Comments on: Is ‘Pirate DRM’ Really the Best Response to Bulk DMCA Takedowns?

By: Terry4

Terry4 — Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:52:00 +0000

The problem with DMCA take down notices is that they are simply not effective. They can send a take down notice and just a moment later the stuff gets uploaded again and again while the downloaders, that bring in the money for the hosters, can download anonymously and the uploaders can hide their IP-addresses behind proxies.

Therefore cyberlockers and usenet-providers had to store and hand out the IP-addresses of the downloaders so they can be prosecuted like it is the case in p2p-networks or the uploaders had to register with their verified postal address or passport.

By: Riot Nrrrd™

Riot Nrrrd™ — Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:47:00 +0000

I know this won’t be read but … are you that dumb? I can peg out my downlink pipe from Giganews, I can’t even remember the last time I got remotely close to that from a Torrent. Let’s see, would I rather download a TV show episode in 10 minutes or several hours … and that assumes the seeders even stay up … let me think about that for, oh, a picosecond.

By: Terry1

Terry1 — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 02:42:00 +0000

test

By: Jesus

Jesus — Wed, 13 Feb 2013 18:57:00 +0000

Mr Bob.. You look bad all on your own. That’s the only thing your good at.

By: Jesus

Jesus — Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:37:00 +0000

Maybe you should let someone else do the writing for you. Probably the thinking part to. Your trying to hard. You don’t have the intelligence for it.

By: sosad

sosad — Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:37:00 +0000

Everything is political, everything is affecting everyone. Be responsible. This is the only way for growing maturity in internet and social freedom.
Freedom of speech, gun legislation, internet censorship, it all is the same battle.
You seem to be the one in your petty torrent church, trying to imagine you are at home, putting pressure on folks and thinking that they would give a faq.
Free yourself from your categories, then you ll may be become kind of useful to the real community.

Think again, P2P is now both ideology and realpolitik, and no more your filesharing ghetto only. This a great victory, try to learn , participate and enjoy History.

And you should definitely try to stop telling others what they should do, would bring reality, happiness and safety in your life.

Good luck.

By: Scary_Devil_Monastery

Scary_Devil_Monastery — Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:00:00 +0000

Honestly, what is obvious to pirates and techies and completely obfuscated for bobmail and the rest of his sectarian colleagues in the international church of copyright is that as long as any method introduces manual-only steps the individual user has to take, the automated indexing and takedown fails.

And with that, so does any method the *IAA’s have of enforcement. Simply because any corporation has to look at the bottom line which is that to employ one more, another has to go. Manpower is expensive.

Many methods exist of verification which will stump any computer ever built but be mere entertainment for a five-year old child.

In this we are aided since the cpyright church doctrine apparently has it that the internet is a series of tubes maintained and run by a mailservice of leprechaun-mounted unicorns. Or something similarly confusing.

By: Lemon

Lemon — Tue, 12 Feb 2013 04:27:00 +0000

Yes and no. Some indexers decode the obfuscated names (either via human effort, or automated processes via NFO, etc).

By: Terry1

Terry1 — Tue, 12 Feb 2013 02:00:00 +0000

By: Guest

Guest — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:13:00 +0000

Well it seems it’s not a scam.