No dice there,

A. no precedent value in even its own jurisdiction let alone the rest of the world.

B. Highest court of Europe didn’t make any decision because it never got there.

“It doesn’t matter what you do, it matters what the site does and the site’s intentions.”

Which is, non commercial copyright infringement which many, many jurisdictions including Sweden deem perfectly legal.

“Yet almost every one of them has ads on the site”

P2P =/= Website

You need to pick up a book or Google these terms.

“No, commercial doesn’t mean you personally pay for it with cash. You see ads”

Ad block? So no I don’t.

“you click links”

Certainly not. You’re asking for malware clicking ads.

“Remember, most of the sites don’t run on free servers, they have to pay – and they collect “donations” and such, which is a nice way of saying they collect money to pay for piracy,”

Voluntary, unsolicited, optional donation. You are aware of the difference between payment and donation right?

But frankly I can’t remember the last time I saw a public indexer asking for donations given the extremely low bandwidth requirements of all but the largest indexes out there.

“At the end of almost every P2P transaction there is some form of payment, promotion, or “cost””

Sorry to burst your bubble, but P2P actually has none of these at all.

So much for promising to leave the site, but as is the case with all copyright trolls, you can’t stop being a liar.

Most creation (technological, economic, social, etc) happened and happens without reference to copyright or property rights. Most creators create without expecting a great deal of financial reward. Most people who like music or other types of content *do* pay for it if they can, regardless of copyright law or profit motives. These are social facts that capitalism and copyright shills do not want known.