Comments on: Court Orders Expert Opinion in P2P Leecher Mod Case

By: Ed2K Is Good

Ed2K Is Good — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 00:11:36 +0000

http://forum.emule-project.net/index.php?showtopic=135083

emule seedbox one of 3.

I think OvernetUser on slyck.com may know. Maybe when the emule section gets updated again (sites) on slyck, he will post the seedbox providers for the ed2k network like he did for bittorrent.

By: Ed2K Is Good

Ed2K Is Good — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 23:46:55 +0000

39 Aug 14, 2009 at 19:59 by Anonymous
There are legit reasons for using lecher mods, for instance, ISP monitoring traffic, downloading stuff in a country where UL is illegal but DL inst
Anyway, I don’t care who I share with, If they go on to upload something to me that I want or they never upload ever again, I don’t care as long as I can download and share

A lecher is (i am defining as such) someone who takes from a network that has to have sharing by peers to exist & not ever giving back.

If everyone was this, there would be no network.

If a program is designed as a leacher program such as newsgroups, cool. Only then should one leach instead of leaching off of networks that require users to share to stay alive.

Even sharing anything at all is better than nothing at all.

Just to think that there are many more of these “bad” lechers out there, so sad.

Thankfully, this will hopefully help file sharers in some way with this court case. Hopefully someone will tell this chick that leaching is bad and she should be ashamed of herself also. She should also be required to upload for “924 days or use a emule (ed2k client seed box). These seed boxes are rare as so it seems but they are available just like bt seed boxes.

People don’t leach!!

63 Aug 15, 2009 at 14:16 by Necrowizard
So, will she get the 5000 euro back when she wins the case?
Else it seems a bit silly to pay an expert 5000 euro, instead of just paying that anti-piracy company 700 euro.
BTW, why does the woman has to proof she is not guilty? I though the anti-piracy company had to prove she was. And if her lecher mod was working, they can’t.

By: romeo

romeo — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 23:25:21 +0000

She’s a damned cheat who’d be banned from any private tracker lol

By: Anon

Anon — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:04:26 +0000

damn u leecher, sharing is caring!!

No money to u woman

By: hmmmm

hmmmm — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:14:21 +0000

Or she takes the 2 grand and then some, pays off the 700 euros and calls it a day – Nothing worth pirating in the past year and a half anyway.

By: Anonymouse

Anonymouse — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:42:56 +0000

No way I’m giving money to a leecher. ;)

By: Fuck Fascism

Fuck Fascism — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:07:55 +0000

Yet all you who download from Hotfile etc., don’t consider yourselves leechers? Think about it.

By: anon

anon — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:20:11 +0000

just replace the old judge with a tech savvy younger judge

I sure hope the pirates of today can strive towards greatness and in the future make biased decisions against those damned copyright whores.

TPB judge was biased!

By: Necrowizard

Necrowizard — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:16:42 +0000

So, will she get the 5000 euro back when she wins the case?

Else it seems a bit silly to pay an expert 5000 euro, instead of just paying that anti-piracy company 700 euro.

BTW, why does the woman has to proof she is not guilty? I though the anti-piracy company had to prove she was. And if her leecher mod was working, they can’t.

By: Anno

Anno — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:15:17 +0000

Fuck her! I really hope she lose the case and need to pay a big bill!

DiE FUCKiNG Leecher!