoned Infringement? &#8211; FUCK THE RIAA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17719#comment-607379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five and day [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five and day [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
