<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IFPI Wins Danish File-Sharing Case</title>
	<atom:link href="https://torrentfreak.com/ifpi-wins-danish-file-sharing-case-081021/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://torrentfreak.com/ifpi-wins-danish-file-sharing-case-081021/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:05:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Užra&#353;ai i&#353; skaitmeninio fronto #6 : nežinau.lt</title>
		<link>/ifpi-wins-danish-file-sharing-case-081021/#comment-507952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Užra&#353;ai i&#353; skaitmeninio fronto #6 : nežinau.lt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5829#comment-507952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] siuntimas iš torrent? tebelaikomas nelegaliu, tol pagautam gali tekti už tai susimok?ti. Danijos teismas atsakovui, kurio kompiuteryje buvo aptikta 13 t?kstan?i? nelegaliai ?sigyt? k?.... Maždaug 2 dolerius už dain?. Verta ?sigyti legaliai, nes gausis dvigubai pigiau. Dan? teismo [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] siuntimas iš torrent? tebelaikomas nelegaliu, tol pagautam gali tekti už tai susimok?ti. Danijos teismas atsakovui, kurio kompiuteryje buvo aptikta 13 t?kstan?i? nelegaliai ?sigyt? k?&#8230;. Maždaug 2 dolerius už dain?. Verta ?sigyti legaliai, nes gausis dvigubai pigiau. Dan? teismo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IFPI Wins Danish File-Sharing Case &#124; CyberLaw Blog</title>
		<link>/ifpi-wins-danish-file-sharing-case-081021/#comment-507747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IFPI Wins Danish File-Sharing Case &#124; CyberLaw Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5829#comment-507747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] IFPI Wins Danish File-Sharing Case: &#8220; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IFPI Wins Danish File-Sharing Case: &#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RandomGuy</title>
		<link>/ifpi-wins-danish-file-sharing-case-081021/#comment-507540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RandomGuy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5829#comment-507540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I thought it would be around $250,000 but it was only $24,000. I mean, thats like half of a average yearly salary so he got it easy I tell ya&#039;.

Thats like taking out a loan from the bank, paying the courts, then paying back to loan bit by bit.

I tell you again, he got it easy. 

BIG TIME!! :D &lt;3]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I thought it would be around $250,000 but it was only $24,000. I mean, thats like half of a average yearly salary so he got it easy I tell ya&#8217;.</p>
<p>Thats like taking out a loan from the bank, paying the courts, then paying back to loan bit by bit.</p>
<p>I tell you again, he got it easy. </p>
<p>BIG TIME!! :D &lt;3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danish Man Fined For Sharing Music, But At Around $2/Song</title>
		<link>/ifpi-wins-danish-file-sharing-case-081021/#comment-507413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danish Man Fined For Sharing Music, But At Around $2/Song]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5829#comment-507413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] or simply made them available). Either way, what&#8217;s more interesting is that the court has fined him approximately ,400, or a bit less than per song. As the article notes, the court estimated actual losses from the file [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or simply made them available). Either way, what&#8217;s more interesting is that the court has fined him approximately ,400, or a bit less than per song. As the article notes, the court estimated actual losses from the file [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23-10-2008 &#9679; Pirateria, quando il risarcimento non basta - Climarsoft Forum</title>
		<link>/ifpi-wins-danish-file-sharing-case-081021/#comment-507322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23-10-2008 &#9679; Pirateria, quando il risarcimento non basta - Climarsoft Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5829#comment-507322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] corone, circa 80 centesimi di euro per ogni brano che ha scaricato e non acquistato.  La Danimarca, osserva TorrentFreak, volge verso un futuro di proporzionalit? nel trattare i casi di sharing illegale [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] corone, circa 80 centesimi di euro per ogni brano che ha scaricato e non acquistato.  La Danimarca, osserva TorrentFreak, volge verso un futuro di proporzionalit? nel trattare i casi di sharing illegale [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h33t</title>
		<link>/ifpi-wins-danish-file-sharing-case-081021/#comment-507267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[h33t]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5829#comment-507267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it is taking the piss isnt it!

