Comments on: Cached Torrents and Network Neutrality https://torrentfreak.com/cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/ Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News Tue, 28 Oct 2014 19:25:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: Access /cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-56083 Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:11:38 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-56083 I Hope This Torrent thing get fixed Soon I hate having Rogers cable and not being able to download at the speeds i pay for….

]]> By: RB /cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-4644 Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:30:10 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-4644 It seems like Congress wants to mess with something else that is doing fine. They already protect us, as mentioned above. They freedom of the internet has made it so successful; it will surely be stifled when they get involved.

]]> By: Dr. Witson /cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-3664 Wed, 31 May 2006 23:15:49 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-3664 Yes, NYC, current FCC directives do support Net Neutrality as it has traditionally been defined. In the only known case in which a complaint was lodged, the FCC acted to prevent a small ISP from blocking its customers’ use of VOIP. Case open, fine imposed, case closed. Everybody got the idea and there have been no additional violations.

]]> By: NYC /cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-3554 Wed, 31 May 2006 17:37:39 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-3554 Aren’t consumers already protected by current FCC regulations and the market?!

]]> By: keepitfree /cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-3424 Wed, 31 May 2006 02:39:34 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-3424 I think, as someone who opposes censorship, Bram is (understandably) concerned about having the government decide how the Internet should run. He makes an interesting point about hacker attacks. I’m curious as to what impact net neutrality legislation would have on the ability to block hackers?

]]> By: Net Chick /cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-3407 Wed, 31 May 2006 00:33:20 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-3407 I still havent figured out why Moby and REM are supporting net neut. What’s in it for them? Is Google paying them? It seems they came out of the woodwork to fight for a problem thats not even a problem yet.

]]> By: SoCal619 /cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-3404 Wed, 31 May 2006 00:19:45 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-3404 I agree that regulation is not needed…what’s the Government’s track record on solving problems? Ha! I could understand the clamour for regulation if there were terrible greivances that needed to be righted but what’s the real problem? Whiney corporations? Should Moby help dictate our Government’s policy on the internet?

]]> By: ghoti06 /cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-3367 Tue, 30 May 2006 17:55:52 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-3367 So eloquent, JO. If all net “neutrality” supporters can marshal arguments as effectively as you, then the telecom companies are screwed for sure!

In all seriousness, Bram makes some good points. Not only is regulation not needed here, it would probably do more harm than good. More people need to say it.

]]> By: jo /cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-3296 Tue, 30 May 2006 08:54:13 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/cached-torrents-and-network-neutrality/#comment-3296 bram can suck my dick

]]>