<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iiNet: ISP Not Liable For BitTorrent Piracy, High Court Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="https://torrentfreak.com/iinet-isp-not-liable-for-bittorrent-piracy-high-court-rules-120420/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://torrentfreak.com/iinet-isp-not-liable-for-bittorrent-piracy-high-court-rules-120420/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lengthening Arm of Uncle Sam’s ‘Pirate’ Justice &#124; &#124; Because They Told Me Not ToBecause They Told Me Not To</title>
		<link>/iinet-isp-not-liable-for-bittorrent-piracy-high-court-rules-120420/#comment-922080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Lengthening Arm of Uncle Sam’s ‘Pirate’ Justice &#124; &#124; Because They Told Me Not ToBecause They Told Me Not To]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 06:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=49823#comment-922080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] month the Australian High Court emphatically rejected an attempt by Hollywood studios to have local ISPs held responsible for the file-sharing activities [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] month the Australian High Court emphatically rejected an attempt by Hollywood studios to have local ISPs held responsible for the file-sharing activities [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aussie Anti-Piracy Plan in Trouble &#124; TorrentFreak</title>
		<link>/iinet-isp-not-liable-for-bittorrent-piracy-high-court-rules-120420/#comment-921640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aussie Anti-Piracy Plan in Trouble &#124; TorrentFreak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 20:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=49823#comment-921640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] after ISP iiNet won its landmark case against the local anti-piracy outfit AFACT, a mutual agreement is farther away than ever [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] after ISP iiNet won its landmark case against the local anti-piracy outfit AFACT, a mutual agreement is farther away than ever [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notrackingme &#124; Proxy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; iiNet: ISP Not Liable For BitTorrent Piracy, High Court Rules</title>
		<link>/iinet-isp-not-liable-for-bittorrent-piracy-high-court-rules-120420/#comment-920748</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Notrackingme &#124; Proxy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; iiNet: ISP Not Liable For BitTorrent Piracy, High Court Rules]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 21:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=49823#comment-920748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source: iiNet: ISP Not Liable For BitTorrent Piracy, High Court Rules [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: iiNet: ISP Not Liable For BitTorrent Piracy, High Court Rules [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El cada vez más largo brazo de la ley &#8220;pirata&#8221; del Tío Sam! &#124; Partido Pirata</title>
		<link>/iinet-isp-not-liable-for-bittorrent-piracy-high-court-rules-120420/#comment-920691</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[El cada vez más largo brazo de la ley &#8220;pirata&#8221; del Tío Sam! &#124; Partido Pirata]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 18:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=49823#comment-920691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] mes pasado el Tribunal Supremo de Australiarechazó enfáticamente un intento por parte de los estudios de Hollywood para que los ISP [proveedores de internet] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mes pasado el Tribunal Supremo de Australiarechazó enfáticamente un intento por parte de los estudios de Hollywood para que los ISP [proveedores de internet] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lengthening Arm of Uncle Sam’s ‘Pirate’ Justice &#124; Zombie Torrents - Ultimate Torrents Downloads</title>
		<link>/iinet-isp-not-liable-for-bittorrent-piracy-high-court-rules-120420/#comment-920491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Lengthening Arm of Uncle Sam’s ‘Pirate’ Justice &#124; Zombie Torrents - Ultimate Torrents Downloads]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 09:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=49823#comment-920491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] month the Australian High Court emphatically rejected an attempt by Hollywood studios to have local ISPs held responsible for the file-sharing activities [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] month the Australian High Court emphatically rejected an attempt by Hollywood studios to have local ISPs held responsible for the file-sharing activities [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lengthening Arm of Uncle Sam’s ‘Pirate’ Justice &#124; Top News Story</title>
		<link>/iinet-isp-not-liable-for-bittorrent-piracy-high-court-rules-120420/#comment-920371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Lengthening Arm of Uncle Sam’s ‘Pirate’ Justice &#124; Top News Story]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 03:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=49823#comment-920371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] month the Australian High Court emphatically rejected an attempt by Hollywood studios to have local ISPs held responsible for the file-sharing activities [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] month the Australian High Court emphatically rejected an attempt by Hollywood studios to have local ISPs held responsible for the file-sharing activities [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notrackingme &#124; Proxy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Lengthening Arm of Uncle Sam’s ‘Pirate’ Justice</title>
		<link>/iinet-isp-not-liable-for-bittorrent-piracy-high-court-rules-120420/#comment-920366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Notrackingme &#124; Proxy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Lengthening Arm of Uncle Sam’s ‘Pirate’ Justice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 02:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=49823#comment-920366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] month the Australian High Court emphatically rejected an attempt by Hollywood studios to have local ISPs held responsible for the file-sharing activities [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] month the Australian High Court emphatically rejected an attempt by Hollywood studios to have local ISPs held responsible for the file-sharing activities [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lengthening Arm of Uncle Sam’s ‘Pirate’ Justice &#124; We R Pirates</title>
		<link>/iinet-isp-not-liable-for-bittorrent-piracy-high-court-rules-120420/#comment-920337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Lengthening Arm of Uncle Sam’s ‘Pirate’ Justice &#124; We R Pirates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 00:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=49823#comment-920337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] month the Australian High Court emphatically rejected an attempt by Hollywood studios to have local ISPs held responsible for the file-sharing activities [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] month the Australian High Court emphatically rejected an attempt by Hollywood studios to have local ISPs held responsible for the file-sharing activities [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lengthening Arm of Uncle Sam’s ‘Pirate’ Justice &#124; Best Seedbox</title>
		<link>/iinet-isp-not-liable-for-bittorrent-piracy-high-court-rules-120420/#comment-920336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Lengthening Arm of Uncle Sam’s ‘Pirate’ Justice &#124; Best Seedbox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 00:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=49823#comment-920336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] month the Australian High Court emphatically rejected an attempt by Hollywood studios to have local ISPs held responsible for the file-sharing activities [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] month the Australian High Court emphatically rejected an attempt by Hollywood studios to have local ISPs held responsible for the file-sharing activities [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lengthening Arm of Uncle Sam&#8217;s &#8216;Pirate&#8217; Justice &#124; TorrentFreak</title>
		<link>/iinet-isp-not-liable-for-bittorrent-piracy-high-court-rules-120420/#comment-920290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Lengthening Arm of Uncle Sam&#8217;s &#8216;Pirate&#8217; Justice &#124; TorrentFreak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 22:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=49823#comment-920290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] month the Australian High Court emphatically rejected an attempt by Hollywood studios to have local ISPs held responsible for the file-sharing activities [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] month the Australian High Court emphatically rejected an attempt by Hollywood studios to have local ISPs held responsible for the file-sharing activities [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