DC is direct downloads it is not filesharing as we know it p2p

DC is criminal piracy. rules for DC hubs are extreme, they are no better than topsites

and you title the article &quot;filesharing&quot; and not &quot;piracy&quot;?!

it is becoming very clear that torrentfreak is anti-p2p

torrentfreak is anti-p2p. stupid is as stupid does. you are not ignorant

http://www.h33t.com where legitimacy is earned]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is taking the piss isnt it!</p>
<p>DC is direct downloads it is not filesharing as we know it p2p</p>
<p>DC is criminal piracy. rules for DC hubs are extreme, they are no better than topsites</p>
<p>and you title the article &#8220;filesharing&#8221; and not &#8220;piracy&#8221;?!</p>
<p>it is becoming very clear that torrentfreak is anti-p2p</p>
<p>torrentfreak is anti-p2p. stupid is as stupid does. you are not ignorant</p>
<p><a href="http://www.h33t.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.h33t.com</a> where legitimacy is earned</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinamarqu&#234;s obrigado a pagar 1,65 euros por cada m&#250;sica que partilhou &#124; Remixtures</title>
		<link>/ifpi-wins-danish-file-sharing-case-081021/#comment-507213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dinamarqu&#234;s obrigado a pagar 1,65 euros por cada m&#250;sica que partilhou &#124; Remixtures]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5829#comment-507213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Como é óbvio, nenhum juiz acreditou nessa história. Para além disso, ficou bem claro que o indivíduo não podia ter usado uma ligação sem fios, um argumento que deu muito jeito em dois casos anteriores também ocorridos na Dinamarca. Não admira por isso que ele tenha sido condenado pelo tribunal distrital. Depois de apelar para um tribunal superior da Dinamarca, o Vestre Landsret, acabou por ser novamente condenado por esta instância judicial esta segunda-feira, de acordo com o site dinamarquês Comon.dk (Tradução Google Translator) citado pelo TorrentFreak. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Como é óbvio, nenhum juiz acreditou nessa história. Para além disso, ficou bem claro que o indivíduo não podia ter usado uma ligação sem fios, um argumento que deu muito jeito em dois casos anteriores também ocorridos na Dinamarca. Não admira por isso que ele tenha sido condenado pelo tribunal distrital. Depois de apelar para um tribunal superior da Dinamarca, o Vestre Landsret, acabou por ser novamente condenado por esta instância judicial esta segunda-feira, de acordo com o site dinamarquês Comon.dk (Tradução Google Translator) citado pelo TorrentFreak. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPile &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Danish Man Fined For Sharing Music, But At Around $2/Song</title>
		<link>/ifpi-wins-danish-file-sharing-case-081021/#comment-506962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TPile &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Danish Man Fined For Sharing Music, But At Around $2/Song]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5829#comment-506962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] or simply made them available). Either way, what&#8217;s more interesting is that the court has fined him approximately $24,400, or a bit less than $2 per song. As the article notes, the court estimated actual losses from the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or simply made them available). Either way, what&#8217;s more interesting is that the court has fined him approximately $24,400, or a bit less than $2 per song. As the article notes, the court estimated actual losses from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web News Site &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Danish Man Fined For Sharing Music, But At Around $2/Song</title>
		<link>/ifpi-wins-danish-file-sharing-case-081021/#comment-506952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web News Site &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Danish Man Fined For Sharing Music, But At Around $2/Song]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5829#comment-506952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] files, or simply made them available). Either way, what&#039;s more interesting is that the court has fined him approximately $24,400, or a bit less than $2 per song. As the article notes, the court estimated actual losses from the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] files, or simply made them available). Either way, what&#8217;s more interesting is that the court has fined him approximately $24,400, or a bit less than $2 per song. As the article notes, the court estimated actual losses from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Scoop - Hot Technology Gossip &#187; Danish Man Fined For Sharing Music, But At Around $2/Song</title>
		<link>/ifpi-wins-danish-file-sharing-case-081021/#comment-506945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tech Scoop - Hot Technology Gossip &#187; Danish Man Fined For Sharing Music, But At Around $2/Song]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=5829#comment-506945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] files, or simply made them available). Either way, what&#039;s more interesting is that the court has fined him approximately $24,400, or a bit less than $2 per song. As the article notes, the court estimated actual losses from the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] files, or simply made them available). Either way, what&#8217;s more interesting is that the court has fined him approximately $24,400, or a bit less than $2 per song. As the article notes, the court estimated actual losses from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
